Something Amusing

[east-stand-nic]

22 hours ago, sadoldgit said:

You are the one who posts laughing emojis instead of engaging in debate. You are the one who spouts conspiracy theories without one shred of firm evidence. You are the one who says he doesn’t support Trump yet clearly does. You are the one who says he is no longer going to post here yet, like a dose of the clap at a brothel, makes an unwelcome return time after time. You are the one who calls people vile and then accuses others of having a mental illness.

I started it??? Go back and look at the posts on here from way back (from before you were born probably) and you will see exactly where it started. I’ll give you a clue, it wasn’t from me. If you are Dune, your posts come as no surprise. If you are not Dune, to display even less of an intellectual capacity takes some doing. Well done.

You are, without a shred of doubt, a total twat.

P.S. You have said on more than one occasion that you weren’t going to post on here any more.

 

16 hours ago, sadoldgit said:

1. I have never said that I don’t use emojis on here. What is your point?

2. You rarely post “ evidence” just normally laughing emojis. Where you do post conspiracy theories I don’t recall many “facts” being involved.

3. Despite his strange and bizarre behaviour you do not call him out and when others do you respond with a laughing emoji which, to me, implies that you think that the poster is talking nonsense (that is your general approach). Trump believes in conspiracy theories as do you. Why wouldn’t you support him (same with Musk)? 
 

4. The forum or a thread, either way you do not keep your promise. I really can’t be bothered to go look but funny that other people mention it too.

5. I have never said that I do not call other people things (what is the problem with calling people right wing If they  openly support right wing policies. Same with far right policies)?

6. No I won’t leave the forum. Given the way you behave you probably weren’t even born when I started to get pile ons because I am, apparently, a lefty woke snowflake pinko. You will have to go back years on these threads. Good luck with that chum.

7. All half intelligent people will see that the only thing buried here is you and your batshit crazy theories and posts.

8. I missed this one. You are either Dune or you aren’t. Either way you are a prize WUM and, probably, the biggest twat currently posting on here. No conspiracy theory about it.

I appreciate that English is probably not your first language which is probably why you struggle to make any coherent arguments. I shall just round up my response so there is no confusion. I use emojis. I call people names and started doing so many years ago when I was on the end of several kickings. You use laughing emojis as either implicit support for someone who has been criticised by inferring their posts are not to be taken seriously or you use them in place of responding to a direct criticism which you can’t answer and want to duck. You get upset when people call you names yet you are happy to call them names too. Despite the fact that you have posted in support of various conspiracies on here, you claim that you are not a conspiracy theorist. Ok? 

Buried.
 

 

 

Good god, your first reply is in itself a great example of how thick you are, or perhaps it is just a lack of awareness you have? Go back to your post to me, quoted at the top here where you say, and I quote 'You are the one who posts laughing emojis instead of engaging in debate.' So would you like to explain why it is OK for you to post laughing Emoji's? You are clearly saying here that when I do it, it is rather than engaging in debate, so can I assume that is also why you do it?

I wont bother going through all the others as you show a total lack of awareness that you do all the things you deride me and others for doing but seem to think somehow when you do it, the menaing is not the same. Totally buried.

[egg]

2 minutes ago, east-stand-nic said:

 

Good god, your first reply is in itself a great example of how thick you are, or perhaps it is just a lack of awareness you have? Go back to your post to me, quoted at the top here where you say, and I quote 'You are the one who posts laughing emojis instead of engaging in debate.' So would you like to explain why it is OK for you to post laughing Emoji's? You are clearly saying here that when I do it, it is rather than engaging in debate, so can I assume that is also why you do it?

I wont bother going through all the others as you show a total lack of awareness that you do all the things you deride me and others for doing but seem to think somehow when you do it, the menaing is not the same. Totally buried.

You 2 are as tragic as each other. Quick point - people are interested in what mad Donny is doing/saying, not whether you and SoG want to get it on in a Travelodge. 

[sadoldgit]

I hadn’t realised that the phrase that Starmer uses, “the coalition of the willing”, was originally used by George Bush when trying to drum up international support for the Iraq war. I wonder if the significance is lost on Trump?

