saintwarwick Posted 11 February, 2009 Share Posted 11 February, 2009 Nah, a Luvvie is a deluded fool like you that supports Lowe. Nah, a luvvie is someone who gets behind the team no matter who is in charge, Lowe is a slight hinderence that needs to be removed but otherwise is trying to get the club solvent. If you think differently then you are the biggest fool. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dibden Purlieu Saint Posted 11 February, 2009 Share Posted 11 February, 2009 Nah, a luvvie is someone who gets behind the team no matter who is in charge, Lowe is a slight hinderence that needs to be removed but otherwise is trying to get the club solvent. If you think differently then you are the biggest fool. Luvvie alert...Luvvie alert. If you supported Southampton you'd want Lowe, and all his friends and family dead Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mole Posted 11 February, 2009 Share Posted 11 February, 2009 Nah, a luvvie is someone who gets behind the team no matter who is in charge, Lowe is a slight hinderence that needs to be removed but otherwise is trying to get the club solvent. If you think differently then you are the biggest fool. You're the fool for thinking he's capable of saving SFC. He is such a negative presence that he is costing the club thousands in lost gate receipts not to mention his poor judgement on football matters. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
saintwarwick Posted 11 February, 2009 Share Posted 11 February, 2009 I have a different anti Lowe post for every day of the year and then some. Get used to it. You don't, you have the same anti Lowe post every day and we have got used to it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JohnnyFartPants Posted 11 February, 2009 Share Posted 11 February, 2009 You're the fool for thinking he's capable of saving SFC. He is such a negative presence that he is costing the club thousands in lost gate receipts not to mention his poor judgement on football matters. Brilliant. Luckily for us, Stanley has a plan though. If we want to be successful, all we need is Lowe out, right? That way we will be world beaters again just as we were when Crouch was in charge. Oh. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JohnnyFartPants Posted 11 February, 2009 Share Posted 11 February, 2009 You don't, you have the same anti Lowe post every day and we have got used to it. That made me LOL. So true too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
saintjay77 Posted 11 February, 2009 Share Posted 11 February, 2009 is there really any point in this thread being open? It started as a taunt to wind people up and as what was probably intended it has turned into yet another Lowe debate. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NickG Posted 11 February, 2009 Share Posted 11 February, 2009 If you class Pearson as average how do you class Wotte and Portvliet in comparison? Pearson average-quite good Jan -failed Wotte - far too early to say, some good signs Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mole Posted 11 February, 2009 Share Posted 11 February, 2009 Pearson average-quite good Jan -failed Wotte - far too early to say, some good signs Good signs? 2 points from 9 is relegation form. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
saintwarwick Posted 11 February, 2009 Share Posted 11 February, 2009 You're the fool for thinking he's capable of saving SFC. He is such a negative presence that he is costing the club thousands in lost gate receipts not to mention his poor judgement on football matters. So you think Lowe has come in to sink the ship? Granted there are a few fans who dislike him vehemontly but some of us can actually support the team whoever is in charge, it seems babies like yourself who didn't get who you wanted start throwing dummies out of your pram. If you want to control a club maybe Ebbsfleet is the team for you, until then try supporting the team you so purport. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
saintwarwick Posted 11 February, 2009 Share Posted 11 February, 2009 Good signs? 2 points from 9 is relegation form. Why not give him 13 games like you gave Pearson before passing judgement Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
saintjay77 Posted 11 February, 2009 Share Posted 11 February, 2009 Good signs? 2 points from 9 is relegation form. How many points did Peason have after his 1st 3 games? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mole Posted 11 February, 2009 Share Posted 11 February, 2009 So you think Lowe has come in to sink the ship? Granted there are a few fans who dislike him vehemontly but some of us can actually support the team whoever is in charge, it seems babies like yourself who didn't get who you wanted start throwing dummies out of your pram. If you want to control a club maybe Ebbsfleet is the team for you, until then try supporting the team you so purport. I know Lowe has come and will sink the ship. He might not have intended doing it, but his that much of a pariah and is so clueless in football matters that it was always going to end in failure. Don't take this the wrong way but you do seem to be one of the most clueless posters on this site. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mole Posted 11 February, 2009 Share Posted 11 February, 2009 Why not give him 13 games like you gave Pearson before passing judgement Stop being a div, he will take us down and over 80% of fans polled realise this. Time to stop talking out your arse Warwick and admit you don't have scooby. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NickG Posted 11 February, 2009 Share Posted 11 February, 2009 Good signs? 2 points from 9 is relegation form. it is. If it continues we will go down. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
