ottery st mary Posted 23 May, 2009 Share Posted 23 May, 2009 Information regarding our prospective new owner Jack SCHITT. WHO IS JACK SCHITT ? For some time many of us ITKs have wondered just who is Jack Schitt? We find ourselves at a loss when someone says, 'You don't know Jack Schitt!' Well, thanks to my sawce, you can now respond in an intellectual way. MAY BE HARD FOR SOME POSTERS. Jack Schitt is the only son of Awe Schitt. Awe Schitt, the fertilizer magnate, married O. Schitt, the owner of Needeep N. Schitt, Inc. They had one son, Jack. In turn, Jack Schitt married Noe Schitt. The deeply religious couple Produced six children: Holie Schitt, Giva Schitt, Fulla Schitt, Bull Schitt, and the twins Deep Schitt and Dip Schitt. Against her parents' objections, Deep Schitt married Dumb Schitt, a high school dropout. After being married 15 years, Jack and Noe Schitt divorced. Noe Schitt later married Ted Sherlock, and because her kids were living with them, she wanted to keep her previous name. She was then known as Noe Schitt Sherlock. Meanwhile, Dip Schitt married Loda Schitt, and they produced a son with a rather nervous disposition named Chicken Schitt. Two of the other six children, Fulla Schitt and Giva Schitt, were inseparable throughout childhood and subsequently married the Happens brothers in a dual ceremony. The wedding announcement in the newspaper announced the Schitt-Happens nuptials. The Schitt-Happens children were Dawg, Byrd, and Horse. Bull Schitt, the prodigal son, left home to tour the world. He recently Returned from Italy with his new Italian bride, Pisa Schitt. Now when someone says, 'You don't know Jack Schitt our new owner as from next FRIDAY,' you can correct them. Sincerely, Crock O. Schitt Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snowballs2 Posted 23 May, 2009 Share Posted 23 May, 2009 We are going to regret it if it goes to the Marc Jackson consortium. He made a pigs ear of the Bournemouth bid Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JustMike Posted 23 May, 2009 Share Posted 23 May, 2009 Oh dear what a disaster why??? what are you basing your assumptions on Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OldNick Posted 23 May, 2009 Share Posted 23 May, 2009 We are going to regret it if it goes to the Marc Jackson consortium. He made a pigs ear of the Bournemouth bid of course we have a tremendous lot to choose from dont we Lol ? Pinnacle were in pole position, they lost that, why was that? If MJand his lot fail we are left with nothing as I doubt Salz and co will get a chance at £5m as I believe it is worth more split up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Smirking_Saint Posted 23 May, 2009 Share Posted 23 May, 2009 We are going to regret it if it goes to the Marc Jackson consortium. He made a pigs ear of the Bournemouth bid Past is past, we don't know anything until it happens. lets just wait and see, rather this than liquidation and no club IMO. From what has been said he is only the broker anyways and if he saves my club fair play to him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Saintleigh Posted 23 May, 2009 Share Posted 23 May, 2009 unlikely as he is on holiday at the moment. I would have thought Matt could afford somewhere a bit posher for a holiday than a car park in Isleworth - he's just been on Soccer AM. Saving money to put in to the Pinnacle bid? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OldNick Posted 23 May, 2009 Share Posted 23 May, 2009 why??? what are you basing your assumptions onLook at his join date Mike.A skate or plant trying to upset the fanbase. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Golac's Cunning Stunts Posted 23 May, 2009 Share Posted 23 May, 2009 Look at his join date Mike.A skate or plant trying to upset the fanbase. I really wish you would stop accusing people of being "skates" or "plants" just because they joined recently and have a differing opinion to you. Why can't you just debate the argument with well thought out posts? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Leicestersaint Posted 23 May, 2009 Share Posted 23 May, 2009 Well I am not at all impressed with the Bournemouth interview - does he have any plans I wonder - does he have any real money? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
docker-p Posted 23 May, 2009 Share Posted 23 May, 2009 My guess based on nothing other than guesswork is MJ has been given a closer look of the books merely so Fry can publicly let that be known to get the serious bidders, Pinacle, Canadian group, to pull their fingers out. