Wade Garrett Posted 31 May, 2009 Posted 31 May, 2009 the crowds at the end of the season may have helped, the buckets? - waste of time and money But surely the point is that they tried to do something? Makes me laugh that some people are slagging these people off for being 'misguided', when they have hung off of every word from serial bullsh*tting chancer Jackson over the last few weeks. A touch of hypocrisy there.
hypochondriac Posted 31 May, 2009 Posted 31 May, 2009 But surely the point is that they tried to do something? Makes me laugh that some people are slagging these people off for being 'misguided', when they have hung off of every word from serial bullsh*tting chancer Jackson over the last few weeks. A touch of hypocrisy there. ??? :confused: You've lost me.
hypochondriac Posted 31 May, 2009 Posted 31 May, 2009 the crowds at the end of the season may have helped, the buckets? - waste of time and money Yep. Encouraging people to come to the games and get behind the club was a very good idea. Respect to Nick and Co. for that.
miserableoldgit Posted 31 May, 2009 Posted 31 May, 2009 Thank you soo much for giving us some good news for a change I must admit I was getting really worried rumour has it that some of the northstand was being given over to the away fans and as a season ticking holder for ten years in that stand I do not relish the thought at having to move from my spot in block 42 we are united in that stand and have supported that team through thick and thin, please make sure that it remains the North Stand for the home supporters cant wait till the season tickets come out Blimey! The longest sentance in the world! Ever!
hypochondriac Posted 31 May, 2009 Posted 31 May, 2009 Really. Just like to state now: never at any point during the last few weeks have I hung off of Jackson's words. I haven't even spoken to the man and I never wanted him in any position to make decisions about our club.
NickG Posted 31 May, 2009 Posted 31 May, 2009 But surely the point is that they tried to do something? Makes me laugh that some people are slagging these people off for being 'misguided', when they have hung off of every word from serial bullsh*tting chancer Jackson over the last few weeks. A touch of hypocrisy there. don't see the link - think bucket collectors were misguided and Jackson appears full of it!
hypochondriac Posted 31 May, 2009 Posted 31 May, 2009 don't see the link - think bucket collectors were misguided and Jackson appears full of it! Thanks for understanding my point of view.
rallyboy Posted 31 May, 2009 Posted 31 May, 2009 For those people who have run out of commas I have a few below you can use. They do break sentences up and aid breathing for those trying to read. ,,,,,,,, ,,,
Saints foreva Posted 31 May, 2009 Posted 31 May, 2009 Just a quick thought... Pinnacle are buying the stadium aswell right..?
Evo Posted 1 June, 2009 Posted 1 June, 2009 A bit belated here, but I'm heartened by TL's words and the unusually long length this thread reached before the obvious trolling began To win at poker all you need is a chip and a chair. Last week we were chipless and tottering upon a one legged milking stool. That stool has been swapped for a chair, all we need now is a chip! Er, I think...
sotonist Posted 1 June, 2009 Posted 1 June, 2009 For those people who have run out of commas I have a few below you can use. They do break sentences up and aid breathing for those trying to read. ,,,,,,,, ,,, if reading affects your breathing it's probably your problem.
eelpie Posted 1 June, 2009 Posted 1 June, 2009 Blimey! The longest sentance in the world! Ever! Sententious? You are sentenced.
Red_No_7 Posted 3 June, 2009 Posted 3 June, 2009 how did the op get hold of this letter from tony lynam? why was it not a mod/admin or whatever that put it on here? im confused :confused: thanks in advance...
sotonist Posted 3 June, 2009 Posted 3 June, 2009 how did the op get hold of this letter from tony lynam? why was it not a mod/admin or whatever that put it on here? im confused :confused: thanks in advance... It was posted in the "Pinnacle clinches it" thread. I think the OP just wanted to draw attention to it and give people a place to discuss the message itself without distractions.
Pancake Posted 3 June, 2009 Posted 3 June, 2009 how did the op get hold of this letter from tony lynam? why was it not a mod/admin or whatever that put it on here? im confused :confused: thanks in advance... Tony himself posted it: http://www.saintsweb.co.uk/forum/showpost.php?p=314973&postcount=474
Matthew Le God Posted 3 June, 2009 Author Posted 3 June, 2009 It was posted in the "Pinnacle clinches it" thread. I think the OP just wanted to draw attention to it and give people a place to discuss the message itself without distractions. Yep, it may have got lost on page 10 of a different thread. So I made a new thread as clearly it deserved one
sadoldgit Posted 3 June, 2009 Posted 3 June, 2009 (edited) And the fact it's just one owner is good. Gone of the days of personality/ego clashes. Why? Is this one owner going to be the Chairman, manager, head coach etc etc. There are personality and ego clashes in most organisations, why should the new set up be any different? They can clash all they like so long as they turn things around at SFC. Edited 3 June, 2009 by sadoldgit
bridge too far Posted 3 June, 2009 Posted 3 June, 2009 Why? Is this one owner going to be the Chairman, manager, head coach etc etc. There are personality and ego clashes in most organisations, why should the new set up be any different? They can clash all they like so long as they turn things around at SFC. No, s/he is going to be the owner
Wes Tender Posted 3 June, 2009 Posted 3 June, 2009 Why? Is this one owner going to be the Chairman, manager, head coach etc etc. There are personality and ego clashes in most organisations, why should the new set up be any different? They can clash all they like so long as they turn things around at SFC. As far as I can gauge it, there were to have been three partners in a consortium and then two of them dropped out, leaving just the one. now, if you believe that this guy is going to stand in front of a mirror and argue with himself, then you might be right. Apart from that, he will be the one financing the whole thing, it will be his club. He might appoint a chairman if he doesn't wish to be chairman himself, he could equally appoint executive directors to run the business for him and he will also probably appoint his own manager to run the team. But he will be the boss and the others will be under no illusions that if they don't work in the way he wants, or don't get on with him, then they will either be fired or can leave. Surely you can see the difference between this situation and the one that we have had for over a decade. A lot of those squabbles caused by rival shareholding individuals or groups has now gone, so it was a reasonable enough comment that also a lot of the cause of friction and internal wrangling has also gone.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now