bridge too far Posted 1 February, 2009 Share Posted 1 February, 2009 ??? 19 Ranteen / Sundance is reputedly Lord Jonathan MARLAND. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eelpie Posted 1 February, 2009 Share Posted 1 February, 2009 Exactly right Manji, and even if it was a 1,000 as claimed ... Quote by austsaint: "Speaking to one of the senior officers as we got into Kingsway, he commented on how well behaved and sensible the marchers were and estimated abot 1,500." I hope that helps. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toomer Posted 1 February, 2009 Share Posted 1 February, 2009 19 Ranteen / Sundance is reputedly Lord Jonathan MARLAND. Just a bit slow on the uptake today. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EastleighSoulBoy Posted 1 February, 2009 Share Posted 1 February, 2009 Sundance Beast, Nineteen Canteen and JohnnyFartPants - are they all the same person? I have been told that 19/Beast are one and the the same. I don't think that JFP is part of the unholy alliance. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Trumush Posted 1 February, 2009 Share Posted 1 February, 2009 I have been told that 19/Beast are one and the the same. I don't think that JFP is part of the unholy alliance. Does anyone know if "19/Beast " is the same guy who at the 2007 AGM gave the top table horrendous stick telling them they had no right to be there etc,then at last years AGM ,gave Lowe his undying support, and sniped at Crouch,Lawrie,Corbett etc throughout the meeting(until they walked out).Just curious. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alpine_saint Posted 1 February, 2009 Share Posted 1 February, 2009 Exactly right Manji, and even if it was a 1,000 as claimed by the walkers (marchers implies some kind of glory so lets not use that) it was still less than 7.5% of the total number of Saints fans at the game today less the Swans. 7.5% made their point, well done but you remain in the minority, a tiny one at that, if you believe the BBC reports of 'several hundred'. You are oppose those who simply want to support the team and accept that given what Lowe and Wilde have inherited we should be pleased to still to be in touch with plan A - survival. Certainly no worse off than after 44 games last season any way. Did anyone hear about the spoilt Charlton fans protesting today or Watford fans. Did Leicester fans walk away from their club and desert Mandaric when he took them down. Why? A lack of prejudice whipped up by a poisoned and demented few, perhaps? I find it very amusing that considering some of the so called older, wiser and passionate fans that it took the guile of a 16 year old lad so the gutless with their petty and personal agendas could latch on to this lad's enterprise. Well done Connor and I mean that sincerely at least you had the courage and the guts to get off your backside and do something about it instead of moaning and groaning and dishing out the verbal abuse to anyone with a different view. If I was Rupert Lowe I would bring you into the fold and offer you a role at the club, your enterprise should be rewarded and your energy channelled more productively to help the club develop. So what did the walk achieve? Does anyone know? Yesterday was National Gorilla Suit Day, it looks like it the walk could have been in recognition of that fact although most of you left your suits at home although a fair few had them on judging by the pictures. Do you have plan now? At least you have a 1.5% larger minority than the shareholders who decided not to support Lowe at the AGM but unfortunately until you actually get significant support your actions will fall on deaf ears and entrench those you wish to remove. Why? Because whether we like it or not the vast majority showed today they believe Lowe and Wilde are a far better option or lesser evil whichever way you want to look at it than Crouch and his wild and ridiculous claims. Leon do you make a habit of making stupid false prophecies in January with regard to Saints? Well dane all, shows over and lets get back to supporting this club even though some of you will no doubt be gutted we didn't get stuffed 5-0 as per some posters sentiments - Charlie Wayman's among others. Your time for protest should have been last May and now like Crouch you are just a bunch of bitter after timers. Why dont you bog off back to your ECB election, Little Lord Fauntleroy ??? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wadesmith Posted 1 February, 2009 Share Posted 1 February, 2009 I can't beleive it took 6 people to carry that paper coffin. Surely that thing wasn't that heavy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
