Give it to Ron Posted 21 February, 2009 Posted 21 February, 2009 Based on his performance today....getting over a million for him was good business. He was shocking!!!
Papa Shango Posted 21 February, 2009 Posted 21 February, 2009 So what? Today was just one game. He was a class act for us.
Give it to Ron Posted 21 February, 2009 Author Posted 21 February, 2009 Well if you had watched him play at Stoke then you would know it was not just today....Ok he has had a bad run of injuries and the couple of halves he played I saw him in he was awful. He did Ok for us but the point of my post was that I think we did well out of the deal...thats what!!
exit2 Posted 21 February, 2009 Posted 21 February, 2009 I thought he looked quality Really? I know football is all about opinions but our group thought he was ****e.
Saf... Posted 21 February, 2009 Posted 21 February, 2009 Euell sussed him out straight away. Get stuck into him and he can't dominate anyone. Well done Euell.
NickG Posted 21 February, 2009 Posted 21 February, 2009 thought he was quite poor today - on that performance not close to either of our CBs. Has he played many for them or is he still rusty?
Arizona Posted 21 February, 2009 Posted 21 February, 2009 Based on his performance today....getting over a million for him was good business. He was shocking!!! So what? Today was just one game. He was a class act for us. You're both right.
andybeal Posted 21 February, 2009 Posted 21 February, 2009 I've only seen him play once for us - Sheff Wed away last season and he was sh*te. But so was Kelvin that day and he's good now.
Glasgow_Saint Posted 21 February, 2009 Posted 21 February, 2009 Really? I know football is all about opinions but our group thought he was ****e. Good in the air, strong in the tackle and clearly organising the back line (or trying) quite a decent game when u consider him returning here + debut? + long layoff! Leads by example and thats why/what i like(d) about him - inspires and demands more effort from those around him and thats something we have missed - aka a leader
70's Mike Posted 21 February, 2009 Posted 21 February, 2009 Good in the air, strong in the tackle and clearly organising the back line (or trying) quite a decent game when u consider him returning here + debut? + long layoff! Leads by example and thats why/what i like(d) about him - inspires and demands more effort from those around him and thats something we have missed - aka a leader you are talking about today ?
NickG Posted 21 February, 2009 Posted 21 February, 2009 Good in the air, strong in the tackle and clearly organising the back line (or trying) quite a decent game when u consider him returning here + debut? + long layoff! Leads by example and thats why/what i like(d) about him - inspires and demands more effort from those around him and thats something we have missed - aka a leader last season -would agree, not today tho.
Give it to Ron Posted 21 February, 2009 Author Posted 21 February, 2009 He was the number 6 today...the one who went off injured....again, so demanding more around him is fine but leading by example when you are constantly beaten in the air and ground is a gross exageration of his performance IMO.
saintwarwick Posted 21 February, 2009 Posted 21 February, 2009 Based on his performance today....getting over a million for him was good business. He was shocking!!! So what? Today was just one game. He was a class act for us. You're both right. You are right
up and away Posted 21 February, 2009 Posted 21 February, 2009 Well if you had watched him play at Stoke then you would know it was not just today....Ok he has had a bad run of injuries and the couple of halves he played I saw him in he was awful. He did Ok for us but the point of my post was that I think we did well out of the deal...thats what!! He's just not fit and has played how many minutes this season? He was a good player for us and I expect him to be once again when fit. But we definitely dodged a bullet when we managed to offload him to Stoke, even with getting Pulis jnr in return. I was wondering if we had not managed to offload him how much more trouble we would have been financially? Would we have been even able to afford what little we have now?
Arizona Posted 21 February, 2009 Posted 21 February, 2009 You are right And so are you. Unless I am wrong in which case...:smt104
sidthesquid Posted 21 February, 2009 Posted 21 February, 2009 You are right We're all right, everybody's right, even Alps & Stan, it's that sort of a day
AlfredKo Posted 21 February, 2009 Posted 21 February, 2009 I only notice he was playing today when I saw this post. The player of year for him last season was just a joke. He will never and ever be as good as Size and Claus, so as Jack Cork.
Arizona Posted 21 February, 2009 Posted 21 February, 2009 I assume he got a decent reception? No wonder he didn't play well, he's a f**king television. I am really sorry.
Bailey Posted 21 February, 2009 Posted 21 February, 2009 Davies did well in the first half IMO. However, selling him may have proved to be a clever bit of business in the end as he always seems to struggle with injuries. Still, he was first class during his time here but he's left now and so we move on.
saintwarwick Posted 21 February, 2009 Posted 21 February, 2009 We're all right, everybody's right, even Alps & Stan, it's that sort of a day Perhaps we should do this winning thing more often
saintwarwick Posted 21 February, 2009 Posted 21 February, 2009 Davies did well in the first half IMO. However, selling him may have proved to be a clever bit of business in the end as he always seems to struggle with injuries. Still, he was first class during his time here but he's left now and so we move on. Have to agree with this, he was good when here but he has moved on now, we now have an equally good replacement in size, albeit several monthe late.
Seaford Saint Posted 21 February, 2009 Posted 21 February, 2009 Good in the air, strong in the tackle and clearly organising the back line (or trying) quite a decent game when u consider him returning here + debut? + long layoff! Leads by example and thats why/what i like(d) about him - inspires and demands more effort from those around him and thats something we have missed - aka a leader I agree with you. He had a good game
Saint Fen Posted 21 February, 2009 Posted 21 February, 2009 Anybody who went to Sheff Wed away last season could see he cannot deal with pace and power. but to be fair it was one of hid first, a bit like today. He is a good honest pro who puts in 100% with a decent run of games, he'll get better with time for them.
LostBoys Posted 22 February, 2009 Posted 22 February, 2009 I watched him warming up and while he was jumping well off both feet I though he ran awkwardly and less than full speed which is normally a pretty good sign that you are carrying an injury(ies). On yesterdays performance he will not be missed. I thought Seijs played well yesterday and Liptak good in the few minutes - one header he did he was over a foot higher than Parkin could jump - shades of Michael
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now