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dubai_phil Posted 23 May, 2009 Share Posted 23 May, 2009 Well I am not at all impressed with the Bournemouth interview - does he have any plans I wonder - does he have any real money? Is it "HIS" consortium? It doesn't quite say that in the Echo article. You will note at all times it refers to another name at the same time. Maybe he doesn't NEED to be the one with any money, and nobody seems to have leaked any information about who actually provided the proof of funds and contractual agreements needed to get this far in the process So, there are at the moment no other options. Fry states clearly he can still talk to others. They are in no way preferable to being bought by Paul Allen or Steve Jobs, but while one of the only two names mentioned has made a public fool of himself, wait until we discover who else is in the group and what the actual money support is all about. Mind you, some on here will lok a bit silly if it turns out there is somebody with big bucks behind the bid (as unlikely as that may seem) Just possibly, being bloody minded is an important part of actually getting this far. There is still one hell of a lot to be done before they actually get to buy the club and while no-others are in the frame after 4 weeks of Fry trying, perhaps that tells US something about the world outside of football OR how big a mess the club actually is in. Opinions are good, assumptions make an ass out of u and me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
miserableoldgit Posted 23 May, 2009 Share Posted 23 May, 2009 Well I am not at all impressed with the Bournemouth interview - does he have any plans I wonder - does he have any real money? No he doesn`t! Nor does the Lynham guy from Pinnacle. They are front men for the people that (possibly) do. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Red and White Army Posted 23 May, 2009 Share Posted 23 May, 2009 There is so much mis-information and guesswork on this thread. First of all, the 500k was never to do due diligence - the money would have guarenteed someone a period of exclusivity. Some breathing space for a credible bid. I seriously doubt there will be anything in the books/accounts which surprises any credible bidder. We are not that complicated, and Fry and his team will have a complete picture of our assets, liabilities and future commitments. These will have already been made available to anyone wanting to bid. Due diligence is about confirming their are no hidden nasties, and the information you have been working from is in fact correct. I would suggest there will be no surprises for anyone opening up our books in the due diligence process. Finally - on the subject of a Marc Jackon led consortium - all I can say is that I hope it doesn't scare off any real biggers. I have zero confidence in that fat fool to pull any bid off - he was made to look a complete idiot at Bournemouth and his own consortium ditched him. He strikes me as being well below average intelligence, he has no money and I think he is just a chancer trying to take a cut. If he pulls it off - fair play - but I hope neither the administrator nor a proper bidder wastes time or money because of him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
miserableoldgit Posted 23 May, 2009 Share Posted 23 May, 2009 Marc Jackson consortium has moved to due diligence. However they have no exclusivity as the £500k deposit has for the moment been waived. Source: Echo website. www.dailyecho.co.uk There were a number of posters on here who pooh-poohed Pinnacle because of spelling mistakes on their website. Have people checked the headline on this Saints article? "Soithampton", "Dilligence"? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hypochondriac Posted 23 May, 2009 Share Posted 23 May, 2009 We are going to regret it if it goes to the Marc Jackson consortium. He made a pigs ear of the Bournemouth bid If he is our only option then there's nothing to regret! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Verbal Posted 23 May, 2009 Share Posted 23 May, 2009 There were a number of posters on here who pooh-poohed Pinnacle because of spelling mistakes on their website. Have people checked the headline on this Saints article? "Soithampton", "Dilligence"? "Man Stabbed in Face"? Sheesh, these negotiations are getting ugly. If you ask me, we need more pooh-poohing. Pooh-poohing is what we do best. (Tiggers too) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
miserableoldgit Posted 23 May, 2009 Share Posted 23 May, 2009 "Man Stabbed in Face"? Sheesh, these negotiations are getting ugly. If you ask me, we need more pooh-poohing. Pooh-poohing is what we do best. (Tiggers too) It is an Olympic Sport in 2012 doncha know! That`s one definite Gold Medal for us! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LostBoys Posted 23 May, 2009 Share Posted 23 May, 2009 I think this is a joke by the Echo. As I understand it not having any real knowledge apart from what has been published, our Administrator wants £14m for the club and has granted dd to a bunch of individuals classified as tyre kickers on here who could not raise £1m in buying Bournemouth. Wait for the last minute hitch announcement by the Echo - probably on Tuesday. More grief to come boys and girls. