um pahars Posted 2 May, 2009 Posted 2 May, 2009 Well if hot air and stupidity could help Saints, he'd make us Champions of Europe... Collect it and pipe it through the undersoil pipes, or collect the bullsht and spread it over the training pitches at Staplewood;)
Daren W Posted 2 May, 2009 Posted 2 May, 2009 Collect it and pipe it through the undersoil pipes, or collect the bullsht and spread it over the training pitches at Staplewood;) Um Old chap, you might just have saved the long term financial stabilty of this club! There'd BS to cover the south coast and enough hot air to take Branson to the moon in one of his balloons.. g e n i u s.....
Nineteen Canteen Posted 2 May, 2009 Posted 2 May, 2009 Have you contributed at all in any way to saving Saints? I haven't contributed to its downfall if that helps.
Nineteen Canteen Posted 2 May, 2009 Posted 2 May, 2009 Um Old chap, you might just have saved the long term financial stabilty of this club! There'd BS to cover the south coast and enough hot air to take Branson to the moon in one of his balloons.. g e n i u s..... Daren shouldn't you be organising band practice?
Daren W Posted 2 May, 2009 Posted 2 May, 2009 Daren shouldn't you be organising band practice? Well at least I'm doing something Numpteen.... Shouldn't you be boring the tits off everyone? Oh sorry... You already are...
Daren W Posted 2 May, 2009 Posted 2 May, 2009 I haven't contributed to its downfall if that helps. That would be a no then.... Gave at the office again eh? Lol
JustMike Posted 2 May, 2009 Posted 2 May, 2009 Lowe should do the right thing for once and stay well away from all things saints.
Nineteen Canteen Posted 2 May, 2009 Posted 2 May, 2009 Lowe should do the right thing for once and stay well away from all things saints. That may be the case and perhaps mirrors Daren's venture as impresario elect? Who knows.
Daren W Posted 2 May, 2009 Posted 2 May, 2009 That may be the case and perhaps mirrors Daren's venture as impresario elect? Who knows. Saints Aid you mean? Well Lee and Nick asked me to help and of course I'd help... I'm doing the programme, no more, no less. Did you have a problem reading that on the Saints Aid web page or are you just re-adjusting the facts for some minor insult again? Whatever Im doing it's more than can be said for "I gave at the office" twots like you who do nothing. You're all **** and wind aren't you? lol Seriously, you having a dig... it's like having my leg humped by a poodle... Jog on, there's a good boy...
Nineteen Canteen Posted 2 May, 2009 Posted 2 May, 2009 Saints Aid you mean? Well Lee and Nick asked me to help and of course I'd help... I'm doing the programme, no more, no less. Did you have a problem reading that on the Saints Aid web page or are you just re-adjusting the facts for some minor insult again? Whatever Im doing it's more than can be said for "I gave at the office" twots like you who do nothing. You're all **** and wind aren't you? lol Seriously, you having a dig... it's like having my leg humped by a poodle... Jog on, there's a good boy... Sorry for the misunderstanding I didn't realise it was being so professionally organised. Will the programme be ghost written or do you have a different off-forum style? Leg humped by a poodle? Unusual analogy, does it happen to you often, dogs being aroused in your presence? Or is poodle a metaphor for something else that likes to worship at your altar?
OldNick Posted 2 May, 2009 Posted 2 May, 2009 Sorry for the misunderstanding I didn't realise it was being so professionally organised. Will the programme be ghost written or do you have a different off-forum style? Leg humped by a poodle? Unusual analogy, does it happen to you often, dogs being aroused in your presence? Or is poodle a metaphor for something else that likes to worship at your altar? NC you dont help yourselves at times. You put over some very good points but then go on crusades against other respected posters on here. Keep to putting over you valid points and try and keep away from the conflict.
