thegaffer Posted 10 June, 2009 Posted 10 June, 2009 Any ideas on why the new owner won't reveal himself?
ShirleySaint Posted 10 June, 2009 Posted 10 June, 2009 She is having too much fun reading all the wild guesses on here.
Pancake Posted 10 June, 2009 Posted 10 June, 2009 http://www.saintsweb.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?t=13433
Window Cleaner Posted 10 June, 2009 Posted 10 June, 2009 Any ideas on why the new owner won't reveal himself? obviously a shrinking violet
skintsaint Posted 10 June, 2009 Posted 10 June, 2009 She is having too much fun reading all the wild guesses on here. delia smith?
Badger Posted 10 June, 2009 Posted 10 June, 2009 Any ideas on why the new owner won't reveal himself? Its against the law to "reveal yourself" in a public place. Perhaps its a condition of his parole.
SaintRichmond Posted 10 June, 2009 Posted 10 June, 2009 Any ideas on why the new owner won't reveal himself? Rupert wants it to come as a lovely surprise ...........
Quickfire Double Posted 10 June, 2009 Posted 10 June, 2009 Any ideas on why the new owner won't reveal himself? I'm going to go for the fact that there isn't a new owner yet...
INFLUENCED.COM Posted 10 June, 2009 Posted 10 June, 2009 Any ideas on why the new owner won't reveal himself? Is this cryptic ?
Saint J 77 Posted 10 June, 2009 Posted 10 June, 2009 Do we actually have a new owner yet? Nothing is signed yet it could still not happen. It’s been very quiet since Pinnacle entered the exclusivity period. As much as I want this to happen and to have a new owner perhaps whoever they are decided not to revealed themselves in case they choose not to go through with it? I know they loose £500,000 but with Saints I would not be surprised if it still didn’t happen. Now there is supposed Swiss interest if this deal does fall through and you can bet that will be the next failed takeover to follow this one and so on. Sorry I have become a cynic over the last few years of waiting for a takeover to happen. I just want it signed and sealed this has dragged on far too long. If they do sort it then out then I’ll start the guessing but at that point I would guess the new owner will probably make themselves known to the fans. I think it will be anyone we will have heard of before although it would be nice to be wrong!
Gordon Mockles Posted 10 June, 2009 Posted 10 June, 2009 Because no-one on this forum is patient enough to wait. It'll come.
suewhistle Posted 10 June, 2009 Posted 10 June, 2009 Rupert wants it to come as a lovely surprise ........... Noooo, don't even joke about it! Perhaps they are selling a few assets to come up with some readies, and don't want to be seen as a forced seller...
dubai_phil Posted 10 June, 2009 Posted 10 June, 2009 IMHO Three options 1) It is a business person who is successful, OR some form of equity/property fund. IF something goes wrong by maintaining silence there is no impact on their business reputation (eg avoid a Jacko scenario) 2) There wasn't one but they were still looking when they found the deposit 3) It is a household name who doesn't want to be named as it would make all the smaller creditors, players out of contract, players/manager/coaches being targetted want more money out of them. My bet would be 1)
slickmick Posted 10 June, 2009 Posted 10 June, 2009 IMHO Three options 1) It is a business person who is successful, OR some form of equity/property fund. IF something goes wrong by maintaining silence there is no impact on their business reputation (eg avoid a Jacko scenario) 2) There wasn't one but they were still looking when they found the deposit 3) It is a household name who doesn't want to be named as it would make all the smaller creditors, players out of contract, players/manager/coaches being targetted want more money out of them. My bet would be 1) I'ill have a shot at 3.
Pancake Posted 10 June, 2009 Posted 10 June, 2009 IMHO Three options 1) It is a business person who is successful, OR some form of equity/property fund. IF something goes wrong by maintaining silence there is no impact on their business reputation (eg avoid a Jacko scenario) 2) There wasn't one but they were still looking when they found the deposit 3) It is a household name who doesn't want to be named as it would make all the smaller creditors, players out of contract, players/manager/coaches being targetted want more money out of them. My bet would be 1) Little from (1) little from (3) for me, with a little "knows that football fans are not the nicest to Chairmen/Investors that fail" sprinkled on top.
eelpie Posted 10 June, 2009 Posted 10 June, 2009 Any ideas on why the new owner won't reveal himself? Retired Chippendale?
Pancake Posted 10 June, 2009 Posted 10 June, 2009 Amazingly despite my preconceptions, this thread has ended up being funny!
Weston Super Saint Posted 10 June, 2009 Posted 10 June, 2009 I cam exclusively reveal that our new owner will be
DT Posted 10 June, 2009 Posted 10 June, 2009 IMHO Three options 1) It is a business person who is successful, OR some form of equity/property fund. IF something goes wrong by maintaining silence there is no impact on their business reputation (eg avoid a Jacko scenario) 2) There wasn't one but they were still looking when they found the deposit 3) It is a household name who doesn't want to be named as it would make all the smaller creditors, players out of contract, players/manager/coaches being targetted want more money out of them. My bet would be 1) My bet would be 4) it is a Susan Boyle-fronted consortium that had slightly overcalculated the worth of its sponsor due to unforeseen events. I can certainly hear one fat lady singing, anyway...
sun of spain Posted 10 June, 2009 Posted 10 June, 2009 She is going through a messy divorce at the moment,from some Aussi guy.
