sidthesquid Posted 25 February, 2009 Posted 25 February, 2009 It might have had somehting to do with agreeing with Alpo twice in a row, which was decidely spooky, but I am starting to get the strangest of feelings that there is something approaching a ceasefire on here and a unanimity of feeling that maybe it would be best if we rallied behind the team from now till the end of the season, then we can let the bloodletting begin once we are (hopefully) safe. True, or am I whistling in the dark?
INFLUENCED.COM Posted 25 February, 2009 Posted 25 February, 2009 Shut up you Lowe Luvvie Wilde pillow biting crouch cuddling freak !!!!! (not really) Always agreed that unity behind the team is paramount
NickG Posted 25 February, 2009 Posted 25 February, 2009 It might have had somehting to do with agreeing with Alpo twice in a row, which was decidely spooky, but I am starting to get the strangest of feelings that there is something approaching a ceasefire on here and a unanimity of feeling that maybe it would be best if we rallied behind the team from now till the end of the season, then we can let the bloodletting begin once we are (hopefully) safe. True, or am I whistling in the dark? the sensible view -agree, it meant to be sport / pleasure / entertainment after all!
Saint Fan CaM Posted 25 February, 2009 Posted 25 February, 2009 Strangest feeling eh? You can get ointment for that.
Mole Posted 25 February, 2009 Posted 25 February, 2009 Lowe is bad news for SFC. I won't be happy until him and Judas Wilde have gone for good.
Colinjb Posted 25 February, 2009 Posted 25 February, 2009 Behind the team, yes? Behind Lowe and Wilde? F*ck no.
SFC Forever Posted 25 February, 2009 Posted 25 February, 2009 Would be nice to have a ceasefire for a few weeks.
Mole Posted 25 February, 2009 Posted 25 February, 2009 Would be nice to have a ceasefire for a few weeks. Would be nice not to have smug threads started by the Luvvies on the back of 1 win.
Block 5 Posted 25 February, 2009 Posted 25 February, 2009 Alpine has been handing out Ecstasy to everyone.....
Wes Tender Posted 25 February, 2009 Posted 25 February, 2009 The increased impression of unity is seemingly to the concept of either Crouch being admitted to the board so that the three main shareholding groups each have some representation, but failing that unlikely eventuality, there appears to be growing agreement that all of the major shareholders and their internecine warfare and huge egos be consigned to the bin, to be replaced by an independent board.
Dr Who? Posted 25 February, 2009 Posted 25 February, 2009 I will give it until about 17.55 on Saturday then the war will probably start again. I am hoping out of all hope that the war will stay away for the rest of the season, but we will see.
pilsburydoughboy Posted 25 February, 2009 Posted 25 February, 2009 I will give it until about 17.55 on Saturday then the war will probably start again. I am hoping out of all hope that the war will stay away for the rest of the season, but we will see. Not this Saturday.It will be all smiles on the sunny south coast for the saints
sidthesquid Posted 25 February, 2009 Author Posted 25 February, 2009 Would be nice not to have smug threads started by the Luvvies on the back of 1 win. How little you grasp - all I have ever said is that this is not the time for the bloodbath. Bring it on in June, but not now
Channon's Sideburns Posted 25 February, 2009 Posted 25 February, 2009 The increased impression of unity is seemingly to the concept of either Crouch being admitted to the board so that the three main shareholding groups each have some representation, but failing that unlikely eventuality, there appears to be growing agreement that all of the major shareholders and their internecine warfare and huge egos be consigned to the bin, to be replaced by an independent board. Crouch won't be joining the board and I think he knows it himself. However, it is a statement which will, in time, again show Lowe and Wilde in a bad light - as why does anyone think they will let him in????? Did they respond to his last request re:£2M at all, even to say NO?? Did they foooook. Therefore although I agree with the proposal on a temporary basis, it would be foolish for anyone to think that this forum will be all strawberries and cream for the rest of the season. I said it on here last night, collectively we could do a better job than Lowe Wilde and Crouch of running this club, we really could. Even with the differences of opinion, we all put our thoughts firmly in trying to make this club a success. And, let's again try to knock the incorrect theory on the head regarding protests and the team.... YOU CAN (AND I CONTINUE) PROTEST ABOUT THE REMOVAL OF LOWE AND WILDE WHILST SUPPORTING THE TEAM 110%. Anyone suggesting otherwise is at best being at bit misleading.
sidthesquid Posted 25 February, 2009 Author Posted 25 February, 2009 Behind the team, yes? Behind Lowe and Wilde? F*ck no. Exactly - behind the team NOW when it counts
Mole Posted 25 February, 2009 Posted 25 February, 2009 How little you grasp - all I have ever said is that this is not the time for the bloodbath. Bring it on in June, but not now Who the **** are you to say when we should protest?
sidthesquid Posted 25 February, 2009 Author Posted 25 February, 2009 A Southampton season-ticket holder, fully paid up and entitled to an opinion
Arizona Posted 25 February, 2009 Posted 25 February, 2009 It might have had somehting to do with agreeing with Alpo twice in a row, which was decidely spooky, but I am starting to get the strangest of feelings that there is something approaching a ceasefire on here and a unanimity of feeling that maybe it would be best if we rallied behind the team from now till the end of the season, then we can let the bloodletting begin once we are (hopefully) safe. True, or am I whistling in the dark? Evening Rupert.