Daren W Posted 2 May, 2009 Posted 2 May, 2009 Sorry for the misunderstanding I didn't realise it was being so professionally organised. Will the programme be ghost written or do you have a different off-forum style? Leg humped by a poodle? Unusual analogy, does it happen to you often, dogs being aroused in your presence? Or is poodle a metaphor for something else that likes to worship at your altar? It's not being professionally done... it's being done by me... Or what that what you were implying????? lol So what are you dong for the club? Giving at the office still? lolol Oh, and the poodle metaphor? You want me to explain it? 1) Poodle... Slightly effeminate dog 2) Humping ones leg. I can just imagine those little doggy legs working frantically as they're humping away. Just as I can imagine your little fingering tap tapping away frantically as you google and cut and paste your latest bonne note.. Seriously you need to work on the insults because you're just so unremittingly dull... Must try harder Numpteen.... lol
Daren W Posted 2 May, 2009 Posted 2 May, 2009 Ignore the idiot Darren, he's not work it. ssshh.... He's giving me a virtual thrashing... lol I do think I should tell him I have no intention of being his "fag" lol
Nineteen Canteen Posted 2 May, 2009 Posted 2 May, 2009 NC you dont help yourselves at times. You put over some very good points but then go on crusades against other respected posters on here. Keep to putting over you valid points and try and keep away from the conflict. Nick I refer you to post 403 and Daren's first and as usual unsolicted abusive response to one of my posts followed by the rest of the usual suspects. Daren and Um may have once been respected posters but have damaged their own reputations by their persistent and peevish crusades against me and I can only conclude it's because they can't argue against some of the points I raise. Nick as I have discussed with you recently i am not here to curry favour with the alledged masses but merely to ask questions and encourage comment and so with respect I will not keep away from conflict when the flak starts to fly in my direction. Although, I can appreciate how tiresome it is to read posts that are nothing more than me having to trade or respond to insults with these two 'charcaters'. In fact I gave up with Um a while ago not least because of his persistent lies about pm's. I can barely remember sending him 1 maybe 2 and yet he would have you believe I am sending him abusive pms all the time! I think he is secretly proud of the attention although I am more than a little hurt he has deleted it. The man clearly has a problem and so does Daren and neither should dish it out as they have done and not expect a little friendly comment in return. Daren is partcularly easy to wind in and more sensitive than many actresses. At least in Um's defence he does have some useful facts and if you need anything in the historical knowledge department just challenge his thinking and he'll trot off and find the info without you having to do the work. A nice compliant accountant type.
John B Posted 2 May, 2009 Posted 2 May, 2009 NC you dont help yourselves at times. You put over some very good points but then go on crusades against other respected posters on here. Keep to putting over you valid points and try and keep away from the conflict. Yes I stupidly said he made some sensible points which he does but now his tone has changed completely
Weston Saint Posted 2 May, 2009 Posted 2 May, 2009 I have not posted much recently being too busy, hence my delay in responding to comments.. I have never said I defend Nineteen Canteen. I have defended his right to post. I have commented when posters just rubbish him without answering the points or just being downright stupid. He has told you we disagree on many points. I will also defend Andrew Cowen's reputation when someone comes on here and says it is a FACT that 19C is Andrew Cowen. AC does not post on this site. Neither has Lowe ever posted (although it seems he got his fingers burned once for employing someone who did the pr posting for him). Leon Crouch has never posted. Dave Jones is alleged to have posted for a short while some time back. We all know about Michael Wilde's postings. Lee Hoos read the forum regularly during his period as COE and made one or two posts with general opinions on Football but nothing controvercial. We might get some good news soon (runs away and hides before the flack comes)
Daren W Posted 2 May, 2009 Posted 2 May, 2009 Nick I refer you to post 403 and Daren's first and as usual unsolicted abusive response to one of my posts followed by the rest of the usual suspects. Daren and Um may have once been respected posters but have damaged their own reputations by their persistent and peevish crusades against me and I can only conclude it's because they can't argue against some of the points I raise. Nick as I have discussed with you recently i am not here to curry favour with the alledged masses but merely to ask questions and encourage comment and so with respect I will not keep away from conflict when the flak starts to fly in my direction. Although, I can appreciate how tiresome it is to read posts that are nothing more than me having to trade or respond to insults with these two 'charcaters'. In fact I gave up with Um a while ago not least because of his persistent lies about pm's. I can barely remember sending him 1 maybe 2 and yet he would have you believe I am sending him abusive pms all the time! I think he is secretly proud of the attention although I am more than a little hurt he has deleted it. The man clearly has a problem and so does Daren and neither should dish it out as they have done and not expect a little friendly comment in return. Daren is partcularly easy to wind in and more sensitive than many actresses. At least in Um's defence he does have some useful facts and if you need anything in the historical knowledge department just challenge his thinking and he'll trot off and find the info without you having to do the work. A nice compliant accountant type. Unsolicted abuse? lol Get her... Points? What points? You hammer home your ridiculous pro Lowe agenda, get shot down more any other poster I know, run, hide and then pop back on another thread with the same tired agenda driven drivel. You really do seem to have delusions of adequacy, as you obviously seem to think you're mine and Um's arch nemesis which is quite frankly hilarious as you've had your arse kicked all over this messageboard without reply. I notice you still haven't answered eelpie's question when he asked you what you've done for the club recently which tells us all we need to know... You've done nothing... I think, that as you've obviously challenged Um's version of this PM saga and called him a liar, I take that as an open invite for Um to publish them... don't you? lol As for the "friendly comments" tag, I'll remember that when I cut and paste that cowardly dig you made at me on Essru's messageboard... As for Um being the compliant accoutant type.... Obviously no mirrors in your house you dullard. Now **** off you screaming, overly verbose, unremittingly dull, drama queen...
