Huffton Posted 1 April, 2009 Posted 1 April, 2009 I'm not sure if I've got this right, but if Lowe does resign tomorrow, or any time in the near future, does he just get away with this scot free? I mean, as far as I remember he didn't exactly pay much for his shares in the first place, his chronic mis-management has cost a lot of people their jobs and livlihoods, not to mention other businesses linked with Saints suffering from our demise. And what does Lowe get? It seems to me like he gets to walk away with nothing, it cost him nothing to get in and it will cost him nothing to walk away leaving the friggin mess he has created. Really doesn't sem fair:(
Ponty Posted 1 April, 2009 Posted 1 April, 2009 He won't get the money he paid for his shares. What else do you expect Huffton? Incompetence is rewarded with loss of job and that's effectively what's happened.
Huffton Posted 1 April, 2009 Author Posted 1 April, 2009 What else do you expect Huffton? Birching Racking Breaking on the wheel Hanging, drawing and quartering All in public of course. In all seriousness though Ponty, did he actually pay anything for his shares in the first place? I honestly can't remember how he came to be in power, apart from it being a bit underhand.
thorpie the sinner Posted 1 April, 2009 Posted 1 April, 2009 If Lowe does leave tomorrow with nothing, ie no shares!! that really is it!!! isn't it????????
Alain Perrin Posted 1 April, 2009 Posted 1 April, 2009 And he had a care home business that he doesn't have anymore.
N/West Saint Posted 1 April, 2009 Posted 1 April, 2009 I wonder if he has done a Freddy and aranged his own pension before he goes
Ponty Posted 1 April, 2009 Posted 1 April, 2009 Birching Racking Breaking on the wheel Hanging, drawing and quartering All in public of course No rotting fruit?
Ponty Posted 1 April, 2009 Posted 1 April, 2009 In all seriousness though Ponty, did he actually pay anything for his shares in the first place? I honestly can't remember how he came to be in power, apart from it being a bit underhand. There were payments made, by Lowe and his father, but the amounts were pretty derisory. I can't help but think he's not really made any money to speak of from his involvement in SFC.
Tamesaint Posted 1 April, 2009 Posted 1 April, 2009 And he had a care home business that he doesn't have anymore. I wonder what it was like in his care homes?? The average age of the staff would have been 19 . There would have been plenty of Swedish nurses and I bet that the catering would have been top notch. I hear that Chris Iwelumo tried to book a place there.
EastleighSoulBoy Posted 1 April, 2009 Posted 1 April, 2009 There were payments made, by Lowe and his father, but the amounts were pretty derisory. I can't help but think he's not really made any money to speak of from his involvement in SFC. Apart from his salary?
Psycrow Posted 1 April, 2009 Posted 1 April, 2009 I'm pretty sure if he is director of a company that effectively goes bankrupt (if that is what happens tomorrow), he will be barred from being a director of any company for the next 5 years... but that will be the extent of any punishment. Now I'm not a high priced lawyer (oooOOOooo), so stand to be corrected here.
Ponty Posted 1 April, 2009 Posted 1 April, 2009 Apart from his salary? Well, he was doing a job for a wage. Isn't that everyone's right?
Psycrow Posted 1 April, 2009 Posted 1 April, 2009 I wonder what it was like in his care homes?? The average age of the staff would have been 19 . There would have been plenty of Swedish nurses and I bet that the catering would have been top notch. I hear that Chris Iwelumo tried to book a place there. mmmmm ... Swedish Nurses....
sticksaint Posted 1 April, 2009 Posted 1 April, 2009 Apart from his salary? And all his dividends etc whilst we were in the premiership
captain sensible Posted 1 April, 2009 Posted 1 April, 2009 i would imagine that he might get another bite of the cherry....after all the administrator can only try to tie up all the debts; ie make offers to the creditors regards debts, all of a sudden some money may appear from any of Lowe, Crouch or Wilde, and the Club would fall into their laps again, I'm no expert....where the hell is Jonah, has he posted tonite? He's the only "qualified" poster who can provide some proper commentry on the goings on that I am aware of.
Tamesaint Posted 1 April, 2009 Posted 1 April, 2009 i would imagine that he might get another bite of the cherry....after all the administrator can only try to tie up all the debts; ie make offers to the creditors regards debts, all of a sudden some money may appear from any of Lowe, Crouch or Wilde, and the Club would fall into their laps again, I'm no expert....where the hell is Jonah, has he posted tonite? He's the only "qualified" poster who can provide some proper commentry on the goings on that I am aware of. Jonah only posts during work time. He should be back on ere tomorrow morning.