Dibden Purlieu Saint Posted 25 February, 2009 Posted 25 February, 2009 Who the **** are you to say when we should protest? To be fair Stanley, who the **** are you except for a target of fun and ridicule?
sidthesquid Posted 25 February, 2009 Author Posted 25 February, 2009 Evening Rupert. If I knew how to do it I'd be highlighting the following phrase about the bloodletting which you chose to ignore I think he has to go, but at the right time in an orderly way & now is not the time
saintwarwick Posted 25 February, 2009 Posted 25 February, 2009 Lowe is bad news for SFC. I won't be happy until him and Judas Wilde have gone for good. You have a happy side :confused:
Arizona Posted 25 February, 2009 Posted 25 February, 2009 If I knew how to do it I'd be highlighting the following phrase about the bloodletting which you chose to ignore I think he has to go, but at the right time in an orderly way & now is not the time You're just dressing it up with a bit of anti-Lowe stuff so it isn't so obvious what you're playing at. Nice try Rupert.
gordonToo Posted 25 February, 2009 Posted 25 February, 2009 It could be the case that some sort of bottom had to be hit before a recovery was possible and it's also just possible that this conicided with JP's departure, and with it an implicit admission that Lowe's final experiment was an abject failure. For me, Wotte seems to have a good grip on what's required and is demonstrating a level of self belief and confidence that we have missed all season. As a result there doesn't seem much point in doing anything other than wholeheartedly support him and the team and hope that the change is not too late. Once results start to turn everything else should fall into place.
miserableoldgit Posted 25 February, 2009 Posted 25 February, 2009 To be fair Stanley, who the **** are you except for a target of fun and ridicule? Don`t forget his fat friend Ollie.
sidthesquid Posted 25 February, 2009 Author Posted 25 February, 2009 You're just dressing it up with a bit of anti-Lowe stuff so it isn't so obvious what you're playing at. Nice try Rupert. I hate Rupert - he's c**t now do you believe me (ps Not that fond of that Arizona cove either....) Oh b*gger, that's given the game away
Arizona Posted 25 February, 2009 Posted 25 February, 2009 I hate Rupert - he's c**t now do you believe me (ps Not that fond of that Arizona cove either....) Oh b*gger, that's given the game away Nope. Don't worry Rupert, your secret's safe with me.
Saint Martini Posted 25 February, 2009 Posted 25 February, 2009 Would be nice not to have smug threads started by the Luvvies on the back of 1 win. Would be nice if anyone that said something positive about the club is immediately branded a lowe luvvie.
ottery st mary Posted 25 February, 2009 Posted 25 February, 2009 Would be nice if anyone that said something positive about the club is immediately branded a lowe luvvie. I always think of you as a beautiful Dutch Tulip as opposed to a Lowey Luvvie or Pixie.
Mole Posted 25 February, 2009 Posted 25 February, 2009 So instead of being called Lowe Luvvies, what would weirdos like to be called?
Nineteen Canteen Posted 25 February, 2009 Posted 25 February, 2009 You have a happy side :confused: That made me laugh and he may well have done before he crossed over into his dark malevolent side. Is he for real? If so is one 'person' enough to confirm that the lunatic fringe does exist?
ottery st mary Posted 25 February, 2009 Posted 25 February, 2009 So instead of being called Lowe Luvvies, what would weirdos like to be called? Us Lowey Luvvies have already agreed to be called Rupeys Ra Ra Girls or Cheerleaders. I volunteer to knock the squad into shape for the next game...jonah, nick, chi, get into line and hold your pom poms up straight.
chi saint Posted 25 February, 2009 Posted 25 February, 2009 Lowe is bad news for SFC. I won't be happy until him and Judas Wilde have gone for good. Man, you are really on form tonight, yet another well thought out comment, why not turn your computer off, help conserve energy, do your bit to save the planet and more importantly save what is left of that one brain cell. You really are wasting time and effort by pressing those keys if that's all you have to offer, so log off..... and I mean that most sincerely.