Mole Posted 2 May, 2009 Posted 2 May, 2009 Unsolicted abuse? lol Get her... Points? What points? You hammer home your ridiculous pro Lowe agenda, get shot down more any other poster I know, run, hide and then pop back on another thread with the same tired agenda driven drivel. You really do seem to have delusions of adequacy, as you obviously seem to think you're mine and Um's arch nemesis which is quite frankly hilarious as you've had your arse kicked all over this messageboard without reply. I notice you still haven't answered eelpie's question when he asked you what you've done for the club recently which tells us all we need to know... You've done nothing... I think, that as you've obviously challenged Um's version of this PM saga and called him a liar, I take that as an open invite for Um to publish them... don't you? lol As for the "friendly comments" tag, I'll remember that when I cut and paste that cowardly dig you made at me on Essru's messageboard... As for Um being the compliant accoutant type.... Obviously no mirrors in your house you dullard. Now **** off you screaming, overly verbose, unremittingly dull, drama queen... I agree with your sentiments, but ultimately it's just feed for the troll.
Daren W Posted 2 May, 2009 Posted 2 May, 2009 (edited) I agree with your sentiments, but ultimately it's just feed for the troll. Agreed. Troll duly blocked. Ooh... I feel warm and fuzzy now.... Edit: That's no bloody use, I've blocked the pillock and it says: "This message is hidden because Nineteen Canteen is on your ignore list." What use is that? I just know I'll be tempted to see what he's posted! Can he not just vanish from sight??? Edited 2 May, 2009 by Daren W
Nineteen Canteen Posted 2 May, 2009 Posted 2 May, 2009 Unsolicted abuse? lol Get her... Points? What points? You hammer home your ridiculous pro Lowe agenda, get shot down more any other poster I know, run, hide and then pop back on another thread with the same tired agenda driven drivel. You really do seem to have delusions of adequacy, as you obviously seem to think you're mine and Um's arch nemesis which is quite frankly hilarious as you've had your arse kicked all over this messageboard without reply. I notice you still haven't answered eelpie's question when he asked you what you've done for the club recently which tells us all we need to know... You've done nothing... I think, that as you've obviously challenged Um's version of this PM saga and called him a liar, I take that as an open invite for Um to publish them... don't you? lol As for the "friendly comments" tag, I'll remember that when I cut and paste that cowardly dig you made at me on Essru's messageboard... As for Um being the compliant accoutant type.... Obviously no mirrors in your house you dullard. Now **** off you screaming, overly verbose, unremittingly dull, drama queen...[/QUOTE] Remind you off anyone? What if I add in predictable and repetitive? BTW I answered Eelpie's comments on another thread.
