sidthesquid Posted 9 February, 2009 Share Posted 9 February, 2009 Oh and I never suggested Lowe wasn't paid, I was trying to differentiate between being a shareholding director and an employed one - hence the latter being easier to sack Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
um pahars Posted 9 February, 2009 Share Posted 9 February, 2009 Oh and I never suggested Lowe wasn't paid, I was trying to differentiate between being a shareholding director and an employed one - hence the latter being easier to sack The latter one is only more difficult to sack to the extent of their personal shareholding and with just over 5%, that's not enough to ensure Lowe is unsackable. It would require the withdrawal of support from some who have erstwhile backed him to date, but the mere fact he is a minority shareholder with 5/6% does not preclude him from being removed from office. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sidthesquid Posted 9 February, 2009 Share Posted 9 February, 2009 It doesn't make it impossible, I agree, but for whatever reason his proxies have been totally and unwaveringly loyal up to now. Wilde is the wild-card (pardon the pun) but I cannot see him switching sides again Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
um pahars Posted 9 February, 2009 Share Posted 9 February, 2009 It doesn't make it impossible, I agree, but for whatever reason his proxies have been totally and unwaveringly loyal up to now. There are some in Lowe's cabal that I think would support him no matter what he did (his father, Cowen, Marland etc), but I also think there may be some, who when the push really comes to the shove, might just put their loyalty to their Club before him (i.e. Askham & Richards). Wilde is the wild-card (pardon the pun) but I cannot see him switching sides again Well considering his U-turn a year ago was an about turn of epic proportions, then I fail to see how anyone could rule out Wilde changing his mind again. He was scathing of Lowe a couple of years back and even as recently as just over a year ago he was still vociferous against him (go back to the Runnymeded minutes where they couldn't agree to serve on a board together!!!!). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sidthesquid Posted 9 February, 2009 Share Posted 9 February, 2009 There are some in Lowe's cabal that I think would support him no matter what he did (his father, Cowen, Marland etc), but I also think there may be some, who when the push really comes to the shove, might just put their loyalty to their Club before him (i.e. Askham & Richards). Any evidence of this? Well considering his U-turn a year ago was an about turn of epic proportions, then I fail to see how anyone could rule out Wilde changing his mind again. He was scathing of Lowe a couple of years back and even as recently as just over a year ago he was still vociferous against him (go back to the Runnymeded minutes where they couldn't agree to serve on a board together!!!!). What were we actually arguing about? I've spent so long defending every line I write I can no longer remember what the original point was Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Weston Super Saint Posted 20 February, 2009 Author Share Posted 20 February, 2009 FAO Mark Wotte. Please stop blaming the fans, it is you and the other idiots that run the club that have put us in this position, so either STFU and get us out of this mess or f&%ck off!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now