Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Reports suggest we are confident of resolving but no timeframe given.

Speculation suggests that because he worked for 777 and not a club directly, that’s why he hasn’t met the criteria set post Brexit and we are the first to fall foul of the new rules set by the FA. Whether our appeal is successful isn’t certain but I hope it does work out as his CV is very well suited to both our needs and the wider club model needs.

Posted (edited)
  On 28/01/2025 at 11:13, goodymatt said:

Reports suggest we are confident of resolving but no timeframe given.

Speculation suggests that because he worked for 777 and not a club directly, that’s why he hasn’t met the criteria set post Brexit and we are the first to fall foul of the new rules set by the FA. Whether our appeal is successful isn’t certain but I hope it does work out as his CV is very well suited to both our needs and the wider club model needs.

Expand  

Yet Gao was allowed to buy the club despite failing FFP and the rules were then changed afterwards.

Yes, I know that was the PL and the FA are official sponsors for football-management related visas but the inconsistency of applying rules when they want and ignoring them when they don’t by governing bodies does my head in. Home Office panel will have made the decision but if the FA is sponsor they have a key role.

Edited by Gloucester Saint
  • Like 1
Posted
  On 28/01/2025 at 12:22, Gloucester Saint said:

Yet Gao was allowed to buy the club despite failing FFP and the rules were then changed afterwards.

Yes, I know that was the PL and the FA are official sponsors for football-management related visas but the inconsistency of applying rules when they want and ignoring them when they don’t by governing bodies does my head in. Home Office panel will have made the decision but if the FA is sponsor they have a key role.

Expand  

Just get him on a dinghy across the channel....no probs then ;) 

  • Like 1
  • Haha 6
Posted (edited)
  On 28/01/2025 at 18:47, lambtiss said:

I thought that also 

Expand  

It is a faff from a payroll perspective, even with the 183 days pa or less rule on the double tax treaty (Germany and UK have a DTA) overseas nationals doing predominantly work for UK firms can still get stung for employee NI contributions https://germantaxes.de/tax-tips/double-tax-treaty/

Not impossible and gives the club leverage with the FA to lean on the Home Office for a fast-track appeal if the club pays for it.

Edited by Gloucester Saint
Posted

Surely a DoF is going to have their own ideas regarding style of football or manager that is suitable.

Dragan has said in the media Juric is here for eighteen months. 

We’ve then gone after a DoF afterwards.

Is this another example of SR going backwards around things?

Posted
  On 28/01/2025 at 12:22, Gloucester Saint said:

Yet Gao was allowed to buy the club despite failing FFP and the rules were then changed afterwards.

Yes, I know that was the PL and the FA are official sponsors for football-management related visas but the inconsistency of applying rules when they want and ignoring them when they don’t by governing bodies does my head in. Home Office panel will have made the decision but if the FA is sponsor they have a key role.

Expand  

Invade Greenland before Trump. Exploit mineral resources amassing vast wealth. Engage in dodgy arms deals to protect interests and shore up UK defence industry. Engage in dreadful human rights abused, handily (or not if cut off as punishment) including all those who disagree or report against any of the above. Use government leverage, defense contracts and Infrastructure projects to get pressure put on PL and FA behind the scenes. Find that the rules strangely shift to your whims. Once again, SR failing to take the simple route. 🙂

  • Haha 2
Posted
  On 28/01/2025 at 23:09, FarehamSaintJames said:

Surely a DoF is going to have their own ideas regarding style of football or manager that is suitable.

Dragan has said in the media Juric is here for eighteen months. 

We’ve then gone after a DoF afterwards.

Is this another example of SR going backwards around things?

Expand  

I don't see the DoF job as interfering with the manager's tactics and strategy on the pitch. It's more about making sure the club is operating to get the best out of the first team and to put the best squad together that it can. 

  • Like 1
Posted
  On 29/01/2025 at 07:55, SaintsLoyal said:

Give Phil Parsons the job, hes been sticking his nose into football not long after arrival, massive experience from selling vacuum cleaners.

