Challenger Posted January 18 Posted January 18 2 hours ago, spyinthesky said: I thought is was Nottingham (Nottm) Forest and Notts County?? Seem to remember Brian Clough went ape shit when Notts Forest was engraved on a trophy they won. Made them redo it . 1
bangkoksaint Posted January 18 Posted January 18 27 minutes ago, Chez said: you are missing the `best' one, or at least the one that annoys my brother in law Forest fan, David McGoldrich, whose £1.2m fee helped us afford Sir Rickie. Ah yes of course!
Winnersaint Posted January 18 Posted January 18 Heavy defeat, Woods double. We are so shite. Franny is right when he says we’re like a boxer who’s taken too many punches. 1
Gooderz Posted January 19 Posted January 19 On 17/01/2025 at 23:58, Pamplemousse said: They're good on the counter attack, we need to sit in for 90 minutes and let them try to break us down. agreed 👍
ant Posted January 19 Posted January 19 On 17/01/2025 at 09:28, Football Special said: The Forest fan I know has been unbearable recently, would love to bring them back down to earth Get that Mickey Evans back in the side , he'll take his chances How daft we were to bin off Maik Taylor in favour of Jones. Could've had another decade from him at the top level. 3
benjii Posted January 19 Posted January 19 18 hours ago, Football Special said: Thats a great shout, Notts Forest fans love to remind Derby about that record points season, big incentive for them, we're heading up early, Plan is to get into Hooters for some bantz, charm a few ladies in hot pants, then hit the fan zone for a sing song 🎶 refreshing tasteless pint in a plastic cup for £7 The two on the left have no business there. 4
benjii Posted January 19 Posted January 19 For the record (l to r in descending order): 3, 5, 4, 6, 2, 1
Convict Colony Posted January 19 Posted January 19 1 hour ago, benjii said: For the record (l to r in descending order): 3, 5, 4, 6, 2, 1 3,5,6,4,2,1 6 got ahead of 4 based on massive rack 2
benjii Posted January 19 Posted January 19 11 minutes ago, Convict Colony said: 3,5,6,4,2,1 6 got ahead of 4 based on massive rack Ooh, yeah, i missed that. VAR review - massive rack number 6. 3
Sunglasses Ron Posted January 19 Posted January 19 Oh God, do we have bother with today? Can’t we just pull a sickie or something? 3
benjii Posted January 19 Posted January 19 1 hour ago, Charlie Wayman said: Neanderthals were thought to be extinct. Charlie, we all know you love the tits. 1
CSA96 Posted January 19 Posted January 19 1x spare ticket for today’s game. Can meet in Nottingham / at ground (yes, I know, I’m being optimistic)
TheAlehouseBrawlers Posted January 19 Posted January 19 (edited) 55 minutes ago, CSA96 said: 1x spare ticket for today’s game. Can meet in Nottingham / at ground (yes, I know, I’m being optimistic) CSA96 meet tttdcs https://www.saintsweb.co.uk/topic/61302-wanted-one-spare-for-forest-please/ Tough slog ahead, strong side and probably the best ground in the country for atmosphere these days. Optimistic head on, a hard-fought draw would be another positive step on the Juric turnaround. Edit: Just throwing this little beauty in there from the reverse fixture - tbf we only lost 0-1 Edited January 19 by TheAlehouseBrawlers Just remembered..... 4 1
Marsdinho Posted January 19 Posted January 19 2 hours ago, Charlie Wayman said: Neanderthals were thought to be extinct. We've all got a bit of Neanderthals in us. Fact 2
TheAlehouseBrawlers Posted January 19 Posted January 19 2 hours ago, Convict Colony said: 3,5,6,4,2,1 6 got ahead of 4 based on massive rack Probably the best line-up but tbf no.1 is the most appropriate and biggest example of the establishment name she's representing. 1
FarehamSaintJames Posted January 19 Posted January 19 Hoping for: Four at the back, Manning on the left, KWP on the right, extra attacking player up top. Strong performance. Reality: Five at the back, probably three RB’s, no striker, little attacking intent apart from a sporadic counter attack. Forest dominating and scoring at least three. “Plucky” Saints unfortunate again. 1
CylonKing Posted January 19 Posted January 19 (edited) Live just over an hour's walk from the ground. To get there I have to walk along Southampton St and go past St Mary's gardens, surely good omens for today...2-0 Forest! 😁 Edited January 19 by CylonKing 1
Sheaf Saint Posted January 19 Posted January 19 14 hours ago, Challenger said: Seem to remember Brian Clough went ape shit when Notts Forest was engraved on a trophy they won. Made them redo it . Rightly so. Notts is short for Nottinghamshire - the county, not the city. Would be akin to someone calling us Southants.
