Jump to content

US election

revolution saint

By revolution saint,
in The Lounge

 Share

Recommended Posts

TopGun

TopGun

Posted
Posted
Notice the leftie hand wringer's post above, just shows the pic with no comments?....Thats because he knows its a fake but want's peep's to think its the real deal

 

A bit like uhhboma's fake styrofoam greek temple columns......Plenty more of that to come from the Dems thats for sure

 

I think you'll find that Palin won't need any assistance from the Dems to end up looking like the naive red neck that she is.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Saint George

Saint George

Posted
Posted
An interesting development or just a publicity stunt do you think ?

 

http://www.blackbottom.com/watch.php?v=WdBJd9b9i8A

 

Link might not last very long as another young man is claiming to be the father of

the child that Palins daughter is expecting.

 

Yup the Dems are scared, real scared...Just when they thought they had the election in the bag, along comes Sarah to p*ss on their Styrofoam Greek Columns......So now they're running around fabricating any sh*t they can think of...They even had some anonymous waitress on a dem blog saying she overheard SP refering to uhhboma as 'Sambo' not only did she not give her name but no one knows what Restaurant this was supposed to be in either....true story?.......you decide

 

And all this before we even started talking about uhhboma's very dodgy past associates yet....thats on the horizon though....Then watch him squeal :)

 

BTW great win for the Saints today ...Who Dat saying they gonna beat dem Saints!!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites
saintwarwick

saintwarwick

Posted
Posted
Yup the Dems are scared, real scared...Just when they thought they had the election in the bag, along comes Sarah to p*ss on their Styrofoam Greek Columns......So now they're running around fabricating any sh*t they can think of...They even had some anonymous waitress on a dem blog saying she overheard SP refering to uhhboma as 'Sambo' not only did she not give her name but no one knows what Restaurant this was supposed to be in either....true story?.......you decide

 

And all this before we even started talking about uhhboma's very dodgy past associates yet....thats on the horizon though....Then watch him squeal :)

 

BTW great win for the Saints today ...Who Dat saying they gonna beat dem Saints!!!!

 

Guess your mind is made up on who you will vote for, a couple of questions, why the reference to uhhboma as you call him and why do you dislike him so much? Why suddenly a person called Sarah has rocked your boat?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Saint Martini

Saint Martini

Posted
Posted
Heh so Palin's a 'naive' redkneck?...wtf does that make uhhboma? ....an expeienced comunity orginiser? lol

 

Right, cause Obama has said in an interview he's not sure what a president actually does...

 

I think the Dems were scared about three minutes when Palin was announced as McCains running mate. Then the **** had already hit the fan and nobody is going to take her seriously except people that already supported McCain anyway.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Guest Hacienda

Guest Hacienda

Posted
Posted
Notice the leftie hand wringer's post above,

 

First time I've ever been called that. :rolleyes:

 

But then again this is St George we are on about.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
LVSaint

LVSaint

Posted
Posted
Right, cause Obama has said in an interview he's not sure what a president actually does...

 

I think the Dems were scared about three minutes when Palin was announced as McCains running mate. Then the **** had already hit the fan and nobody is going to take her seriously except people that already supported McCain anyway.

 

 

I think she's only capable of winning over a very small percentage of fickle Hilldog fans, this looks like it'll backfire on the Republicans. Just because he bears a pair of tits, she is so far removed from Hillary it's funny.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
revolution saint

revolution saint

Posted
  • Author
Posted

The choice of Palin is a strange choice (at least from the outside anyway). The only thing she has going for her is inexperience and being a woman. I doubt that'll sway many hilldog supporters and it makes the republicans look like they're aping the democrats - witness McCain's 'change is coming' speech the other day. I suppose she appeases a few right wingers in the party but so could a lot of other candidates for the VP position and anyway isn't the idea that successful parties move to the centre rather than pleasing the more extreme elements in their own party?

 

To be honest I've still got a hunch that McCain will win.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
saint1977

saint1977

Posted
Posted
I think she's only capable of winning over a very small percentage of fickle Hilldog fans, this looks like it'll backfire on the Republicans. Just because he bears a pair of tits, she is so far removed from Hillary it's funny.

 

A bit concerning if the Republicans manage to cheat and buy the election as they did in 2000 - McCain probably has a 50/50 chance of making a term with his health so Palin, the inexperienced Redneck, would be President. Still, we're talking about an electorate that voted (genuinely this time) in 2004 for Bush Jnr on the basis he was the sort of bloke you'd go for a beer with.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
RoswellSaint

RoswellSaint

Posted
Posted

Only 8 weeks to go. If you think you have heard too much over there, imagine what it has been like here and will be for the next 2 months. This is my first chance to vote for president.

 

Not inspiring choices. McCain too old, too much like Bush in approach to world, picked a very right wing running mate (or so she has been portrayed so far). Obama - inexperienced but will attempt to rebuild US relationship with rest of the world.

 

It will be close but I think Obama will win. McCain needs to change the perception of Palin if he is to win the "soccer mom" vote. Most of them are socially liberal, fiscally conservative - not NRA loving, anti-abortion, etc.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Saint George

Saint George

Posted
Posted
Guess your mind is made up on who you will vote for, a couple of questions, why the reference to uhhboma as you call him and why do you dislike him so much? Why suddenly a person called Sarah has rocked your boat?