SP Saint Posted 2 May, 2009 Posted 2 May, 2009 Nick I refer you to post 403 and Daren's first and as usual unsolicted abusive response to one of my posts followed by the rest of the usual suspects. Daren and Um may have once been respected posters but have damaged their own reputations by their persistent and peevish crusades against me and I can only conclude it's because they can't argue against some of the points I raise. Nick as I have discussed with you recently i am not here to curry favour with the alledged masses but merely to ask questions and encourage comment and so with respect I will not keep away from conflict when the flak starts to fly in my direction. Although, I can appreciate how tiresome it is to read posts that are nothing more than me having to trade or respond to insults with these two 'charcaters'. In fact I gave up with Um a while ago not least because of his persistent lies about pm's. I can barely remember sending him 1 maybe 2 and yet he would have you believe I am sending him abusive pms all the time! I think he is secretly proud of the attention although I am more than a little hurt he has deleted it. The man clearly has a problem and so does Daren and neither should dish it out as they have done and not expect a little friendly comment in return. Daren is partcularly easy to wind in and more sensitive than many actresses. At least in Um's defence he does have some useful facts and if you need anything in the historical knowledge department just challenge his thinking and he'll trot off and find the info without you having to do the work. A nice compliant accountant type. I think you're the one with the problem old boy and it's not just your ill-educated spelling.
Nineteen Canteen Posted 2 May, 2009 Posted 2 May, 2009 I think you're the one with the problem old boy and it's not just your ill-educated spelling. When it comes down to pointing out speling erors then the barrel is being well and truly scraped. I think better than I can type therefore I am. Try and comment on the views I am trying to express in my post old boy and don't be so haughty unless you start signing off with a 'see me' in red ink.
pilsburydoughboy Posted 2 May, 2009 Posted 2 May, 2009 I always thought of N/C or Rupes to his chums more like Gollum.
OldNick Posted 2 May, 2009 Posted 2 May, 2009 Nick I refer you to post 403 and Daren's first and as usual unsolicted abusive response to one of my posts followed by the rest of the usual suspects. Daren and Um may have once been respected posters but have damaged their own reputations by their persistent and peevish crusades against me and I can only conclude it's because they can't argue against some of the points I raise. Nick as I have discussed with you recently i am not here to curry favour with the alledged masses but merely to ask questions and encourage comment and so with respect I will not keep away from conflict when the flak starts to fly in my direction. Although, I can appreciate how tiresome it is to read posts that are nothing more than me having to trade or respond to insults with these two 'charcaters'. In fact I gave up with Um a while ago not least because of his persistent lies about pm's. I can barely remember sending him 1 maybe 2 and yet he would have you believe I am sending him abusive pms all the time! I think he is secretly proud of the attention although I am more than a little hurt he has deleted it. The man clearly has a problem and so does Daren and neither should dish it out as they have done and not expect a little friendly comment in return. Daren is partcularly easy to wind in and more sensitive than many actresses. At least in Um's defence he does have some useful facts and if you need anything in the historical knowledge department just challenge his thinking and he'll trot off and find the info without you having to do the work. A nice compliant accountant type.NC, I think you will find that you had previous history woth DW when you used to try and discredit his articles as well as Duncan. Coming back as NC gave you an opportunity to start with a clean slate and use your valid points to win debates.I find it difficult to join in and add some support to SOME of your views as it will end up as a slanging match and I lose some credibility with these people I like even though they are poles apart. Gingeletiss seems to jump on any idea i put and tries to take the other side, but I dont dislike him and try not to be overly abusive. He is a good adversary and like um and most of the others on here I amsure would get on really well with in the real world. Get back on level and remember that you may not have been an angel from teh beginning i know that from our many crossing of swords a year or so ago.
View From The Top Posted 2 May, 2009 Posted 2 May, 2009 My previous comments regarding the NC are as valid today as when I wrote. them. We can but hope.
Fan The Flames Posted 2 May, 2009 Posted 2 May, 2009 Yes I stupidly said he made some sensible points which he does but now his tone has changed completely Thats because the profile is shared by a bunch of numpties, they are a real tag team of w*****s.