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Saint Billy Posted 23 May, 2009 Share Posted 23 May, 2009 Information regarding our prospective new owner Jack SCHITT. WHO IS JACK SCHITT ? For some time many of us ITKs have wondered just who is Jack Schitt? We find ourselves at a loss when someone says, 'You don't know Jack Schitt!' Well, thanks to my sawce, you can now respond in an intellectual way. MAY BE HARD FOR SOME POSTERS. Jack Schitt is the only son of Awe Schitt. Awe Schitt, the fertilizer magnate, married O. Schitt, the owner of Needeep N. Schitt, Inc. They had one son, Jack. In turn, Jack Schitt married Noe Schitt. The deeply religious couple Produced six children: Holie Schitt, Giva Schitt, Fulla Schitt, Bull Schitt, and the twins Deep Schitt and Dip Schitt. Against her parents' objections, Deep Schitt married Dumb Schitt, a high school dropout. After being married 15 years, Jack and Noe Schitt divorced. Noe Schitt later married Ted Sherlock, and because her kids were living with them, she wanted to keep her previous name. She was then known as Noe Schitt Sherlock. Meanwhile, Dip Schitt married Loda Schitt, and they produced a son with a rather nervous disposition named Chicken Schitt. Two of the other six children, Fulla Schitt and Giva Schitt, were inseparable throughout childhood and subsequently married the Happens brothers in a dual ceremony. The wedding announcement in the newspaper announced the Schitt-Happens nuptials. The Schitt-Happens children were Dawg, Byrd, and Horse. Bull Schitt, the prodigal son, left home to tour the world. He recently Returned from Italy with his new Italian bride, Pisa Schitt. Now when someone says, 'You don't know Jack Schitt our new owner as from next FRIDAY,' you can correct them. Sincerely, Crock O. Schitt Excellent! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
benjii Posted 23 May, 2009 Share Posted 23 May, 2009 (edited) Is it "HIS" consortium? It doesn't quite say that in the Echo article. You will note at all times it refers to another name at the same time. Maybe he doesn't NEED to be the one with any money, and nobody seems to have leaked any information about who actually provided the proof of funds and contractual agreements needed to get this far in the process So, there are at the moment no other options. Fry states clearly he can still talk to others. They are in no way preferable to being bought by Paul Allen or Steve Jobs, but while one of the only two names mentioned has made a public fool of himself, wait until we discover who else is in the group and what the actual money support is all about. Mind you, some on here will lok a bit silly if it turns out there is somebody with big bucks behind the bid (as unlikely as that may seem) Just possibly, being bloody minded is an important part of actually getting this far. There is still one hell of a lot to be done before they actually get to buy the club and while no-others are in the frame after 4 weeks of Fry trying, perhaps that tells US something about the world outside of football OR how big a mess the club actually is in. Opinions are good, assumptions make an ass out of u and me. If some mega-rich impresario is behind it, it does kind of beg the question of why a bumbling, embarrassing, amateur is the public face though? Edited 23 May, 2009 by benjii Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dubai_phil Posted 23 May, 2009 Share Posted 23 May, 2009 If some mega-rich impresario is behind it, it does kind of beg the question of why a bumbling, embarrassing, amateur is the public face though? Which begs the answer. Who has said he is behind it or even in front of it? Only the always accurate Echo who reported what one employee of SFC Ltd thought they saw on 7th May. Sloppy journalism leads to sloppy opinions unfortunately, all the possible information has been discussed on here, found on web sites or nearly accurately reported in the Echo. But of course as well all know everything all the time we never bother to read and analyse some of the hints in amongst the words The one lead I can give is that we all know that Didier Drogba is a complete c*ck as proven by the UEFA investigation. Didier Drogba would however be a benefit in most football teams. However a team with only one Drogba, or a team with 11 Drogbas would be a joke. One MJ on his own consortium would be a far bigger joke than a one man Drogba team. However, give Fry some intelligence, he may just have spotted that, as may the actual investors. Never going to be anyone's first choice but timing and options were taken out of our hands Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
benjii Posted 23 May, 2009 Share Posted 23 May, 2009 Which begs the answer. Who has said he is behind it or even in front of it? I think it's fair to say it's a working premise of this thread. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
derry Posted 23 May, 2009 Author Share Posted 23 May, 2009 (edited) I was told this morning that Pinnacle may well be out of it as two of their consortium don't want to carry on, leaving just one who can't do it on his own. I was told they had made contact about joining the MJ bid but were knocked back. The overseas consortium apparently are still serious. This seems to be the left field bidder waiting for it to get serious. Edited 23 May, 2009 by derry Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mole Posted 23 May, 2009 Share Posted 23 May, 2009 Preferable to Lowe, but Jacko will bring no funds for players. I can see this being an unstable period for club as this is not the final solution. If Jacko and co lasted 6 months i'd be surprised. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scummer Posted 23 May, 2009 Share Posted 23 May, 2009 Why has TNT been banned? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hypochondriac Posted 23 May, 2009 Share Posted 23 May, 2009 Why has TNT been banned? I'm glad. He clearly had some sort of ridiculous agenda. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mole Posted 23 May, 2009 Share Posted 23 May, 2009 I'm glad. He clearly had some sort of ridiculous agenda. You don't what you're talking about in this instance Hypo. He had no agenda over and above his own opinion. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scummer Posted 23 May, 2009 Share Posted 23 May, 2009 I'm glad. He clearly had some sort of ridiculous agenda. I'm not disagreeing with that, but there's plenty of people with agendas on here who haven't been banned. Just looked through his most recent posts, and can't see anything to warrant a ban. I'm wondering if some posts have been deleted or something? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hypochondriac Posted 23 May, 2009 Share Posted 23 May, 2009 You don't what you're talking about in this instance Hypo. He had no agenda over and above his own opinion. He was banging on about Jackson at every opportunity, including dredging up old threads for no reason. Everyone realises MJ's limitations but if he is our only choice then so be it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hypochondriac Posted 23 May, 2009 Share Posted 23 May, 2009 I'm not disagreeing with that, but there's plenty of people with agendas on here who haven't been banned. Just looked through his most recent posts, and can't see anything to warrant a ban. I'm wondering if some posts have been deleted or something? I'm sure the mods had a valid reason. They haven't tried to hide it or anything. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
saint_mears Posted 23 May, 2009 Share Posted 23 May, 2009 I'm glad. He clearly had some sort of ridiculous agenda. Only agenda seems to be having an opinion like many on here ! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wiltshire Saint Posted 23 May, 2009 Share Posted 23 May, 2009 Information regarding our prospective new owner Jack SCHITT. WHO IS JACK SCHITT ? For some time many of us ITKs have wondered just who is Jack Schitt? We find ourselves at a loss when someone says, 'You don't know Jack Schitt!' Well, thanks to my sawce, you can now respond in an intellectual way. MAY BE HARD FOR SOME POSTERS. Jack Schitt is the only son of Awe Schitt. Awe Schitt, the fertilizer magnate, married O. Schitt, the owner of Needeep N. Schitt, Inc. They had one son, Jack. In turn, Jack Schitt married Noe Schitt. The deeply religious couple Produced six children: Holie Schitt, Giva Schitt, Fulla Schitt, Bull Schitt, and the twins Deep Schitt and Dip Schitt. Against her parents' objections, Deep Schitt married Dumb Schitt, a high school dropout. After being married 15 years, Jack and Noe Schitt divorced. Noe Schitt later married Ted Sherlock, and because her kids were living with them, she wanted to keep her previous name. She was then known as Noe Schitt Sherlock. Meanwhile, Dip Schitt married Loda Schitt, and they produced a son with a rather nervous disposition named Chicken Schitt. Two of the other six children, Fulla Schitt and Giva Schitt, were inseparable throughout childhood and subsequently married the Happens brothers in a dual ceremony. The wedding announcement in the newspaper announced the Schitt-Happens nuptials. The Schitt-Happens children were Dawg, Byrd, and Horse. Bull Schitt, the prodigal son, left home to tour the world. He recently Returned from Italy with his new Italian bride, Pisa Schitt. Now when someone says, 'You don't know Jack Schitt our new owner as from next FRIDAY,' you can correct them. Sincerely, Crock O. Schitt I don't see how this is relevant. If this guy, Schitt, is going to take over then I wish him well and pray that he has enough money (or backers with money) to make sure we have a bright future! Digging up his family history serves no purpose and could be considered out of order. How would you like to have your family detailed plastered all over this board? Anyway, seems strange that he hasn't been mentioned in other threads or stories.......fingers crossed that this one works out! COYR!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JustMike Posted 23 May, 2009 Share Posted 23 May, 2009 I really wish you would stop accusing people of being "skates" or "plants" just because they joined recently and have a differing opinion to you. Why can't you just debate the argument with well thought out posts? like the person that nick is referring to you mean? (TNT) who just bases his / her opinions on Jackson purely by what was written on here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gingeletiss Posted 23 May, 2009 Share Posted 23 May, 2009 Information regarding our prospective new owner Jack SCHITT. WHO IS JACK SCHITT ? For some time many of us ITKs have wondered just who is Jack Schitt? We find ourselves at a loss when someone says, 'You don't know Jack Schitt!' Well, thanks to my sawce, you can now respond in an intellectual way. MAY BE HARD