Jump to content

Dyer permanently to Swansea, keeps the club going.


Recommended Posts

Posted

SFC Ltd which is under their jurisdiction is NOT in administration. That is why they have called an enquiry.

 

Why have they called an enquiry if it's that clear cut?

Posted
Because they want to dock us 10 points but aren't sure if it is fair to do so.

 

Furthermore, they want to dock us 10 points but know that if they do, and it's not a totally watertight ruling, whoever takes over the club could take legal action against the football league. It all comes down to the smallprint in the rule book IMO and how it can be legally interpreted.

Posted
Furthermore, they want to dock us 10 points but know that if they do, and it's not a totally watertight ruling, whoever takes over the club could take legal action against the football league. It all comes down to the smallprint in the rule book IMO and how it can be legally interpreted.

 

Pretty much. Already three sets of lawyers have disected the league's rule. They have obviously come to the same conclusion and the league already know the answer.

 

Mawhinny is a politician, together with the committee, don't want their paw prints on this, so have handed the job of breaking the news to yet another group of lawyers, who will come to the same inevitable conclusion as the others at great expense.

 

They will then display mock horror and declare that the 'loophole' will be closed.

 

Firstly there is no loophole, the rule would only apply if SFC Ltd was in administration and it's not. In any event it is the FA/league rules which stipulated the public company had to be independent from the football club company.

 

No club can sue the league having agreed to waive that right as a condition of entry to the league, they can only use the appointed tribunals of the league's grievance procedures.

 

SLH Ltd can however sue the pants off the league if they cause them losses by damaging their asset, as they are a public company outside the jurisdiction of the football authorities..

Posted
SLH Ltd can however sue the pants off the league if they cause them losses by damaging their asset, as they are a public company outside the jurisdiction of the football authorities..

 

The league has to err on the side of caution - especially if we get enough points to stay up.

 

Can you imagine the potential damages if they deduct the points and force us down? And how screwed up things would be if part of the legal remedy was reinstatement?

 

It doesn't bear thinking about, and the league has to know it.

Posted
The league has to err on the side of caution - especially if we get enough points to stay up.

 

Can you imagine the potential damages if they deduct the points and force us down? And how screwed up things would be if part of the legal remedy was reinstatement?

 

It doesn't bear thinking about, and the league has to know it.

 

Of course they do Bill, otherwise there would have been a clear statement a week ago reiterating the league rules and when and how they would be applied.

Posted
Thats just it, we are not in administration, it's getting really frustrating pointing out to people who can't be bothered to read the information, or are really too thick to understand the most simple facts.

 

SLH Ltd. the publically quoted owners of the whole shareholding in SFC Ltd (the club) are in administration.

 

SFC Ltd, the club, are not in administration and are still trading. The significance of the club going into administration is the immediate penalty of 10 points deducted after the last match of the season if we are NOT relegated, which would then ensure relegation, OR in the event of being relegated already the 10 point deduction is applied at the start of next season.

 

The league have a massive problem as the company in administration is a public company not in their jurisdiction.

 

SFC Ltd which is under their jurisdiction is NOT in administration. That is why they have called an enquiry.

 

That is why the sale of Dyer contracted with Swansea for about £500,000

should ensure solvency for the forseeable future. Buying time to sort out new ownership of SLH and avoid a 10 point deduction.

 

No new owner given the choice would entertain not selling Dyer, and the football club as a result going into administration.

 

Furthermore he is being sold, short of unforeseen events.

 

Oh I see where you are coming from now! Sorry..understand now. (Although we shouldawait the outcome of Lord Mawhinney's independent review before we can confirm that one.)

 

Lets hope you are right. Mind you be nice to keep Dyer in League 1 if a buyer can come in and tempt him to stay.

Posted

I am hearing all sorts of things now, but I'm damned if I'm going to put any of it on here.

 

.

 

I would rather you did post.

 

it would be nice to have some new information rather than the continual debate about who is responsible for the mess.

Posted
Furthermore, they want to dock us 10 points but know that if they do, and it's not a totally watertight ruling, whoever takes over the club could take legal action against the football league. It all comes down to the smallprint in the rule book IMO and how it can be legally interpreted.

 

It would be very handy if somebody could post the actual Football League regulation in question , all I can find are press summary's which may or may not be accurate . Or is it covered by the Official Secrets Act ?

Posted
**** me. This post (and the responses to it) sums up the quality of idiot that (in the main) populates this board.

 

A benefit game v Leicester to save the club. Hahaha. If anyone considers that remotely plausible you need to be taken out of the gene pool.

 

http://www.saintsfc.co.uk/articles/article.php?page_id=11666

 

Oh my word, it looks like my info was correct doesnt it muppet. The fact is that leon Crouch has personally phoned Nigel Pearson and in principle he has agreed to play. It may not happen if the Dyer rumours turn ut to be true but it is clearly being planned. LEts face it who else is likely to play us Man U? Ha Ha Ha

 

Back to the bottom of the gene pool for you son.

Posted
http://www.saintsfc.co.uk/articles/article.php?page_id=11666

 

Oh my word, it looks like my info was correct doesnt it muppet. The fact is that leon Crouch has personally phoned Nigel Pearson and in principle he has agreed to play. It may not happen if the Dyer rumours turn ut to be true but it is clearly being planned. LEts face it who else is likely to play us Man U? Ha Ha Ha

 

Back to the bottom of the gene pool for you son.

 

Your info correct? Where does it say a benefit game against Leicester on that link? Looks like you are the muppet. Suggest you do your homework next time before posting b0llocks.

Posted
Your info correct? Where does it say a benefit game against Leicester on that link? Looks like you are the muppet. Suggest you do your homework next time before posting b0llocks.

 

I am glad you posted that as I too could see no mention of Leicester and was wondering what the hell the original post was about

Posted
Your info correct? Where does it say a benefit game against Leicester on that link? Looks like you are the muppet. Suggest you do your homework next time before posting b0llocks.

 

So i post that there is to be a benefit game against Leicester with a source alluding to an ex player. Then low and behold t days later an ex saint says they are planning a benefit gaeme. Just need to confirm the team i reckon, whatt do u think gene pool boy

Posted
So i post that there is to be a benefit game against Leicester with a source alluding to an ex player. Then low and behold t days later an ex saint says they are planning a benefit gaeme. Just need to confirm the team i reckon, whatt do u think gene pool boy

 

There has been a meeting, a game was put forward, it's not Leicester. The Dyer transfer fee may put it on ice or postpone it until after the season is over.

Posted
WTF would anyone want to go to a match against Leicester?

 

Am I ******** paying for that.

 

Can't you read? If there is a match and it isn't definite, it's not Leicester.

That information came from someone at the meeting.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...