SaintRobbie Posted 1 April, 2009 Posted 1 April, 2009 He won't get the money he paid for his shares. What else do you expect Huffton? Incompetence is rewarded with loss of job and that's effectively what's happened. But incompetence should have rewarded him with the same result many years ago Ponty, still... happy days... (I think).
brmbrm Posted 1 April, 2009 Posted 1 April, 2009 Its Lowe's revenge, all this. You have to understand that. Uber-ego, too big to just leave things be. Hopefully this is catharsis at last. COYR
captain sensible Posted 1 April, 2009 Posted 1 April, 2009 Its Lowe's revenge, all this. You have to understand that. Uber-ego, too big to just leave things be. Hopefully this is catharsis at last. COYR Actually...I dont buy that.....Im sure he would have rather succeded...so that he could well and truly rub all his critics faces in the dirt.....far more rewarding to prove everyone wrong. He had a go....too little too late...long lasting damage already done. Apparantly the big problem was the overdraft with Barclays, as far as I am aware. I will always dislike Barclays more than Lowe.
Whitey Grandad Posted 1 April, 2009 Posted 1 April, 2009 Actually...I dont buy that.....Im sure he would have rather succeded...so that he could well and truly rub all his critics faces in the dirt.....far more rewarding to prove everyone wrong. He had a go....too little too late...long lasting damage already done. Apparantly the big problem was the overdraft with Barclays, as far as I am aware. I will always dislike Barclays more than Lowe. Won't they lose any chance of recovering their money?
Bevans Posted 1 April, 2009 Posted 1 April, 2009 Surely there's a possibility of him (and the other directors) being done for fraudulent and / or wrongful trading i.e. basically they knew the company was insolvent and the creditors wouldn't be paid. What Psycrow said is nearly correct although as I understand it to be effectively 'banned' from being a director of a company for the five years mentioned you have to be "done" for either of the above. People have mentioned before about Lowe et al basically just starting up the same company again under a different name, theoretically they will be banned from being a director should they attempt to do so: A 'phoenix' company' is one which carries on the same business as an old business, often on the same premises, but leaving behind the creditors of the old company. The Company Directors Disqualification Act 1986 says a big no no to this!
Gemmel Posted 2 April, 2009 Posted 2 April, 2009 Surely there's a possibility of him (and the other directors) being done for fraudulent and / or wrongful trading i.e. basically they knew the company was insolvent and the creditors wouldn't be paid. What Psycrow said is nearly correct although as I understand it to be effectively 'banned' from being a director of a company for the five years mentioned you have to be "done" for either of the above. People have mentioned before about Lowe et al basically just starting up the same company again under a different name, theoretically they will be banned from being a director should they attempt to do so: A 'phoenix' company' is one which carries on the same business as an old business, often on the same premises, but leaving behind the creditors of the old company. The Company Directors Disqualification Act 1986 says a big no no to this! Leon, Go to bed mate
70's Mike Posted 2 April, 2009 Posted 2 April, 2009 He will still be a Director of Southampton Football Club Ltd , if he only resigns from the PLC
ooh it's a corner Posted 2 April, 2009 Posted 2 April, 2009 I'm pretty sure if he is director of a company that effectively goes bankrupt (if that is what happens tomorrow), he will be barred from being a director of any company for the next 5 years... but that will be the extent of any punishment. Now I'm not a high priced lawyer (oooOOOooo), so stand to be corrected here. Not true I'm afraid. In order to be barred from being a Director you have to be proven to have behaved inappropriately, which most frequently means that you have traded illegally (by taking on more debt without the ability to pay it back). Going backrupt isnt a case for being banned from Directorships. I very much doubt if Lowe has behaved illegally, despite his obviously failings.
eurosaint Posted 2 April, 2009 Posted 2 April, 2009 For all his faults I have heard from other clubs directors and also from the FA (indirectly) that Rupert always championed the Saints and held his corner every time, he fought like a tiger to get the best deals for us, that I know for sure ! Being an egotist, however, it manifests itself in all sorts of ways (ie. he thinks he knows best on everything) He should have worked much harder on his relationship with the fans and should have left footballing strategy to the experts! In the end of course it is now history and we all have to pick up the pieces but IMHO he believed he was doing the right thing even although it ended in disaster ! I await a torrent of abuse.........
Clapham Saint Posted 2 April, 2009 Posted 2 April, 2009 I'm pretty sure if he is director of a company that effectively goes bankrupt (if that is what happens tomorrow), he will be barred from being a director of any company for the next 5 years... but that will be the extent of any punishment. Now I'm not a high priced lawyer (oooOOOooo), so stand to be corrected here. Unfortunately not. The Administrator will look into the conduct of directors and make a report (I think to the secretary of state but I may be wrong on that one) under the Company Director's Disqualification Act 1986. IF he is found to have committed an offence then he could be disqualified, see here: http://www.insolvency.gov.uk/pdfs/guidanceleafletspdf/cddadd.pdf But in realisty I suspect that this won't happen. Although a t0sser I don't think that anything he has done could be proved to have been illegal. He will lose his shares and his job (one of them anyway) but that's about it.
Doctoroncall Posted 2 April, 2009 Posted 2 April, 2009 Well, he was doing a job for a wage. Isn't that everyone's right? It is, I'd just like to point out that towards the end of our EPL years, he was one of the highest earning chairman in the premiership which includes, Man Utd, Liverpool, Chelsea, Arsenal, Spurs...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now