Draino76 Posted 4 May, 2009 Posted 4 May, 2009 http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/8032125.stm Aaaww thats such a shame, I thought the 'queen of expenses', would have been another ideal unelected Labour candidate. Her hubby would be a great '1st lady' too.
St Landrew Posted 4 May, 2009 Posted 4 May, 2009 That's fine with me, as I don't want Harriet Harman as the Prime Minister either.
bridge too far Posted 4 May, 2009 Posted 4 May, 2009 This person should be the next leader of the Labour Party IMO. But he won't be http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jon_Cruddas
St Landrew Posted 4 May, 2009 Posted 4 May, 2009 This person should be the next leader of the Labour Party IMO. But he won't be http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jon_Cruddas And we probably know why too.
saintwarwick Posted 4 May, 2009 Posted 4 May, 2009 That's fine with me, as I don't want Harriet Harman as the Prime Minister either. Ditto
benjii Posted 4 May, 2009 Posted 4 May, 2009 There's no chance another female PM will be allowed to slip through the net so soon after Thatcher.
bridge too far Posted 4 May, 2009 Posted 4 May, 2009 There's no chance another female PM will be allowed to slip through the net so soon after Thatcher. But really a Prime Minister should be chosen on his / her party policies rather than sex, don't you think? Still, if the Tories get in next time, there'll be no risk of a female PM. There are hardly any female shadow cabinet members.
saintwarwick Posted 4 May, 2009 Posted 4 May, 2009 But really a Prime Minister should be chosen on his / her party policies rather than sex, don't you think? Still, if the Tories get in next time, there'll be no risk of a female PM. There are hardly any female shadow cabinet members. Their wasn't many to choose from when Maggie first came to power
St Landrew Posted 4 May, 2009 Posted 4 May, 2009 But really a Prime Minister should be chosen on his / her party policies rather than sex, don't you think? Still, if the Tories get in next time, there'll be no risk of a female PM. There are hardly any female shadow cabinet members. I believe Harriet Harmon has shown over the years that the truth to her is something that can be bent to her own convenience. If any established persuasion, I consider myself Liberal/Democrat/Labour, but HH is one of many politicians that I don't consider having leadership potential from that arena. Because he's a Catholic? Nope. Think again mate. We're talking image over content here.
St Landrew Posted 5 May, 2009 Posted 5 May, 2009 His surname? We have a winner..! It's unfortunate that much could be made of it. He's possibly an exellent bloke, but we'll never find out.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now