Turkish Posted April 16 Posted April 16 15 minutes ago, Saint Fan CaM said: There….fixed it for you. Unfortunately MLG isn’t particularly bright. in his world unless there is a £20m debit with the name Rasmus Ankersen next to it he wouldn’t get it 1
Matthew Le God Posted April 16 Posted April 16 8 minutes ago, Turkish said: However much some of the helmets on here rim Sports Republic at every opportunity you’re right. They even once described themselves at a player trading company. it won’t stop the arse licking by some on here but it’s clearly not about making SFC as successful as it can be I think you will struggle to find examples of doing that to Sport Republic. On what are you basing the claim of not wanting Saints to be successful?
Matthew Le God Posted April 16 Posted April 16 9 minutes ago, Turkish said: Unfortunately MLG isn’t particularly bright. in his world unless there is a £20m debit with the name Rasmus Ankersen next to it he wouldn’t get it Utter nonsense yet again. How are they removing money from the group?
Turkish Posted April 16 Author Posted April 16 Just now, Matthew Le God said: I think you will struggle to find examples of doing that to Sport Republic. On what are you basing the claim of not wanting Saints to be successful? There are some on this thread I did not say that was the case Yet again you’ve failed
Turkish Posted April 16 Author Posted April 16 (edited) 3 minutes ago, Matthew Le God said: Utter nonsense yet again. How are they removing money from the group? I didn’t say they were, I said you wouldn’t be able to comprehend anything other than a very black and white example of them doing it. Given your repeated failure to comprehend simple concepts on a football forum it appears that summation to be correct Yet again you fail Edited April 16 by Turkish
Matthew Le God Posted April 16 Posted April 16 2 minutes ago, Turkish said: 1) There are some on this thread 2) I did not say that was the case Yet again you’ve failed 1) Name them! 2) Yes you did, you said... "it’s clearly not about making SFC as successful as it can be"
Turkish Posted April 16 Author Posted April 16 (edited) 2 minutes ago, Matthew Le God said: 1) Name them! 2) Yes you did, you said... "it’s clearly not about making SFC as successful as it can be" Which is different to what i said 7 minutes ago, Matthew Le God said: On what are you basing the claim of not wanting Saints to be successful? 3 fails in 3 posts everthing okay at home Matty? Edited April 16 by Turkish
Matthew Le God Posted April 16 Posted April 16 (edited) 20 minutes ago, Turkish said: I didn’t say they were, I said you wouldn’t be able to comprehend anything other than a very black and white example of them doing it. Given your repeated failure to comprehend simple concepts on a football forum it appears that summation to be correct Yet again you fail Name a non "black and white example" of them taking money out of the group. Edited April 16 by Matthew Le God
Matthew Le God Posted April 16 Posted April 16 1 minute ago, Turkish said: Which is different to what i said It isn't.
Turkish Posted April 16 Author Posted April 16 Just now, Matthew Le God said: Name a none "black and white example" of them taking money out of the group. I didn’t say they had, I said if there was one you wouldn’t be able to comprehend it 4 posts 4 fails Struggling tonight aren’t we
Turkish Posted April 16 Author Posted April 16 1 minute ago, Matthew Le God said: It isn't. Not making someone as successful as they can be is different to not wanting them to be successful at all 5 posts 5 fails probably time you went to bed
Matthew Le God Posted April 16 Posted April 16 Just now, Turkish said: Not making someone as successful as they can be is different to not wanting them to be successful at all 5 posts 5 fails probably time you went to bed Suggest a motivation for not wanting to be as successful as they can be?
