Jump to content

Who will be our No1 keeper next season

Markyruk

By Markyruk,
in The Saints

 Share

Recommended Posts

Badger

Badger

Posted
Posted
30 minutes ago, Whitey Grandad said:

Really? There was one on Friday that went straight into the crowd at the half way line.

I can  live with that providing he keeps the ball out of the net.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Lighthouse

Lighthouse

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, Chez said:

Macca is off. In his eyes he will feel he has been treated pretty shabbly this season.

Complete conjecture. I’ve no idea why you’d think he feels his way, he’s been paid very well to be one of our goalkeepers. He was originally brought in as cover for Forster, so it’s not like he’s ever been promised he would be our number one either.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Saint Fan CaM

Saint Fan CaM

Posted
Posted
7 minutes ago, Lighthouse said:

Complete conjecture. I’ve no idea why you’d think he feels his way, he’s been paid very well to be one of our goalkeepers. He was originally brought in as cover for Forster, so it’s not like he’s ever been promised he would be our number one either.

Absolutely - at the stage of career he’s at, he’s done very well to maintain a well paid secure role. Whenever I’ve seen him he hardly looks miffed - on the contrary.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Oldandtired

Oldandtired

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, Whitey Grandad said:

Really? There was one on Friday that went straight into the crowd at the half way line.

And there were many more that went straight to their intended target…..

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Whitey Grandad

Whitey Grandad

Posted
Posted
33 minutes ago, Oldandtired said:

And there were many more that went straight to their intended target…..

Let’s just say that his kicking is ‘wayward’. However I’d rather he kicked the ball long than faffed around in his own penalty area.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Wade Garrett

Wade Garrett

Posted
Posted
2 hours ago, pimpin4rizeal said:

Knowing us we will prob go all out for the next city youth keeper 

£10m plus for the next Gunn/Bazunu.  Del Boy couldn’t do a better job selling their shit.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Chez

Chez

Posted
Posted (edited)
5 hours ago, Whitey Grandad said:

Really? There was one on Friday that went straight into the crowd at the half way line.

a footballer misplaced a pass? Hang him. 

His kicking out to the wing backs was very good on Friday. Watch the game again. 

Edited by Chez
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Chez

Chez

Posted
Posted (edited)
4 hours ago, Lighthouse said:

Complete conjecture. I’ve no idea why you’d think he feels his way, he’s been paid very well to be one of our goalkeepers. He was originally brought in as cover for Forster, so it’s not like he’s ever been promised he would be our number one either.

He's a professional footballer not being picked and the guy that has his shirt ain't doing a great job. I'd be amazed if he has spent the year just smiling at his bank balance. 

It almost seemed like we didn't play him a lot last season to ensure he didn't get a contract extension, despite it crying out for a keeper change. How happy would you be? After many years service, would you sign a new contract for a club/manager like that? 

Edited by Chez
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Lighthouse

Lighthouse

Posted
Posted
9 minutes ago, Chez said:

He's a professional footballer not being picked and the guy that has his shirt ain't doing a great job. I'd be amazed if he has spent the year just smiling at his bank balance. 

It almost seemed like we didn't play him a lot last season to ensure he didn't get a contract extension, despite it crying out for a keeper change. How happy would you be? After many years service, would you sign a new contract for a club/manager like that? 

Have a look back at the summer transfer thread from 2022 if you’re interested. There were an awful lot of, “FFS! We’d better not be going into another season with McC,” type comments. He hasn’t earned the first team spot, that’s why he was replaced by Baz in the first place. Even when he came in at the end of last season he looked awful, worse than Baz, and was shipping goals left, right and centre.

The fact that he didn’t get picked, in a position where you can only ever have one player and it pays to be consistent, is hardly mistreating the guy. I don’t believe for a minute that he feels any animosity towards the club and if he does, he can p*ss off.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
ErwinK1961

ErwinK1961

Posted
Posted (edited)

Exactly the same happened with Forster. He came in for a few games (replacing the bloke currently in the sticks), played well in one game and people wanted him to get an extension, completely forgetting the absolute dross he displayed prior to that.

It’s time to move on, hopefully he has one last good game for us before he departs.

We need a new GK, end of.

