AndyNorthernSaints Posted 28 February, 2009 Share Posted 28 February, 2009 Depends on what you think caring is. I think it means giving millions the kick up the arse they needed to get out there working and pay their way. For some, and many northerners, it means a free ride. Unemployment is zero in the south then??????????????????????????????? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AndyNorthernSaints Posted 28 February, 2009 Share Posted 28 February, 2009 Up north spiritual home, surrounded by lazy c*nts who are obviously influencing your opinions. I certainly do not read the Daily Mail btw, lol, and in fact I refuse to read that tat even though it is effectively given away for free (Metro) in London every day. We all know northerners are lazy c*nts, this is a fact. Polish, no problem, good workers. You win the prize of most ignorant, stupid, unknowledgeable, uninformed poster of the year. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Julian H. Cope Posted 28 February, 2009 Share Posted 28 February, 2009 Legend. Those who hate her are merely p*ssed off they (or their parents) had to work at some point in their lives. Lazy c*nts. Your comments abhor me. What an absolute f***ing c*nt you are. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Johnny Bognor Posted 28 February, 2009 Share Posted 28 February, 2009 The main group worse off as a result of this immigration is the working classes who have had there wages and working conditions undermined by cheap labour. | I wouldn't call labour cheap, the cost of this current admistration will leave us hundreds of billions in debt. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mole Posted 28 February, 2009 Author Share Posted 28 February, 2009 You win the prize of most ignorant, stupid, unknowledgeable, uninformed poster of the year. You dissapoint me you cheeky little Northern monkey, i thought you were gonna give that prize to me. You bugger you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheCholulaKid Posted 28 February, 2009 Share Posted 28 February, 2009 The idea that we are made to feel afraid of the future offends me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hamster Posted 28 February, 2009 Share Posted 28 February, 2009 Why would anyone want to "punish the weak"? You can judge a people by how they treat those less fortunate than themselves IMHO. Capitalism, Socialism, Communism andism will have those who try to take advantage for their own selfish ends, but we shouldn't praise the likes of Thatcher for increasing the numbers who fell into unemployment and homelessness solely because SHE didn't think their contribution to society and the economy was worthy. People worth is not to onlky be measured in financial terms. She ruined a whole generation of society IMHO and we can witness the results of her actions every single day just by opening a newspper or turning on a TV. People simply do not care like they used to. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mole Posted 28 February, 2009 Author Share Posted 28 February, 2009 Why would anyone want to "punish the weak"? Ever heard of Charles Darwin? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bridge too far Posted 28 February, 2009 Share Posted 28 February, 2009 Ever heard of Charles Darwin? He didn't punish the weak He said that IN THE ANIMAL KINGDOM the strong survive at the expense of the weak. Unless, of course, you are suggesting that we are merely animals? I can believe that of some. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mole Posted 28 February, 2009 Author Share Posted 28 February, 2009 He didn't punish the weak He said that IN THE ANIMAL KINGDOM the strong survive at the expense of the weak. Unless, of course, you are suggesting that we are merely animals? I can believe that of some. If we're not animals that only leaves vegetables or minerals. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bridge too far Posted 28 February, 2009 Share Posted 28 February, 2009 If we're not animals that only leaves vegetables or minerals. Looking in the mirror again, hun? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hamster Posted 28 February, 2009 Share Posted 28 February, 2009 Ever heard of Charles Darwin? Was he (one of the wimps) in her cabinet? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mole Posted 28 February, 2009 Author Share Posted 28 February, 2009 Looking in the mirror again, hun? I had a funny feeling this was going to be thrown back but i expected better of you BTF. