LGTL Posted 29 November, 2024 Posted 29 November, 2024 Literally searching for reasons to disallow that goal. 1
Baird of the land Posted 29 November, 2024 Posted 29 November, 2024 I can understand the idea that armstrong trying to flick it was offside what i don't get is it taking half an hour to decide that 2
Lighthouse Posted 29 November, 2024 Posted 29 November, 2024 Just now, Gloucester Saint said: With what or whom? With the keeper and defender's decision making. We might not like it but that was the right call. Armstrong went too far, too early. 1
OttawaSaint Posted 29 November, 2024 Posted 29 November, 2024 Fuck off! Celebrated that "goal" twice. How is AArm interfering, it didn't change a thing about the pass. Utter, utter bullshit.
Oldandtired Posted 29 November, 2024 Posted 29 November, 2024 I don't understand football anymore. They have right royally fucked it up 2
Gloucester Saint Posted 29 November, 2024 Posted 29 November, 2024 Whilst I have no time for Martin or SR, that is another calamity from VAR. At what point are PGMOL being sacked?
stknowle Posted 29 November, 2024 Posted 29 November, 2024 No different to the one against us v Arsenal which needless to say went against us. We are shit but fuxsakes we get no luck whatsoever.
verlaine1979 Posted 29 November, 2024 Posted 29 November, 2024 Armstrong was miles off. Had no business trying to flick it. 2
Lee On Solent Saint Posted 29 November, 2024 Posted 29 November, 2024 He didn't even touch the ball, absolute comedy.
Saint Fan CaM Posted 29 November, 2024 Posted 29 November, 2024 Honestly, if Saints don’t ask for that decision to be investigated they need sanctioning.
tdmickey3 Posted 29 November, 2024 Posted 29 November, 2024 At least it give Martin something to blame the rest of the shit we have produced in this match 3 1
Saint86 Posted 29 November, 2024 Posted 29 November, 2024 They wanted to rule it as offside. They couldn't see the ball and the player to show it clearly, so they've made some nonsense up about Armstrong to justify it. Simple as that. We were never getting that goal. 2 1
John Boy Saint Posted 29 November, 2024 Posted 29 November, 2024 What complete horseshit - especially when you look at that Manure goal last season where Rashford actually went to the ball in an offside position - and the other player scored. these clowns don’t know their arse from their elbow! 4
RedArmy Posted 29 November, 2024 Posted 29 November, 2024 Just now, verlaine1979 said: Armstrong was miles off. Had no business trying to flick it. Flick it where? His leg doesn’t make a single movement that would be either trying to score or make a pass. That is corrupt as fuck AGAIN. 2
Gloucester Saint Posted 29 November, 2024 Posted 29 November, 2024 1 minute ago, Lighthouse said: With the keeper and defender's decision making. We might not like it but that was the right call. Armstrong went too far, too early. He didn’t need to do it either, fucked it up for Tyler. Still doesn’t excuse stalling the game for that long though. 1
Lee On Solent Saint Posted 29 November, 2024 Posted 29 November, 2024 Just now, Lighthouse said: With the keeper and defender's decision making. We might not like it but that was the right call. Armstrong went too far, too early. Every action on the fuckin pitch influences a decision, it's bullshit
OttawaSaint Posted 29 November, 2024 Posted 29 November, 2024 Why look at Archer first. It's moot if AArm is determined to have been ATBS (audacity to be Saints). 3
petermcpete Posted 29 November, 2024 Posted 29 November, 2024 If he was clearly interfering why did they spend so fucking long on the first check? Desperate to find a way to rule it out. 1
Saint86 Posted 29 November, 2024 Posted 29 November, 2024 We are the charity case for the league. We're bottom and adrift, considered as no hopers. So we're seen as an easy team for them to give var calls against and keep the other teams at least partially appease.
verlaine1979 Posted 29 November, 2024 Posted 29 November, 2024 Just now, RedArmy said: Flick it where? His leg doesn’t make a single movement that would be either trying to score or make a pass. That is corrupt as fuck AGAIN. He did, he stuck out his leg to try and either knock it or move it on with his heel. 1
adrian lord Posted 29 November, 2024 Posted 29 November, 2024 Was it a clear error by the ref? Was it an obvious error by the ref?
Lighthouse Posted 29 November, 2024 Posted 29 November, 2024 1 minute ago, OttawaSaint said: Fuck off! Celebrated that "goal" twice. How is AArm interfering, it didn't change a thing about the pass. Utter, utter bullshit. How can the cross going through the legs of a player five yards from goal NOT be interfering? The keeper has to position himself to cover the threat of Armstrong, thereby leaving the ar post exposed. If that goal gets given against Saints I guarantee this entire forum would be fuming. 2 2
Baird of the land Posted 29 November, 2024 Posted 29 November, 2024 2 minutes ago, verlaine1979 said: Armstrong was miles off. Had no business trying to flick it. I'd love to understand why they didn't look at armstrong to start with Why spend 20 minutes drawing lines on archer's position when armstrong was obviously offside. If he was interferring it should have taken 1 minute max to decide.. 2
Gloucester Saint Posted 29 November, 2024 Posted 29 November, 2024 Just now, Saint86 said: We are the charity case for the league. We're bottom and adrift, considered as no hopers. So we're seen as an easy team for them to give var calls against and keep the other teams at least partially appease. PGMOL were dreadful last season as well, and before that. Hence Clattenburg’s role with Forest.
