Smalls Posted 26 April, 2009 Posted 26 April, 2009 I 100% believe if Nigel Pearson had been allowed to carry on we would not have been relegated. This is what annoys me the most, you have Rupurt Lowe mouthing of about the finances were fine when he was in charge its the bloody choices he made about everything else that has put the final nail in our coffin.
JustMike Posted 26 April, 2009 Posted 26 April, 2009 Oh not again agreed, there is no need for another thread on this :mad:
saintmatt Posted 26 April, 2009 Posted 26 April, 2009 the big question is would pearson have wanted to stay knowing he had no money to spend,and the club was on far from stable ground?what annoys me most is that we (allegedly) got rid of pearson to go for a cheaper manager, and then splashed over a million on schneiderlin and his wages!if we'd invested that money in the management,we might be sitting in the dizzy heights of championship mid-table by now
ulstersaint Posted 26 April, 2009 Posted 26 April, 2009 I agree with the opinion regarding Pearson and think we would have done better under him this season. But just a thought: if you were Pearson would you rather work for Lowe-life or Madric? No brainer, really.
docker-p Posted 26 April, 2009 Posted 26 April, 2009 I 100% believe if Nigel Pearson had been allowed to carry on we would not have been relegated. This is what annoys me the most, you have Rupurt Lowe mouthing of about the finances were fine when he was in charge its the bloody choices he made about everything else that has put the final nail in our coffin. Couldn't agree with you more Smalls. Just another balls up by Lowe to add to the list of his failings and incompetencies. Lowe must never be allowed to return to SMS in any capacity
Andoverian Posted 26 April, 2009 Posted 26 April, 2009 I 100% believe if Nigel Pearson had been allowed to carry on we would not have been relegated. This is what annoys me the most, you have Rupurt Lowe mouthing of about the finances were fine when he was in charge its the bloody choices he made about everything else that has put the final nail in our coffin. Quite right and in my opinion you cant say it too often. I'm fed up with the " oh no not again brigade". We should never ever forget the damage Rupert Lowe did to this great club
OldNick Posted 26 April, 2009 Posted 26 April, 2009 Quite right and in my opinion you cant say it too often. I'm fed up with the " oh no not again brigade". We should never ever forget the damage Rupert Lowe did to this great cluband LC and Lm and Askham and Wiseman and Corbett and Wilde and the players and managers and the fans and and and , do we have to go over and over all the divisive arguements forever?
docker-p Posted 26 April, 2009 Posted 26 April, 2009 and LC and Lm and Askham and Wiseman and Corbett and Wilde and the players and managers and the fans and and and , do we have to go over and over all the divisive arguements forever? Not sure what LM has done to be on your list, or Mary Corbett. Please explain
OldNick Posted 26 April, 2009 Posted 26 April, 2009 Not sure what LM has done to be on your list, or Mary Corbett. Please explain They all have been part of the decision making processes in the clubs recent history including the reverse takeover. I dont see anyone who can hold their hands up saying they did us proud. I dont wish for these constant divisive debates to keep going, but if some wish to bring it up time and again I will answer. I thought we were trying to move on, but if we want to carry on with the same polarised arguements then so be it. I DONT WANT RL OR ANY OF THE OTHERS EVER TO BE INVOLVED AGAIN, sorry for shouting Docker
Smalls Posted 26 April, 2009 Author Posted 26 April, 2009 and LC and Lm and Askham and Wiseman and Corbett and Wilde and the players and managers and the fans and and and , do we have to go over and over all the divisive arguements forever? Yes we do mate ! that's what these forums are for friendly debate. People need to know just how many horrendous judgement calls big RL has made
Dalek2003 Posted 26 April, 2009 Posted 26 April, 2009 Pearson v JP Hoddle v PS Same story, differnt league. Only difference, RL made the JP decision, fans (vocal minority) made the PS decision.
Whitey Grandad Posted 26 April, 2009 Posted 26 April, 2009 Pearson v JP Hoddle v PS Same story, differnt league. Only difference, RL made the JP decision, fans (vocal minority) made the PS decision. Every football club must have the support of the fans to succeed. That much, at least, should be apparent after this season.