FOR SOME POSTERS. Jack Schitt is the only son of Awe Schitt. Awe Schitt, the fertilizer magnate, married O. Schitt, the owner of Needeep N. Schitt, Inc. They had one son, Jack. In turn, Jack Schitt married Noe Schitt. The deeply religious couple Produced six children: Holie Schitt, Giva Schitt, Fulla Schitt, Bull Schitt, and the twins Deep Schitt and Dip Schitt. Against her parents' objections, Deep Schitt married Dumb Schitt, a high school dropout. After being married 15 years, Jack and Noe Schitt divorced. Noe Schitt later married Ted Sherlock, and because her kids were living with them, she wanted to keep her previous name. She was then known as Noe Schitt Sherlock. Meanwhile, Dip Schitt married Loda Schitt, and they produced a son with a rather nervous disposition named Chicken Schitt. Two of the other six children, Fulla Schitt and Giva Schitt, were inseparable throughout childhood and subsequently married the Happens brothers in a dual ceremony. The wedding announcement in the newspaper announced the Schitt-Happens nuptials. The Schitt-Happens children were Dawg, Byrd, and Horse. Bull Schitt, the prodigal son, left home to tour the world. He recently Returned from Italy with his new Italian bride, Pisa Schitt. Now when someone says, 'You don't know Jack Schitt our new owner as from next FRIDAY,' you can correct them. Sincerely, Crock O. Schitt Is he related to the, 'soon to be Pope'.......Holy Schitt???? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ottery st mary Posted 23 May, 2009 Share Posted 23 May, 2009 I don't see how this is relevant. If this guy, Schitt, is going to take over then I wish him well and pray that he has enough money (or backers with money) to make sure we have a bright future! Digging up his family history serves no purpose and could be considered out of order. How would you like to have your family detailed plastered all over this board? Anyway, seems strange that he hasn't been mentioned in other threads or stories.......fingers crossed that this one works out! COYR!! Don't poo poo this until you have heard from Jack...He is having a dump at the mo. I am not partaking of the ****ss:rolleyes: Oh! craaap for a moment I thought I was in the shiiite.....like the mighty Saints. But then I know when Jack has got over his dose of the runs he will post further facts about his shiiittty family himself.:smt084 By the way Jack is a poster on here but it could be one of a dozen of us mate..so many full of verbal dia......rear...sorry cany spel.:smt117 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
saint_ed Posted 23 May, 2009 Share Posted 23 May, 2009 I am HUGELY concerned at the prospect of Wacko Jacko being involved with the club. I assume you will be reading this Jackson, so if all you are doing is bringing some groups together then fair play, but PLEASE don't assume an important role within the club because you are a bumbling baffoon. EDIT: unless you are the new IT technician. Best wishes, xx Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Micky Posted 23 May, 2009 Share Posted 23 May, 2009 (edited) Why has TNT been banned? It's dangerous stuff mate - you don't want your kids messing about with that stuff - stay safe and away from explosives. Edited 23 May, 2009 by Micky Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
miserableoldgit Posted 23 May, 2009 Share Posted 23 May, 2009 I am HUGELY concerned at the prospect of Wacko Jacko being involved with the club. I assume you will be reading this Jackson, so if all you are doing is bringing some groups together then fair play, but PLEASE don't assume an important role within the club because you are a bumbling baffoon. EDIT: unless you are the new IT technician. Best wishes, xx Strangely, he speaks very highly of you! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
saint_ed Posted 23 May, 2009 Share Posted 23 May, 2009 Strangely, he speaks very highly of you! I'm sick to death of amateurs being involved in the club! Board members, managers, coaches, players etc. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
paris Posted 23 May, 2009 Share Posted 23 May, 2009 Dear Mr Jackson , If you are about to save our club from going under please do ignore this post from Saint ed . Thanks , Concerned supporter. I am HUGELY concerned at the prospect of Wacko Jacko being involved with the club. I assume you will be reading this Jackson, so if all you are doing is bringing some groups together then fair play, but PLEASE don't assume an important role within the club because you are a bumbling baffoon. EDIT: unless you are the new IT technician. Best wishes, xx Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