Gingeletiss Posted 2 May, 2009 Posted 2 May, 2009 NC, I think you will find that you had previous history woth DW when you used to try and discredit his articles as well as Duncan. Coming back as NC gave you an opportunity to start with a clean slate and use your valid points to win debates.I find it difficult to join in and add some support to SOME of your views as it will end up as a slanging match and I lose some credibility with these people I like even though they are poles apart. Gingeletiss seems to jump on any idea i put and tries to take the other side, but I dont dislike him and try not to be overly abusive. He is a good adversary and like um and most of the others on here I amsure would get on really well with in the real world. Get back on level and remember that you may not have been an angel from teh beginning i know that from our many crossing of swords a year or so ago. A ittle reminder nick, of what you said earlier:- can you read and digest what I have said? or you thicker than Mr Thick on a dim day. Whatever my thoughts on LM !!!!!! but I dont dislike him and try not to be overly abusive. The thing is nick I don't dislike you, I'm just perplexed as to why you defend Stupert so much, yet like NinteentheBeastattheChargecanteen, you run down all the people who matter at Saints. You have pegged Lawrie Mac, Mary, you had a go at Pearson. I'm just trying to understand the fan in you, as being a 'stayaway fan', my views don't really count!!!...do they??
SP Saint Posted 2 May, 2009 Posted 2 May, 2009 When it comes down to pointing out speling erors then the barrel is being well and truly scraped. I think better than I can type therefore I am. Try and comment on the views I am trying to express in my post old boy and don't be so haughty unless you start signing off with a 'see me' in red ink. The reason I'm not commenting on your 'views' if you can call them that, is because I don't want to feed the troll. Just showing you're not quite the clever chap you make yourself out to be. Oh and that's spelling (double 'l') and error (double 'r') Why don't you see if the chaps in one of the bedsits downstairs has a dictionary you can borrow? Oh and just to keep you happy: Please don't see me.
Alain Perrin Posted 2 May, 2009 Posted 2 May, 2009 (edited) The brilliance is I can post this as many times as I want without it getting as repetitive as the arguments you're having. Lowe has gone. Get over it. Look forward. If he comes back, post away, but there is no real hint of that. The only evidence is that he knows some bloke from the channel islands... woo hoo! So does Matt Le Tiss - is he in cahoots with Lowe too? Or,fact fans, here's a conspiracy for you. Lowe went to Radley. Do you know which other bidder also is a Radley old boy? Fill your boots. No amount of argument will change the blinkered arguments, or change the past. Until people realise we are a football club, not a ****ing contest, we'll keep sinking. Edited 2 May, 2009 by Alain Perrin Stanley's picture is better (I retain creative inspiration though :) ).
chrisobee Posted 2 May, 2009 Posted 2 May, 2009 You know I'm not going to post anything about this topic which may mean something or nothing, does anyone really know? What is amazing is that it's run already to 9 pages, what's sad is the in fighting that continues relentlessly on this board and the reason I have only just paid my fiver to enable me to post as often as I like but on the General Sports and particularly Cricket where in several years on S4E/TSF I cannot recall any of this nonsense. I think it would be really useful if certain people learnt to respect others, not make sarcastic comments and resort to abuse. I have just one word for that, PATHETIC!
Nineteen Canteen Posted 2 May, 2009 Posted 2 May, 2009 The reason I'm not commenting on your 'views' if you can call them that, is because I don't want to feed the troll. Just showing you're not quite the clever chap you make yourself out to be. Oh and that's spelling (double 'l') and error (double 'r') Why don't you see if the chaps in one of the bedsits downstairs has a dictionary you can borrow? Oh and just to keep you happy: Please don't see me. Just the one r in irony though.
Verbal Posted 2 May, 2009 Posted 2 May, 2009 Just the one r in irony though. Since you bring it up, it would be a little bit less like fingernails on a chalkboard if you'd stop repeating Sundance's habit of spelling 'allegedly' with too many 'd's. Thanks ever so politely much.
um pahars Posted 3 May, 2009 Posted 3 May, 2009 In fact I gave up with Um a while ago not least because of his persistent lies about pm's. I can barely remember sending him 1 maybe 2 and yet he would have you believe I am sending him abusive pms all the time! I think he is secretly proud of the attention although I am more than a little hurt he has deleted it. You've never sent me a PM!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Although someone called SundanceBeast set me many LMFAO:D;) Do you think it would be naughty to share them with others up here??? What's Fashanu up to nowadays and what do you make of Portsmuff winning the Cup???
