washsaint Posted 29 August, 2008 Posted 29 August, 2008 I'm a wee bit confused (not difficult I know!) as we're absolutely skint yet we're signing players (albeit on loan/free transfers) at a rate of knots. How are we able to do this if we're so skint? Or does it mean the likes of Euell, BWP, John and Skacel are off?
Saintandy666 Posted 29 August, 2008 Posted 29 August, 2008 I have no idea. Does anyone know how much we are paying our loanees, or whether it is split? Could be an explanation there.
Andy_Porter Posted 29 August, 2008 Posted 29 August, 2008 I doubt anyone knows how much we're paying Cork and Pekhart but I assume most of te money will be being paid by their proper clubs. I think Euell, BWP and Skacel will all leave on deadline day.
70's Mike Posted 29 August, 2008 Posted 29 August, 2008 I'm a wee bit confused (not difficult I know!) as we're absolutely skint yet we're signing players (albeit on loan/free transfers) at a rate of knots. How are we able to do this if we're so skint? Or does it mean the likes of Euell, BWP, John and Skacel are off? suppose it depends on how skint we are now, after all last official figures covered a period a few months back now
Thedelldays Posted 29 August, 2008 Posted 29 August, 2008 of course we are skint..we are hardly breaking the bank and we will try and compete where possible.. we are skint in respects to working to a very very tight budget...
aintforever Posted 29 August, 2008 Posted 29 August, 2008 of course we are skint..we are hardly breaking the bank and we will try and compete where possible.. we are skint in respects to working to a very very tight budget... Obviously nowhere near going into administration though, as some on here have suggested.
Wildgoose Posted 29 August, 2008 Posted 29 August, 2008 Obviously nowhere near going into administration though, as some on here have suggested. My thoughts too.....
Ian the Red Posted 29 August, 2008 Posted 29 August, 2008 It is strange that we paid out for Spiderman, 1.5m euros???
Thedelldays Posted 29 August, 2008 Posted 29 August, 2008 It is strange that we paid out for Spiderman, 1.5m euros??? of course. it will be no where near that in the intial outlay
Professor Posted 30 August, 2008 Posted 30 August, 2008 I'm a wee bit confused (not difficult I know!) as we're absolutely skint yet we're signing players (albeit on loan/free transfers) at a rate of knots. How are we able to do this if we're so skint? Or does it mean the likes of Euell, BWP, John and Skacel are off? Its not as strange as it seems. The club was not skint, but was spending more than its income. The Micawber principle - Weekly Income £1, expenditure £1.10p result misery; Income £1, expenditure 90p, result happiness. The club has got substantial income from gate money and commercial activities and now appears to be working to a proper budget. What has been done is reduce the expenditure, which in turn opens up the option of spending within budget, instead of over budget. If more players are sold/loaned out, the prospects of more strengthening in Jan will be improved.
musesaint Posted 30 August, 2008 Posted 30 August, 2008 I'm a wee bit confused (not difficult I know!) as we're absolutely skint yet we're signing players (albeit on loan/free transfers) at a rate of knots. How are we able to do this if we're so skint? Or does it mean the likes of Euell, BWP, John and Skacel are off? By Monday watch the sales.....
FMPR Posted 30 August, 2008 Posted 30 August, 2008 Rasiak going would have freed up lots of money for wages
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now