SaintsLoyal Posted January 17 Posted January 17 I suspect if you went on private coaches away you will probably recognise this Mark Savage, who has been found guilty of owning child porn. https://www.dailyecho.co.uk/news/24849204.totton-pervert-admits-offences-2-000-child-abuse-images/
hypochondriac Posted January 17 Posted January 17 Hardly the worst crime in the world. I'm sure he won't get a custodial sentence.
Toadhall Saint Posted January 17 Posted January 17 36 minutes ago, hypochondriac said: Hardly the worst crime in the world. I'm sure he won't get a custodial sentence. Unless your the child.
SaintsLoyal Posted January 17 Author Posted January 17 2 hours ago, hypochondriac said: Hardly the worst crime in the world. I'm sure he won't get a custodial sentence. Eh ? have you been hacked ?
east-stand-nic Posted January 20 Posted January 20 Has he been sentenced yet? Would be interesting to compare his punishment with that of Huw Edwards who walked away having been classed as no danger to society. Different rules for the plebs I wonder?
badgerx16 Posted January 20 Posted January 20 28 minutes ago, east-stand-nic said: Has he been sentenced yet? Would be interesting to compare his punishment with that of Huw Edwards who walked away having been classed as no danger to society. Different rules for the plebs I wonder? There have to be some benefits from being the BBC's Royal correspondant.
benjii Posted January 20 Posted January 20 1 hour ago, east-stand-nic said: Has he been sentenced yet? Would be interesting to compare his punishment with that of Huw Edwards who walked away having been classed as no danger to society. Different rules for the plebs I wonder? Is the offence the same? Edwards had images of a 17 year old that the individual in question sent himself. Not sure what this guy has done but if, for example, he's got loads of pictures of small kids getting molested then clearly it would be ridiculous if his sentence wasn't harsher.
egg Posted January 20 Posted January 20 4 minutes ago, benjii said: Is the offence the same? Edwards had images of a 17 year old that the individual in question sent himself. Not sure what this guy has done but if, for example, he's got loads of pictures of small kids getting molested then clearly it would be ridiculous if his sentence wasn't harsher. The images that he was sentenced for were mostly of kids aged 13-15. Without knowing the details of what each of these blokes had (frankly I don't want to know) it's impossible to draw any kind of comparison. 1
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now