Legod Third Coming Posted 18 February, 2009 Posted 18 February, 2009 Good luck to him. The perfect example of what we need(ed). A disciplinarian with his head screwed on who believes in getting the basics right.
The Farmer Posted 18 February, 2009 Posted 18 February, 2009 Good luck to him. The perfect example of what we need(ed). A disciplinarian with his head screwed on who believes in getting the basics right. The exact opposite of someone who would work with Lowe. You need to be obedient, submissive and have no other opportunities in the game before you would consider being Lowe's lackey.
bridge too far Posted 18 February, 2009 Posted 18 February, 2009 Good luck to him. The perfect example of what we need(ed). A disciplinarian with his head screwed on who believes in getting the basics right. Sounds a lot like one Nigel Pearson to me.
Legod Third Coming Posted 18 February, 2009 Author Posted 18 February, 2009 Sounds a lot like one Nigel Pearson to me. That would be their first names causing that confusion for you.
skintsaint Posted 19 February, 2009 Posted 19 February, 2009 Good luck to him. The perfect example of what we need(ed). A disciplinarian with his head screwed on who believes in getting the basics right. Fans would have gone mental for appointing another manager from non-league standard footie. Anyway, still not convinced by Cloughie Mk2
Mole Posted 19 February, 2009 Posted 19 February, 2009 The exact opposite of someone who would work with Lowe. You need to be obedient, submissive and have no other opportunities in the game before you would consider being Lowe's lackey. Spot on. Lowe wants a manager who will obey without question.
CHAPEL END CHARLIE Posted 19 February, 2009 Posted 19 February, 2009 Spot on. Lowe wants a manager who will obey without question. This chap ?
saintjay77 Posted 19 February, 2009 Posted 19 February, 2009 The exact opposite of someone who would work with Lowe. You need to be obedient, submissive and have no other opportunities in the game before you would consider being Lowe's lackey. Yeah just like WGS
manzo Posted 19 February, 2009 Posted 19 February, 2009 Are you seriously telling me that this board wouldn't have gone into meltdown if we appointed a manager from the conference?
Frank's cousin Posted 19 February, 2009 Posted 19 February, 2009 Are you seriously telling me that this board wouldn't have gone into meltdown if we appointed a manager from the conference? Similar reaction to that of JP and Wotte at the very least.
Chez Posted 19 February, 2009 Posted 19 February, 2009 All Nigels are good managers Spackman was appalling.
Greenridge Posted 19 February, 2009 Posted 19 February, 2009 3 league wins in a row....what we'd give for that. Shows that with the right change of manager things can happen. Don't think he's added any players, indeed I think their 'star' player Giles Barnes moved to Fulham(?).
The Farmer Posted 19 February, 2009 Posted 19 February, 2009 Yeah just like WGS WGS needed an inroad back, and he got it. He played the servant for a bit, but then after his man-management skills took effect he knew he had the fans ear and he was back where he belonged. He tried to push us up a notch with a couple of bone fida signings, Lowe reeled him in, cue WGS with half asses excuse to bail. You picked a bad example my friend. WGS is the type of case study that proves my point. Its Lowe's way or the highway. Lowe has ruined the club for all Sotonians, FOR EVER. Thank him and Gay Askham for the fact this city will never ever be a footballing force again, ever.
JohnnyFartPants Posted 19 February, 2009 Posted 19 February, 2009 Are you seriously telling me that this board wouldn't have gone into meltdown if we appointed a manager from the conference? Well a similar comment was made when he was appointed, that he was a show piece appointment used to get the crowds in and he will take them down. Basically if he failed it would be seen as a stupid idea because he had no experience at that level but if he made it he would be an inspirational choice, not like our board manages to acheive.
corky morris Posted 19 February, 2009 Posted 19 February, 2009 Yeah just like WGS And that is exactly why Strachan left! Did he ever have that hip operation?
JohnnyFartPants Posted 19 February, 2009 Posted 19 February, 2009 WGS needed an inroad back, and he got it. He played the servant for a bit, but then after his man-management skills took effect he knew he had the fans ear and he was back where he belonged. He tried to push us up a notch with a couple of bone fida signings, Lowe reeled him in, cue WGS with half asses excuse to bail. You picked a bad example my friend. WGS is the type of case study that proves my point. Its Lowe's way or the highway. Lowe has ruined the club for all Sotonians, FOR EVER. Thank him and Gay Askham for the fact this city will never ever be a footballing force again, ever. So he used us then?
Frank's cousin Posted 19 February, 2009 Posted 19 February, 2009 WGS needed an inroad back, and he got it. He played the servant for a bit, but then after his man-management skills took effect he knew he had the fans ear and he was back where he belonged. He tried to push us up a notch with a couple of bone fida signings, Lowe reeled him in, cue WGS with half asses excuse to bail. You picked a bad example my friend. WGS is the type of case study that proves my point. Its Lowe's way or the highway. Lowe has ruined the club for all Sotonians, FOR EVER. Thank him and Gay Askham for the fact this city will never ever be a footballing force again, ever. That old chestnut - reopeated so many times even those who invented this baltent propoganda now believe its true... Sure Strachan left because he he felt he could take us no further without the cash to build on the 2003 season - although the realization that even with moderate success we could not hod on to players such as Bridge at a provincial club when the big boys offered triple salaries played its part to... but Strachan is far wiser than most fans and despite being naturally dissapointed, also appreciated we did not have the cash, could not afford to break te structure that kept us living within our means and avoiding the growth of debt as so many other clubs continue to do...
saintjay77 Posted 19 February, 2009 Posted 19 February, 2009 WGS needed an inroad back, and he got it. He played the servant for a bit, but then after his man-management skills took effect he knew he had the fans ear and he was back where he belonged. He tried to push us up a notch with a couple of bone fida signings, Lowe reeled him in, cue WGS with half asses excuse to bail. You picked a bad example my friend. WGS is the type of case study that proves my point. Its Lowe's way or the highway. Lowe has ruined the club for all Sotonians, FOR EVER. Thank him and Gay Askham for the fact this city will never ever be a footballing force again, ever. LOL of course. So WGS is a no good dirty liar and we should be glad we are shot of him. How dare he say he had no problem with Lowe! How dare he say he wanted a break for a while? He sould never get another job again unless he comes out and publicly slates RL and our club for being so crap! Your talking arse mate. He has had plenty of opertunity to come out and say the facts but every time he has the facts have been he didnt have a problem with RL or our club. How many other mid to lower table clubs have there chairmen thell there managers that they cant afford to get this player or that player? Even Chelsea havnt been able to go out and buy willy nilly now and with all there millions you wouldnt expect the board to refuse going for the best players in the world would you? We lived within our means end of story.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now