saintjay77 Posted 11 February, 2009 Share Posted 11 February, 2009 Stop being a div, he will take us down and over 80% of fans polled realise this. Time to stop talking out your arse Warwick and admit you don't have scooby. A poll was taken just after we lost 1 match that we didnt play too good in. If we convincingly win our next match how do you think the same poll would read then? Was that poll entered by the entire fan base of the couple of hundred that visit this site? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mole Posted 11 February, 2009 Share Posted 11 February, 2009 it is. If it continues we will go down. I'll be interested to see what the deluded Lowe supporters have to say when Bristol City have beat us and it's 2 points from 12. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NickG Posted 11 February, 2009 Share Posted 11 February, 2009 Stop being a div, he will take us down and over 80% of fans polled realise this. Time to stop talking out your arse Warwick and admit you don't have scooby. lol! So appoint another manager, do another poll -if there is still majority thinking we are down -sack him and so on! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NickG Posted 11 February, 2009 Share Posted 11 February, 2009 I'll be interested to see what the deluded Lowe supporters have to say when Bristol City have beat us and it's 2 points from 12. who are they, I'll ask them for you Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
saintwarwick Posted 11 February, 2009 Share Posted 11 February, 2009 I know Lowe has come and will sink the ship. He might not have intended doing it, but his that much of a pariah and is so clueless in football matters that it was always going to end in failure. Don't take this the wrong way but you do seem to be one of the most clueless posters on this site. Really, please enlighten me as to how I am so high up in the clueless stakes considering I am up against the likes of you. Can you also tell me how Lows is going to sink the ship without using the "fans not attending because of him" theory. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pancake Posted 11 February, 2009 Share Posted 11 February, 2009 As Ponty has already pointed out, can we please leave the insults at home? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dibden Purlieu Saint Posted 11 February, 2009 Share Posted 11 February, 2009 A poll was taken just after we lost 1 match that we didnt play too good in. If we convincingly win our next match how do you think the same poll would read then? Was that poll entered by the entire fan base of the couple of hundred that visit this site? And considering the people that post on this site, I don't think it matters. For instance, did you vote Stanley? If so, that is one vote that we needn't take any notice of. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
saintjay77 Posted 11 February, 2009 Share Posted 11 February, 2009 I'll be interested to see what the deluded Lowe supporters have to say when Bristol City have beat us and it's 2 points from 12. As your so good at predictions..... How will our next manager do? Who will be our next manager? How will we do in league 1? How will we do next season IF we survive? Who will eventually buy our club? Whats Saturdays Lotto numbers? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mole Posted 11 February, 2009 Share Posted 11 February, 2009 lol! So appoint another manager, do another poll -if there is still majority thinking we are down -sack him and so on! He should never have been appointed but Lowe won't ever admit he's wrong so we'll just get relegated. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eelpie Posted 11 February, 2009 Share Posted 11 February, 2009 If Burley was cr@p and was getting more points per game than Pearson, then how was Pearson "doing a decent job"? The last point is more telling. Burley lost interest after his best players Bale and Jones departed. His last half season was poor. He left the team dispirited. D&G left them in a shambles. Pearson had to rebuild confidence and try out different team combinations resulting in some more heavy defeats, true, before we were able to begin to see the results of a better performing side. He was doing a decent job. Early results do not compare with results over a longer period of time, and this is also true of Wotte. But we are in a much more critical situation now. Wotte has very little time to get the results we need. I hope he does. Do you think he will? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NickG Posted 11 February, 2009 Share Posted 11 February, 2009 He should never have been appointed but Lowe won't ever admit he's wrong so we'll just get relegated. I don't think he will, but even if he turns out to be great, you will never like him or give him a chance due to Lowe. Be more open minded. Judge him over the next few games. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mole Posted 11 February, 2009 Share Posted 11 February, 2009 Really, please enlighten me as to how I am so high up in the clueless stakes considering I am up against the likes of you. Can you also tell me how Lows is going to sink the ship without using the "fans not attending because of him" theory. SFC saw the largest %age drop in season ticket sales out of all 92 football league clubs (bar Morecambe) on Lowes return. The "fan not attending because of him" theory cannot be brushed aside as much you'd love to do it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NickG Posted 11 February, 2009 Share Posted 11 February, 2009 aren't most sold in early bird/march madness (Crouch/NP), not sure just wondered Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