Nineteen Canteen Posted 26 April, 2009 Posted 26 April, 2009 I 100% believe if Nigel Pearson had been allowed to carry on we would not have been relegated. This is what annoys me the most, you have Rupurt Lowe mouthing of about the finances were fine when he was in charge its the bloody choices he made about everything else that has put the final nail in our coffin. There is no certainty in life but you 100% believe? With Global Warming you can't even believe 100% the tide will come in tomorrow and not take out Sandbanks. Based on the evidence of Pearson's time at the club you could not have been 100% certain about anything with regard to his managerial ability. Or do you believe with 100% certainty and the benefit of 20:20 hindsight as no doubt even Lowe could have made some great managerial appointments and then be able to wind the clock back a season. All those penalities we missed would Pearson have taken them himself? There are no certainties in life but believe 100% that at the end of last season no one could have had 100% belief in Pearson's ability based on those 13/14 games.
WestSaint Posted 26 April, 2009 Posted 26 April, 2009 There is no certainty in life but you 100% believe? With Global Warming you can't even believe 100% the tide will come in tomorrow and not take out Sandbanks. Based on the evidence of Pearson's time at the club you could not have been 100% certain about anything with regard to his managerial ability. Or do you believe with 100% certainty and the benefit of 20:20 hindsight as no doubt even Lowe could have made some great managerial appointments and then be able to wind the clock back a season. All those penalities we missed would Pearson have taken them himself? There are no certainties in life but believe 100% that at the end of last season no one could have had 100% belief in Pearson's ability based on those 13/14 games. He was a better bet than a punt on two cheap unknown dutchmen
70's Mike Posted 26 April, 2009 Posted 26 April, 2009 i wanted rupert out with a vengence but even i believe dragging up the posts for the 100th time is pointless lets face it if Jim Steele had not let the ball slip under his foot in 77 we may have won the European Cup Winners Cup
Nineteen Canteen Posted 26 April, 2009 Posted 26 April, 2009 i wanted rupert out with a vengence but even i believe dragging up the posts for the 100th time is pointless lets face it if Jim Steele had not let the ball slip under his foot in 77 we may have won the European Cup Winners Cup Do you believe that 100% as there are no certainties in life apparently, apart from Nigel Pearson's managerial capability. Can't comment on Jim Steele as I think I had to be in bed by 7.30pm after getting to grips with my Silver Reading book 4. Funny isn't it you spend your formative years reading in bed only to reach your teens and revert to looking at pictures.
Greenridge Posted 26 April, 2009 Posted 26 April, 2009 He was a better bet than a punt on two cheap unknown dutchmen And therein lies the basis of the argument. In fact there can be no argument.
Windmill Arm 2 Posted 26 April, 2009 Posted 26 April, 2009 i 100% believe if nigel pearson had been allowed to carry on we would not have been relegated. This is what annoys me the most, you have rupurt lowe mouthing of about the finances were fine when he was in charge its the bloody choices he made about everything else that has put the final nail in our coffin. minus ten points with or without nigel fukkin pearson!!!!!!!!!! Hth
um pahars Posted 26 April, 2009 Posted 26 April, 2009 minus ten points with or without nigel fukkin pearson!!!!!!!!!! Hth I could counter that woth success on the pitch under Pearson then gates wouldn't have dropped so low and therefore we could well have pulled in enough money to have avoided administration. To record you second home win in February is going to have a massive impact on attendances.
Mowgli Posted 26 April, 2009 Posted 26 April, 2009 I 100% believe if Nigel Pearson had been allowed to carry on we would not have been relegated. This is what annoys me the most, you have Rupurt Lowe mouthing of about the finances were fine when he was in charge its the bloody choices he made about everything else that has put the final nail in our coffin. Good for you. Can we move on now please?
Dark Munster Posted 27 April, 2009 Posted 27 April, 2009 Pearson v JP Hoddle v PS Same story, differnt league. Only difference, RL made the JP decision, fans (vocal minority) made the PS decision. Oi, leave Luggy alone! Sturrock's record with Saints: P 13 W 5 D 2 L 6 (1.31 points per game = 50 points over a 38-game Premiership season). Not bad, a lot better than Wigley, Gray, JP, and Wotte. How about this: Pearson v JP PS v Wigley Same story, different league.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now