lamanga Posted 7 April, 2009 Posted 7 April, 2009 Sorry I couldn't hear it (SaintsTV shocking service) But well done all on here who kept us updated.
Arizona Posted 7 April, 2009 Posted 7 April, 2009 I'd probably have taken that given our form against Watford. Surely we have to drop Euell though, or at least put him in midfield.
JustMike Posted 7 April, 2009 Posted 7 April, 2009 sounds like we were lucky to come away with a point, so i'll take that. Keeps us in there.
ALWAYS_SFC Posted 7 April, 2009 Posted 7 April, 2009 A point is ok but not really enough in our position. Sounds like we need to work on defending set pieces according to radio solent.
forever a red and white Posted 7 April, 2009 Posted 7 April, 2009 sounds as if euell should have scored, that goal may give us a bit of conifdence for fridays game. Believe
niceandfriendly Posted 7 April, 2009 Posted 7 April, 2009 1 Point is fecking useless. We are down. you're probably right. but it's a point more than we had with 5 minutes to go. we should have won according to Radio Hampshire though...oh well we'll see.
It's There Posted 7 April, 2009 Posted 7 April, 2009 One point is crucial. Although not ideal, we're only 3 points from safety as both Norwich and Forest are 1 ans 2 ahead respectably. As long as we do better than both in the run in by a win, then we can stay up...slim, but possible- if only we can get a home win soon!!- our away form will get us a few more points!
um pahars Posted 7 April, 2009 Posted 7 April, 2009 Keeps us alive and still not adrift. This point isn't that bad, it's just the Charlton result is the shtter.
ALWAYS_SFC Posted 7 April, 2009 Posted 7 April, 2009 Why didn't Saeijs take the second free kick? Because Surman wanted glory but as with all his free kicks he failed.
Toomer Posted 7 April, 2009 Posted 7 April, 2009 Would have been a good point away if we had not lost to Charlton and drawn at home to Derby & QPR.
Yate Saint Posted 7 April, 2009 Posted 7 April, 2009 Shame Euell missed a sitter and then Watford score straight after. Point is not really enough, but it could keep us up. As long as the 10points are not taken, then after tonight we are still in with a shout.
Ponty Posted 7 April, 2009 Author Posted 7 April, 2009 The biggest consolation is that Barnsley have poor form too, plus a sh!tter of a run-in.
um pahars Posted 7 April, 2009 Posted 7 April, 2009 1 Point is fecking useless. We are down. Stay confident fella. As conifdent as I was when I was behind the wheel of a 432 this afternoon:D
Legod Third Coming Posted 7 April, 2009 Posted 7 April, 2009 bugger. I need a titw4nk to cheer me up now.
LVSaint Posted 7 April, 2009 Posted 7 April, 2009 Sorry I couldn't hear it (SaintsTV shocking service) But well done all on here who kept us updated. Yep, thanks all who kept the text going. Point is better than nothing. We will see.
Legod Third Coming Posted 7 April, 2009 Posted 7 April, 2009 stay confident fella. As conifdent as i was when i was behind the wheel of a 432 this afternoon:d fv432?
ALWAYS_SFC Posted 7 April, 2009 Posted 7 April, 2009 Stay confident fella. As conifdent as I was when I was behind the wheel of a 432 this afternoon:D Ignore old Windmill he could make a rollover lottery win seem like a funeral:D
LVSaint Posted 7 April, 2009 Posted 7 April, 2009 Shame Euell missed a sitter and then Watford score straight after. Point is not really enough, but it could keep us up. As long as the 10points are not taken, then after tonight we are still in with a shout. 10 points or not, finishing above the drop zone will at least mean there is no deduction next season.
rocknrollman no2 Posted 7 April, 2009 Posted 7 April, 2009 Although we didnt lose,we need to be getting three points.I doubt one point will make much difference. Why oh why does Euell keep missing easy chances?With his experience he should be putting them away. Oh well Wolves next.
Sheaf Saint Posted 7 April, 2009 Posted 7 April, 2009 A point is ok but not really enough in our position. Sounds like we need to work on defending set pieces according to radio solent. To be fair, we've been needing to do that since the mid 80s! Given that our track record against Watford over the last few years has been shocking, ordinarily I would take that result. But I don't think it will be enough in the long run. We need wins, and to get only a point from two games against lower opposition in the space of 3 days is not enough.
hypochondriac Posted 7 April, 2009 Posted 7 April, 2009 One point is crucial. Although not ideal' date=' we're only 3 points from safety as both Norwich and Forest are 1 ans 2 ahead respectably. As long as we do better than both in the run in by a win, then we can stay up...slim, but possible- if only we can get a home win soon!!- our away form will get us a few more points![/quote'] We only have to do better than Norwich if we can beat forest on the last day.
Charlie2008 Posted 7 April, 2009 Posted 7 April, 2009 (edited) Got it all to do on Friday now. Still Argyle dit it, why shouldn't we? I have every confidence if we can get some strikers striking, after all we have Saeijs scoring now - who's next to step up to the plate? Edited 7 April, 2009 by Charlie2008 Spelling!
dubai_phil Posted 7 April, 2009 Posted 7 April, 2009 That was a good result based on our history v Watford and a real hoot doing the whole Skype thing between UK UAE & Latvia. Next stop the saintsskypeconference call forum
rocknrollman no2 Posted 7 April, 2009 Posted 7 April, 2009 Got it all to do on Friday now. Still Argyle dit it, why shouldn't we? I have every confidence if we can get some strikers striking, after all we have Saijis scoring now - who's next to step up to the plate? Anyone but Surman!!!!
