Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
bold down below and blonde on their head. And blue eyes preferably.

 

You mean bald? Everyone likes bold down below. I hate bald undercarriage. Is it the look or the feel that you like? I really don't like baldy porn, might as well read the lancet, on the other hand not keen on a down under Bellamy. So - look or feel?

Posted (edited)
bold down below and blonde on their head. And blue eyes preferably.
And a spikey dark hairy balloon knot to lap. Edited by Dog
Posted
i like a runway, thin but so its not like she is pre-pubescent

 

I am probably a bit older than you and can say that at my age I feel secure with them being totally shaven down there. If I get any pre-pubescent feelings I need only look at the beard.

Guest Dark Sotonic Mills
Posted
i like a runway, thin but so its not like she is pre-pubescent

 

Err No Hair = Pre-Pubescent

Hair = Pubescent

 

That's one of the definitions...

 

:rolleyes:

Posted
anyone who likes a bald muff either wants to have sex with a barbie doll or a six year old

 

brazilians/runways, who are you? craig david?

 

give me the classic furry triangle anyday

 

I can assume you like a woman with hairy armpits and legs like a scotsman too?

Posted
I can assume you like a woman with hairy armpits and legs like a scotsman too?

 

 

as i said, 'the classic furry triangle', not hairy legs/arms/mouth/back/palms etc. but sometimes some light underarm hair can do funny things to me (its probably going to too many raves with skanky psy-trance types...)

Posted
as i said, 'the classic furry triangle', not hairy legs/arms/mouth/back/palms etc. but sometimes some light underarm hair can do funny things to me (its probably going to too many raves with skanky psy-trance types...)

 

My point is that when someone has a hang up about doing a bird with a shaven snatch and it is based on child sex, then it doesn't add up. Women spend their lives ridding their bodies of hair from all manner of places. Legs, armpits, some even the top lip. Now, in all these instances the hair would not be there when they were young girls. It is just a natural extension of a woman wanting to feel feminine and it does not equate to anything child related. I think it is more to do with being the opposite to a man.

Posted
My point is that when someone has a hang up about doing a bird with a shaven snatch and it is based on child sex, then it doesn't add up. Women spend their lives ridding their bodies of hair from all manner of places. Legs, armpits, some even the top lip. Now, in all these instances the hair would not be there when they were young girls. It is just a natural extension of a woman wanting to feel feminine and it does not equate to anything child related. I think it is more to do with being the opposite to a man.

 

Surely the same thing could be said about your ear and nose hair though?

Posted
Surely the same thing could be said about your ear and nose hair though?

 

That point crossed my mind too as I wrote it but to be honest there is a subtle difference. Sometimes, even now, 25 years after first getting facial hair, I prefer my 2 or 3 day stubble look. I think it looks great although I have had different reactions from different people. However, curly hairs growing out of the side of my ears has never been a good look. An example. Whilst a woman might say to her friend, "Ooh, I really like a man with stubble" I have yet to hear one say, "Ooh, I really like a man with hairy ears."

Posted
My point is that when someone has a hang up about doing a bird with a shaven snatch and it is based on child sex, then it doesn't add up. Women spend their lives ridding their bodies of hair from all manner of places. Legs, armpits, some even the top lip. Now, in all these instances the hair would not be there when they were young girls. It is just a natural extension of a woman wanting to feel feminine and it does not equate to anything child related. I think it is more to do with being the opposite to a man.

 

Why do women remove their body hair? Obviously I don't know the answer but I guess that its based on our particulate culture's (male) vision of female beauty, thin/hairless/childlike. If the vogue was for hairy women, would they go through the pain of removing it? I don't know. I'm a very hairy man, in some places it looks good, and in others in looks ridiculous, but then again, that could also be down to what's deemed culturally acceptable.

 

The hairless look makes me think of American porn which by and large is awlful. They want it to be graphic but pubic hair is still deemed to be dirty (in a bad way), bloody sex-obsessed puritons (a bunch of God fearing paedo's). My afternoon coffee has kicked in and i'm rambling...

Posted
Why do women remove their body hair? Obviously I don't know the answer but I guess that its based on our particulate culture's (male) vision of female beauty, thin/hairless/childlike. If the vogue was for hairy women, would they go through the pain of removing it? I don't know. I'm a very hairy man, in some places it looks good, and in others in looks ridiculous, but then again, that could also be down to what's deemed culturally acceptable.

 

The hairless look makes me think of American porn which by and large is awlful. They want it to be graphic but pubic hair is still deemed to be dirty (in a bad way), bloody sex-obsessed puritons (a bunch of God fearing paedo's). My afternoon coffee has kicked in and i'm rambling...

 

There is an obvious solution to all this and it is to let them grow hairy snatches, but if it's not your bag, simply turn them over and go up the wrong-un!

Posted

Baldy bird = NO!

Chewbacca bird = NO!

Somewhere in between bird = OK!

 

Anais Nin has something to say about this I think, it's between the necrophilliac and voyuer stories.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...