saintwarwick Posted 11 February, 2009 Share Posted 11 February, 2009 Stop being a div, he will take us down and over 80% of fans polled realise this. Time to stop talking out your arse Warwick and admit you don't have scooby. So Pearson was god after 13 games but you are not willing to let another coach the same period to prove himself? Proves what a one sided div you are. Pearson did well for us last season after taking us to virtual relegation, I was one of the supporters on here who wanted him to stay (and most others), the fact he is not here now doesn't mean we should neglect whoever is in charge because we have issues against who is running the club. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mole Posted 11 February, 2009 Share Posted 11 February, 2009 aren't most sold in early bird/march madness (Crouch/NP), not sure just wondered Aha, this old chestnut. This point was put before by Ruperts Rat Pack but the story of lowes return came out during the March Madness renewal time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JohnnyFartPants Posted 11 February, 2009 Share Posted 11 February, 2009 Burley lost interest after his best players Bale and Jones departed. His last half season was poor. He left the team dispirited. D&G left them in a shambles. Pearson had to rebuild confidence and try out different team combinations resulting in some more heavy defeats, true, before we were able to begin to see the results of a better performing side. He was doing a decent job. Early results do not compare with results over a longer period of time, and this is also true of Wotte. But we are in a much more critical situation now. Wotte has very little time to get the results we need. I hope he does. Do you think he will? With the risk of sounding like a Lowe supporter, based on having some positive thoughts no less, I think he will survive. The loaned out players are coming back and I think Wotte has an idea what is needed. I don't think it will be easy but I think the one thing people have to remember is everyone down the bottom is bricking it. When we would be just outside the bottom three year in year out in the Premiership we didn't think we were safe with this much of the season to go, so why do we assume we are down now? There will be a few more twists and turns yet and I feel we have as much chance as anyone to get out. I think Saga will keep scoring and the new Central Defender will get the back four sorted. If that happens and Davis keeps his form up then we have every chance. As much as my views differ from Stanley's, we both want the same thing and although we won't be world beaters anytime soon, I feel we have enough (now we have called back players) to stay up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NickG Posted 11 February, 2009 Share Posted 11 February, 2009 I like the stupidity of your selecting a piece of my OP,OB. To say that Burleys perfromance was better than a manager who took over a group of players,the overwhelming number of whom he would have known nothing about,and that manager only gets 0.13 points per game less,is as about as stupid as it can get.Also when taking on board that Pearson managed to identify in a few weeks and solve our need for decent CBs,something Burley failed to do in over 2 years. I am not saying that Pearson is a great manager,or that he will become one.He did a good job for us in the circumstances,and is doing so at Leicester in advantageous circumstances.Yes he has money at Leicester that other L1 clubs can only dream of,but many managers have failed to take advantage in such circumstances Benitez has failed when considering the money he has spent. Scolari has failed when considering the money that has been spent to give him the players at his disposal. Many managers have failed at Spurs and Newcastle considering the money they have spent. Spending money does not guarantee success.Pearson is doing it successfully at the moment at a low level,nobody knows where it will go from here. The main point of my OP was to demonstrate how some on here like to lie or mis-represent in order to try to back-up their support of the Lord God Lowe.Amen. This is why your post is far from proof of anything. You talk about having to use someone elses players and needing to motivate them, but his level of motivation for the same players got a worse performance and therefore wasn't as good, and this season the playing staff are totally different. Not saying he isn't ok just its not that easy to compare. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mole Posted 11 February, 2009 Share Posted 11 February, 2009 So Pearson was god after 13 games but you are not willing to let another coach the same period to prove himself? Proves what a one sided div you are. Pearson did well for us last season after taking us to virtual relegation, I was one of the supporters on here who wanted him to stay (and most others), the fact he is not here now doesn't mean we should neglect whoever is in charge because we have issues against who is running the club. All of us will have no choice but to suffer the latest Dutch idiot taking us down. Lowe is so pigheaded he won't even admit he got it wrong though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NickG Posted 11 February, 2009 Share Posted 11 February, 2009 Aha, this old chestnut. This point was put before by Ruperts Rat Pack but the story of lowes return came out during the March Madness renewal time. didn't think it was confirmed until after the end of the season, as Crouch was still promising investment within a few days of the end of the season, might be wrong, am I? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NickG Posted 11 February, 2009 Share Posted 11 February, 2009 All of us will have no choice but to suffer the latest Dutch idiot taking us down. Lowe is so pigheaded he won't even admit he got it wrong though. why do you think he is such an idiot? After all this whole thread is about how hard it was for NP to turn around a team doing badly Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