[badgerx16]

8 minutes ago, sadoldgit said:

I hadn’t realised that the phrase that Starmer uses, “the coalition of the willing”, was originally used by George Bush when trying to drum up international support for the Iraq war. I wonder if the significance is lost on Trump?

Where were you during Gulf War 1 ?

[sadoldgit]

13 minutes ago, badgerx16 said:

Where were you during Gulf War 1 ?

 Certainly not in the Gulf.

[whelk]

22 minutes ago, badgerx16 said:

Where were you during Gulf War 1 ?

That is set up for Turkish to answer

[Turkish]

14 minutes ago, whelk said:

That is set up for Turkish to answer

Was it 

1/ making chutney

2/ furiously writing letters into Points of View

3/ on a coffee break at the CPS

[whelk]

1 hour ago, Turkish said:

Was it 

1/ making chutney

2/ furiously writing letters into Points of View

3/ on a coffee break at the CPS

Or maybe that was when he was still in his dark fascist phase?

[Gloucester Saint]

12 hours ago, Turkish said:

Was it 

1/ making chutney

2/ furiously writing letters into Points of View

3/ on a coffee break at the CPS

I’m guessing at 3

[Turkish]

35 minutes ago, Gloucester Saint said:

I’m guessing at 3

Making tit squeezing gestures at women whilst brewing up?

[sadoldgit]

4 hours ago, Gloucester Saint said:

I’m guessing at 3

Come on Gloucester, please don’t encourage the forum narcissist who has got nothing better to do with his life than to follow a complete stranger around on the internet and make inane comments. You are better than that. Leave him and nutty nic to their own devices.

[east-stand-nic]

2 hours ago, sadoldgit said:

Come on Gloucester, please don’t encourage the forum narcissist who has got nothing better to do with his life than to follow a complete stranger around on the internet and make inane comments. You are better than that. Leave him and nutty nic to their own devices.

Just can't help yourself can you. Boring old racist. 

[sadoldgit]

4 minutes ago, east-stand-nic said:

Just can't help yourself can you. Boring old racist. 

And neither can you. The post was directed at another person, not you. I’ll leave you and your obsessive behaviour to it. Have fun.

[badgerx16]

51 minutes ago, east-stand-nic said:

Just can't help yourself can you. Boring old racist. 

Change the fucking record.

[inspectorfrost]

and there was me thinking this related to Lowe being referred to the police by his own party

[whelk]

When I saw the title I hoped someone had beaten Elon Musk to death

[Gloucester Saint]

1 hour ago, whelk said:

When I saw the title I hoped someone had beaten Elon Musk to death

He thought Rupert should be Reform UK leader and a future Prime Minister. 

[east-stand-nic]

19 hours ago, sadoldgit said:

Come on Gloucester, please don’t encourage the forum narcissist who has got nothing better to do with his life than to follow a complete stranger around on the internet and make inane comments. You are better than that. Leave him and nutty nic to their own devices.

 

17 hours ago, sadoldgit said:

And neither can you. The post was directed at another person, not you. I’ll leave you and your obsessive behaviour to it. Have fun.

Really? Would you like to explain the mention of me, and why I cannot reply to a post where my name is mentioned? You really are so thick. 

16 hours ago, badgerx16 said:

Change the fucking record.

Only me? Are you being childish again and attacking only one? Sog is not guilty in anyway? Same old silly viewpoint. Bias and playing favourites. Just because I show you up so much, as I am going here again now.

[badgerx16]

Somebody is feeling got at.

[east-stand-nic]

Seem indeed I have got at people.  I have people. No explanation  for the otherwise.

Edited Saturday at 19:35 by east-stand-nic

[johnnyboy]

33 minutes ago, east-stand-nic said:

Seem indeed I have got at people.  I have people. No explanation  for the otherwise.

Not sure what your edit was but that’s just a collection of words it makes no sense Matt sorry mate !

[The Kraken]

[tdmickey3]

1 hour ago, johnnyboy said:

Not sure what your edit was but that’s just a collection of words it makes no sense Matt sorry mate !

Is he on something recreational?

[Holmes_and_Watson]

He has people. Despite having people, he's had a go at them. Successfully. As he's got to them. As well as having people, he's also got an (or possibly the only) otherwise. Unlike the people he has, he wants to make it known that his possession of an otherwise is something of a mystery.

Seemed clear to me.