santo_michele Posted 1 February, 2009 Share Posted 1 February, 2009 Since I feel I would be wasting my breath to try and have a reasoned argument with the likes of sundance beast, nineteen canteen and manji, I think it is more appropriate not to bother. So, forgive me for lowering the tone, but I think my subsequent comment will echo the thoughts of most of the people here today: "F*ck off". Thank you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SimonRichards Posted 1 February, 2009 Share Posted 1 February, 2009 Here are some of my Pictures from yesterday Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Daren W Posted 1 February, 2009 Share Posted 1 February, 2009 As someone else mentioned, I reckon you would have to go back years to find a protest march in this fine City that pulled in the numbers that were there today. As Lawrie once said we hide and conceal our passion, but to get 1,500 out on a march an hour and a half+ before kick off is a very big coup. It may not sit well with your beliefs, but I very much doubt we will see another demo of this size for any other cause for quite a while. Um, I get he impression that with some posters on this site, unless the entire crowd at St Marys turned up they'd write it off as being a failure. Hell if the entire crowd did turn up they'd moan that unless the entire population of Southampton turned up they'd view it as a failure... lol It must really hurt that a helluva lot of people showed they cared rather than sit on a website being smug... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ottery st mary Posted 1 February, 2009 Share Posted 1 February, 2009 I can't beleive it took 6 people to carry that paper coffin. Surely that thing wasn't that heavy. The death of a massive football club had been placed inside. A heavy load to carry for our stoic fans....Bring Rupert and Michael to book for this atrocity. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Torbay Saint Posted 1 February, 2009 Share Posted 1 February, 2009 I must congratulate the organisers yesterday. The protest looked very impressive. The Welsh media also did us a favour during the week by reporting on the protests and asking the Swans fans to support it (there have also been in our situation) and it was great to see them supporting us from their buses. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OldNick Posted 1 February, 2009 Share Posted 1 February, 2009 every time i come on this forum, i find ridiculous Lowe PR plants. It's so disheartening. Witness "Nineteen Canteen". The latest little example of this. The People want the Lowe out. Lowe doesnt do the people the courtesy of talking to them in the way they expect. It's not rocket science, PR boy. Maybe if there was less emphasis on cynical tactics of manipulation via online PR plants like you, and more on honest open discourse and human engagement, the problem would cease to exist. When you next report back to Lowe, maybe that should be your advice. In the meantime, stop playing a game that takes no one in on here. Time for a strategy rethink, Mr entrepreneur. Or the downturn will start to bite.Someone with 8 posts and then posts on politics talks about PR plants Lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
manji Posted 1 February, 2009 Share Posted 1 February, 2009 Quote by austsaint: "Speaking to one of the senior officers as we got into Kingsway, he commented on how well behaved and sensible the marchers were and estimated abot 1,500." I hope that helps. They would say that to justify the overtime.................. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OldNick Posted 1 February, 2009 Share Posted 1 February, 2009 Seeing the pictures it shows a great turnout.Not full of numbskulls but just decent well meaning Saints fans.Whether it will make a difference only time will tell.More than I expected and so was a success by the organisers, although is it right there was a bit of trouble with some Swansea (told so at SMS, so dont know if true) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ottery st mary Posted 1 February, 2009 Share Posted 1 February, 2009 Someone with 8 posts and then posts on politics talks about PR plants Lol nick, you do make me laugh...You say your not one of Ruperts Ra Ra girls then you shake your pom poms all about and start accusing others of what they are or not...Almost to Ruperts orders... If I didn't know you better....I would suggest you were enjoying the repartee. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OldNick Posted 1 February, 2009 Share Posted 1 February, 2009 nick, you do make me laugh...You say your not one of Ruperts Ra Ra girls then you shake your pom poms all about and start accusing others of what they are or not...Almost to Ruperts orders... If I didn't know you better....I would suggest you were enjoying the repartee.I just think the hypocrisy of the post needs answering.Had a poster come on having a go at LC with only 8 posts he would be called a PR plant.SOME of the real anti RL 's are like spoilt schoolkids and only want the rules to be played to their rules or they will take the ball away. 19 is quite free to give his/her opinions.It is not to what many like and some I disagree with but the poster puts up a good and fair debate.All IMHO of course Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
