Danny Posted 7 May, 2009 Posted 7 May, 2009 Looks like it's now in development hell permanently. Well, even more permanently than it already was. http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/gamesblog/2009/may/07/games-pc
thesaint sfc Posted 7 May, 2009 Posted 7 May, 2009 I've long, long, long since stopped caring about Duke Nukem. I think it would be one of the biggest game let downs ever. It would need to be far cry 2, meets Doom 3, but 100 times better.
Danny Posted 7 May, 2009 Author Posted 7 May, 2009 I've long, long, long since stopped caring about Duke Nukem. I think it would be one of the biggest game let downs ever. It would need to be far cry 2, meets Doom 3, but 100 times better. Yeah, after all, if it's spent 12 years in development there's no way it could possibly meet that level of hype and expectation.
thesaint sfc Posted 7 May, 2009 Posted 7 May, 2009 What could they have possibly made pre 2002 that they could still use now? It's been re-written so many times, just to catch up with the technological advances that it has probably taken about 8 years just to do that!
thesaint sfc Posted 16 May, 2009 Posted 16 May, 2009 http://www.gameshadow.com/gamepedia/10374b/duke_nukem_forever/trailers/duke_nukem_forever_gameplay_video/?utm_source=nl101&utm_medium=email&utm_content=2nd-d&utm_campaign=newsletter&newsletter=101
Saint_Jonny Posted 16 May, 2009 Posted 16 May, 2009 doesnt look far from being released does it? surely a developer can come in, save it and get it finished (quicker than 3DR have done....) money to be made there!!
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now