Nineteen Canteen Posted 3 May, 2009 Posted 3 May, 2009 You've never sent me a PM!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Although someone called SundanceBeast set me many LMFAO:D;) Do you think it would be naughty to share them with others up here??? What's Fashanu up to nowadays and what do you make of Portsmuff winning the Cup??? Um thanks for confirming this, I thought I may have sent you one over block 10 gate to try and discuss or apologise but it must have been between SG and myself when I was being warned over the whole issue. I did offer my apologies through SG and offered to make them direct but didn't get a response. To be honest though I have never quite understood how I got that wrong but have kept an open mind because of your initial posts, long before my infraction, detailing what happened and location and same row and those around me at the time telling someone called Steve to sit down, as if they knew of him but not as an acquaintance or friend. Despite Exit2's confirmation that you were in block 4 nothing would surprise me but for the time being I consider we were both a victim of a strange coincidence and mistaken identity and I should never have read your posts. Would like to meet you one day just so I can get rid of my nagging doubts if nothing else. Copying and pasting pm's onto a public forum? I'm surprised a man of your integrity even asks the question and I don't suppose Sundance would be to impressed either. Trouble is Um you have a track record of cutting and pasting public posts to take comments out of their original context to suit your own agenda or in attempt to belittle or rubbish a poster who has made some well founded and reasonable comments that you don't like or can't debate and so go out to discredit their integrity or balance IMO. So pasting pms whoever wrote them probably not a good idea. How many pm's did Sundance send you as you give the impression he was quite prolific?
Tamesaint Posted 3 May, 2009 Posted 3 May, 2009 (edited) Um thanks for confirming this, I thought I may have sent you one over block 10 gate to try and discuss or apologise but it must have been between SG and myself when I was being warned over the whole issue. I did offer my apologies through SG and offered to make them direct but didn't get a response. To be honest though I have never quite understood how I got that wrong but have kept an open mind because of your initial posts, long before my infraction, detailing what happened and location and same row and those around me at the time telling someone called Steve to sit down, as if they knew of him but not as an acquaintance or friend. Despite Exit2's confirmation that you were in block 4 nothing would surprise me but for the time being I consider we were both a victim of a strange coincidence and mistaken identity and I should never have read your posts. Would like to meet you one day just so I can get rid of my nagging doubts if nothing else. Copying and pasting pm's onto a public forum? I'm surprised a man of your integrity even asks the question and I don't suppose Sundance would be to impressed either. Trouble is Um you have a track record of cutting and pasting public posts to take comments out of their original context to suit your own agenda or in attempt to belittle or rubbish a poster who has made some well founded and reasonable comments that you don't like or can't debate and so go out to discredit their integrity or balance IMO. So pasting pms whoever wrote them probably not a good idea. How many pm's did Sundance send you as you give the impression he was quite prolific? What a silly, silly man. And he has nothing better to do at 1.48 on a Saturday night than write this tosh!!! Edited 3 May, 2009 by Tamesaint
SFC Forever Posted 3 May, 2009 Posted 3 May, 2009 And all this on a thread about whether we will see Lowe at forest or not.
Fan The Flames Posted 3 May, 2009 Posted 3 May, 2009 Lowe has gone. Get over it. Look forward. No amount of argument will change the blinkered arguments, or change the past. Until people realise we are a football club, not a ****ing contest, we'll keep sinking. Yeah because the fall of our club is just due to fans infighting, rollyeye thingy. People are rightly angry that the **** might be swanning around at Forest. It means he is interferring, getting involved again or just making a nuisance of himself. Either way its not wanted, the majority of sane people just want him to **** off and not come back.
Ajv2809 Posted 3 May, 2009 Posted 3 May, 2009 Am tempted to go now, just so I can wait outside after and lay one on that c*nt! Will give you fifty quid if you do!
