Jump to content

When Irish eyes are smiling


Channon8

Recommended Posts

Do these two statements not conflict somewhat?

 

Ok, the Irish deal may fall through and Pinnacle step in. But you aren't really in the hunt if someone has exclusivity and close to the deal.

 

Have you not considered the possibility that Pinnacle may have brought new bidders to the table? I'm not saying they have, but there is of course an Irish connection.

 

Sorry, just thinking out loud, and quite likely I'm completely wrong, so probably best just to ignore my conjecture.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Have you not considered the possibility that Pinnacle may have brought new bidders to the table? I'm not saying they have, but there is of course an Irish connection.

 

Sorry, just thinking out loud, and quite likely I'm completely wrong, so probably best just to ignore my conjecture.

 

Ok ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is there any chance the usual suspects could stop polluting this thread with their crap? It is pretty annoying to have to wade through pages of rubbish in an attempt to find out what is actually happening...

 

Thanks

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is there any chance the usual suspects could stop polluting this thread with their crap? It is pretty annoying to have to wade through pages of rubbish in an attempt to find out what is actually happening...

 

Thanks

At the moment there is no concrete news as to what is actually happening. There is an, as yet, unsubstantiated rumour of an Irish bid. HTH.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well we are more likely to get the spelling and grammar right (eventually) than the eventual buyer. I had to proof read this several times before I had the courage to press . I cannot wait to see what I ****ed up :-)

 

What exactly makes you think that the eventual buyer is less likely to get the spelling and grammar right than the 'we' you mention?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Both can be correct depending on the situation. E.G. "It was (X and ) me" or "(X and ) I did it". And you a teacher. What chance do our children stand!:)

 

Teaching in Gosport we have never needed to reach such high standards!

 

So - back to my problem...

 

"Who did it?"

"It was I." or "It was me."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is there any chance the usual suspects could stop polluting this thread with their crap? It is pretty annoying to have to wade through pages of rubbish in an attempt to find out what is actually happening...

 

Thanks

 

Thank you

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sounds fantastic, as long as they don't move us to Dublin - "Dublin Saints" a la "Dublin Dons" that was mooted a few years ago...

 

Great news. Hope it comes off. Get that green away kit in too...

 

LOL that's a rumour I had completely forgotten about

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Technically wrong, should never use "me" with "to be" in its past, present or future participle forms.

 

Therefore should always be "It is/was/will be I" rather than me.

 

To completely clear this up, I is the subject pronoun, me is the object pronoun. Therefore if you did something, use "I" if it was done to you or by you, use "me".

 

 

 

Both can be correct depending on the situation. E.G. "It was (X and ) me" or "(X and ) I did it". And you a teacher. What chance do our children stand!:)
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd like to change my avatar to show my support for the bid, but couldn't bring myself to fly the Irish tricolour. Would anyone happen to know whether they are Southern Irish or Northern Irish?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Technically wrong, should never use "me" with "to be" in its past, present or future participle forms.

 

Therefore should always be "It is/was/will be I" rather than me.

 

To completely clear this up, I is the subject pronoun, me is the object pronoun. Therefore if you did something, use "I" if it was done to you or by you, use "me".

 

 

INSTA-CORRECT (since I apparently cannot edit) if it was done to you or BY SOMEONE ELSE to you. If it was done by you, use I.

 

Oh for feck's sake.

 

Subject of sentence - I

Object of sentence - me

 

Always I with "to be"

 

Enough

Link to comment
Share on other sites

To the best of my knowledge McManus and Magnier made a good profit when they sold their shares at Man U to the yanks and are about to do the same to Ellis Short at Sunderland !

Given their track record in football and probable personal contact to Mick Channon it all does tend to add up !

2 + 2 normally = 4 but in this case we are talking about the Saints, so look out for a little leprachaun in the woodpile !!!!

 

Ps. I hope that my punctuation is not too bad ??

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Technically wrong, should never use "me" with "to be" in its past, present or future participle forms.

 

Therefore should always be "It is/was/will be I" rather than me.

 

To completely clear this up, I is the subject pronoun, me is the object pronoun. Therefore if you did something, use "I" if it was done to you or by you, use "me".

That was what I was trying to say.:)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Technically wrong, should never use "me" with "to be" in its past, present or future participle forms.

 

Therefore should always be "It is/was/will be I" rather than me.

 

To completely clear this up, I is the subject pronoun, me is the object pronoun. Therefore if you did something, use "I" if it was done to you or by you, use "me".

 

Is "It is/was/will be one" allowed?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hey - top marks for 'oirish' stereotypes, chaps.

 

Pat and Mick landed themselves a job at a sawmill. Just before morning tea Pat yelled: "Mick! I lost me finger!"

 

"Have you now?" says Mick. "And how did you do it?"

 

"I just touched this big spinning thing here like this...Damn! There goes another one!"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...