Window Cleaner Posted 1 May, 2009 Posted 1 May, 2009 As the title says I see 9 year old Matthew has got it wrong then....it is the players fault. 14K a week for 5 goals from 58 games is unacceptable.We could have got a League 2 striker in at 3K a week and he'd have fluked just as many.Bet Sam Vokes doesn't get 14K a week,yet the money paid to that player stopped us from acquiring lads like Vokes.
popyto Posted 1 May, 2009 Posted 1 May, 2009 Finally some seriuos jounalism about the plight of the club:)
Window Cleaner Posted 1 May, 2009 Posted 1 May, 2009 I really should of checked my spelling And the grammar, whilst you're at it. Should have After all you did mensh
Jonnyboy Posted 1 May, 2009 Posted 1 May, 2009 I see 9 year old Matthew has got it wrong then....it is the players fault. 14K a week for 5 goals from 58 games is unacceptable.We could have got a League 2 striker in at 3K a week and he'd have fluked just as many.Bet Sam Vokes doesn't get 14K a week,yet the money paid to that player stopped us from acquiring lads like Vokes. Who are we talking?
Window Cleaner Posted 1 May, 2009 Posted 1 May, 2009 Who are we talking? Euell of course, although there are others that haven't pulled their weight, or the weight of their salaries anyway. to me, and this is just me, any player taking more than 5K a week from the club this season (and last) has not contributed to the height of his abilities. I blame the players, make no bones about it.
miserableoldgit Posted 1 May, 2009 Author Posted 1 May, 2009 and the grammar, whilst you're at it. Should have after all you did mensh :d:d
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now