Mole Posted 25 February, 2009 Posted 25 February, 2009 Us Lowey Luvvies have already agreed to be called Rupeys Ra Ra Girls or Cheerleaders. I volunteer to knock the squad into shape for the next game...jonah, nick, chi, get into line and hold your pom poms up straight. A poll would be helpful me thinks. Lowe Luvvies Ruperts ra ra girls Rupert rat pack rupeys groupies
saintwarwick Posted 25 February, 2009 Posted 25 February, 2009 So instead of being called Lowe Luvvies, what would weirdos like to be called? Stanley?
ottery st mary Posted 25 February, 2009 Posted 25 February, 2009 (edited) A poll would be helpful me thinks. Lowe Luvvies Ruperts ra ra girls Rupert rat pack rupeys groupies Most upsetting thing is they will not let me join their group however hard I try. Rupert said I am one of the 20,000 + fans who he despises. spelling..easier to say hate. Edited 25 February, 2009 by ottery st mary
saintwarwick Posted 25 February, 2009 Posted 25 February, 2009 That made me laugh and he may well have done before he crossed over into his dark malevolent side. Is he for real? If so is one 'person' enough to confirm that the lunatic fringe does exist? I think he's a akate on a windup.
Mole Posted 25 February, 2009 Posted 25 February, 2009 I think he's a akate on a windup. I agree, he used to post as somedunce beast and was widely regarded as a skate troll.
Nineteen Canteen Posted 25 February, 2009 Posted 25 February, 2009 Stanley? Stanley above post is an example of an amusing one liner. Try it sometime it will help release the tension. Either that by a puncture repair kit for your doll.
Mole Posted 25 February, 2009 Posted 25 February, 2009 Stanley above post is an example of an amusing one liner. Try it sometime it will help release the tension. Either that by a puncture repair kit for your doll. In English please.
Saint Martini Posted 25 February, 2009 Posted 25 February, 2009 So instead of being called Lowe Luvvies, what would weirdos like to be called? How about fans? The fact that someone sees something good happening at a club even if the management of said club is rotten to the bone doesn't mean that person likes the management. If that someone even thinks a decision taken by that management is good doesn't mean that he likes the management. It just means that sometimes bad people make good decision (or bad ones that turn out alright). I desperately want Wotte to succeed and keep us safe this year. I'd want him to take us to the PL again. If that means that Lowe will still be the de facto chairman so be it, rather that then this club slowly decending into football leagues no-man land. Besides, as a successful club I'd we're more likely to attract a decent investor then as a League One club coming out of admin.
Nineteen Canteen Posted 25 February, 2009 Posted 25 February, 2009 In English please. I rest my case, goodnight Stanley. Hopefully in the morning the increasing air of goodwill and level headed debate will be back to abuse and petty name calling otherwise, you somedunce you, may need to re-register. Keep going though its interesting watching you unravel admist a desire for us all to support the club and agree a way forward simply beyond Lowe out which hasn't worked Stanley and now all your toys are on the floor. Poor little Stanley and his behavioural issues try and contain your anger. What do you prefer Stanley as you didn't answer my previous questions. Entering a good debate over your views or administering a good kicking when your eloquence (in English) has let you down? Lots of love xxxxx
Weston Saint Posted 25 February, 2009 Posted 25 February, 2009 I have found it better not to respond to Stanley. I know some of his history.
Mole Posted 25 February, 2009 Posted 25 February, 2009 I rest my case, goodnight Stanley. Hopefully in the morning the increasing air of goodwill and level headed debate will be back to abuse and petty name calling otherwise, you somedunce you, may need to re-register. Keep going though its interesting watching you unravel admist a desire for us all to support the club and agree a way forward simply beyond Lowe out which hasn't worked Stanley and now all your toys are on the floor. Poor little Stanley and his behavioural issues try and contain your anger. What do you prefer Stanley as you didn't answer my previous questions. Entering a good debate over your views or administering a good kicking when your eloquence (in English) has let you down? Lots of love xxxxx As snide as ever i see somedunce. The Lowe Out campaign is ongoing and it'll never stop until he's gone for good.
Mole Posted 25 February, 2009 Posted 25 February, 2009 I have found it better not to respond to Stanley. I know some of his history. And i know some of yours. Don't you forget that. For one i know you're a liar with no principles.
Ponty Posted 25 February, 2009 Posted 25 February, 2009 Ok, the bickering has taken a bit of a nasty tone now. May I suggest a break until tomorrow perhaps?
Mole Posted 25 February, 2009 Posted 25 February, 2009 Ok, the bickering has taken a bit of a nasty tone now. May I suggest a break until tomorrow perhaps? Ask "honest Ron" about SOS.
solentstars Posted 25 February, 2009 Posted 25 February, 2009 I have found it better not to respond to Stanley. I know some of his history. hes lost the plot but is good entertainment and gives us a good laugh.
RoswellSaint Posted 25 February, 2009 Posted 25 February, 2009 Ok, the bickering has taken a bit of a nasty tone now. May I suggest a break until tomorrow perhaps? And the thread started out with someone commenting that there appeared to be a ceasefire. Oh well.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now