INFLUENCED.COM Posted 7 April, 2009 Posted 7 April, 2009 Its another point that many didn't expect us to get, on the pitch its not over for us
um pahars Posted 7 April, 2009 Posted 7 April, 2009 fv432? Indeed. Piece of pss, don't know what the fuss is all about. Tanking is easy;)
ALWAYS_SFC Posted 7 April, 2009 Posted 7 April, 2009 Indeed. Piece of pss, don't know what the fuss is all about. Tanking is easy;) Tommy tanking?
Um Bongo Posted 7 April, 2009 Posted 7 April, 2009 Just saw the free kick on SSN. QUALITY. MLT style.
saintwarwick Posted 7 April, 2009 Posted 7 April, 2009 sounds like we were lucky to come away with a point, so i'll take that. Keeps us in there. Not from the sky sports reports during the night, seems we had a lot of the play and chances.
bpsaint Posted 7 April, 2009 Posted 7 April, 2009 Would have taken it before the game to be honest, never a great place for us to go so consider the point a bonus. Stunning free kick from Saeijs,can't believe he didnt take the second one!
saint lard Posted 7 April, 2009 Posted 7 April, 2009 Just seen the goals,Davis should've done better with Watfords 1st,terrible marking in the box(or perhaps non exsistant) for their second, Brilliant freekick by JPS.
paris Posted 7 April, 2009 Posted 7 April, 2009 One point is better than none away to Watford it's not bad...
Noodles34 Posted 7 April, 2009 Posted 7 April, 2009 We only have to do better than Norwich if we can beat forest on the last day. er, presuming we stay in touch with Forest until the last day, and that is a big ask!
Wes Tender Posted 7 April, 2009 Posted 7 April, 2009 After we were 2-1 down I'd settle for the point, but really it is probably not going to be enough, as this was our game in hand and would have put us level with Norwich had we won. Having listened to the match on Solent, it seems that although we played much better than on Saturday, we suffered from some rather strange decisions from Wotte. The most incomprehensible according to Merrington being Smith a left footed player out on the right and B-WP a right footed player out on the left. Merrington urged Wotte to at least swap them around from time to time just to try something different, but it didn't happen at all. Weird. Then when it came to the substitutions, Merrington was amazed that B-WP went off and not Smith, who he thought had not earned his corn. He wondered why Wotte did not try Surman on the left and B-WP on the right. Size was stupendous for his goals, especially the free kick, which was of unexpected quality, but which of the two CBs was responsible for allowing Priskin a free header? One of them should have been marking him and if that was Size's responsibility, then it removes some of the gloss of his performance. Again, Size had a handful of somebody's shirt and risked another penalty. Surely he should have learned his lesson from Saturday. There was a bad miss from Euell that could have won it for us had he not bottled it, but equally there was a worse miss from Rose that could have won it for Watford. Davies came under fire for being beaten at his near post, albeit from a narrow angle, but Merrington reckoned that when he watched it again, Davies would be disappointed. However, Davies' season has been immense and so it's unfair to lay much blame at his door. I continue to wonder what the point of Wotton is. Merrington was calling for a poll on whether Wotte should remain next season. If he keeps us up from here, then he will have earned it. But personally I don't think that he's up to it, although better than Poortvliet.
John Boy Saint Posted 7 April, 2009 Posted 7 April, 2009 Anyone but Surman!!!! He has all chuffin season to step up to the plate and has come up short, with the experience that he has v many in the team and the amount of sunshine he has had blown up his backside he should be banging on the door of the captains armband by now. I am very disappointed he did not step aside for a player who had the midas touch tonight by comparison. Well we are still in the mix.
JustMike Posted 7 April, 2009 Posted 7 April, 2009 Not from the sky sports reports during the night, seems we had a lot of the play and chances. second half we were up against it a bit
saintwarwick Posted 7 April, 2009 Posted 7 April, 2009 Stay confident fella. As conifdent as I was when I was behind the wheel of a 432 this afternoon:D Don't start Windmill of, he will be telling us about his Challenger next
Wes Tender Posted 7 April, 2009 Posted 7 April, 2009 bugger. I need a titw4nk to cheer me up now. I didn't think that either your man boobs were that pendulous, or your d*ck so long...
Ludwig Posted 7 April, 2009 Posted 7 April, 2009 F*cking awesome. SIZE! Absolute beast of a free-kick. Davis at fault for their first, really should've saved it. James is what we need in midfield, not scared to tackle, a liability at RB though, got raped by McAnuff. We were quite lucky not to go 3-1 down but a point is far on the balance of play. JPS! F*ck yeah. Euell really needs to learn how to finish. Had a couple of wonderful chances.
saintwarwick Posted 7 April, 2009 Posted 7 April, 2009 second half we were up against it a bit I agree, maybe a game of two halves.
hypochondriac Posted 7 April, 2009 Posted 7 April, 2009 F*cking awesome. SIZE! Absolute beast of a free-kick. Davis at fault for their first, really should've saved it. James is what we need in midfield, not scared to tackle, a liability at RB though, got raped by McAnuff. We were quite lucky not to go 3-1 down but a point is far on the balance of play. JPS! F*ck yeah. Euell really needs to learn how to finish. Had a couple of wonderful chances. I thought you were a hornets fan?
Kaiser Soze Posted 7 April, 2009 Posted 7 April, 2009 We are down, I'm sure of that a million per cent.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now