Expand  

He used to play alongside Glenn Cockerill so he's not completely naive to the world of football. 

Posted
  On 29/01/2025 at 07:55, SaintsLoyal said:

Give Phil Parsons the job, hes been sticking his nose into football not long after arrival, massive experience from selling vacuum cleaners.

Expand  

I can't work out if this is a dig at him or not... But I think hes in general done a pretty decent job. The fan zone and Dell bar are a great idea in terms of increasing revenue for the club and despite how shite are are, SMS is full every week. 

  • Like 2
Posted
  On 29/01/2025 at 09:59, Dman said:

I can't work out if this is a dig at him or not... But I think hes in general done a pretty decent job. The fan zone and Dell bar are a great idea in terms of increasing revenue for the club and despite how shite are are, SMS is full every week. 

Expand  

I’ll be interested to see how he works with Spores assuming the WP is sorted out - Spores may find another way to work for the club with a dual tax agreement but it would be better not to be limited to 182 days or less in the UK pa. Phil would benefit from having a senior UK-based football presence who has some credibility, sorely lacking in SR thus far.

Posted (edited)
  On 29/01/2025 at 07:55, SaintsLoyal said:

Give Phil Parsons the job, hes been sticking his nose into football not long after arrival, massive experience from selling vacuum cleaners.

Expand  

He's familiar with the club, so a suck it and see appointment might work to really get into the corners. 🙂

 

Edited by Holmes_and_Watson
typo
Posted
  On 28/01/2025 at 23:09, FarehamSaintJames said:

Surely a DoF is going to have their own ideas regarding style of football or manager that is suitable.

Dragan has said in the media Juric is here for eighteen months. 

We’ve then gone after a DoF afterwards.

Is this another example of SR going backwards around things?

Expand  

you dont know how long Solak has been talking to Spors, so its impossible to say.

Posted
  On 28/01/2025 at 19:03, Gloucester Saint said:

It is a faff from a payroll perspective, even with the 183 days pa or less rule on the double tax treaty (Germany and UK have a DTA) overseas nationals doing predominantly work for UK firms can still get stung for employee NI contributions https://germantaxes.de/tax-tips/double-tax-treaty/

Not impossible and gives the club leverage with the FA to lean on the Home Office for a fast-track appeal if the club pays for it.

Expand  

If the club want him enough i'm sure they would "gross up" the NI to compensate. It's peanuts at the end of the day in the telephone numbers for salaries they are dealing with.

  • Like 1
Posted
  On 29/01/2025 at 09:50, Greenridge said:

He used to play alongside Glenn Cockerill so he's not completely naive to the world of football. 

Expand  

I looked this up and yeah, he played under GC in the famous 14-1 win. It was our Phil who's error led to the conceded goal. One of our own. 

Posted
  On 02/02/2025 at 09:21, Saint Fan CaM said:

Appoint in some manner”….sounding like some half-baked shoe-in job. Not sure I’m getting good vibes about this, but time will tell I guess.

Expand  

I wonder if that is working for the club (or Group), but based elsewhere to avoid the Work Permit problems as others have mentioned.

At the moment I’d be optimistic about the appointment given his name has previously been linked with Newcastle etc. Having said that, Ankersen also came in with a ‘good reputation’. 

Posted
  On 02/02/2025 at 07:33, goodymatt said:

 

Expand  

 

  On 02/02/2025 at 09:21, Saint Fan CaM said:

“Appoint in some manner”….sounding like some half-baked shoe-in job. Not sure I’m getting good vibes about this, but time will tell I guess.

Expand  

Perhaps Saints can't get a work permit sorted, so he is appointed by Sport Republic for the group and works for the group but based abroad.

  • Like 1
  • Confused 1
Posted
  On 02/02/2025 at 10:38, Badger said:

I wonder if that is working for the club (or Group), but based elsewhere to avoid the Work Permit problems as others have mentioned.

