Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
  On 19/06/2024 at 20:46, Saint_clark said:

First thing I noticed Adams do is dive screaming and rolling around for a freekick when he wasn't even touched. Playacting twat got the Swiss player booked, too.

Expand  

Bet Wolves are buzzing that they've secured his services.

Posted
  On 19/06/2024 at 20:15, Andy Hill said:

Adams really is very average…. but admittedly he is getting very little support

Expand  

Second half much like the first. He puts in a shift, but is a bit isolated. A support striker looking for a partner.

  On 19/06/2024 at 20:18, SaintsBarry74 said:

Scotlands probably the worst team at this euros, such horrible defending.

Expand  

Gunn, Ralston, Hanley and Henry all have a massive error waiting to happen. Put them together...

  On 19/06/2024 at 20:19, Baird of the land said:

Tierney hamstrings seem to be made of glass. 

Expand  

He was covering for someone else's error at the time too. Blighted with injuries, and hope he recovers soon.

Posted (edited)
  On 19/06/2024 at 19:14, sfc4prem said:

Scotland's 6th ever goal at the Euros. Aptly shite, deflected in.

Expand  

It looks like the keeper had the shot covered until the deflection but they have given McTominay the goal.

Edited by sadoldgit
Posted
  On 19/06/2024 at 21:30, sadoldgit said:

It looks like the keeper had the shot covered until the deflection but they have given McTominay the goal.

Expand  

The keeper 'having it covered' has no bearing on whether or not an o.g. is given. The original shot has to be off target, which McT's wasn't. What I do find irritating about the interpretation of this rule is incidents like the goal which denied Pelle a hat trick against Sunderland. The shot was clearly going in before it hit one of Liam Bridcutt's legs, then it bounced in off the other one and was given as an o.g. I would argue that had that player not touched the ball at all, the goal would have gone in, therefore it should have been Pelle's.

Posted

Remember Ostenstaads hattrick wasn't given due to I think G.Neville sliding and helping it in, even though it was clearly going in anyway, guess the rules have changed since then.

Posted
  On 19/06/2024 at 20:31, a1ex2001 said:

Must have put steel rods in his gloves to prevent flappy wrist syndrome!

Expand  

Third one was where he tipped the shot round the post . The commentary said what an awful miss by the forward , the replay showed Gunn tipping it round the post ! The first 2 were full length dives so well done .

Posted
  On 20/06/2024 at 08:24, Lighthouse said:

The keeper 'having it covered' has no bearing on whether or not an o.g. is given. The original shot has to be off target, which McT's wasn't. What I do find irritating about the interpretation of this rule is incidents like the goal which denied Pelle a hat trick against Sunderland. The shot was clearly going in before it hit one of Liam Bridcutt's legs, then it bounced in off the other one and was given as an o.g. I would argue that had that player not touched the ball at all, the goal would have gone in, therefore it should have been Pelle's.

Expand  

What I don’t get is that it didn’t just deflect off the defender, he leathered it into the back of the net whilst trying to clear the ball.

Posted

Serbia threatening to quit the Euro's should Uefa not punish Croatia and Albania for some slurs.

But it looks like they're quitting by their own accord anyway... 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...