 

Uhhbama?...That's just a response to the lie that he's a great orator.....Get him away from the teleprompter and he's pretty much incoherent....sounds more like a blithering idiot than the 'great orator' he's held up to be.

 

As for disliking him so much?....I have to admit i started off a little biased against him, he immediately reminded me of Tony Blair and that was bad enough....But then i looked at him a little closer and what i found was basically ****ing scary.

 

I cant recommend to peeps who are fawning over the 'One' to take a good hard look at what's behind the charade...This guy didn't get where he is on his own, not by a long way...There's some very dodgy people who had a hand in putting 'the turtle on the post'.

 

Being leader of a country especially a country with the power of the US is not just about policy its also about judgment....now take a look at Uhhbama's judgment in just some of the friends, influences and aquatintence's he chooses and has chose to keep.....All very well documented...Ya'll can google them to find out more

 

Bill Ayers...... friend of Uggbama

 

Bernardine Dohrn......ditto

 

Kwame Malik Kilpatrick.......ditto

 

Antoin "Tony" Rezko........ditto

 

Rev. Jeremiah A. Wright Jr.....20 year association as Uhhbamas pastor and mentor

 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8M-kD0QdRJk http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y2QDpBRFVAA

 

 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=voBBx9EaEGA&feature=related

 

Cynthia K. Miller....part of Uhhbama's team

 

Dr. Khalid al-Mansour....who 'chose' and sponsored Uggbama in his early days

 

This is just the tip of the iceberg with him....there's huge chunks of his past that have either gone missing or are conflicting....hell we dont even know his leagal real name for sure....Barry? Barack? Obama? Soereto? Husain? Mohamed?...could be any combination of those....You decide

 

And i haven't even started on his socialist policies.......the same policies that screwed Britain over in the 70's and again more recently

 

Hating Bush is not a reason to vote Uggboma

 

And yeah.....Sarah, although i dont agree with all her policies has added some balance to some of McCains left wing leanings.....making the overall package the right one

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Guest Hacienda

Guest Hacienda

Posted
Posted

 

This guy didn't get where he is on his own, not by a long way...There's some very dodgy people who had a hand in putting 'the turtle on the post'.

 

Being leader of a country especially a country with the power of the US is not just about policy its also about judgment.

 

You voted for GWB and yet fail to see the irony of your post about the current challengers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
doublesaint

doublesaint

Posted
Posted

With a political system so dependent on large scale donations to either party, is it at all surprising that people who back the candidates may have some reason to have a say in policy decisions. You can't seriously tell me that Bush/McCain do not have equally 'dodgy' people backing him. And this is not getting at Bush/McCain personally, more the party machine and the American political system, though even that is a travesty of democracy in the first place.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Guan 2.0

Guan 2.0

Posted
Posted
The irony of that statement is hilarious coming on the day MSNBC had to remove their top 2 anchor men due to their extreme Uhhbama/left wing bias.

 

You couldnt make it up lol

 

 

And therein lies the difference. As there was a danger of bias creeping into the reporting (or presentation) of the news, MSNBC pulled the two anchors. Has fox ever done the same? Like **** they have. The same anchors who would east **** directly from McCains Anus if he told them it was chocolate are still there, peddling their right wing inferences, while the channel sadly trots out it's ridiculous 'fair and balanced' line.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Thedelldays

Thedelldays

Posted
Posted
And therein lies the difference. As there was a danger of bias creeping into the reporting (or presentation) of the news, MSNBC pulled the two anchors. Has fox ever done the same? Like **** they have. The same anchors who would east **** directly from McCains Anus if he told them it was chocolate are still there, peddling their right wing inferences, while the channel sadly trots out it's ridiculous 'fair and balanced' line.

this crap happens everywhere...even here in the UK...nothing new or shocking

Link to comment
Share on other sites
LVSaint

LVSaint

Posted
Posted
The irony of that statement is hilarious coming on the day MSNBC had to remove their top 2 anchor men due to their extreme Uhhbama/left wing bias.

 

You couldnt make it up lol

 

Come now. I will admit there is left wing bias from a number of other news channels, but none come even close to matching Fox for out and out vehement bias and general tabloid trash. It is comical.

 

If Fox News did the same as MSNBC have done, they'd have dead airtime (and we can discount Alan Colmes, Sean Hannity's stooge)

 

And before you label me as a CNN worshipping liberal. I'm not totally convinced by the Obama ticket but atleast I'm remaining objective - something totally absent from your 'maintain the party lines' soundbites.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Ponty

Ponty

Posted
Posted
yes and it is bad...but closer to home (yes on a lesser scale) the BBC have been very disproportionate on very sensitive issue on many times in the past..which, condsidering the unique way it is funded is not acceptable really...

 

Ahem.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Guest Hacienda

Guest Hacienda

Posted
Posted
yes and it is bad...but closer to home (yes on a lesser scale) the BBC have been very disproportionate on very sensitive issue on many times in the past..which, condsidering the way it is funded is not acceptable really...

 

BBC maybe a bit liberal but compared to Fox they are as pure as the driven snow.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • 2 weeks later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing
×
×
  • Create New...