Matthew Le God Posted April 16 Posted April 16 (edited) 6 minutes ago, Turkish said: I didn’t say they had, I said if there was one you wouldn’t be able to comprehend it 4 posts 4 fails Struggling tonight aren’t we It isn't hard to spot money leaving accounts of the group. What the accounts do show is they have put large amounts into Saints! Edited April 16 by Matthew Le God
Turkish Posted April 16 Author Posted April 16 (edited) 3 minutes ago, Matthew Le God said: Suggest a motivation for not wanting to be as successful as they can be? To get premier league money to fund the group of clubs 6/6 MLG the gift that keeps giving Edited April 16 by Turkish
Matthew Le God Posted April 16 Posted April 16 (edited) 2 minutes ago, Turkish said: To get premier league money to fund the group of clubs 6/6 MLG the gift that keeps giving Time after time you have failed to explain how they are "getting Premier League money" out of the group and keeping it for themselves. Edited April 16 by Matthew Le God
Turkish Posted April 16 Author Posted April 16 2 minutes ago, Matthew Le God said: It isn't hard to spot money leaving accounts. What the accounts do show is put large amounts into Saints! Again I never said they were what I said was if they were you wouldn’t be able to comprehend unless it was clearly written 7/7 failed again
Turkish Posted April 16 Author Posted April 16 1 minute ago, Matthew Le God said: Time after time you have failed to explain how they are "getting Premier League money" out of the group and keeping it for themselves. And you’ve failed to understand I have never said they were 8 posts 8 fails tonight has been a disaster for you you’re like a punch drunk end of career boxer who doesn’t know when you throw the towel in
Holmes_and_Watson Posted April 16 Posted April 16 (edited) 5 minutes ago, Turkish said: To get premier league money to fund the group of clubs 6/6 MLG the gift that keeps giving Good grief. How can someone involved in education have such an inability to learn? "Name a none "black and white example" Is this another numeracy fail? A literacy fail? Is he looking at nun pics on the match day threads? 10 minutes ago, Turkish said: probably time you went to bed Just waiting for his kid to read him a bed time story, before another night of dreams about his man crush, Mr Spors. Edited April 16 by Holmes_and_Watson 1
Matthew Le God Posted April 16 Posted April 16 (edited) 7 minutes ago, Turkish said: Again I never said they were what I said was if they were you wouldn’t be able to comprehend unless it was clearly written 7/7 failed again Utter nonsense and avoidance yet again. I'm very familiar with how business accounts work and it is obvious when millions are leaving the account to the owners. The reverse is evident. The accounts show them putting large amounts into the club in the accounts. Edited April 16 by Matthew Le God
Turkish Posted April 16 Author Posted April 16 Just now, Matthew Le God said: Utter nonsense and avoidance yet again. I'm very familiar with how business accounts work and it is obvious when millions are leaving the account to the owners. The reverse is evident. The accounts shoe them putting large amounts into the club in the accounts. 9/9 This is your Liz Truss moment
Matthew Le God Posted April 16 Posted April 16 3 minutes ago, Turkish said: 9/9 This is your Liz Truss moment Still waiting for an explanation of how they would take money out of the accounts and no one notice it happening. This isn't just me, I mean... no one noticing! Have you have been taking accounting advice from Kwasi Kwarteng!?
Turkish Posted April 16 Author Posted April 16 (edited) 6 minutes ago, Matthew Le God said: Still waiting for an explanation of how they would take money out of the accounts and no one notice it happening. This isn't just me, I mean... no one noticing! Have you have been taking accounting advice from Kwasi Kwarteng!? I didn’t say no one else notice I said you wouldn’t notice. Yet again youre saying I said this I didn’t. A terrible, terrible night for you. Not MLG, OMG. Just when you think it can’t get worse for you it does. 10 posts 10 fails MLG 0 Turkish 10 congratulations on beating saints record 🥳🥳🥳🥳🥳 Edited April 16 by Turkish
Matthew Le God Posted April 16 Posted April 16 (edited) 3 minutes ago, Turkish said: I didn’t say no one else notice I said you wouldn’t notice. Yet again your saying I said this I didn’t. a terrible, terrible night for you. No MLG, OMG. Just when you think it can’t get worse for you it does. 10 posts 10 fails MLG 0 Turkish 10 congratulations on beating saints record 🥳🥳🥳🥳🥳 Oh dear Turkish. You jumped into this discussion and have forgotten how it started. It started with me questioning the claim that they have taken money out of the group. No-one has provided any evidence of them doing that. Time after time you fail to understand the burden of proof. You fail to comprehend, avoid questions and make petty insults. Rinse and repeat, year after year. Edited April 16 by Matthew Le God
Turkish Posted April 16 Author Posted April 16 (edited) 6 minutes ago, Matthew Le God said: Oh dear Turkish. You jumped into this discussion and have forgotten how it started. It started with me questioning the claim that they have taken money out of the group. No-one has provided any evidence of them doing that. Time after time you fail to understand the burden of proof. You fail to comprehend, avoid questions and make petty insults. Rinse and repeat, year after year. 11/11 another fail 1/ i was having a parallel discussion with someone else and you responded to me 2/ i said in an unrelated post you weren’t particularly bright. Something your last 11 posts have proven 3/ you have repeatedly claimed I said things which I did not a disastrous night Edited April 16 by Turkish