Suhari Posted January 19 Posted January 19 1 hour ago, FarehamSaintJames said: Hoping for: Four at the back, Manning on the left, KWP on the right, extra attacking player up top. Strong performance. Reality: Five at the back, probably three RB’s, no striker, little attacking intent apart from a sporadic counter attack. Forest dominating and scoring at least three. “Plucky” Saints unfortunate again. Juric is a 3 CB merchant; doubt it will change. Worked well enough for a chunk of time on Thursday. As did the attacking set up. Hoping we can build on the good stuff from last time out. Not really expecting any kind of result, but some continued effort, organisation, pride and attacking intent will be a nice thing. 2
coalman Posted January 19 Posted January 19 1 hour ago, TheAlehouseBrawlers said: CSA96 meet tttdcs https://www.saintsweb.co.uk/topic/61302-wanted-one-spare-for-forest-please/ Tough slog ahead, strong side and probably the best ground in the country for atmosphere these days. Optimistic head on, a hard-fought draw would be another positive step on the Juric turnaround. Edit: Just throwing this little beauty in there from the reverse fixture - tbf we only lost 0-1 I'm surprised we were so far up the pitch. The graphic perfectly captures the look down the wing and come back tendencies though 1
saintant Posted January 19 Posted January 19 Anyone know if Dibling is going to be fit for this one? Hoping he is as the front three with him, Fernandes and Sulemana worked pretty well against Man Utd.
CSA96 Posted January 19 Posted January 19 2 hours ago, TheAlehouseBrawlers said: CSA96 meet tttdcs https://www.saintsweb.co.uk/topic/61302-wanted-one-spare-for-forest-please/ Tough slog ahead, strong side and probably the best ground in the country for atmosphere these days. Optimistic head on, a hard-fought draw would be another positive step on the Juric turnaround. Edit: Just throwing this little beauty in there from the reverse fixture - tbf we only lost 0-1 Nice one, sorted 1
Midfield_General Posted January 19 Posted January 19 (edited) 2 hours ago, TheAlehouseBrawlers said: To this day, those were the maddest 'tactics' I think I can remember seeing someone actually set out to do deliberately. Then came the Bournemouth game, where he somehow managed to top it. How some people still defended him after witnessing those two shit shows I will never know. Edited January 19 by Midfield_General 6
trousers Posted January 19 Posted January 19 (edited) 31 minutes ago, saintant said: Anyone know if Dibling is going to be fit for this one? My hunch is that it'll be a tough call, assuming he picked up 'just a knock' rather than something more serious. As a still-developing teenager, there's a danger that we 'run him into the ground' in these 2-games-per-week scenarios, but given how much we have now come to rely upon him, resting him is almost tantamount to starting with 10 players, given we don't have anyone who can adequately replace what he brings to the table. #bitofaconundrum Edited January 19 by trousers
obelisk Posted January 19 Posted January 19 I'm hoping that our attackers have been getting some shooting practice. Just a bit more composure with the finishing on Thursday would have seen Saints walk away with 3 points, not for the first time either.
Osvaldorama Posted January 19 Posted January 19 2 hours ago, TheAlehouseBrawlers said: Edit: Just throwing this little beauty in there from the reverse fixture - tbf we only lost 0-1 Hahahaha forgot about that. Fucking tragic. Should have been sacked just for this 2
Harry_SFC Posted January 19 Posted January 19 How can anyone have seen KWPs performance on the left against Diallo and put him there again a few days later? Especially a premier league manager.
