Jump to content

Jeremy Clarkson.


OLYMPIC
 Share

Recommended Posts

He admitted publicly this week that he 'didn't see the recession coming'.

 

He is therefore uneducated, ignorant or ill informed, which by the definition you posted makes him an idiot :D

 

Boooooooo :D

 

He's definitely not uneducated. He's definitely not ignorant. He may well have been ill informed but that's hardly his fault, really, if that's the case.

 

If he was ill informed so was every other leader / finance minister in the Western world. So I guess they're all idiots then :rolleyes:

 

Clarkson, on the other hand, was sort of educated at some public school somewhere, but to no great degree. He's definitely ignorant and this is demonstrated by his regular use of offensive phrases and descriptions of people. He's probably as well informed as the rest of us but he chooses to ignore / misuse that information.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Don't worry Jillyanne you are not the first, My youngest sister married a Jock Pongo 25 years ago, He rose through the ranks, Took her with him all over the world, She had three lovely Kidd's, They are well off with the houses they sold, and his high pension, And now they are semi retired in there Early 40s running there own ranch and Hotel catering for posh ass golfers in Margate Durban S Africa, And iff asked what i think of my Scottish brother in law. I reply To me he is a KANT!:D..................Best of luck Girl.

 

Thanks for that!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

lay into Slang 1. To scold sharply.

2. To attack physically; beat up.

 

I don't have to TRY to be clever :D

 

Believing the internet dictionary is one of the reasons grammar has gone to pot. If you believe that, then read this: http://i-shrugged.blogspot.com/2008/02/into-or-in-to.html It's just as believable as the one you found, which is incorrect.

 

You can reword the statement to read similar to; "he laid in, to Gordon Brown". But the comma is not needed, however it helps to show why the use of 'into' is incorrect in this instance when you read the statement properly.

Bye.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Even though he took back the controversial aspects of his statement, I do utterly respect Clarkson for him sticking by his initial statement that Gordon Brown is an idiot.

 

If only more people around would have more conviction in their words, MR WILDE!!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Believing the internet dictionary is one of the reasons grammar has gone to pot. If you believe that, then read this: http://i-shrugged.blogspot.com/2008/02/into-or-in-to.html It's just as believable as the one you found, which is incorrect.

 

You can reword the statement to read similar to; "he laid in, to Gordon Brown". But the comma is not needed, however it helps to show why the use of 'into' is incorrect in this instance when you read the statement properly.

Bye.

My dear boy, please take note :-

Oxford English Dictionary : lay into ( informal ) attack violently.

Chambers Dictionary : lay into someone ( colloq ) to attack or scold them severely.

Cambridge Dictionary : lay into ( sb ) phrasal verb INFORMAL

to attack someone physically or to criticise them in an angry way:

{m:- In the middle of the meeting she suddenly laid into him for no apparent reason. }

 

TTFN ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My dear boy, please take note :-

Oxford English Dictionary : lay into ( informal ) attack violently.

Chambers Dictionary : lay into someone ( colloq ) to attack or scold them severely.

Cambridge Dictionary : lay into ( sb ) phrasal verb INFORMAL

to attack someone physically or to criticise them in an angry way:

{m:- In the middle of the meeting she suddenly laid into him for no apparent reason. }

 

TTFN ;)

 

They are all noted as slang though aren't they, which technically is incorrect English ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They are all noted as slang though aren't they, which technically is incorrect English ;)

English is a living, evolving language; the language of Chaucer grew into that of Shakespeare, which itself had perhaps 20% of the words and phrases commonly in use today, and the grammar and accepted spelling keep pace; after all, 'meh' made it into the Collins Dictionary at the end of last year.

 

It all depends on what the individual defines as 'correct' English, ( and we can start by discounting all the American corruptions such as 'color' and 'lite' :p ).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...