Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

...is struggling against Soderling. Would like to see him finally lose at the French Open. His dominance has started to bore me. I'd like to see Federer equal Sampras and eventually surpass his Grand Slam total. If Nadal loses then the draw would be less daunting for Murray, who I think lacks belief against the top two in the Grand Slam tournaments.

Posted

For Federer to really cement himself as the best ever he'd probably have to beat Nadal when winning the French IMO.

Posted
get in put a bit of money on soderling when he broke in the 3rd, happy days

 

I noticed on Betfair somebody had £20000 on Nadal @1.02 before the match

 

Not happy days for him

Posted
Get in. Please Federer win it this year!

 

He's a great player Federer, don't get me wrong but am I the only one who doesn't like his attitude sometimes? I mean when he wins everything is fine obviously, but when he loses, well, he's a bit of a bad loser. Not very gracious and all that. I just don't like him that much to be honest and I much perfer Nadals attitude.

Posted
He's a great player Federer, don't get me wrong but am I the only one who doesn't like his attitude sometimes? I mean when he wins everything is fine obviously, but when he loses, well, he's a bit of a bad loser. Not very gracious and all that. I just don't like him that much to be honest and I much perfer Nadals attitude.

 

I prefer watching Federer when he is at his best to be honest. I really felt for Fed that time he lost to Rafa and just started crying. It must be really hard to be on the end of a loss like that after an amazing match that that neither deserved to lose. I've never seen Federer be arrogant, it's just he says when he has played really well and when he has played badly.

Posted
I noticed on Betfair somebody had £20000 on Nadal @1.02 before the match

 

Not happy days for him

 

That is pathetic, risking 20,000 to win 400 less BF commission ?? Must have more money than sense.

Posted
He's a great player Federer, don't get me wrong but am I the only one who doesn't like his attitude sometimes? I mean when he wins everything is fine obviously, but when he loses, well, he's a bit of a bad loser. Not very gracious and all that. I just don't like him that much to be honest and I much perfer Nadals attitude.

 

I agree, but he has this reputation in the media as a gracious winner, carries himself impeccably etc...it simply doesn't ring true. Some of his pronouncements also border on arrogance. I can't fathom the media perception of him...

Posted

Federer is a total d*ck... but still very good at tennis.

 

I found it satisfying at Wimbledon 2008 to see him cry. It was almost akin to when McEnroe broke Borg's heart all those years ago. Still at least Borg wasn't a dildo.

Posted

federer is possibly one of the most down to earth athletes i have ever met. You lot other than hypo just don't like him for being an absolute demon on the court.

Posted
He's a great player Federer, don't get me wrong but am I the only one who doesn't like his attitude sometimes? I mean when he wins everything is fine obviously, but when he loses, well, he's a bit of a bad loser. Not very gracious and all that. I just don't like him that much to be honest and I much perfer Nadals attitude.

 

Federer is one of the most gracious losers on the tour IMO. Surely it's understandable that he's not over the moon when he loses, but in recent years he's lost to Nadal in the big matches on so many occasions, it must be hard for him to carry on being gracious. I think he's earnt the right to be a little bit arrogant if he wants to be. Having said that, I don't think he's one of the most entertaining players to watch.

 

Without being bias towards the Brits, I genuinely think Murray is on of the most entertaining. Huge range of shots and seems to be able to find angles which no other players can. He, of course, won't win the french, or probably any other grand slam this year, but I am almost certain he will win a couple during his career - although he better get a move on though because he's no longer one of the young players any more.

 

Nadal IS a ****.

Posted
Federer is one of the most gracious losers on the tour IMO. Surely it's understandable that he's not over the moon when he loses, but in recent years he's lost to Nadal in the big matches on so many occasions, it must be hard for him to carry on being gracious. I think he's earnt the right to be a little bit arrogant if he wants to be. Having said that, I don't think he's one of the most entertaining players to watch.

 

Without being bias towards the Brits, I genuinely think Murray is on of the most entertaining. Huge range of shots and seems to be able to find angles which no other players can. He, of course, won't win the french, or probably any other grand slam this year, but I am almost certain he will win a couple during his career - although he better get a move on though because he's no longer one of the young players any more.

 

Nadal IS a ****.

 

I agree with that (except I'm not overly keen on Murray). Federer is just honest. When he plays brilliantly he says he has and when he doesn't he says that too! It's just that normally he plays well so what is he supposed to say? That he played awful? I think he needs a good coach again though because he has been poor by his standards this year. Hope he can win the French and then Wimbledon again though.

Posted
federer is possibly one of the most down to earth athletes i have ever met. You lot other than hypo just don't like him for being an absolute demon on the court.

 

No, I do not like him because he is a d*ck.

Posted
federer is possibly one of the most down to earth athletes i have ever met. You lot other than hypo just don't like him for being an absolute demon on the court.

 

No, I like his play, you name-dropping ******. You seem a bit special.

Posted
If Nadal loses then the draw would be less daunting for Murray, who I think lacks belief against the top two in the Grand Slam tournaments.

 

eh? minty has a great record against federer. nadal granted he struggles against, but he's in the black against federer unless im mistaken (which is probable)

Posted
eh? minty has a great record against federer. nadal granted he struggles against, but he's in the black against federer unless im mistaken (which is probable)

 

googled it. 7-2 in nadals favour.

 

WTF do i know about tennis eh? i'll shut up....

Posted
googled it. 7-2 in nadals favour.

 

WTF do i know about tennis eh? i'll shut up....

 

I thought the original comment was about Murray?

 

He's not played Nadal 9 times in slams - that record is surely Nadal v Federer?

Posted

correct!!! i cant even google correctly!! i did indeed mean federer vs minty...oops.

 

6-2 in murrays favour that one...

 

i blame sunstroke...and lagers

Posted
correct!!! i cant even google correctly!! i did indeed mean federer vs minty...oops.

 

6-2 in murrays favour that one...

 

i blame sunstroke...and lagers

 

At 9.42 in the morning!!

Posted
I agree with that (except I'm not overly keen on Murray). Federer is just honest. When he plays brilliantly he says he has and when he doesn't he says that too! It's just that normally he plays well so what is he supposed to say? That he played awful? I think he needs a good coach again though because he has been poor by his standards this year. Hope he can win the French and then Wimbledon again though.

 

I don't know what you have against Murray as he is just as honest as Federer, I hope Murray wins a major soon but some will still find fault with him if he does as brits normally do with winners.

Posted
I don't know what you have against Murray as he is just as honest as Federer, I hope Murray wins a major soon but some will still find fault with him if he does as brits normally do with winners.

 

I thought Andy Murray was Scottish, not British. His wording, not mine.

Posted
I don't know what you have against Murray as he is just as honest as Federer, I hope Murray wins a major soon but some will still find fault with him if he does as brits normally do with winners.

 

Nothing against Murray I just prefer Fed when he is on top form (granted he needs a coach because he has lost his way this past year.) and I prefer Federer's attitude.

Posted
eh? minty has a great record against federer. nadal granted he struggles against, but he's in the black against federer unless im mistaken (which is probable)

 

I was referring to his big match mentality in the Grand Slam tournaments against the top two. I know he has a superior record against Federer, but I'm still not sure he has the belief at the very highest level. I wouldn't mind being proved wrong.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...