Harry_SFC Posted January 19 Posted January 19 Also another game where we have to watch Adam Armstrong try and play football. So tiring. 1 2
Convict Colony Posted January 19 Posted January 19 I think people forget KWP saved a couple of goal attempts by tracking Diallo a lot into the box. I thought he did ok the other night, got unlucky with the richocet for the first and 2nd was just equiste play 2
OnceaSaintalwaysaSaint Posted January 19 Posted January 19 Sule's first good game for us rewarded with being on the bench - but Archer in so I'm happy. I predict Archer will be key to us next year.
die Mannyschaft Posted January 19 Posted January 19 1 minute ago, OnceaSaintalwaysaSaint said: Sule's first good game for us rewarded with being on the bench - but Archer in so I'm happy. I predict Archer will be key to us next year. It's Possesion Death Metal, looks aggressive but more asleep in a coffin. 1
OnceaSaintalwaysaSaint Posted January 19 Posted January 19 Although looked again and he's joined by Armstrong. FFS. Why oh why?
Lighthouse Posted January 19 Author Posted January 19 I like that yellow kit, shame we’ve lost every single league game we’ve played in it. Glad to see Archer back, TP seems to have fallen out of favour somewhat. 1
tdmickey3 Posted January 19 Posted January 19 Bloody Armstrong, utter waste of a shirt. It might get worse, he might bring on someone even more pointless in Smallbone
beatlesaint Posted January 19 Posted January 19 To be honest I’m past getting wound up by who’s in and who’s out now given it seems to make very little difference in any particular game and it’ll make no difference whatsoever in the season, we are down and we are finishing bottom. 3 1
washsaint Posted January 19 Posted January 19 What a monumentally crap squad we have. That is absolute garbage 1
OnceaSaintalwaysaSaint Posted January 19 Posted January 19 4 minutes ago, Lighthouse said: I like that yellow kit, shame we’ve lost every single league game we’ve played in it. Glad to see Archer back, TP seems to have fallen out of favour somewhat. Thanks Lighthouse. Don't know how to put this screenshot on the site. Really helps to see the team in its entirety. With Dibbers injured, this doesn't look much of an attacking threat at all.
Totton Saint Posted January 19 Posted January 19 Selection does seem a little bit illogical. Any streams please folks
macca155 Posted January 19 Posted January 19 Both Sulemana and Ugochukwa losing their places seems a little harsh. Aribo didn't play badly the other night but big Les was a physical threat and we have precious little of that. I'm guessing Sulemana can't play 90, so he'll be on around the 60 minute. Maybe Ivan wants to keep something back on the bench, to avoid a Thursday type capitulation. Guess we'll see. 4
Harry_SFC Posted January 19 Posted January 19 1 minute ago, macca155 said: Both Sulemana and Ugochukwa losing their places seems a little harsh. Aribo didn't play badly the other night but big Les was a physical threat and we have precious little of that. I'm guessing Sulemana can't play 90, so he'll be on around the 60 minute. Maybe Ivan wants to keep something back on the bench, to avoid a Thursday type capitulation. Guess we'll see. Despite what some say our midfield without Ugochukwu has very little defensive protection given that Downes seems to just charge around like a headless chicken this season. 2
Baird of the land Posted January 19 Posted January 19 1 minute ago, macca155 said: Both Sulemana and Ugochukwa losing their places seems a little harsh. Aribo didn't play badly the other night but big Les was a physical threat and we have precious little of that. I'm guessing Sulemana can't play 90, so he'll be on around the 60 minute. Maybe Ivan wants to keep something back on the bench, to avoid a Thursday type capitulation. Guess we'll see. I’m assuming (changes) are a conditioning thing. Though does annoy me slightly seeing Armstrong getting a million opportunities. 3
ButtikonSaint Posted January 19 Posted January 19 A bit surprised that Sulemana doesn't start after what he showed in the past 2 games, bit of tiredness maybe? Guess Juric didn't fancy playing Archer or Sulemana on the right to replace Dibling. Rest of the team seems about right.
CB Fry Posted January 19 Posted January 19 Armstrong and Archer in the same team seems pointless to me. And I would have played three actual centre backs (ie Wood) as we have their Wood to deal with. That said, worrying about our first eleven feels academic. We can't beat this opposition I'm sorry to say. Prove me wrong ladsssssss
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now