SP Saint Posted 3 May, 2009 Posted 3 May, 2009 You've never sent me a PM!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Although someone called SundanceBeast set me many LMFAO:D;) Do you think it would be naughty to share them with others up here??? Copying and pasting pm's onto a public forum? I'm surprised a man of your integrity even asks the question and I don't suppose Sundance would be to impressed either. Trouble is Um you have a track record of cutting and pasting public posts to take comments out of their original context to suit your own agenda or in attempt to belittle or rubbish a poster who has made some well founded and reasonable comments that you don't like or can't debate and so go out to discredit their integrity or balance IMO. So pasting pms whoever wrote them probably not a good idea. How many pm's did Sundance send you as you give the impression he was quite prolific? What a silly, silly man. And he has nothing better to do at 1.48 on a Saturday night than right this tosh!!! The poor chap is sitting up all alone in his attic bed-sit trying to be ironic. I feel sorry for him too. I wonder what made switch from being confrontational to nice to Um Pahars in the space of a single post? :confused: I notice he refers to Sundance in the third person so they can't be one and the same. As Sundance is totally anonymous and not posting on here anymore, I can't see any reason why Um Pahars shouldn't post his old PM's on here. If Sundance was a known person or a current poster it would of course be a different matter. [-X Go for it Steve. Let's all have a larff!!! :smt117:smt117:smt117
Daren W Posted 3 May, 2009 Posted 3 May, 2009 Yeah because the fall of our club is just due to fans infighting, rollyeye thingy. People are rightly angry that the **** might be swanning around at Forest. It means he is interferring, getting involved again or just making a nuisance of himself. Either way its not wanted, the majority of sane people just want him to **** off and not come back. True. I think most people are furious not only that he's there, effectively sticking two fingers up at the fans but also that he's blagged a freebie. I think people are generally quite forgiving and will let things go but not when it's being thrown up in their face and let's be honest when people are preaching to the fans to move on, wouldn't it be wise to mention that to Lowe himself? I'm sure all of us would like to move on and forget the man ever existed but it's damn hard when he's doing his level best to keep reminding us.
OldNick Posted 3 May, 2009 Posted 3 May, 2009 A ittle reminder nick, of what you said earlier:- can you read and digest what I have said? or you thicker than Mr Thick on a dim day. Whatever my thoughts on LM !!!!!! but I dont dislike him and try not to be overly abusive. The thing is nick I don't dislike you, I'm just perplexed as to why you defend Stupert so much, yet like NinteentheBeastattheChargecanteen, you run down all the people who matter at Saints. You have pegged Lawrie Mac, Mary, you had a go at Pearson. I'm just trying to understand the fan in you, as being a 'stayaway fan', my views don't really count!!!...do they??Overly abusive after you had questioned my thread that everyone else understood where I was coming from.I think it was a fair assessment of that moment. I criticise the fact thaat some are allowed to get away with anything and others are crioticised for everything. LM paid nothign for his sharea aka RL and sold trhem as soon as he was able under the agreement. RL gets accused of taking money fromn the club. It is balance. NP is said to be a fantastic manager 3 wins in 17 Wotte 4 in 17 with ;lesser players. i believe in fairness. Dont confuse it with total support.MC put her weight behind MW which probably was the worst decisiono f the lot, is she above criticisn for that as her father did good things (forget not he was on the board that allowed LM to leave as we didnt stump up enough cash to keep him as has been put on here) You cannot have it all ways. Accept they alll have done some good but the whole board have been culpable.
Gingeletiss Posted 3 May, 2009 Posted 3 May, 2009 Overly abusive after you had questioned my thread that everyone else understood where I was coming from.I think it was a fair assessment of that moment. I criticise the fact thaat some are allowed to get away with anything and others are crioticised for everything. LM paid nothign for his sharea aka RL and sold trhem as soon as he was able under the agreement. RL gets accused of taking money fromn the club. It is balance. NP is said to be a fantastic manager 3 wins in 17 Wotte 4 in 17 with ;lesser players. i believe in fairness. Dont confuse it with total support.MC put her weight behind MW which probably was the worst decisiono f the lot, is she above criticisn for that as her father did good things (forget not he was on the board that allowed LM to leave as we didnt stump up enough cash to keep him as has been put on here) You cannot have it all ways. Accept they alll have done some good but the whole board have been culpable. Are you rattled nickh...everyone else understood!!!.. um!! I don't think so. Still no answer, as to why you have deemed to put up a thread about extolling the virtues, of a man you don't like. Not that I disagree, I'm just wondering why you...
