Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Screw him. The ruddy-cheeked bastard completely unnecessarily took us into administration a few days after the cut-off date for the points deduction to apply for the next season if relegated without it (which we did of course). So as an act of spite he gifted us a postponed 10 point deduction as we went down to league 1. He tried to cover it up with a pathetic excuse that the parent company, not the club itself, went into administration, and so the club shouldn't get a points deduction. Anyone with half a brain knew that was a bollocks argument and was never going to succeed.

  • Like 7
Posted
13 hours ago, Dark Munster said:

Screw him. The ruddy-cheeked bastard completely unnecessarily took us into administration a few days after the cut-off date for the points deduction to apply for the next season if relegated without it (which we did of course). So as an act of spite he gifted us a postponed 10 point deduction as we went down to league 1. He tried to cover it up with a pathetic excuse that the parent company, not the club itself, went into administration, and so the club shouldn't get a points deduction. Anyone with half a brain knew that was a bollocks argument and was never going to succeed.

It was worth a try though and we do have a modern stadium.

  • Like 1
Posted

I was pleased to play a small part in ousting Lowe from his perch in SFC and welcomed the new regime with Crouch etc., which eventually came good with Markus’ short but effective reign. I have to say that I have some empathy with some of Lowes politics, but as always the deployment of ideas is everything…talk is cheap.

  • Like 1
  • Confused 1
Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, benjii said:

"I'm enraged I'm being treated badly" says man who joined a party of selfish, lying pricks.

Stick to the labour party then chap , they always tell the truth 

 

Edited by Football Special
  • Like 1
  • Haha 3
Posted
On 09/03/2025 at 17:58, Gloucester Saint said:

The spending of 2006/7 further accelerated the club towards the abyss but fact was we were heading there under Lowe at a good speed already. The idea that he could manage a nation’s economy well is hilarious. 

So he says his lawyer told him that all allegations against him were unfounded, to which his lawyer says "I didn't say that".

Really doesn't sound like a trustworthy character and I remember him as the person who bankrupted our club. That's probably not accurate but fuck him, he sounds a right arrogant knob.

 

  • Like 5
Posted
8 minutes ago, OnceaSaintalwaysaSaint said:

So he says his lawyer told him that all allegations against him were unfounded, to which his lawyer says "I didn't say that".

Really doesn't sound like a trustworthy character and I remember him as the person who bankrupted our club. That's probably not accurate but fuck him, he sounds a right arrogant knob.

 

Think it was the lawyer, a KC, acting for Reform he said told him that (which is even more surprising that they might have said it, or that he revealed them saying it.)

  • Like 2
Posted
3 minutes ago, ApprenticeBillionaire said:

Yes he's such a "good MP" that a party of abject shithouses want him out.

Ah let me guess...

hE sPeAkS hIS mINd ThaTs WhY 

If he's speaking "his mind" I'm surprised we're hearing anything longer than a herniated syllable. For which he's apparently making £1500 a week from Twitter alone.

  • Like 1
Posted
5 hours ago, ApprenticeBillionaire said:

Yes he's such a "good MP" that a party of abject shithouses want him out.

Ah let me guess...

hE sPeAkS hIS mINd ThaTs WhY 

He's practically the only MP acting in opposition to the government,  he's done an excellent job , 

 

  • Like 5
Posted
2 hours ago, Football Special said:

He's practically the only MP acting in opposition to the government,  he's done an excellent job , 

 

Although we are politically polar opposites, (me being a Lib Dem remainer), I partly get where you are coming from on this point. Lowe at least tries to engage with the Parliamentary system with some organisation, which probably stems from his experiences at the FA and better times at Saints 2000-2004. Anderson ditto. Farage and Tice are Boris talking heads, Farage is strong presentationally but very little substance and would never be across the detail properly. 

  • Like 4
Posted
1 hour ago, Gloucester Saint said:

Although we are politically polar opposites, (me being a Lib Dem remainer), I partly get where you are coming from on this point. Lowe at least tries to engage with the Parliamentary system with some organisation, which probably stems from his experiences at the FA and better times at Saints 2000-2004. Anderson ditto. Farage and Tice are Boris talking heads, Farage is strong presentationally but very little substance and would never be across the detail properly. 

Exactly there's tons of MPs , my own included who do fuck all and drift through parliament in a safe seat with very little scrutiny.  

I despise the tories and labour,  neither of which have the best interests for this country at heart,  reform offered a glimmer of political hope for a lot of disenfranchised people but unfortunately they're not a political party, all strings are pulled by Zia, party members get no say so it's destined to fail as it will now do. 

