Jump to content

Hair on Women


saint_stevo
 Share

Recommended Posts

bold down below and blonde on their head. And blue eyes preferably.

 

You mean bald? Everyone likes bold down below. I hate bald undercarriage. Is it the look or the feel that you like? I really don't like baldy porn, might as well read the lancet, on the other hand not keen on a down under Bellamy. So - look or feel?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Dark Sotonic Mills
i like a runway, thin but so its not like she is pre-pubescent

 

Err No Hair = Pre-Pubescent

Hair = Pubescent

 

That's one of the definitions...

 

:rolleyes:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can assume you like a woman with hairy armpits and legs like a scotsman too?

 

 

as i said, 'the classic furry triangle', not hairy legs/arms/mouth/back/palms etc. but sometimes some light underarm hair can do funny things to me (its probably going to too many raves with skanky psy-trance types...)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

as i said, 'the classic furry triangle', not hairy legs/arms/mouth/back/palms etc. but sometimes some light underarm hair can do funny things to me (its probably going to too many raves with skanky psy-trance types...)

 

My point is that when someone has a hang up about doing a bird with a shaven snatch and it is based on child sex, then it doesn't add up. Women spend their lives ridding their bodies of hair from all manner of places. Legs, armpits, some even the top lip. Now, in all these instances the hair would not be there when they were young girls. It is just a natural extension of a woman wanting to feel feminine and it does not equate to anything child related. I think it is more to do with being the opposite to a man.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My point is that when someone has a hang up about doing a bird with a shaven snatch and it is based on child sex, then it doesn't add up. Women spend their lives ridding their bodies of hair from all manner of places. Legs, armpits, some even the top lip. Now, in all these instances the hair would not be there when they were young girls. It is just a natural extension of a woman wanting to feel feminine and it does not equate to anything child related. I think it is more to do with being the opposite to a man.

 

Surely the same thing could be said about your ear and nose hair though?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Surely the same thing could be said about your ear and nose hair though?

 

That point crossed my mind too as I wrote it but to be honest there is a subtle difference. Sometimes, even now, 25 years after first getting facial hair, I prefer my 2 or 3 day stubble look. I think it looks great although I have had different reactions from different people. However, curly hairs growing out of the side of my ears has never been a good look. An example. Whilst a woman might say to her friend, "Ooh, I really like a man with stubble" I have yet to hear one say, "Ooh, I really like a man with hairy ears."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My point is that when someone has a hang up about doing a bird with a shaven snatch and it is based on child sex, then it doesn't add up. Women spend their lives ridding their bodies of hair from all manner of places. Legs, armpits, some even the top lip. Now, in all these instances the hair would not be there when they were young girls. It is just a natural extension of a woman wanting to feel feminine and it does not equate to anything child related. I think it is more to do with being the opposite to a man.

 

Why do women remove their body hair? Obviously I don't know the answer but I guess that its based on our particulate culture's (male) vision of female beauty, thin/hairless/childlike. If the vogue was for hairy women, would they go through the pain of removing it? I don't know. I'm a very hairy man, in some places it looks good, and in others in looks ridiculous, but then again, that could also be down to what's deemed culturally acceptable.

 

The hairless look makes me think of American porn which by and large is awlful. They want it to be graphic but pubic hair is still deemed to be dirty (in a bad way), bloody sex-obsessed puritons (a bunch of God fearing paedo's). My afternoon coffee has kicked in and i'm rambling...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why do women remove their body hair? Obviously I don't know the answer but I guess that its based on our particulate culture's (male) vision of female beauty, thin/hairless/childlike. If the vogue was for hairy women, would they go through the pain of removing it? I don't know. I'm a very hairy man, in some places it looks good, and in others in looks ridiculous, but then again, that could also be down to what's deemed culturally acceptable.

 

The hairless look makes me think of American porn which by and large is awlful. They want it to be graphic but pubic hair is still deemed to be dirty (in a bad way), bloody sex-obsessed puritons (a bunch of God fearing paedo's). My afternoon coffee has kicked in and i'm rambling...

 

There is an obvious solution to all this and it is to let them grow hairy snatches, but if it's not your bag, simply turn them over and go up the wrong-un!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...