Matthew Le God Posted April 16 Posted April 16 4 minutes ago, Turkish said: 11/11 another fail 1/ i was having a parallel discussion with someone else and you responded to me. 2/ i said in an unrelated post you weren’t particularly bright. Something your last 11 posts have proven 3/ you have repeatedly claimed I said things which I did not a disastrous night 1) You were responding to a response to me. I was questioning the claim that they have taken money out of the group. No-one has provided any evidence of them doing that. Time after time you fail to understand the burden of proof. 2) Yet another example of pathetic petty insults. 3) Not at all. That is your modus operandi, not mine! 1
Turkish Posted April 16 Author Posted April 16 (edited) 18 minutes ago, Matthew Le God said: 1) You were responding to a response to me. I was questioning the claim that they have taken money out of the group. No-one has provided any evidence of them doing that. Time after time you fail to understand the burden of proof. 2) Yet another example of pathetic petty insults. 3) Not at all. That is your modus operandi, not mine! 12/12 it is you who have failed to understand, as usual Your first failure was to misquote my initial post which was not even in response to you and it has been a catalogue of errors since. A terrible night of posting from you where you have proven my earlier point, that you are not particularly bright, to be 💯 percent accurate, unlike anything you’ve posted today its interesting that the only thing you’ve got right tonight is that when I referred to the helmets on here rimming the club I was talking about you 😂😂😂 Edited April 16 by Turkish
Holmes_and_Watson Posted April 16 Posted April 16 7 minutes ago, Turkish said: 12/12 it is you who have failed to understand, as usual Your first failure was to misquote my initial post which was not even in response to you and it has been a catalogue of errors since. A terrible night of posting from you where you have proven my earlier point, that you are not particularly bright, to be 💯 percent accurate, unlike anything you’ve posted today It's nice for MLG to distract us from our season, by getting an even lower points total. If he had only read your post properly. You even pointed out why he wouldn't get it, which he promptly didn't get. "I'm very familiar with how business accounts work... The accounts shoe them putting large amounts into the club in the accounts." It's been a long time since businesses kept their money in shoes. He can't be teaching English. Maths is out, since he can't count to two. Too many logical fails to involve any rhetoric. We can now rule out accountancy. A really bitter RE teacher? 1
saint michael Posted April 16 Posted April 16 1 hour ago, Turkish said: However much some of the helmets on here rim Sports Republic at every opportunity you’re right. They even once described themselves at a player trading company. although it’s true that only a handful of clubs globally can’t sign and keep the best in the world that business model at Saints has been to buy low and sell high for a numbers of years nothing wrong with that, Dortmund do it brilliantly, Brighton have too in recent years but when it’s your only strategy and you do it incredibly badly like we’ve done you end up where we are. I can only think of Ramsdale and Ings as players of proven premier league quality weve signed in about 10 years and Ings with his injury record was a bit of a gamble. You can’t build a successful team when all you care about is how much you can sell a player for. the last four transfer windows we’ve been in the premier league have been absolutely shambolic, a load of kids in 2022 then a load of shite in January. 2024 a load of players baring a couple miles off it and let’s not even talk about this January. it won’t stop the arse licking by some on here but it’s clearly not about making SFC as successful as it can be Looks like you have your hands full with MLG extracting any point he can and ignoring the essence of the message. Agree with your points above and see this as a key point that will drive the club I love down and down I think the owners don’t align with football as a sport. 4
Holmes_and_Watson Posted April 16 Posted April 16 6 minutes ago, trousers said: Anyone fancy starting a thread to cover transfer news? I hear they get derailed. Did I tell you about the first thread I saw derailed? It was the summer of '46... yeah, I know the internet was decades away. I'm going to build up to that... 🙂 1 1
Gloucester Saint Posted April 16 Posted April 16 38 minutes ago, Holmes_and_Watson said: It's nice for MLG to distract us from our season, by getting an even lower points total. If he had only read your post properly. You even pointed out why he wouldn't get it, which he promptly didn't get. "I'm very familiar with how business accounts work... The accounts shoe them putting large amounts into the club in the accounts." It's been a long time since businesses kept their money in shoes. He can't be teaching English. Maths is out, since he can't count to two. Too many logical fails to involve any rhetoric. We can now rule out accountancy. A really bitter RE teacher? Our grandparents generation didn’t trust banks after the Great Depression of the 1930s. Maybe the Banking Crisis of 2008 had a similar impact on MLG? 1