saint_ed Posted 23 May, 2009 Share Posted 23 May, 2009 Dear Mr Jackson , If you are about to save our club from going under please do ignore this post from Saint ed . Thanks , Concerned supporter. Paris, as I said, if all he is doing is putting the two parties together then he deserves all the praise in the world, but he is the type of person who craves involvement. Were you not around on the forum during the previous takeover saga's?? There is no point having a takeover only to end up in the sh!t yet again a year later. Ask any Bournemouth fans when fans took over their club when they first entered administration.....a year later they were in another sinking boat with even bigger holes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DaintyDave Posted 23 May, 2009 Share Posted 23 May, 2009 Again, zero quotes from any named source. More spoon-fed journalism. I am going to call the Echo and tell them I am leading a consortium and we have loads of money and are willing to pay the deposit. Then call them every day with updates. Seems they'll print anything. Incidentally, IF this report was true, where is the update to creditors (of which I am sitting next to one right now) from the administrator, which we were promised on "a weekly basis or when there is anything significant to report"...... Thought not, so again, just more spoon-fed info to the Echo who are desperate to print anything. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sad saints fan Posted 23 May, 2009 Share Posted 23 May, 2009 I was told this morning that Pinnacle may well be out of it as two of their consortium don't want to carry on, leaving just one who can't do it on his own. I was told they had made contact about joining the MJ bid but were knocked back. The overseas consortium apparently are still serious. This seems to be the left field bidder waiting for it to get serious. I was reading through this thread wondering if it would be possible legally for 2 of the rival bidders to get together which would obviously give the club more money. Does the above quote mean that in theory we could get a consortium of consortiums. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Block 5 Posted 23 May, 2009 Share Posted 23 May, 2009 (edited) creditors (of which I am sitting next to one right now) Who is this creditor? Someone from Aviva, Barclays etc? Or a programme seller from SMS? Who are you Dainty Dave? Bournemouth fan? Marc Jackson's jilted lover? HelpmeRhonda? Tommac? Saint David? Edited 23 May, 2009 by Block 5 Afterthought Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
carljack Posted 23 May, 2009 Share Posted 23 May, 2009 Well I am not at all impressed with the Bournemouth interview - does he have any plans I wonder - does he have any real money? NO! AND ERGH NO! The deluded fool is on an ego trip as Fry is about to find out. SAINT TILL I DIE! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
carljack Posted 23 May, 2009 Share Posted 23 May, 2009 Dear Mr Jackson , If you are about to save our club from going under please do ignore this post from Saint ed . Thanks , Concerned supporter. Harsh but Fair SURELY FFS. Saint till i die! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hypochondriac Posted 23 May, 2009 Share Posted 23 May, 2009 Paris, as I said, if all he is doing is putting the two parties together then he deserves all the praise in the world, but he is the type of person who craves involvement. Were you not around on the forum during the previous takeover saga's?? There is no point having a takeover only to end up in the sh!t yet again a year later. Ask any Bournemouth fans when fans took over their club when they first entered administration.....a year later they were in another sinking boat with even bigger holes. Yes there is because it means I will have a football club to go and watch. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
70's Mike Posted 23 May, 2009 Share Posted 23 May, 2009 staggered by some of what i have just read on this thread, we are in div 3 , potless on the verge of being extinct and some are slagging off what looks like are only real offer. realism has to kick in guys , there is no multi billionaire mooring his yacht in Ocean Village or landing his helicopter at SMS. WE are just going to have to start building from within slowly like Ted did in the early 60's Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EastleighSoulBoy Posted 23 May, 2009 Share Posted 23 May, 2009 I am HUGELY concerned at the prospect of Wacko Jacko being involved with the club. I assume you will be reading this Jackson, so if all you are doing is bringing some groups together then fair play, but PLEASE don't assume an important role within the club because you are a bumbling baffoon. EDIT: unless you are the new IT technician. Best wishes, xx Oh dear! What sort of bumbling buffoon misspells buffoon? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Golac's Cunning Stunts Posted 23 May, 2009 Share Posted 23 May, 2009 like the person that nick is referring to you mean? (TNT) who just bases his / her opinions on Jackson purely by what was written on here. Right so because TNT does it, that makes it alright for Nick to do it too. There are more than just posts to allow one to form an opinion of Jackson. There's his pathetic attempts to take over Bournemouth and all the BS he came out with during that escapade. There's enough evidence in Jackson's own posts on here to suggest he may not be the full ticket. So no, I don't think TNT would have based his opinion purely on what is written here. I'm happy to wait and see what happens. Def no need for abuse from either side though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now