It's a shame this topic came up on here anyway,  I avoid the lounge for that reason,  much better to talk football where we can share common ground 👍🏻 

  • Like 5
  • Haha 2
Posted
3 hours ago, Gloucester Saint said:

Although we are politically polar opposites, (me being a Lib Dem remainer), I partly get where you are coming from on this point. Lowe at least tries to engage with the Parliamentary system with some organisation, which probably stems from his experiences at the FA and better times at Saints 2000-2004. Anderson ditto. Farage and Tice are Boris talking heads, Farage is strong presentationally but very little substance and would never be across the detail properly. 

Farage doesn’t do detail. Well known amongst those who have worked with him.

  • Like 3
Posted
8 hours ago, Football Special said:

Exactly there's tons of MPs , my own included who do fuck all and drift through parliament in a safe seat with very little scrutiny.  

I despise the tories and labour,  neither of which have the best interests for this country at heart,  reform offered a glimmer of political hope for a lot of disenfranchised people but unfortunately they're not a political party, all strings are pulled by Zia, party members get no say so it's destined to fail as it will now do. 

It's a shame this topic came up on here anyway,  I avoid the lounge for that reason,  much better to talk football where we can share common ground 👍🏻 

Most politicians are parasites. 
 

reform party is a limited company owned by Farage so his rules matter not party members.  

  • Like 2
Posted
On 09/03/2025 at 22:57, ApprenticeBillionaire said:

You must be trolling.

No saints fan in their right fucking mind likes Lowe.

I believe they were known as the "Lowe Luvvies" back in the day. . .

  • Like 2
Posted
13 hours ago, Gloucester Saint said:

Although we are politically polar opposites, (me being a Lib Dem remainer), I partly get where you are coming from on this point. Lowe at least tries to engage with the Parliamentary system with some organisation, which probably stems from his experiences at the FA and better times at Saints 2000-2004. Anderson ditto. Farage and Tice are Boris talking heads, Farage is strong presentationally but very little substance and would never be across the detail properly. 

A lot of respect for this post.

Instead of rubbishing people, I do like that you can somewhat understand why people would appreciate Lowe.

Zero need for frothing-at-the-mouth and screaming “far right” which appears to be the popular method of shutting down opinions that people don’t like these days.

Nice to see that discourse can be had in a polite manner, even if you don’t agree with someone’s politics. 
 

  • Like 5
Posted
16 hours ago, Football Special said:

He's practically the only MP acting in opposition to the government,  he's done an excellent job , 

 

Excellent job compared to two complete tossers you mean.

  • Like 2
Posted

Even if I knew nothing about his past the bloke would have lost me when he declared that the BBC is a cancer at the heart of this country. 

I appreciate that some people do not like the BBC and there is a thread on this subject on this forum..... But come on "A cancer"??? 

Lowe is a complete prick. 

 

 

 

  • Like 6
Posted
2 hours ago, Crab Lungs said:

I legitimately thought he always tried his best for us. 

I think he gets unfairly remembered for the actions of utter charlatan Michael Wilde. On the other hand, I never got the sense that he tried too hard to bring in new investment and getting rid of Nigel Pearson was a dreadful decision

Also, how does Guy Askham manage to stay under the radar for Saints' decline under his watch?

  • Like 5
Posted
10 hours ago, Ted Bates Statue said:

I think he gets unfairly remembered for the actions of utter charlatan Michael Wilde. On the other hand, I never got the sense that he tried too hard to bring in new investment and getting rid of Nigel Pearson was a dreadful decision

Also, how does Guy Askham manage to stay under the radar for Saints' decline under his watch?

There were a lot of unanswered questions from that ‘reverse takeover’ in 1996. Guy gets some Saints folklore for being the one who took the contract out to Hamburg for Keegan to sign but the club went downhill under his leadership (if you can call it that), losing the sense of ambition under Lawrie which arguably it hasn’t got back since. As for appointing Ian Branfoot and then giving him a 3 year contract extension….

  • Like 2
Posted
13 hours ago, Tamesaint said:

Even if I knew nothing about his past the bloke would have lost me when he declared that the BBC is a cancer at the heart of this country. 

I appreciate that some people do not like the BBC and there is a thread on this subject on this forum..... But come on "A cancer"??? 

Lowe is a complete prick. 

 

 

 

The BBC are excellent at 2 things.

Nature Documentaries

Employing Paedophiles

  • Like 3
Posted
7 hours ago, LeBizzier69 said:

The BBC are excellent at 2 things.

Nature Documentaries

Employing Paedophiles

With the current news acoss the world the BBC is a beacon of truth . As regards Saville etc he fooled everyone except the victims . Serial abusers are still being found out but Saville was one of a kind beyond compare.

