eelpie Posted 3 May, 2009 Posted 3 May, 2009 Gasmi's contract was not being renewed and he is going back to his club. So what the f*** was the point of playing him at all? We were winning before he came on. Did he even touch the ball? Also what was the point of bringing Ollie Lancashire on for Size? This has done his confidence no good at all. Wotte seemed to have lost the plot. We WOULD have liked to have ended on a high with a win or even a draw. Good bye Wotte.
Arizona Posted 3 May, 2009 Posted 3 May, 2009 Not sure, maybe Wotte just wanted to give the kids a run out or something. I can only hope Size picked up a knock, because the alternative is just retarded. None of the subs did anything of note. Wotte, Gasmi, Pulis, Schneiderlin, Molyneux and a sh*t load of others I can't be arsed to list can all p*ss off.
benjii Posted 3 May, 2009 Posted 3 May, 2009 Size was injured. I agree about Gasmi. Unless he is staying why was he in the squad?
Yate Saint Posted 3 May, 2009 Posted 3 May, 2009 I don't understand that either. Wotte said he never produced what he did in the reserves in the first team. The only thing is, he never played in the first team. pah. 6 Players being watched today as well. Happy days.
ottery st mary Posted 3 May, 2009 Posted 3 May, 2009 I understand that we have been approached for Gasmi ( the French said keep him we know what he is like) Saints trying to offload him and North Baddesley stated they wanted to see him in a game in the Forest.....(They meant Bransgore Rovers next week)...Before they handed us a set of football shirts for his signature. Saints suggested Pulis should be part of the deal to make it fair....Baddesley said No thanks.
Matthew Le God Posted 3 May, 2009 Posted 3 May, 2009 Clearly he was playing for the last time to see if he warranted a contract. http://www.saintsfc.co.uk/articles/article.php?page_id=11739 He blew his chance and will be going back to France according to Wotte.
NickG Posted 3 May, 2009 Posted 3 May, 2009 had a funny feeling he might come good for us - not based on anything seen just funny feeling!
eelpie Posted 3 May, 2009 Author Posted 3 May, 2009 I would like to know, who actually was responsible for signing him? Also Pulis? We have a right to know. Not having to pay their wages could have prevented administration.
trousers Posted 3 May, 2009 Posted 3 May, 2009 I would like to know, who actually was responsible for signing him? Also Pulis? Kim van der Waals?
Minsk Posted 3 May, 2009 Posted 3 May, 2009 Kim van der Waals? Most probably, and how much did he pocket for arranging all these failures? Yet another waste of sooo valuable money from one of the world's greatest business men!!!
trousers Posted 3 May, 2009 Posted 3 May, 2009 Most probably, and how much did he pocket for arranging all these failures? Someone posted a 'league table' a few months ago highlighting which CCC clubs had spent most on agency fees over the last 12 months. I believe we were top or 2nd of said table.... Make of that what you will. Van der Waals certianly seemed to leave the club as quietly as he arrived....
Minsk Posted 3 May, 2009 Posted 3 May, 2009 Someone posted a 'league table' a few months ago highlighting which CCC clubs had spent most on agency fees over the last 12 months. I believe we were top or 2nd of said table.... Make of that what you will. Van der Waals certianly seemed to leave the club as quietly as he arrived.... But only after he was 'outed' on here!
eelpie Posted 3 May, 2009 Author Posted 3 May, 2009 So we think Gasmi's signing was a big idea of Van De Waals. But who was responsible for bringing Pulis here?
eelpie Posted 3 May, 2009 Author Posted 3 May, 2009 How do you Van der Watsit actually exists??? There have been a few photographs of him published on this site.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now