Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
7 minutes ago, Matthew Le God said:

I asked a question, I didn't make a statement. You can't agree with a question.

He answered your question, you just decided to respond like a douche.

Posted (edited)
13 minutes ago, Appy said:

Bednarek linked with Roma according to Craig Hope of Daily Mail

Interesting. He's contracted until 2027, so the club can make a decision that suits them. But with us destined for the championship, the player might well be interested. 

Edited by Chez
  • Like 2
Posted
1 hour ago, Football Special said:

Bath academy wasn't really our choice

And most of those players  left without us being able to hold on to them without matching big Man City contracts which probably wouldn't have been enough anyway 

What do you mean by this? 

Posted
40 minutes ago, Patches O Houlihan said:

RM knew that it was important to try to keep SAA onside. But he also made considerable noise in the media about the immense physical pace, power and size of PL players compared to the Championship. We all knew that Will Smallbone would struggle with the step up - partly because he is not combative, but also due to his relatively slight build.

Now compare SAA to Will in terms of physical stature. Sam is quick and has good skills with the ball at his feet undoubtedly, and I have loved watching him play, and would hope that he would sign a new contract and stake a claim for a solid first team place in the Championship next year. 

BUT

  • He and Megahoma arrived with a wiff of ABK style FIGJAM* about them, and likely would only sign for one contract.
  • He got pushed off the ball plenty in the Championship.

Right now he's just not built to stop Mo Salah or a similarly powerful PL winger/LWB in full flight, and may never be. Maybe we don't want to gamble on him having the required growth spurt AND be willing to sign a new contract AND deliver on that early promise. Maybe that is just too many risks.

Plus if that ~£7m of profit allows us to keep Fernandes next season (or Ramsdale) then for me it will be worth it.

F**k

I'm 

Good

Just

Ask

Me

Yes, I’ll settle for the SAA sale, and for that matter a big price sale of Dibling in the summer, if it means we could keep Fernandes, and even Ramsdale.   Fernandes staying (against the odds) greatly increases the prospect of automatic promotion next season.

Posted (edited)
5 minutes ago, Holmes_and_Watson said:

The Bath academy sat outside the PL catchment area rules. More in the link

https://www.dailyecho.co.uk/sport/24366542.southampton-confirm-famous-bath-academy-centre-set-close/

I thought that’s the angle he was taking.

Interestingly the club rolled over and had their belly tickled on this and didn’t fight it. A fair few other high ranking individuals from other cat 1 clubs and an individual previously at Double Pass (who use to audit the EPPP) thought they would win any legal case (including my ex boss).  

One of the many gripes I have, I won’t lie. 

Other PL and EFL clubs have already ‘allegedly’ spoken to the Uni about being given first option if the ruling relaxes in the next cycle.
 

 

 

13 minutes ago, danjosaint said:

Think it was the fa put pay to Satellite academies , something along those lines 

 

Edited by Monk
  • Like 1
Posted
16 minutes ago, Monk said:

What do you mean by this? 

 

Although FA rules dictated that young players must live within a 90-minute commute of their team, Southampton were granted special dispensation by the Premier League to open a satellite site in Bath due to the port city's coastal location with the sea taking up half of their catchment radius.

 

However, after pressure from the Premier League and EFL to shut down the centre due to it being outside their catchment, which intensified following the Saints' relegation from the top-flight in 2023, the closure has now been finalised with no more young players being taken on.

Those already enrolled in the programme will go on full-time up to under-16s out of Beechen Cliff School in Bath until they finish their studies. Players are also receiving support to transition to other academies, which could be at City or Rovers

  • Like 1
Posted

Torn on whether I want Bednarek to go or not. On the one hand he’s clearly a decent Championship defender and will be useful next season. On the other, I’m just so f**king sick of watching him put in consistently sub-standard performances, season after season. He’s been the avatar for our atrocious recruitment since 2016.

  • Like 9
Posted
5 minutes ago, Monk said:

I thought that’s the angle he was taking.

Interestingly the club rolled over and had their belly tickled on this and didn’t fight it. A fair few other high ranking individuals from other cat 1 clubs and an individual previously at Double Pass (who use to audit the EPPP) thought they would win any legal case (including my ex boss).  

One of the many gripes I have, I won’t lie. 

Other PL and EFL clubs have already ‘allegedly’ spoken to the Uni about being given first option if the ruling relaxes in the next cycle.
 