  • Like 4
Posted
21 minutes ago, CB Fry said:

They pulled the documentary and admitted the error.

 

Didn’t stop it getting out in the first place….and was only pulled after others investigated and highlighted it. 
 

Posted
On 10/03/2025 at 14:04, Hodds37 said:

Didn't like him as Chairman.

But he's an excellent MP.

Compared to the other rag-tag assortment of grifters, charlatans and liars in his former party you may have a point.

  • Like 4
Posted
1 hour ago, LeBizzier69 said:

Didn’t stop it getting out in the first place….and was only pulled after others investigated and highlighted it. 
 

Would it even have been investigated and highlighted if any other company had produced it? I dunno.

It’s because it is funded by the tax payer it has to uphold higher standards, and rightly so. 

  • Like 2
Posted
11 hours ago, LeBizzier69 said:

It is difficult to report on the Gaza conflict as no reporters are allowed in Gaza . A few local reporters have sent out reports when they could to the BBC . Unfortunately the BBC has been under attack for some years now by the Murdoch empire and the right wing press plus the Tories have tried to destroy it entirely by reducing their income , loading cost of the world service from the foreign office to the BBC , loading the cost of free TV licence for over 75 s onto the BBC etc .

If we end up with X , Meta , Truth ! , and other online outlets for information then we are in trouble. 

  • Like 3
Posted
1 hour ago, East Kent Saint said:

It is difficult to report on the Gaza conflict as no reporters are allowed in Gaza . A few local reporters have sent out reports when they could to the BBC . Unfortunately the BBC has been under attack for some years now by the Murdoch empire and the right wing press plus the Tories have tried to destroy it entirely by reducing their income , loading cost of the world service from the foreign office to the BBC , loading the cost of free TV licence for over 75 s onto the BBC etc .

If we end up with X , Meta , Truth ! , and other online outlets for information then we are in trouble. 

That’s only for those who receive Pension Credit. Those who have been careful and have saved for their old age are ‘penalised’ .

  • Like 1
Posted
1 hour ago, East Kent Saint said:

It is difficult to report on the Gaza conflict as no reporters are allowed in Gaza . A few local reporters have sent out reports when they could to the BBC . Unfortunately the BBC has been under attack for some years now by the Murdoch empire and the right wing press plus the Tories have tried to destroy it entirely by reducing their income , loading cost of the world service from the foreign office to the BBC , loading the cost of free TV licence for over 75 s onto the BBC etc .

If we end up with X , Meta , Truth ! , and other online outlets for information then we are in trouble. 

We pay the licence fee for what should be impartial coverage, and we don't get it.

This particular incident, along with their refusal to refer to Hamas as a terrorist organisation (as proscribed in the UK), does raise questions.....

I've always been a big fan of the BBC, and still like a lot of the stuff they do but it's still being questionably run.

If you want balanced news you need other news outlets.

  • Like 1
Posted
18 minutes ago, Whitey Grandad said:

That’s only for those who receive Pension Credit. Those who have been careful and have saved for their old age are ‘penalised’ .

It was payed for out of the social security budget but the BBC were forced to take on this huge bill at the same time as the licence fee was frozen . As we have seen this govt has applied the same rules to winter fuel payments !

Posted
9 minutes ago, LeBizzier69 said:

We pay the licence fee for what should be impartial coverage, and we don't get it.

This particular incident, along with their refusal to refer to Hamas as a terrorist organisation (as proscribed in the UK), does raise questions.....

I've always been a big fan of the BBC, and still like a lot of the stuff they do but it's still being questionably run.

If you want balanced news you need other news outlets.

I think we do get a fairly balanced view from the BBC . There is much totally untrue stuff put out there by Putin etc so it is a beacon of truth in my opinion.

There are other sources such as CH4 , even Sky News that do a good job but youngsters tend to get all their news from social media,  which is a worry going forward , says this 70 yr old 😄

  • Like 2
Posted
3 hours ago, East Kent Saint said:

It was payed for out of the social security budget but the BBC were forced to take on this huge bill at the same time as the licence fee was frozen . As we have seen this govt has applied the same rules to winter fuel payments !

I have always had to pay.

Indeed, this government seems to assume that ever pensioner is rolling in money.

  • Haha 1
Posted
2 hours ago, LeBizzier69 said:

Oh I don’t know….ones that call terrorists, terrorists. 
You?

Sorry to break your heart but the BBC call terrorists, terrorists.

Anyway, you can actually name a more balanced news outlet if you like.

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...