OldNick Posted 3 May, 2009 Posted 3 May, 2009 Are you rattled nickh...everyone else understood!!!.. um!! I don't think so. Still no answer, as to why you have deemed to put up a thread about extolling the virtues, of a man you don't like. Not that I disagree, I'm just wondering why you...Lol I have just started to have to use reading glasses and haven't found them this morning. Im waiting for you to back up the claim below that was on another thread. Originally Posted by Gingeletiss nick.........call it as it as it is........McMoney, I think that's what you call him. TNT has called it right, a few other posters on this thread have questioned your reasons. You have readily had a pop at me and TNT, but still haven't explained why you have a wish to immortalize someone you dislike!! Find me calling him that (as I believe I only have ever put LM) and i will apologise if not you come back and do so yourself
um pahars Posted 3 May, 2009 Posted 3 May, 2009 Um thanks for confirming this, I thought I may have sent you one That's the problem when you have multiple identities, get banned and pop up again to carry on your trolling, as it must be difficult to keep up with which one of your personalities said what to whom;) I did offer my apologies through SG and offered to make them direct but didn't get a response. A very manly way of apologising, third hand through someone else LMFAO. Your reputation is enhanced with every post you make up here:rolleyes: I consider we were both a victim of a strange coincidence and mistaken identity and I should never have read your posts. Would like to meet you one day just so I can get rid of my nagging doubts if nothing else. No, I just consider you a bll shtter who had to have numerous posts removed for trying to spread scurrilous stories about others. Quite fetching when you consider in one of your last posts you were commenting on the potentially libellous claims up here when in fact you're at the front of the queue for having yours pulled. How many pm's did Sundance send you as you give the impression he was quite prolific? So talking about Sundance in the third person now means we're all thrown off the scent of you and your multiple trolling personalities LOL:D You've fooled us there:smt117
Daren W Posted 3 May, 2009 Posted 3 May, 2009 (edited) That's the problem when you have multiple identities, get banned and pop up again to carry on your trolling, as it must be difficult to keep up with which one of your personalities said what to whom;) A very manly way of apologising, third hand through someone else LMFAO. Your reputation is enhanced with every post you make up here:rolleyes: No, I just consider you a bll shtter who had to have numerous posts removed for trying to spread scurrilous stories about others. Quite fetching when you consider in one of your last posts you were commenting on the potentially libellous claims up here when in fact you're at the front of the queue for having yours pulled. So talking about Sundance in the third person now means we're all thrown off the scent of you and your multiple trolling personalities LOL:D You've fooled us there:smt117 Um, I'm sorry to turn on you but you're on thin ice here with me... Especially when I hear, from an impeachable source, that you've been offering out old ladies and children in block 10 You've lost all sorts of credibilty with me if that's true... Edited 3 May, 2009 by Daren W
Nineteen Canteen Posted 3 May, 2009 Posted 3 May, 2009 That's the problem when you have multiple identities, get banned and pop up again to carry on your trolling, as it must be difficult to keep up with which one of your personalities said what to whom;) A very manly way of apologising, third hand through someone else LMFAO. Your reputation is enhanced with every post you make up here:rolleyes: No, I just consider you a bll shtter who had to have numerous posts removed for trying to spread scurrilous stories about others. Quite fetching when you consider in one of your last posts you were commenting on the potentially libellous claims up here when in fact you're at the front of the queue for having yours pulled. So talking about Sundance in the third person now means we're all thrown off the scent of you and your multiple trolling personalities LOL:D You've fooled us there:smt117 ] Careful Um, it was one sentence edited from one post. You might get yourself a reputation for distorting reality to make you look better than you are. At least I know I didn't send you a pm but if I had you would be part of a very select and knowledgeable group from which I have learned a lot. (The majority of that small group disagree with my views) There are some very good people on this forum and I consider myself lucky to be afforded the occassional opportunity of discussing with them some issues off the record. Its just a handful mind and you'd be surprised who I listen to and can be influenced by but it is from the whole spectrum. Those who overdose on smileys and cartoons to try and emphasise a point need not apply. Its all about perception mate and it maybe time for you to manage how you are perceived.
Recommended Posts