 

 

 

Other clubs had been moaning for years, Bristol City particularly 

Posted
7 minutes ago, Lighthouse said:

Torn on whether I want Bednarek to go or not. On the one hand he’s clearly a decent Championship defender and will be useful next season. On the other, I’m just so f**king sick of watching him put in consistently sub-standard performances, season after season. He’s been the avatar for our atrocious recruitment since 2016.

I'd rather keep Bednarek than Stephens

  • Like 10
Posted
2 minutes ago, Lee On Solent Saint said:

I'd rather keep Bednarek than Stephens

So would I. However from the club's point of view, Bednarek would bring in much more of a fee than Stephens would. 

Posted
8 minutes ago, Harry_SFC said:

So would I. However from the club's point of view, Bednarek would bring in much more of a fee than Stephens would. 

Praying for the day Stephens goes home to Plymouth! 

Posted (edited)
24 minutes ago, Lighthouse said:

Torn on whether I want Bednarek to go or not. On the one hand he’s clearly a decent Championship defender and will be useful next season. On the other, I’m just so f**king sick of watching him put in consistently sub-standard performances, season after season. He’s been the avatar for our atrocious recruitment since 2016.

I'm all for him going, and the rest of them. Full reset needed - twice now Bednarek and co have shat themselves in the Premier League. If offered fees now for players, I'd take them and then more in the summer and see where we are at with a new DoF in Spors (if that goes through), and more lessons learned (ik they say that every 6 months or so, but still, let's see what Dragan cooks up I guess?)

Squad is huge too.

Edited by santolijador
big ol' squad
  • Like 2
Posted
34 minutes ago, Lighthouse said:

Torn on whether I want Bednarek to go or not. On the one hand he’s clearly a decent Championship defender and will be useful next season. On the other, I’m just so f**king sick of watching him put in consistently sub-standard performances, season after season. He’s been the avatar for our atrocious recruitment since 2016.

Bit extreme. He cost us a whopping £5m and while his attitude and performances have been lacking at times during his 7/8 years here, it hasnt been a bad return (even just for last season alone).

The avatar for our atrocious recruitment is Guido Carillo or Ross Stewart

  • Like 9
Posted

Remember everyone we must be nice to MLG, don’t say any hurty things to him however much he prattles on, otherwise some on here will accuse you of bullying him 🤦🤦😂😂

Posted
Just now, CB Fry said:

A forward who seems to have never scored a professional goal is a pretty stunning piece of business 👌 

 

 

3 minutes ago, Saint Matty 76 said:

Striker with 0 goals in 20 this season. Seems promising.

Valued at €600k according to transfer market. What do we reckon lads £8m and loaned to Gotekpe?

  • Haha 1
Posted

The Strasbourg guy is supposedly good, the defender, he has been advised by Liverpool related someones to come to us. I don't know about Bednarek, but maybe it's an in and out

The other guy is a random, the striker. Apparently he runs very fast

Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, Lighthouse said:

Torn on whether I want Bednarek to go or not. On the one hand he’s clearly a decent Championship defender and will be useful next season. On the other, I’m just so f**king sick of watching him put in consistently sub-standard performances, season after season. He’s been the avatar for our atrocious recruitment since 2016.

Harsh narrative imo. He cost relative peanuts, is a polish international, and has been here for many years now - he's put in some good seasons in that time under ralph / martin (i.e., promotion) that make up for the fee. Surely the real reason you're directing your ire at him is because we've spent tens of millions on defensive players since and its all been pissed away (i.e., bednarek is still the best we've got 🤣) - but that isn't bednarek's fault.

Edited by Saint86
  • Like 16
Posted
3 hours ago, Matthew Le God said:

If Bednarek really is wanted by AS Roma it highlights he really isn't a bad as many Saints fans make out.

Exactly he’s a good player and rated by plenty of others outside the club, an international as well. He clearly cares about the club and would rather we kept him as he’s just signed an extension hasn’t he 

  • Like 2
Posted
9 hours ago, Lighthouse said:

Torn on whether I want Bednarek to go or not. On the one hand he’s clearly a decent Championship defender and will be useful next season. On the other, I’m just so f**king sick of watching him put in consistently sub-standard performances, season after season. He’s been the avatar for our atrocious recruitment since 2016.