offix Posted 1 February, 2009 Share Posted 1 February, 2009 (edited) Looks like it was a great event. Shame that Canteen and a few others are so far up Ru**rt's arse that they can hardly see daylight, let alone a large group of protesters Edited 1 February, 2009 by offix Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ottery st mary Posted 1 February, 2009 Share Posted 1 February, 2009 I just think the hypocrisy of the post needs answering.Had a poster come on having a go at LC with only 8 posts he would be called a PR plant.SOME of the real anti RL 's are like spoilt schoolkids and only want the rules to be played to their rules or they will take the ball away. 19 is quite free to give his/her opinions.It is not to what many like and some I disagree with but the poster puts up a good and fair debate.All IMHO of course Don't you start throwing your Rupert pom poms at me or you can buy your own drinks when you come to Sidmouth. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OldNick Posted 1 February, 2009 Share Posted 1 February, 2009 Don't you start throwing your Rupert pom poms at me or you can buy your own drinks when you come to Sidmouth. Im polishing my steel toe capped boots now, its not pom poms you should worryh about Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hypochondriac Posted 1 February, 2009 Share Posted 1 February, 2009 Seeing the pictures it shows a great turnout.Not full of numbskulls but just decent well meaning Saints fans.Whether it will make a difference only time will tell.More than I expected and so was a success by the organisers, although is it right there was a bit of trouble with some Swansea (told so at SMS, so dont know if true) If there was I certainly didn't see any. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
beatlesaint Posted 1 February, 2009 Share Posted 1 February, 2009 They would say that to justify the overtime.................. you are priceless.........carry on sniping from behind your keyboard.....you arent quite as funny/pathetic (delete as appropriate) as Sundance/Nineteen but given a bit of time and encouragement you could get there. Like it or not there were 1500 + there....thats 10% of the number of Saints fans at the game.....and if it doesnt bother you or you think its stupid then can i respectfully ask why you bother to post or read this thread ? There are plenty of others for you to comment on. Why dont you start a pro-Lowe one ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
offix Posted 1 February, 2009 Share Posted 1 February, 2009 you are priceless.........carry on sniping from behind your keyboard.....you arent quite as funny/pathetic (delete as appropriate) as Sundance/Nineteen but given a bit of time and encouragement you could get there. Like it or not there were 1500 + there....thats 10% of the number of Saints fans at the game.....and if it doesnt bother you or you think its stupid then can i respectfully ask why you bother to post or read this thread ? There are plenty of others for you to comment on. Why dont you start a pro-Lowe one ? Why the respect? Explain what there is to respect in his obvious wind-ups? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
beatlesaint Posted 1 February, 2009 Share Posted 1 February, 2009 Why the respect? Explain what there is to respect in his obvious wind-ups? just thought i would be polite and not lower myself to his/their level !! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ottery st mary Posted 1 February, 2009 Share Posted 1 February, 2009 Today's protest march in support of Rupert Lowe...This troupe were formally known as the Lowey Luvvies or Lowey Pixies are now known as The Rupert Ra Ra Girls Cheerleading Squad Will posters assist in identifying the various Rupert forum posters? I have spotted nick and manji at the front with johnnyfartpants bringing up the rear. sadoldgit was dropped from the squad due to being subject of a window transfer to the Super Bowl Ra Ra girls. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Delmary Posted 1 February, 2009 Share Posted 1 February, 2009 Here are some of my Pictures from yesterday Some brilliant photos. The demo stretched from the top of the Bargate, down all the way past Debenhams & 1/4 into Hoglands Park. Looking down towards Debenhams from the top of the Bargate the protest march looked awesome. It took my breath away. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Andy_Porter Posted 1 February, 2009 Share Posted 1 February, 2009 The two people in this picture with the banners both got a fairly big picture in the football section of the Mail today. Quite a big write up about our game and the march. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
