Jump to content

Reparatory justice for the transatlantic slave trade


BARCELONASAINT
 Share

Recommended Posts

Commonwealth heads of government are preparing to defy the United Kingdom and agree plans to examine reparatory justice for the transatlantic slave trade, the BBC has learned.

Downing Street insists the issue is not on the agenda for the summit of 56 Commonwealth countries, which begins in the Pacific island nation of Samoa on Friday.

But diplomatic sources said officials were negotiating an agreement to conduct further research and begin a “meaningful conversation” about an issue which could potentially leave the UK owing billions of pounds in reparations.

Ok, I know this is a sensitive subject for many and i will make it clear straight away that what happened in the past was wrong then and it's wrong now. However these events did not happen during our lifetimes and no one alive now should have to pay for what happened well over a hundred years ago and more.

Where do we stop?? Should we go after the Denmark, Sweden and Norway for the Vikings invading our lands and taking slaves?

Do we go after the Italians for invading our lands as part of the Roman Empire and taking slaves? (what did the Romans ever do for us?)

No one alive should be apologising for historical events of the past. By all means acknowledge that these things were wrong by our human standards of today but apologise, NO. Those alive today have nothing to apologise about. 

 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not even worth discussing really. It isn't going to happen (although as usual the big brained genius David Lammy said something years ago not considering that it would come back to bite him if he ever fluked his way into power.) and it's a waste of time getting angry about a fantasy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Another case of people choosing the exact interpretation of the exact moment in history which they feel they’re the victim of. As has been pointed out we can reasonably demand reparations from many European nations, not to mention the Catholic Church, so where does it all end? If we can trace homosapiens back to east Africa, are they ultimately responsible for the whole worlds colonialism?

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

40 minutes ago, Lighthouse said:

Another case of people choosing the exact interpretation of the exact moment in history which they feel they’re the victim of. As has been pointed out we can reasonably demand reparations from many European nations, not to mention the Catholic Church, so where does it all end? If we can trace homosapiens back to east Africa, are they ultimately responsible for the whole worlds colonialism?

 

Also, whilst some Britons were making money from the transatlantic trade, it was Africans who were capturing and selling the slaves. Hows that going to work

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I always find apologies for these sort of things to be a bit pointless.  Maybe apologising "on behalf of the Government" goes somewhere towards acknowledging a wrong, but it's a bit meaningless in terms of being a personal apology if it was generations away.

Sunak had it right when he ruled out reparations.  So did Starmer when he repeated that line.  It would be nonsense to even consider it.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, buctootim said:

Also, whilst some Britons were making money from the transatlantic trade, it was Africans who were capturing and selling the slaves. Hows that going to work

Shhh, we don’t mention that bit. The slave trade was every white person capturing and selling Africans, end of discussion. Also Arabs have never been involved at all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, Lighthouse said:

Shhh, we don’t mention that bit. The slave trade was every white person capturing and selling Africans, end of discussion. Also Arabs have never been involved at all.

Why do you hate Muslims so much?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Probably 90% of the country is still owned by descendants of the Norman invaders. On behalf on my Anglo-Saxon forebears I demand that our land is returned to us, so that we can then pass it back to our Celtic ancestors from whom the Saxons / Angles / Danes / Jutes stole it.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

In one episode of "Who Do You Think You Are ?", Ainsley Harriot went tracing his lineage back to the plantation where one of his ancestors was a slave, only to find another was the plantation owner.

I suppose he could pay himself.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

46 minutes ago, badgerx16 said:

In one episode of "Who Do You Think You Are ?", Ainsley Harriot went tracing his lineage back to the plantation where one of his ancestors was a slave, only to find another was the plantation owner.

I suppose he could pay himself.

That's not so rare, a lot of slave rape back in the day.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 24/10/2024 at 12:07, buctootim said:

 

Also, whilst some Britons were making money from the transatlantic trade, it was Africans who were capturing and selling the slaves. Hows that going to work

 

18 hours ago, Gloucester Saint said:

You’d also have to deduct all of the tens of billions international aid and overseas R&D. A non-starter. More likely to be helping the more stable Commonwealth countries with better access to re-financing facilities. 

Aspects that will be conveniently overlooked.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Badger said:

 

Aspects that will be conveniently overlooked.

The argument seems to be that we need to pay reparations because the slave trade was not done on such an industrial scale before and that that's our fault. Completely insane of course. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, hypochondriac said:

The argument seems to be that we need to pay reparations because the slave trade was not done on such an industrial scale before and that that's our fault. Completely insane of course. 

it's completely bonkers anyone is even talking about this really. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Turkish said:

it's completely bonkers anyone is even talking about this really. 

Bonkers? The PM took the knee just a couple of years ago, all while largely peaceful protests were taking place 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, AlexLaw76 said:

They get better when paid for by someone else…

 

IMG_0929.jpeg

 

10 minutes ago, The Kraken said:

They were the genuine scandal of the piece. Horrendous stuff. No wonder he took all that lolly from the donor to smarten himself up.

Ange is in bondage footwear. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, OldNick said:

Is the Commonwealth of any use to the UK at all? Im not sure we get much in return from them. Perhaps time to end our membership. 

4 members were never even British colonies.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

41 minutes ago, east-stand-nic said:

Do-good nonsense, ill thought through and totally stupid. Some of the obvious do-good nutters on this forum will no doubt love it.

How can something that hasn’t got any traction be ill thought through? Only a few left wing idiots think this should be a thing.

Edited by whelk
Link to comment
Share on other sites

57 minutes ago, east-stand-nic said:

Do-good nonsense, ill thought through and totally stupid. Some of the obvious do-good nutters on this forum will no doubt love it.

I can’t see any support for it on here, irrespective of views. It’s unworkable even if someone did support it - where would you start and draw distinctions? 

It’s confected for domestic audiences to keep some leaders and Heads of State in power.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, east-stand-nic said:

Do-good nonsense, ill thought through and totally stupid. Some of the obvious do-good nutters on this forum will no doubt love it.

It is amazing how badly you read the room.

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, badgerx16 said:

It is amazing how badly you read the room.

He is similar to SOG in that way - imposes the views he thinks is easy to argue against on others but in reality no one is thinking that. Except of course the legion of Nazi Islamophobes on here.

Edited by whelk
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, whelk said:

He is similar to SOG in that way - imposes the views he thinks is easy to argue against on others but in reality no one is thinking that. Except of course the legion of Nazi Islamophobes on here.

Come to think of it, my belt buckle could do with a polish.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...