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rattlehead Posted 28 February, 2009 Share Posted 28 February, 2009 Your comments abhor me. What an absolute f***ing c*nt you are. Well I can only assume you must be a lazy taking the p*ss out of the system northerner for my stated comments to abhor you. A typical northerner in fact. Oh, and on another point, we are "merely animals", although because of the system it is the weak/chavs/lazy p*ss taking northerners and jocks who are breeding the most (in the UK at least) and whose genes will be dominant in future generations. Britain is f*cked and I for one intend to f*ck off abroad permanently at some point. Only foreigners can prevent the UK from becoming a third world country. Another fact for you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AndyNorthernSaints Posted 28 February, 2009 Share Posted 28 February, 2009 Well I can only assume you must be a lazy taking the p*ss out of the system northerner for my stated comments to abhor you. A typical northerner in fact. Oh, and on another point, we are "merely animals", although because of the system it is the weak/chavs/lazy p*ss taking northerners and jocks who are breeding the most (in the UK at least) and whose genes will be dominant in future generations. Britain is f*cked and I for one intend to f*ck off abroad permanently at some point. Only foreigners can prevent the UK from becoming a third world country. Another fact for you. Good ridance bigot. Please hurry up and leave. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jillyanne Posted 28 February, 2009 Share Posted 28 February, 2009 (edited) Well I can only assume you must be a lazy taking the p*ss out of the system northerner for my stated comments to abhor you. A typical northerner in fact. Oh, and on another point, we are "merely animals", although because of the system it is the weak/chavs/lazy p*ss taking northerners and jocks who are breeding the most (in the UK at least) and whose genes will be dominant in future generations. Britain is f*cked and I for one intend to f*ck off abroad permanently at some point. Only foreigners can prevent the UK from becoming a third world country. Another fact for you. ................. Edited 28 February, 2009 by Jillyanne Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rattlehead Posted 28 February, 2009 Share Posted 28 February, 2009 Don't worry Jillstain, I'm sure they'll have the internet. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
revolution saint Posted 28 February, 2009 Share Posted 28 February, 2009 Good ridance bigot. Please hurry up and leave. Doubt we'll be that lucky, don't a lot of countries have IQ tests before allowing immigration? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JohnnyFartPants Posted 28 February, 2009 Share Posted 28 February, 2009 Unemployment is zero in the south then??????????????????????????????? Not really sure but I doubt it, but as I am just down the road from you does it really matter? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mao Cap Posted 1 March, 2009 Share Posted 1 March, 2009 The Thatcherite era is drawing to a close; its laissez-faire capitalism leads to massive inequalities during the upturn and f*cks everybody on the downturn, just as it did in the 20s and 30s. I would be happy, but it's yet to be seen what direction politics will take now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rut Posted 1 March, 2009 Share Posted 1 March, 2009 I've just woken from a dream - Thatcher & Lowe on one plane. Up to you whether it was a happy ending or not.... (but the last thing I remember hearing was 'we haven't got enough fuel'). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hamster Posted 1 March, 2009 Share Posted 1 March, 2009 What would Thatcher have done with the banks do you all think? Would she be considering selling off Royal Mail whilst nationalising banks? Ironic don't you think? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Julian H. Cope Posted 1 March, 2009 Share Posted 1 March, 2009 Well I can only assume you must be a lazy taking the p*ss out of the system northerner for my stated comments to abhor you. A typical northerner in fact. Oh, and on another point, we are "merely animals", although because of the system it is the weak/chavs/lazy p*ss taking northerners and jocks who are breeding the most (in the UK at least) and whose genes will be dominant in future generations. Britain is f*cked and I for one intend to f*ck off abroad permanently at some point. Only foreigners can prevent the UK from becoming a third world country. Another fact for you. I'll chip in for you to f*ck off.I can afford it,I've worked all my life.You really are a cretinous c*nt. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Greedyfly Posted 2 March, 2009 Share Posted 2 March, 2009 My biggest counter to your argument would be suggesting that she destroyed the manufacturing industry. I can only assume you slept through the 70's when we witnessed national strikes in so many different industries. She stripped the trade unions of their powers to stop forcing workers out on strike and thus allowing industry to continue. If you want to blame anyone for the decline of UK industry then look a little further back. Oh, and if your argument is that she closed the coal mines then so what? How many other types of business would be kept going by the British Tax payer when it was losing £5 for every £1 it made? Why do you play the idiot so much when clearly you're not? BTW we've met so this was far from a personal attack, I was just curious. For the record I have agreed with your assesement on this thread through and through. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Greedyfly Posted 2 March, 2009 Share Posted 2 March, 2009 Ok I've just re-read some of your comments and I don't completely agree...Just mostly lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JohnnyFartPants Posted 2 March, 2009 Share Posted 2 March, 2009 Why do you play the idiot so much when clearly you're not? BTW we've met so this was far from a personal attack, I was just curious. For the record I have agreed with your assesement on this thread through and through. I am a bit flumaxed by you now, on more than one point. I am playing the idiot yet you agree with me is the first point. The other one is scratching my head trying to think who I would know off of here. I can get it to a short list of around 4 or 5 people. Any clues? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Greedyfly Posted 4 March, 2009 Share Posted 4 March, 2009 I am a bit flumaxed by you now, on more than one point. I am playing the idiot yet you agree with me is the first point. The other one is scratching my head trying to think who I would know off of here. I can get it to a short list of around 4 or 5 people. Any clues? Well... I meant more specifically when you don't choose to make comments like 'playing Gary Glitter in the family end' (which I nearly ****ed myself with laughter at) or hammer Pearson for keeping us up (which I didn't come anywhere near ****ing myself about) then you often make good and valid arguments to the topic of conversation. Such is the case on this thread and as such I agree with your opinion. Secondly I may have gotten this wrong but I think I have met you, through Bungle, in the Alfred before a game on a couple of occasions. If I am wrong, um, sorry. Does this help with your flumaxation? (I realise I made that word up) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JohnnyFartPants Posted 4 March, 2009 Share Posted 4 March, 2009 Well... I meant more specifically when you don't choose to make comments like 'playing Gary Glitter in the family end' (which I nearly ****ed myself with laughter at) or hammer Pearson for keeping us up (which I didn't come anywhere near ****ing myself about) then you often make good and valid arguments to the topic of conversation. Such is the case on this thread and as such I agree with your opinion. Secondly I may have gotten this wrong but I think I have met you, through Bungle, in the Alfred before a game on a couple of occasions. If I am wrong, um, sorry. Does this help with your flumaxation? (I realise I made that word up) The Gary Glitter comment was a silly joke really, as was the comments about Pearson. I realise he did a good job. I suppose my point was that yes, he did keep us up but that it was still seat of the pants stuff and we never really looked like a team that had turned any brilliant corners with him. I think you have me mixed up with someone else to be honest as I have never met Bungle. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
st_louis_saint Posted 4 March, 2009 Share Posted 4 March, 2009 I think you have me mixed up with someone else to be honest as I have never met Bungle. I have - he's a c**t. He's actually a nice lad, but don't tell him I said that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bungle Posted 4 March, 2009 Share Posted 4 March, 2009 I have - he's a c**t. He's actually a nice lad, but don't tell him I said that. Noted. Where the bloody hell have you been, anyway? Not seen you at a game for ages. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
st_louis_saint Posted 4 March, 2009 Share Posted 4 March, 2009 Noted. Where the bloody hell have you been, anyway? Not seen you at a game for ages. Living in Birmingham, basically. And that ("that" being the time and expense getting to and from SMS) coupled with us being crap, has seen me giving it a miss. However on Saturday, seeing as both those prohibiting factors will not be applicable, I shall be at St Andrews. I'd be happy to indulge in a little imbibing with you should you choose to attend. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bungle Posted 5 March, 2009 Share Posted 5 March, 2009 Living in Birmingham, basically. And that ("that" being the time and expense getting to and from SMS) coupled with us being crap, has seen me giving it a miss. However on Saturday, seeing as both those prohibiting factors will not be applicable, I shall be at St Andrews. I'd be happy to indulge in a little imbibing with you should you choose to attend. What rubbish excuses! Yes I will be there. Should be drinking in the Anchor from midday. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now