At the moment I’d be optimistic about the appointment given his name has previously been linked with Newcastle etc. Having said that, Ankersen also came in with a ‘good reputation’. 

Expand  

 

  On 02/02/2025 at 10:38, Matthew Le God said:

 

Perhaps Saints can't get a work permit sorted, so he is appointed by Sport Republic for the group and works for the group but based abroad.

Expand  

Maybe this guy is the perfect answer…maybe. Personally I think there’s such a huge re-build job required to re-set the footballing side of the club, it needs the full-time focus of a DoF, not some half-baked solution (unless of course this chap is an absolute genius rather than a chum of Ankerson’s or Solak’s). As I say, time will tell. 

The upside is that it seems Juric knows exactly what he needs and importantly who he doesn’t need in his team. It strikes me that players like Manning favoured by RM were chosen because they’re NOT brave or skilled enough to anything adventurous in terms of passing forwards, taking the easy option of a pass backwards to relieve pressure on themselves and placing it on the player they pass to. It would appear that Juric is not tolerating any of that bullshit thankfully, hence the appointment and immediate inclusion of Welington.

Posted
  On 02/02/2025 at 11:17, Saint Fan CaM said:

it needs the full-time focus of a DoF, not some half-baked solution

Expand  

Why couldn't it be done full time remotely and jetting in occasionally? He doesn't need to be at Staplewood every morning to hold meetings and restructure the football department. A lot of it could be done from anywhere in the world with a phone, laptop and internet connection.

  • Confused 1
Posted
  On 02/02/2025 at 11:32, Matthew Le God said:

Why couldn't it be done full time remotely and jetting in occasionally? He doesn't need to be at Staplewood every morning to hold meetings and restructure the football department. A lot of it could be done from anywhere in the world with a phone, laptop and internet connection.

Expand  

As I said, maybe it could, but what does that say to staff about the investment in time and focus of what might be considered the most important person in the footballing side of the club at what is in my opinion a critical year ahead?

  • Like 1
Posted
  On 02/02/2025 at 11:43, Saint Fan CaM said:

As I said, maybe it could, but what does that say to staff about the investment in time and focus of what might be considered the most important person in the footballing side of the club at what is in my opinion a critical year ahead?

Expand  

He could still put the same amount of hours and focus into the role as he would in England. A lot of the role is phone calls & meetings and you do not need to be on UK soil to do that.

  • Confused 3
Posted
  On 02/02/2025 at 11:17, Saint Fan CaM said:

 

Maybe this guy is the perfect answer…maybe. Personally I think there’s such a huge re-build job required to re-set the footballing side of the club, it needs the full-time focus of a DoF, not some half-baked solution (unless of course this chap is an absolute genius rather than a chum of Ankerson’s or Solak’s). As I say, time will tell. 

The upside is that it seems Juric knows exactly what he needs and importantly who he doesn’t need in his team. It strikes me that players like Manning favoured by RM were chosen because they’re NOT brave or skilled enough to anything adventurous in terms of passing forwards, taking the easy option of a pass backwards to relieve pressure on themselves and placing it on the player they pass to. It would appear that Juric is not tolerating any of that bullshit thankfully, hence the appointment and immediate inclusion of Welington.

Expand  

Agree with you, but I also think we'd benefit from someone who is both competent for the role, and committed to it over a few seasons, not a stop-go-stop-go type of musical chairs we've had with Shields, then Willcox pissing off.

But we've got to accept the club can't chain someone to the desk, and if remotely successful they'll be viewed as fair game by others higher up the food chain. Spors after a season with us is likely to be the same with both EPL and probably Bundesliga clubs watching his progress.

  • Like 2
Posted

Have just read that West Ham’s head of recruitment, Steidten,has been sacked after Potter brought his own man in. 

Not suggesting he should be considered for us, as it appears in his time with them he’s upset everyone in the managers post. But wonder how West Ham appointed him with ease and without the Work Permit saga we’ve now got. 

