Weston Saint Posted 5 February, 2009 Share Posted 5 February, 2009 So what do we think. In the first innings WI referred 1 but no chang in decision (correctly) england referred 2 and not changed (again correctly). Reafirms just how good the Umpires are. Now in West Indies innings England have referred 2 and one correctly changed. I like this system as it will take out of the game those occassional bad decisions. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
manji Posted 5 February, 2009 Share Posted 5 February, 2009 I dont like the way it undermines umpires for a start and it slows the game down.Its pretty bad waiting for a decision but imagine sitting around waiting for a decision at a test match and you have no idea whats going on for 4 or 5 mins. Imagine if The Ashes last deciding wicket is on a referral and we are sat around waiting,it kills the drama........ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nellie Posted 5 February, 2009 Share Posted 5 February, 2009 According to Nasser Hussain, Daryl Harper ballsed up the referral by Sarwan. He said the ICC have stated he gave the decision based upon being a standing umpire (i.e. giving the benefit of doubt to the batsman), when he should have only corrected the decision if there it was an obvious mistake. If it's 50/50, then he should always go with the decision that the standing umpire gave originally. I would rather not have the process used as I feel it undermines the standing umpires somewhat; if it is used though, the umpires need to be bloody certain what their remit is to avoid mistakes like today. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
keithd Posted 6 February, 2009 Share Posted 6 February, 2009 takes the talking points out of the game. soon we'll all be down the pub at home wherever talking about a totally sterile salient game, no talking points, no controversy. its like in football, we talk about bad refereering decisions, we wuz robbed. or alternatively talk about the luck we had and how we deserved it. without that the game loses a lot of its excitement. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nellie Posted 8 February, 2009 Share Posted 8 February, 2009 Good to see Daryl Harper was equally as incompetent when adjudicating on Powell's caught behind decision. How on earth couldn't he see the yawning gap between bat and ball? The whole point of the referral syatem is to avoid these kind of elementary mistakes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now