JustMike Posted 7 April, 2009 Posted 7 April, 2009 still dont get why we havent played rudi IN MIDFIELD
benjii Posted 7 April, 2009 Posted 7 April, 2009 still dont get why we havent played rudi IN MIDFIELD Yeah, I would have no problem with swapping Rudi and Surman around. I do think Rudi is a slightly better left-back though.
labibs Posted 7 April, 2009 Posted 7 April, 2009 Great minds think alike. Quiet day at the office mate? Loving the Chelts photos. It's never busy in the public sector! Pub for Wolves game Friday?
ART Posted 7 April, 2009 Posted 7 April, 2009 At this moment in time I question the allegiances of Paul Wotton, Luggy's one time favorite son. No coincidence the defence has been letting in goals with Wotton in the team. Anyone with solid credentials and loyalties but this guy, especially when Luggy's been calling for Saints to get the points deduction. I feel sick that Watford are escaping relegation and have Rasiak in their midst. Surely, considering our circumstances the administrator could request the FA quash all the loan agreements namely Dyer, Rasiak and John.
benjii Posted 7 April, 2009 Posted 7 April, 2009 At this moment in time I question the allegiances of Paul Wotton, Luggy's one time favorite son. No coincidence the defence has been letting in goals with Wotton in the team. Anyone with solid credentials and loyalties but this guy, especially when Luggy's been calling for Saints to get the points deduction. I feel sick that Watford are escaping relegation and have Rasiak in their midst. Surely, considering our circumstances the administrator could request the FA quash all the loan agreements namely Dyer, Rasiak and John. :rolleyes:
Arizona Posted 7 April, 2009 Posted 7 April, 2009 still dont get why we havent played rudi IN MIDFIELD Me neither, thought I was the only one thinking that. Skacel didn't score all those goals for Hearts playing left back. I'm not saying he'd do it again now,but Christ it has to be worth a try. It astonishes me the number of people who want to stick religiously to awful midfielders like Wotton, Lallana and Schneiderlin, but wont even try Skacel. Yeah, I would have no problem with swapping Rudi and Surman around. I do think Rudi is a slightly better left-back though. But he is also a much better left winger. Surman's best possition is CM IMO. THe trouble is he needs a physical partner to play along side. The only players we've had remotely suitable to the job are Pele and Wotton.
benjii Posted 7 April, 2009 Posted 7 April, 2009 Me neither, thought I was the only one thinking that. Skacel didn't score all those goals for Hearts playing left back. I'm not saying he'd do it again now,but Christ it has to be worth a try. It astonishes me the number of people who want to stick religiously to awful midfielders like Wotton, Lallana and Schneiderlin, but wont even try Skacel. But he is also a much better left winger. Surman's best possition is CM IMO. THe trouble is he needs a physical partner to play along side. The only players we've had remotely suitable to the job are Pele and Wotton. Good arguable points, but if you want to play Surman in CM and Rudi at LM then who plays LB? Mills? Or do we go three at the back and play Skacel centrally? That's a bit of a departure for so late in the season IMO. I can't think a Mills/Skacel left side is a better bet than a Skacel/Surman or a Skacel/Holmes left side at this moment in time.
Arizona Posted 7 April, 2009 Posted 7 April, 2009 Good arguable points, but if you want to play Surman in CM and Rudi at LM then who plays LB? Mills? Or do we go three at the back and play Skacel centrally? That's a bit of a departure for so late in the season IMO. I can't think a Mills/Skacel left side is a better bet than a Skacel/Surman or a Skacel/Holmes left side at this moment in time. I would play Surman at LB. I was just pointing out I think Skacel is a better LM than Surman.
Hopkins Posted 7 April, 2009 Posted 7 April, 2009 Personally would play this KD LJ JPS CP LM MS BWP AS DM MS JE But I fear Rudi will continue to play at the back and quite possibly Wotton will play ahead of Morgan which when you think about it wouldn't be that bad because at least he's a presence which will be vital against Watford.
benjii Posted 7 April, 2009 Posted 7 April, 2009 I would play Surman at LB. I was just pointing out I think Skacel is a better LM than Surman. Oh right. Ok!
Arizona Posted 7 April, 2009 Posted 7 April, 2009 Personally would play this KD LJ JPS CP LM MS BWP AS DM MS JE But I fear Rudi will continue to play at the back and quite possibly Wotton will play ahead of Morgan which when you think about it wouldn't be that bad because at least he's a presence which will be vital against Watford. 2 things I disagree with there. 1. You'd drop Skacel altogether and play Molyneux? I know you hate Skacel, but I think that's taking it a bit far. 2. I hope we never have to win the ball off the oppositiong, because there is nobody in that midfield capable of putting in a tackle, winning a 50-50 or a header.
TJD Posted 7 April, 2009 Posted 7 April, 2009 I would pick: ------------------KD------------------ James---Perry----Saieaiaeijs------Skacel BWP---Schneiderlin----Euell------Surman ----------McG---------Saga------------ I am not sure that Euell is a striker but he will work hard in midfield and mcgoldrick is sh** but he hasscored this season and we need goals.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now