saintwarwick Posted 11 February, 2009 Share Posted 11 February, 2009 SFC saw the largest %age drop in season ticket sales out of all 92 football league clubs (bar Morecambe) on Lowes return. The "fan not attending because of him" theory cannot be brushed aside as much you'd love to do it. Incorrect again, it wasn't season ticket sales but just overall attendances. This was based over the first few games of the season which showed our AVERAGE attendance loss which has continued. However if Lowe left tomorrow I would expect a slight increase in attendees but not a great deal to improve our wealth. The fact is the footy is poor and the average fan expects more and until that changes then the stayaways will stayaway. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mole Posted 11 February, 2009 Share Posted 11 February, 2009 didn't think it was confirmed until after the end of the season, as Crouch was still promising investment within a few days of the end of the season, might be wrong, am I? It wasn't confirmed but it was strongly believed (rightly so) that Judas Wilde was going to betray us all. The Echo had run with the story, as had the nationals. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Greenridge Posted 11 February, 2009 Share Posted 11 February, 2009 As with many threads on the forum this started with some good debate but has yet again deteroiorated into childish name calling by the usual offenders. Painful. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Window Cleaner Posted 11 February, 2009 Share Posted 11 February, 2009 is there really any point in this thread being open? It started as a taunt to wind people up and as what was probably intended it has turned into yet another Lowe debate. Anyway, although I have no particular beef with Pearson either way, if he had a worse record than Burley, well you all know what I think about Burley don't you.i Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
St Paul Posted 11 February, 2009 Share Posted 11 February, 2009 Why not give him 13 games like you gave Pearson before passing judgement Wotte was making decisions about the first team all season (Dyer's contract). Woote and jan were spun by the O/S as a pair. Therefore Wotte has had some input into the position we find ourselves in. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wes Tender Posted 11 February, 2009 Share Posted 11 February, 2009 Wotte was making decisions about the first team all season (Dyer's contract). Woote and jan were spun by the O/S as a pair. Therefore Wotte has had some input into the position we find ourselves in. Agreed. A bit like saying that Gorman had failed and demanding that Dodd be given more time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
solentstars Posted 11 February, 2009 Share Posted 11 February, 2009 The naked pics of Lowe and Wilde in bed did make me wonder just what their motives were. Oh, and the constant avatar changing pics of him. Now that is the workings of delusion if ever I saw it.i agree i think that they are in love with rupert:smt054 and like spurned lovers it has turned to hate Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
solentstars Posted 11 February, 2009 Share Posted 11 February, 2009 I have a different anti Lowe post for every day of the year and then some. Get used to it.great another mindless thread coming up soon,i can hardly wait.:smt054 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mole Posted 11 February, 2009 Share Posted 11 February, 2009 great another mindless thread coming up soon,i can hardly wait.:smt054 Every post of yours is criticising what other people post. You are obsessed, and much like Sadoldgit and Franks Cousin, you are good at the old "don't do as i do do as i say" lecturing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
solentstars Posted 11 February, 2009 Share Posted 11 February, 2009 Every post of yours is criticising what other people post. You are obsessed, and much like Sadoldgit and Franks Cousin, you are good at the old "don't do as i do do as i say" lecturing.give my love to rupert the next time you see him with your strange obsession with him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mole Posted 11 February, 2009 Share Posted 11 February, 2009 give my love to rupert the next time you see him with your strange obsession with him. It's not worth responding to you any further as you're obviously just some spotty kid trolling for a reaction. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ponty Posted 11 February, 2009 Share Posted 11 February, 2009 Oh FFS. I swear I'm going to put "luvvie" on the swear filter. Can't we just have one evening of civility? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ottery st mary Posted 11 February, 2009 Share Posted 11 February, 2009 Pixie or Ra Ra Girls or even Ruperts cheerleaders Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
saintjay77 Posted 11 February, 2009 Share Posted 11 February, 2009 Oh FFS. I swear I'm going to put "luvvie" on the swear filter. Can't we just have one evening of civility? Only if you ban us all cause we are all luvvies together!!!! But if you do Ban us then watch out cause we will do a march on your ass!!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mole Posted 11 February, 2009 Share Posted 11 February, 2009 Pixie or Ra Ra Girls or even Ruperts cheerleaders I can think of 101 different phrases to describe these vile interlopers. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now