georgeg Posted 1 February, 2009 Share Posted 1 February, 2009 Same from me. While never being against the principle or idea of the march, I did say I didn't think the turnout would be that great. Massive respect to those who attended not just for attending, but doing it in a manner which makes all fans look good and not like mindless morons. I have been well and truly proven wrong in my comments on the turnout, so well done to all involved thanks Rob - next time make sure YOU are there and make a difference ITS TIME FOR CHANGE!!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EastleighSoulBoy Posted 1 February, 2009 Share Posted 1 February, 2009 Today's protest march in support of Rupert Lowe...This troupe were formally known as the Lowey Luvvies or Lowey Pixies are now known as The Rupert Ra Ra Girls Cheerleading Squad Will posters assist in identifying the various Rupert forum posters? I have spotted nick and manji at the front with johnnyfartpants bringing up the rear. sadoldgit was dropped from the squad due to being subject of a window transfer to the Super Bowl Ra Ra girls. I can see Jonathan/Somedunce/Ranteen, second row on our right as you look. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rut Posted 1 February, 2009 Share Posted 1 February, 2009 Here are some of my Pictures from yesterday Great pics - thanks. Well done to everyone who made the effort, I was there in spirit. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sadoldgit Posted 1 February, 2009 Share Posted 1 February, 2009 Today's protest march in support of Rupert Lowe...This troupe were formally known as the Lowey Luvvies or Lowey Pixies are now known as The Rupert Ra Ra Girls Cheerleading Squad Will posters assist in identifying the various Rupert forum posters? I have spotted nick and manji at the front with johnnyfartpants bringing up the rear. sadoldgit was dropped from the squad due to being subject of a window transfer to the Super Bowl Ra Ra girls. The days of me getting my leg up that high are long gone!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
voteforpedro Posted 1 February, 2009 Share Posted 1 February, 2009 just found this on youtube http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=gvf-f_dy5hk Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ottery st mary Posted 1 February, 2009 Share Posted 1 February, 2009 just found this on youtube http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=gvf-f_dy5hk Some of the marchers are fitter than our players...I lost count at 3,000:p Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EastleighSoulBoy Posted 1 February, 2009 Share Posted 1 February, 2009 Some of the marchers are fitter than our players...I lost count at 3,000:p No stamina! 3,027, not including the O.B. Happy to help Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Iowsaintsfan Posted 1 February, 2009 Share Posted 1 February, 2009 The front ones need to walk slower there was a bit of a gap in the middle! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wes Tender Posted 1 February, 2009 Share Posted 1 February, 2009 Unable to post this morning, but having had a read through on my return home now, I have to have a good belly laugh at the sourness and churlishness contained in the posts by Nineteen Canteen / Sundance and Manji. They're obviously not very good losers, are they? The protest went really well and yet still they won't admit it. Nothing that was predicted by them came to pass, the numbers were much larger, the age range was varied, it wasn't hijacked by the yoof looking for some aggro; in short, it reflected great credit in the supporters. They can't even bleat that it had any effect on the players. In fact, if anything, the atmosphere inside the stadium was probably more supportive than usual, the fans having had a warm-up beforehand. The arch luvvies ask what it achieved? Well, it achieved several things. It brought about a unity of purpose amongst dissenting groups. It will have demonstrated to many that if we act together, we can gain publicity both locally and nationally. Even if Lowe, Wilde and the other charlatans ignore it at the moment, they must accept that now every football fan in the country knows that Southampton fans want to rid the club of its current chairman and board. There must be many businessmen interested in football who will have similarly noted that opportunities might be created in the near future to gain control of the club if either the current board is ousted or the club goes into administration. But if Nineteen Canteen, Manji, or Johnny Fart think that this didn't achieve anything, they should know that this was just the opening ploy, the shot across the bows. Once it becomes clear to the organisers of this march that Lowe and the Quisling will arrogantly turn their backs on their efforts, or better still label the organisers as Neanderthals, they will quickly be open to thinking about the next move to ratchet up the stakes. In my opinion we should have stopped pussy footing around and gone straight for the mass boycott. The march was great and made a point. The boycott will not only make a point, but will hit the board hard in the pocket. The finances are in such a parlous state if they are to be believed, that a few thousand off the attendance figures would have us with such a shortfall agianst our running costs that it would cause alarm not only in the boardroom, but also in the bank manager's office at Barclays. The next home game should not only have a march and demonstration outside the ground; everybody on the march should also not buy a ticket. Perhaps the local radio station could be pursuaded to have a louspeaker feed from their commentary broadcast to outside the ground so that we can listen en-masse and maintain some group spirit, or else CB Fry's original idea of having events supported by ex-players could be investigated. I'm seriously thinking that I won't be bothering with home matches from now on until Lowe is gone. Anybody else? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HILL HEAD SAINT Posted 1 February, 2009 Share Posted 1 February, 2009 Photos show good turn out, good support during the game and decent performance. Glad to see no in-fighting between fans this time. What was the second protect after the game about? Was about 30 to 40 crowded around tv camera outside the front entrance singing anti-lowe songs -looked very set up for the camera, or an alternative protest with embarassing turn out! nice to see a lowe luvie chipping in! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fitzhugh Fella Posted 1 February, 2009 Share Posted 1 February, 2009 Unable to post this morning, but having had a read through on my return home now, I have to have a good belly laugh at the sourness and churlishness contained in the posts by Nineteen Canteen / Sundance and Manji. They're obviously not very good losers, are they? The protest went really well and yet still they won't admit it. Nothing that was predicted by them came to pass, the numbers were much larger, the age range was varied, it wasn't hijacked by the yoof looking for some aggro; in short, it reflected great credit in the supporters. They can't even bleat that it had any effect on the players. In fact, if anything, the atmosphere inside the stadium was probably more supportive than usual, the fans having had a warm-up beforehand. The arch luvvies ask what it achieved? Well, it achieved several things. It brought about a unity of purpose amongst dissenting groups. It will have demonstrated to many that if we act together, we can gain publicity both locally and nationally. Even if Lowe, Wilde and the other charlatans ignore it at the moment, they must accept that now every football fan in the country knows that Southampton fans want to rid the club of its current chairman and board. There must be many businessmen interested in football who will have similarly noted that opportunities might be created in the near future to gain control of the club if either the current board is ousted or the club goes into administration. But if Nineteen Canteen, Manji, or Johnny Fart think that this didn't achieve anything, they should know that this was just the opening ploy, the shot across the bows. Once it becomes clear to the organisers of this march that Lowe and the Quisling will arrogantly turn their backs on their efforts, or better still label the organisers as Neanderthals, they will quickly be open to thinking about the next move to ratchet up the stakes. In my opinion we should have stopped pussy footing around and gone straight for the mass boycott. The march was great and made a point. The boycott will not only make a point, but will hit the board hard in the pocket. The finances are in such a parlous state if they are to be believed, that a few thousand off the attendance figures would have us with such a shortfall agianst our running costs that it would cause alarm not only in the boardroom, but also in the bank manager's office at Barclays. The next home game should not only have a march and demonstration outside the ground; everybody on the march should also not buy a ticket. Perhaps the local radio station could be pursuaded to have a louspeaker feed from their commentary broadcast to outside the ground so that we can listen en-masse and maintain some group spirit, or else CB Fry's original idea of having events supported by ex-players could be investigated. I'm seriously thinking that I won't be bothering with home matches from now on until Lowe is gone. Anybody else? Good post - the protesters have the moral highground, great march, significant numbers and a wide spread of attendees. Plus no anti songs during the match. So the anti Lowe voice is varied, genuine and non political. His defenders on here have been exposed as nothing more than bitter and twisted. Lowe will never see sense but Wilde is a different kettle of fish. He is not held back by a pompous ego- he knows the writing is on the wall. I reckon we continue to support the club in the stadium but more marches beforehand and afterwards. The media coverage has been massive this weekend and that will encourage more to join next time. I sense the tide is turning - however one thing we must be cautious of is that beware of who might come in - the anything but Lowe sentiment was our undoing last time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aintforever Posted 1 February, 2009 Share Posted 1 February, 2009 Boycotting is the best dea in principle, but let's not forget we are in a relegation scrap, if we go down we are screwed regardless of who is running the club. The team needs SMS to be as intimidating as possible for the opposition. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HILL HEAD SAINT Posted 1 February, 2009 Share Posted 1 February, 2009 In my view the so called "real supporters" you speak of,wouldve been the ones who took part in the march. These are the fans who have turned up all season,despite having to watch Lowe and Wilde do their best to send us to League One. Yet they felt they needed to get from behind a keyboard and protest for what they think is right. Have you ever come out from behind your keyboard manji? I tell you what,all you pro Lowes organise a march to tell the city of Southampton what a good job your leader is doing and lets see how many turn up. the band of four,manji,nick h,nick g,and sundance,named and shamed! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
um pahars Posted 1 February, 2009 Share Posted 1 February, 2009 Good post - the protesters have the moral highground, great march, significant numbers and a wide spread of attendees. Plus no anti songs during the match. So the anti Lowe voice is varied, genuine and non political. His defenders on here have been exposed as nothing more than bitter and twisted. Lowe will never see sense but Wilde is a different kettle of fish. He is not held back by a pompous ego- he knows the writing is on the wall. I totally agree. People were asking whether Lowe will step down because of this march and the obvious answer is of course not. But what this protest did was to provide a platform for people to come together and to try and start a process that can grow and grow. We're quite a shy bunch down here and will only step out from the shadows once others have shown us the way. I think the way was shown yesterday and I would like to believe that this could be the start of something positive for our Club. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ponty Posted 1 February, 2009 Share Posted 1 February, 2009 How many Lowe Luvvies do estimate you could muster for a pro Lowe demo? Do the 15,000 fans at the stadium who didn't protest count? If they do, I'll say 15,000. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rocknrollman no2 Posted 1 February, 2009 Share Posted 1 February, 2009 Do the 15,000 fans at the stadium who didn't protest count? If they do, I'll say 15,000. You cant have them,because they stood up at the Ipswich game when we all sang"Stand up if you want Lowe out". Therefore they can be counted as anti Lowes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Norm Posted 1 February, 2009 Share Posted 1 February, 2009 Do the 15,000 fans at the stadium who didn't protest count? If they do, I'll say 15,000. Oh dear, you are normally quite sensible when you post:rolleyes: Lateness of the hour unsettled your thinking? I'm sure a good number of the 15,000 (?) in the stadium would disagree with your point of view. Or have I misunderstood your post? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ponty Posted 1 February, 2009 Share Posted 1 February, 2009 Probably. Stanley knows I was just pulling his leg. IMO no one would turn up to march FOR Lowe, but then that's pretty normal isn't it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Norm Posted 1 February, 2009 Share Posted 1 February, 2009 Probably. Stanley knows I was just pulling his leg. IMO no one would turn up to march FOR Lowe, but then that's pretty normal isn't it? Ponty, sorry. I thought you were serious. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ponty Posted 1 February, 2009 Share Posted 1 February, 2009 No worries. Anything is possible on here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gingeletiss Posted 1 February, 2009 Share Posted 1 February, 2009 Do the 15,000 fans at the stadium who didn't protest count? If they do, I'll say 15,000. There's your problem.....you missed the winky thingy;);) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NickG Posted 1 February, 2009 Share Posted 1 February, 2009 nice to see a lowe luvie chipping in! brilliant insight Hillhead. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Viking Warrior Posted 1 February, 2009 Share Posted 1 February, 2009 I can see where Manji is coming from re the numbers of those that attended. I guess as you got near the stadium fans not involved with the protest merge with those that were on the march. A couple of my mates who were not involved ended amongst the protest march as they neared the stadium. I have just seen them in the Video that was taken outside the pub. Also George the postie (Bike man) did not take part but he is in the video pushing his bike. Was that woman with the push chair really a fan, the kid in it must have been petrified manji is partly right in what he is saying but setting that aside . there was still a good turnout Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now