Jump to content

Saints 1-2 Fulham - Match Thread


Recommended Posts

Posted
11 minutes ago, OttawaSaint said:

And physically weak. Frustrating, clean through twice and it looked like he was wearing wooden clogs.

Add "Can't tackle" to the list

  • Like 2
Posted
1 minute ago, Saint86 said:

Carry on with current intensity and i can only see another loss.

Could go similar to the Villa game although Fulham have nowhere near as much quality. 1-1 would do me..

Posted

Half time.

A better performance. Luckily Fulhams strikers have had stinkers so far, the few chances they did create got fluffed.

Stephens is having one of those games where he looks decent, let's hope he can keep it up.

Might be a good game to chuck Archer on at h/t rather than wait until 60 mins and do the usual triple sub. 

  • Like 1
Posted
1 minute ago, sockeye said:

Need to push on for a second. Stewart needs to come off.

I'd be surprised if he comes out for the second half. He's been terrible and understandably doesn't look fit. Could see him needing to drop down to League 1 or something when his contract runs out. 

  • Like 2
Posted
24 minutes ago, goodymatt said:

Wouldn’t be a surprise if all of Stewart’s injuries have reduced his pace. He looked pretty quick at Sunderland.

Wow, Ross Stewart is probably the worst player I have ever seen …

Always on his heels, weak, basically terrible player. Get him off! 

  • Like 1
Posted
7 minutes ago, Saint NL said:

Half time.

A better performance. Luckily Fulhams strikers have had stinkers so far, the few chances they did create got fluffed.

Stephens is having one of those games where he looks decent, let's hope he can keep it up.

Might be a good game to chuck Archer on at h/t rather than wait until 60 mins and do the usual triple sub. 

Archer hasn't been good at all but he's never looked as bad as Stewart just did. 

Posted

Saints already taking on the role of plucky Championship side. Defend deep and rely on long balls/set pieces. Maybe should have started the season this way.

Posted (edited)
5 minutes ago, Saint NL said:

Lesley looks much improved of late. Sulemana, not so much.

He'd have been better moving to the right and having a shot. Low IQ Sulemana made no effort to change his path to allow a pass towards goal and put him in clear. Sulemana happy to just remain wide with no option. Better running and it's a great chance. He'll  (Sule) never improve.

Edited by OttawaSaint
Posted
16 minutes ago, HKsaint said:

Armstrong or BBD is better than Stewart. 

A tad harsh HK my old pal, Stewart’s played about 3 hrs in the last 3 years. Needs a bit of time to get up to speed.

  • Like 2
Posted (edited)
1 minute ago, stknowle said:

A tad harsh HK my old pal, Stewart’s played about 3 hrs in the last 3 years. Needs a bit of time to get up to speed.

So walking speed next week and then after that, a slight jog?

Edited by OttawaSaint
Posted
Just now, stknowle said:

A tad harsh HK my old pal, Stewart’s played about 3 hrs in the last 3 years. Needs a bit of time to get up to speed.

Seems a sensible strategy to get him a few games to see if we can get him back to some sort of form

  • Like 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, StrangelyBrown said:

Seems a sensible strategy to get him a few games to see if we can get him back to some sort of form

I don't think there's much point. He looks a million miles from a Premier League player.

Posted
Just now, Harry_SFC said:

I don't think there's much point. He looks a million miles from a Premier League player.

Thankfully for us……. Matters not

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...