As others have said he cost £5m 8 years ago as a young prospect and has played over 200 time for the club. He’s not the best player but to hail him as an avatar for crap recruitment is as absurd and your rigorous defence of Russell Martin 

  • Like 9
Posted
9 hours ago, Lighthouse said:

Torn on whether I want Bednarek to go or not. On the one hand he’s clearly a decent Championship defender and will be useful next season. On the other, I’m just so f**king sick of watching him put in consistently sub-standard performances, season after season. He’s been the avatar for our atrocious recruitment since 2016.

Seems you've answered your own question

Posted (edited)
9 hours ago, Matthew Le God said:

They couldn't afford him (sic Stephens) until his contract expires. 

It seems the IT people at SFC do not know how to turn off the 'Automatic Renewal' instruction in his Preferences section.

Edited by Charlie Wayman
  • Like 1
Posted
9 hours ago, woodsaint1 said:

Bit extreme. He cost us a whopping £5m and while his attitude and performances have been lacking at times during his 7/8 years here, it hasnt been a bad return (even just for last season alone).

The avatar for our atrocious recruitment is Guido Carillo or Ross Stewart

And Ely, Vestergaard and Hoedt. All of who, plus Carrillo and Stewart cost far more than Jan and probably less games than him combined.

Posted
29 minutes ago, sadoldgit said:

Anyone posted a picture of that little known classic car the Victor Udoh yet?

Didn't he write The Hunchback of Notre Dame and Les Miserables ?

Posted

After Bednarek and Villa I never wanted to see him in a Saints shirt again but he redeemed himself with last year performances and not been our worst defender this year.

With Wood, THB, Stephens injured and ABK not getting on with 2 injured in a game can we sell him now?

  • Like 1
Posted
45 minutes ago, sadoldgit said:

Anyone posted a picture of that little known classic car the Victor Udoh yet?

That gag is about as funny the 15th time you cracked it as it was the 1st you obsessed oddball

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
14 hours ago, Matthew Le God said:

From which journalists? Or is it random Spurs fans?

Just a few bits on social media. Cant be arsed to verify their veracity. Just cruised around the t'internet and saw a few bits and pieces as per my post. Levy wont spend the money most like.

Posted
10 hours ago, Football Special said:

 

Although FA rules dictated that young players must live within a 90-minute commute of their team, Southampton were granted special dispensation by the Premier League to open a satellite site in Bath due to the port city's coastal location with the sea taking up half of their catchment radius.

 

However, after pressure from the Premier League and EFL to shut down the centre due to it being outside their catchment, which intensified following the Saints' relegation from the top-flight in 2023, the closure has now been finalised with no more young players being taken on.

Those already enrolled in the programme will go on full-time up to under-16s out of Beechen Cliff School in Bath until they finish their studies. Players are also receiving support to transition to other academies, which could be at City or Rovers

But wasn’t it pointless as teams like united started to fly players in which extended the distance to which they could argue that they were within the rules.

Posted
10 hours ago, Football Special said:

 

Although FA rules dictated that young players must live within a 90-minute commute of their team, Southampton were granted special dispensation by the Premier League to open a satellite site in Bath due to the port city's coastal location with the sea taking up half of their catchment radius.

 

However, after pressure from the Premier League and EFL to shut down the centre due to it being outside their catchment, which intensified following the Saints' relegation from the top-flight in 2023, the closure has now been finalised with no more young players being taken on.

Those already enrolled in the programme will go on full-time up to under-16s out of Beechen Cliff School in Bath until they finish their studies. Players are also receiving support to transition to other academies, which could be at City or Rovers

Do Newcastle have an academy, and if so do they have a similar dispensation as you go a very long way out into the North Sea if you travel 90 minutes East of St James' Park.

  • Like 1
Posted

Surely Udoh signing for the u21s initially (as per Alfie House), has no bearing on Cameron Archer leaving at all?

We still have 1 PL loan slot left to use, would expect us to use it?

Posted (edited)
10 minutes ago, goodymatt said:

Surely Udoh signing for the u21s initially (as per Alfie House), has no bearing on Cameron Archer leaving at all?

We still have 1 PL loan slot left to use, would expect us to use it?

I am trying not to write him off but the comments from fans seeing him play point to pace but no end product.

I have absolutely no faith in our recruitment so nothing surprises me anymore 

Edited by Give it to Ron
  • Like 1
  • Sad 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...