Jump to content

Worcs v Hants


bungle
 Share

Recommended Posts

The run rate wasnt the problem. Losing 4 wickets early left us without the wooden thing in the smelly stream. Also we let them off the hook after having them 125-5. 175 was all they should have got.

 

Cant agree about Crawley. Need someone to hold an end up, like he did in the home match v. Worcester when he got a ton. Lack of penetration in the bowling without "Sick Note" Tremlett is more worrying. Hopefully Tahir back at the weekend.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The run rate wasnt the problem. Losing 4 wickets early left us without the wooden thing in the smelly stream. Also we let them off the hook after having them 125-5. 175 was all they should have got.

 

Cant agree about Crawley. Need someone to hold an end up, like he did in the home match v. Worcester when he got a ton. Lack of penetration in the bowling without "Sick Note" Tremlett is more worrying. Hopefully Tahir back at the weekend.

 

Is his jaw mended then, great, but we still need something on the batting side.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...