Holmes_and_Watson Posted April 16 Posted April 16 11 minutes ago, Gloucester Saint said: Our grandparents generation didn’t trust banks after the Great Depression of the 1930s. Maybe the Banking Crisis of 2008 had a similar impact on MLG? Apparently, it was called the great depression because the weight of money-stuffed shoes would leave dents in the pavements. The economy collapsed, not because of a lack of jobs, but because people couldn't lift their legs to get to them. 3
Bob60 Posted April 16 Posted April 16 Can someone find these two tits a playground. Every bloody thread gets detailed with this crap, getting very tedious. 7
StrangelyBrown Posted April 17 Posted April 17 8 hours ago, Bob60 said: Can someone find these two tits a playground. Every bloody thread gets detailed with this crap, getting very tedious. It's a cock waving contest where the action can only be seen with a microscope. 3 5
Turkish Posted April 17 Author Posted April 17 10 hours ago, Bob60 said: Can someone find these two tits a playground. Every bloody thread gets detailed with this crap, getting very tedious. And the common denominator is……
Turkish Posted April 17 Author Posted April 17 He threw the towel in last night. Got an absolute battering. He’ll hide for a short time before coming back swinging correcting people on the most minuscule of points
OldNick Posted April 17 Posted April 17 Come on Turks, this is little more than bullying. You are better than that. We all know MLG is a pedant and is in his nature something he was born with. Give him a break 2
Turkish Posted April 18 Author Posted April 18 On 17/04/2025 at 13:44, OldNick said: Come on Turks, this is little more than bullying. You are better than that. We all know MLG is a pedant and is in his nature something he was born with. Give him a break I know it wouldn’t be long before someone said he was being bullied 😂😂😂😂😂😂
Matthew Le God Posted Saturday at 08:59 Posted Saturday at 08:59 (edited) 1 hour ago, Gloucester Saint said: Yeah, but citing X is like saying voters in some American states know anything about politics - ‘eg voting Trump because he’s going to make my supermarket shopping cheaper or because I care about the environment’. No it isn't. Because all I said was some Saints fans say it, not all Saints fans. Are they not Saints fans? Edited Saturday at 10:10 by Matthew Le God
Midfield_General Posted Saturday at 09:01 Posted Saturday at 09:01 30 minutes ago, Matthew Le God said: You both might not, but some do. As evidenced on Twitter every summer! Oh dear. There is no such platform as 'Twitter'. It's been called 'X' for 21 months. A basic factual error, there. 4
Matthew Le God Posted Saturday at 09:08 Posted Saturday at 09:08 3 minutes ago, Midfield_General said: Oh dear. There is no such platform as 'Twitter'. It's been called 'X' for 21 months. A basic factual error, there. I know what it is called, but most people continue to call it Twitter. When Prince changed his name to a symbol, did people call him Prince or the symbol?
OldNick Posted Saturday at 09:17 Posted Saturday at 09:17 14 hours ago, Turkish said: I know it wouldn’t be long before someone said he was being bullied 😂😂😂😂😂😂 Well standing back from your jolly joust, it looks like bullying to me. You know what you are doing and sadly MLG falls for it and cant help but respond. I don't like to see it and felt it needed calling out. Usually your humerous side is very good and can be entertaining but not on ths occasion. Nobody else has agreed with me and so it must be me who thinks it.
Gloucester Saint Posted Saturday at 09:19 Posted Saturday at 09:19 10 minutes ago, Matthew Le God said: I know what it is called, but most people continue to call it Twitter. When Prince changed his name to a symbol, did people call him Prince or the symbol? You pick other posters for that kind of thing all of the time - no way out on that one MLG 😀 1
Holmes_and_Watson Posted Saturday at 09:24 Posted Saturday at 09:24 3 minutes ago, Gloucester Saint said: You pick other posters for that kind of thing all of the time - no way out on that one MLG 😀 Give him a dozen posts. It won't make any difference. He'll still be wrong. But we'll have to go through that anyway. 1
Matthew Le God Posted Saturday at 09:58 Posted Saturday at 09:58 32 minutes ago, Holmes_and_Watson said: He'll still be wrong. But we'll have to go through that anyway. You and @Turkish do not need to read any of my posts. You choose to read them. If you did not want to read them then you could use the settings on this forum to hide my posts.
Weston Super Saint Posted Saturday at 10:04 Posted Saturday at 10:04 1 hour ago, Matthew Le God said: No it isn't. Because all I Saint was some Saints fans say it, not all Saints fans. Are they not Saints fans? Nope, no idea what that is supposed to mean.
Matthew Le God Posted Saturday at 10:11 Posted Saturday at 10:11 6 minutes ago, Weston Super Saint said: Nope, no idea what that is supposed to mean. Said not Saint.
Holmes_and_Watson Posted Saturday at 10:53 Posted Saturday at 10:53 (edited) 49 minutes ago, Weston Super Saint said: Nope, no idea what that is supposed to mean. Must be something that folk on X say. That's X, not Twitter, of course. 🙂 Edited Saturday at 10:54 by Holmes_and_Watson 1
Fabrice29 Posted Sunday at 07:55 Posted Sunday at 07:55 11 hours ago, Matthew Le God said: 255 people and counting disagree with you! (Argumentum ad populum 😉) And just out of interest how many people looked at it and didn’t like it? 1
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now