Posted
  On 04/02/2025 at 13:41, Badger said:

Have just read that West Ham’s head of recruitment, Steidten,has been sacked after Potter brought his own man in. 

Not suggesting he should be considered for us, as it appears in his time with them he’s upset everyone in the managers post. But wonder how West Ham appointed him with ease and without the Work Permit saga we’ve now got. 

Expand  

Think Spors recent experience being for 777 and not directly at a club level for the period required is the sticking point. New issue since Brexit that we are one of the first to fall foul of. Seems the workaround will be to work directly for SR and not at a specific club, we will find out mid February according to Alfie House.

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)
  On 04/02/2025 at 14:24, goodymatt said:

Think Spors recent experience being for 777 and not directly at a club level for the period required is the sticking point. New issue since Brexit that we are one of the first to fall foul of. Seems the workaround will be to work directly for SR and not at a specific club, we will find out mid February according to Alfie House.

Expand  

I don't know the ins and outs of work permit rules but it seems crazy to me that we can sign a 17 year old playing for his high school in Japan (joining when he's 18), but we can't sign a 42 year old sporting director who, even before his time with 777 group, has the likes of Hoffenheim, Hamburg, Leipzig and Vitesse on his CV.

Edited by Disco Stu
  • Like 2
Posted
  On 04/02/2025 at 23:17, Disco Stu said:

I don't know the ins and outs of work permit rules but it seems crazy to me that we can sign a 17 year old playing for his high school in Japan (joining when he's 18), but we can't sign a 42 year old sporting director who, even before his time with 777 group, has the likes of Hoffenheim, Hamburg, Leipzig and Vitesse on his CV.

Expand  

I assume the difference is that a footballer from Japan can apply for an 'International sportsperson visa' which will give a three year stay, whereas an EU citizen has no right to live or work in the UK - unless they have family members and meet the criteria for the EUSS - except if their 'occupation' is on the 'in demand' list (which this one definitely won't be as there are plenty of UK citizens who could do the job) and their employer is registered for sponsorship.

Posted
  On 02/02/2025 at 11:32, Matthew Le God said:

Why couldn't it be done full time remotely and jetting in occasionally? He doesn't need to be at Staplewood every morning to hold meetings and restructure the football department. A lot of it could be done from anywhere in the world with a phone, laptop and internet connection.

Expand  

Successful management is all about relationships not keyboards and mobile phone numbers.

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)
  On 04/02/2025 at 23:17, Disco Stu said:

I don't know the ins and outs of work permit rules but it seems crazy to me that we can sign a 17 year old playing for his high school in Japan (joining when he's 18), but we can't sign a 42 year old sporting director who, even before his time with 777 group, has the likes of Hoffenheim, Hamburg, Leipzig and Vitesse on his CV.

Expand  

https://andywatsongbe.substack.com/p/sporting-directors-and-the-gbe-rules?utm_campaign=post&showWelcomeOnShare=true

Interesting article here, which has a section on what the current rules are and also details why Spors doesn’t meet them.

Edited by goodymatt
  • Like 2
Posted

If he can't actually be physically present at Staplewood to lead the football side of the club is he actually the right person?

Posted

Feels like a really good appointment and he has an impressive CV. 

Really positive we've been able to attract him in the situation we find ourselves as hes obviously aware that we'll be in the championship next season. 

Lets see if its all too good to be true. 

  • Like 4
Posted (edited)

Interesting that it states Group Technical Director , not specifically Saints.

 

But pleased with the appointment if he is a move away from those responsible for this season's shambles.

Edited by Badger
Posted (edited)
  On 07/02/2025 at 15:45, VectisSaint said:

But he reports to Saints CEO and will be based at Staplewood, so it sounds like Group is Southampton.

Expand  

Yeah very good news he will be based at Staplewood!

 

Lets hope he stays for more than a season.

Edited by Dusic

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...