INFLUENCED.COM Posted 10 June, 2009 Posted 10 June, 2009 IMHO Three options 1) It is a business person who is successful, OR some form of equity/property fund. My bet would be 1) With you on that, not through any mystical power simply because someone told me that was the case but what I don't understand is the original poster is "as close as you can get to Mike Osman" who is close to some of the parties involved with the club/buyer so would have thought he was asking a question the answer to which he already knew...strange
OldNick Posted 10 June, 2009 Posted 10 June, 2009 With you on that, not through any mystical power simply because someone told me that was the case but what I don't understand is the original poster is "as close as you can get to Mike Osman" who is close to some of the parties involved with the club/buyer so would have thought he was asking a question the answer to which he already knew...strangethat were my thoughts, very odd.
wightman35 Posted 10 June, 2009 Posted 10 June, 2009 IMHO Three options 1) It is a business person who is successful, That rules out our good friends RL and MW, I suppose.
Weston Super Saint Posted 10 June, 2009 Posted 10 June, 2009 Any ideas on why the new owner won't reveal himself? Nope. You?
Pancake Posted 10 June, 2009 Posted 10 June, 2009 She is going through a messy divorce at the moment,from some Aussi guy. Eh?
martel Posted 10 June, 2009 Posted 10 June, 2009 Any ideas on why the new owner won't reveal himself? My view is that if this all falls through at the last hurdle then I guess he or she will remain unknown, that way they will not recieve any nasty letters etc. Just a guess!
saints4lifegb Posted 10 June, 2009 Posted 10 June, 2009 I'M SORRY IF I MISSED SOMETHING!!!!!!!! but last night before i went to bed somebody called patred said he would reveal who the secret millionaire was at midnight.I cannot find any posts by him now I presume it was a wind up. Can anyone enlighten me please???
INFLUENCED.COM Posted 10 June, 2009 Posted 10 June, 2009 Can anyone enlighten me please??? You'll have to wait till midnight, stay on line others will keep you company
OldNick Posted 10 June, 2009 Posted 10 June, 2009 I'M SORRY IF I MISSED SOMETHING!!!!!!!! but last night before i went to bed somebody called patred said he would reveal who the secret millionaire was at midnight.I cannot find any posts by him now I presume it was a wind up. Can anyone enlighten me please??? You did the best thing by going to bed.It was a nold age pensioner trying to make a name for himself on the eve of his birthday.
MusicMan Posted 10 June, 2009 Posted 10 June, 2009 Knowing our luck it’s not a new owner but some hedge fund company or something out to make a fast buck.
saints4lifegb Posted 10 June, 2009 Posted 10 June, 2009 You did the best thing by going to bed.It was a nold age pensioner trying to make a name for himself on the eve of his birthday. thanks
INFLUENCED.COM Posted 10 June, 2009 Posted 10 June, 2009 .It was a nold age pensioner trying to make a name for himself on the eve of his birthday. What thats who was revealed as the new owner !! you'll confuse him
Toomer Posted 10 June, 2009 Posted 10 June, 2009 Any ideas on why the new owner won't reveal himself? Because he or she is not the new owner yet.
Weston Super Saint Posted 10 June, 2009 Posted 10 June, 2009 Knowing our luck it’s not a new owner but some hedge fund company or something out to make a fast buck. How many 'stupid' business people do you think exist? There is no fast buck to be made at SFC...
Arcadian Posted 10 June, 2009 Posted 10 June, 2009 I cam exclusively reveal that our new owner will be The white Mr T? Or as Barry Cryer calls him - "that albino ****"
saintbletch Posted 10 June, 2009 Posted 10 June, 2009 Perhaps the individual / business has a background / reputation that, without fuller explanation, might cause concern for Saints' fans and the consortium wants to announce it with all of the other positive news?
Wopper Posted 10 June, 2009 Posted 10 June, 2009 Having an educated yob in charge for years has made us all wary of what to expect next.
Weston Super Saint Posted 10 June, 2009 Posted 10 June, 2009 The white Mr T? Or as Barry Cryer calls him - "that albino ****" Nah. Minty in the background
SaintRichmond Posted 10 June, 2009 Posted 10 June, 2009 Noooo, don't even joke about it! Perhaps they are selling a few assets to come up with some readies, and don't want to be seen as a forced seller... You obviously do not know me ...... I WASN'T joking .......... The Devil's Alliance, ie Lowe & Wilde have been FAR FAR too quiet
dubai_phil Posted 10 June, 2009 Posted 10 June, 2009 On a lighter note, the Echo have allegedly been charging round looking for quotes to tie in with tomorrows big story. Will it be The aftermath of Patred's prank Who leaked the nasty Pinnacle stories The completion of the deal or uh oh Master Bates - better get up early tomorrow your forum may need you
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now