Saint_clark Posted 29 November, 2024 Posted 29 November, 2024 Just now, Lighthouse said: How can the cross going through the legs of a player five yards from goal NOT be interfering? The keeper has to position himself to cover the threat of Armstrong, thereby leaving the ar post exposed. If that goal gets given against Saints I guarantee this entire forum would be fuming. It didn't go through his legs, it was behind him. He flicked his leg backwards so that's deemed interfering but if he doesn't flick his leg it's not. 3
DrSuess1979 Posted 29 November, 2024 Posted 29 November, 2024 1 minute ago, Maggie May said: Who actually likes football anymore? Not this incarnation of it
Elmore Saint Posted 29 November, 2024 Posted 29 November, 2024 Just as the players find the confidence to play proper football off their own backs - VAR puts them back in their place. This league is not the home of the beautiful game. 1
Saint Fan CaM Posted 29 November, 2024 Posted 29 November, 2024 LOL. Lumley now struggling. Who’s left?
Saint NL Posted 29 November, 2024 Posted 29 November, 2024 Just now, Saint Fan CaM said: LOL. Lumley now struggling. Who’s left? Matt Gill getting his boots on 1
Saint_clark Posted 29 November, 2024 Posted 29 November, 2024 Just now, Saint Fan CaM said: LOL. Lumley now struggling. Who’s left? Thank god we made sure we have a fit keeper on the bench. 1
Saint86 Posted 29 November, 2024 Posted 29 November, 2024 Just now, Gloucester Saint said: PGMOL were dreadful last season as well, and before that. Hence Clattenburg’s role with Forest. We must be the most screwed over team this year. Var has cost us enough points to put us adrift put it that way.
OttawaSaint Posted 29 November, 2024 Posted 29 November, 2024 Just now, Lighthouse said: How can the cross going through the legs of a player five yards from goal NOT be interfering? The keeper has to position himself to cover the threat of Armstrong, thereby leaving the ar post exposed. If that goal gets given against Saints I guarantee this entire forum would be fuming. Fuck you're annoying. Just have to be a contrarian eh? The ref could volley it in and run to the BHA dugout and you'd see it different to everyone. 1 2
Disco Stu Posted 29 November, 2024 Posted 29 November, 2024 Armstrong was clearly offside and knew it. Making any movement towards the ball and giving the PGMOL the opportunity to disallow it was complete stupidity. 2 1
OneMrsWallace Posted 29 November, 2024 Posted 29 November, 2024 2 minutes ago, Lighthouse said: With the keeper and defender's decision making. We might not like it but that was the right call. Armstrong went too far, too early. He was beyond the ball, and from the angle behind the goal it's a natural movement and had no opportunity to affect the outcome with some vague raising of his heel. It did nothing to impact either their defenders, keeper or direction of the ball. Wrong decision, poor refereeing. 1
Saint_clark Posted 29 November, 2024 Posted 29 November, 2024 Not very professional from McCarthy there to not be warming up. If he genuinely is injured then having him on the bench instead of a youth keeper is ridiculous. 1
The very right reverend Posted 29 November, 2024 Posted 29 November, 2024 My fear is if we lose this Martin can cry off being sacked to a poor decision. Even if we win 15-1 he needs to go. 3
whelk Posted 29 November, 2024 Posted 29 November, 2024 3 minutes ago, Lighthouse said: How can the cross going through the legs of a player five yards from goal NOT be interfering? The keeper has to position himself to cover the threat of Armstrong, thereby leaving the ar post exposed. If that goal gets given against Saints I guarantee this entire forum would be fuming. Can’t remember but don’t you love VAR?
OttawaSaint Posted 29 November, 2024 Posted 29 November, 2024 1 minute ago, Elmore Saint said: Just as the players find the confidence to play proper football off their own backs - VAR puts them back in their place. This league is not the home of the beautiful game. Yep. Feeling that too. We're 95% shit, but when we finally stumble on that 5% we get shafted in some other way. 1
LGTL Posted 29 November, 2024 Posted 29 November, 2024 3 minutes ago, Lighthouse said: How can the cross going through the legs of a player five yards from goal NOT be interfering? The keeper has to position himself to cover the threat of Armstrong, thereby leaving the ar post exposed. If that goal gets given against Saints I guarantee this entire forum would be fuming. It was nowhere near going through his legs 😂 2
Whitey Grandad Posted 29 November, 2024 Posted 29 November, 2024 3 minutes ago, adrian lord said: Was it a clear error by the ref? Was it an obvious error by the ref? Offsides are nothing to do with the ref. VAR remit.
macca155 Posted 29 November, 2024 Posted 29 November, 2024 1 minute ago, OttawaSaint said: Fuck you're annoying. Just have to be a contrarian eh? The ref could volley it in and run to the BHA dugout and you'd see it different to everyone. Thing is he's right. Armstrong clearly offside makes a move towards the ball. Lino gave it (probably for Archer). No need for VAR just get on with the game. 2
Saint NL Posted 29 November, 2024 Posted 29 November, 2024 The usual Saints experience. Be shit. Score a goal out of nowhere. Suddenly it looks like you might get something. Var nonsense. Lose to an injury time winner. 3
a1ex2001 Posted 29 November, 2024 Posted 29 November, 2024 Look on the bright side we are winning the possessions stats now!
Gloucester Saint Posted 29 November, 2024 Posted 29 November, 2024 Just now, whelk said: Can’t remember but don’t you love VAR? It’s not the technology - worked fine in the Euros. Unless shit thick English officials (one of whom was caught recently snorting cocaine on camera) used it. Then it was just as much as farce as tonight. Import most of our offices bar a couple of the untainted ones clean of Stockley, redundancies at PGMOL and re-start the refereeing system from the grassroots. 2
tdmickey3 Posted 29 November, 2024 Posted 29 November, 2024 Just now, a1ex2001 said: Look on the bright side we are winning the possessions stats now! All that matters
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now