NickG Posted 7 March, 2009 Posted 7 March, 2009 post match, we didn't deserve to win, underperformed today
NickG Posted 7 March, 2009 Author Posted 7 March, 2009 didn't pass it enough against a physically strong side, we made too many unforced errors, Perry and Davis played well -others all could do better
NickG Posted 7 March, 2009 Author Posted 7 March, 2009 we weren't acting just reacting to allow them to score, harsh words at half time
Saint_clark Posted 7 March, 2009 Posted 7 March, 2009 DMG was subbed as was having very poor game ..........Which then meant Euell moved into midfield. And all of a sudden he disappeared from the game.
NickG Posted 7 March, 2009 Author Posted 7 March, 2009 said we were losing the game in the air hence patterson
ALWAYS_SFC Posted 7 March, 2009 Posted 7 March, 2009 DMG was subbed as was having very poor game Rupert won`t be please:rolleyes:d
NickG Posted 7 March, 2009 Author Posted 7 March, 2009 James -manager went a bit mad at half time over the goal!
VectisSaint Posted 7 March, 2009 Posted 7 March, 2009 DMG was subbed as was having very poor game The revoluition is complete, never happened under JP
SaintRichmond Posted 7 March, 2009 Posted 7 March, 2009 post match, we didn't deserve to win, underperformed today Yes, Mr Wotte, we "underperformed" We nevr looked like scoring, ( because we have only Saganoski worthy of the name ) , which is something we have lacked all season However, Mr Wotte, a player called Rasiak managed to get another goal, to help Watford come back to win at Charlton, and put another three points between us and them, which will cost us dear at the end of the season As you (Mr Wotte) are such a fan of Mr Lowe, perhaps you should congratulate him (again) on his astute BUSINESS sense
RobM Posted 7 March, 2009 Posted 7 March, 2009 His astute business sense is to avoid administration by not paying rasiak, our highest earner........ Will that prove to be good business sense if we get relegated, due to not scoring and taking our chances this season? You win games by having better players and playing better football. You can't do that if your best players are playing for someone else... who are higher up the league.
sidthesquid Posted 7 March, 2009 Posted 7 March, 2009 Yes, Mr Wotte, we "underperformed" We nevr looked like scoring, ( because we have only Saganoski worthy of the name ) , which is something we have lacked all season However, Mr Wotte, a player called Rasiak managed to get another goal, to help Watford come back to win at Charlton, and put another three points between us and them, which will cost us dear at the end of the season As you (Mr Wotte) are such a fan of Mr Lowe, perhaps you should congratulate him (again) on his astute BUSINESS sense Boring - we all know why he had to go out on loan, same as last season
VectisSaint Posted 7 March, 2009 Posted 7 March, 2009 His astute business sense is to avoid administration by not paying rasiak, our highest earner........ Astute business sense to copy what Leon Crouch did last season. Sorry but Rasiak has scored 6 goals this season. It was actually one of Lowe's more sensible moves, Rasiak is a lazy toe-rag who had a couple of good seasons but is now past his sell-by date. Watford are not serious candidates for relegation, would be different if we had loaned him to Blackpool, Barnsley, Nottm Forest etc. Now if you want to talk about stupidity consider the loan of Saga, followed by Stern John.
Fitzhugh Fella Posted 7 March, 2009 Posted 7 March, 2009 post match, we didn't deserve to win, underperformed today Good to see an honest appraisal, rather than the usual bull. He has gone up a notch because of that for me.
Gemmel Posted 7 March, 2009 Posted 7 March, 2009 Good to see an honest appraisal, rather than the usual bull. He has gone up a notch because of that for me. Couldn't agree more. Sky and Radio Hampshire saying how well we played and gave him plenty to hide behind, but he didn't. Straight down the line, the performance wasnt good enough. He named his two best players and his worst. Can't ever remember a time being so impressed with post match interview, when we have lost. This guy isn't going to take any ****e from anybody or any player. I still think its a huge ask for him to save us and wish we had changed when it was obvious to all that JP wasnt going to cut it. From what ive seen and heard far, i'd keep this guy on even if we go down and that comes from someone who was very non plus about his appointment and fully expected us to carry on in the way we had under JP.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now