Edited by ErwinK1961
  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Chez

Chez

Posted
Posted
8 minutes ago, Lighthouse said:

Have a look back at the summer transfer thread from 2022 if you’re interested. There were an awful lot of, “FFS! We’d better not be going into another season with McC,” type comments. He hasn’t earned the first team spot, that’s why he was replaced by Baz in the first place. Even when he came in at the end of last season he looked awful, worse than Baz, and was shipping goals left, right and centre.

The fact that he didn’t get picked, in a position where you can only ever have one player and it pays to be consistent, is hardly mistreating the guy. I don’t believe for a minute that he feels any animosity towards the club and if he does, he can p*ss off.

No doubt about it, he was poor in 21/22. We rightly signed a new keeper (personally I wanted both Forster and McCarthy replaced). But we signed the wrong keeper.

During 22/23 we should have dropped Baz and played McCarthy, but seemingly we didn't want him playing a certain number of games in the season so we could cut his wages in half. That's football business.

This season we again go with Baz. That's fine, it was RM's choice, but again he doesn't look great, yet we stick with him rather than play McCarthy.

Do you really think McCarthy has been completely happy to be overlooked for two seasons for a keeper that simply has not performed well? 

In contrast to your thoughts, I'd say that if he has been fine with it, then he can p*ss off. I want players desperate to play, not happy to pick up a pay check.

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Chez

Chez

Posted
Posted
39 minutes ago, ErwinK1961 said:

We need a new GK, end of.

This. If we go up, we make it a priority to get a top class keeper in. No rush or pressure on Baz to rush back and when he is fit, he has to earn his place not waltz straight back in unchallenged.

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Disco Stu

Disco Stu

Posted
Posted
6 minutes ago, Chez said:

This. If we go up, we make it a priority to get a top class keeper in. No rush or pressure on Baz to rush back and when he is fit, he has to earn his place not waltz straight back in unchallenged.

We need a new first choice goalkeeper regardless.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Chez

Chez

Posted
Posted
15 minutes ago, Disco Stu said:

We need a new first choice goalkeeper regardless.

realistically, if we don't go up, we probably won't get one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
S-Clarke

S-Clarke

Posted
Posted
18 hours ago, ErwinK1961 said:

Exactly the same happened with Forster. He came in for a few games (replacing the bloke currently in the sticks), played well in one game and people wanted him to get an extension, completely forgetting the absolute dross he displayed prior to that.

It’s time to move on, hopefully he has one last good game for us before he departs.

We need a new GK, end of.

I agree, I think we will get a new keeper - but my fear is that it will be a stop gap to cover Bazunu. I really think the club need to be 'harsh' on this one and replace him with a new paid for long-term option. Bazunu can be part of the squad when he's back from injury, but we really need to use this opportunity to plan without him in whatever league we're in.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Cabrone

Cabrone

Posted
Posted

If we get promoted I'd make a top quality GK + a top quality striker the no 1 priorities.

I do wonder if we'd have had a better GK last season whether we would have been relegated in the first place.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Midfield_General

Midfield_General

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, S-Clarke said:

I agree, I think we will get a new keeper - but my fear is that it will be a stop gap to cover Bazunu. I really think the club need to be 'harsh' on this one and replace him with a new paid for long-term option. Bazunu can be part of the squad when he's back from injury, but we really need to use this opportunity to plan without him in whatever league we're in.

image.jpeg.a3e0d9ba9c04b1c000b6578c1c3fd041.jpeg

  • Haha 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Whitey Grandad

Whitey Grandad

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, Cabrone said:

If we get promoted I'd make a top quality GK + a top quality striker the no 1 priorities.

I do wonder if we'd have had a better GK last season whether we would have been relegated in the first place.

We would still have been relegated. We were 12 points at least away from safety. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
The Curse of St Mary's

The Curse of St Mary's

Posted
Posted
3 hours ago, LegalEagle said:

We’re in for the Plymouth keeper 

Just read he is known for his shot stopping ability and decisive dealing of crosses which sells it for me. Complete opposite to Bazuna then! I seem to recall made some good saves at St Marys back in December. One year left on his contract. Seems more like a back up type signing rather than straight in as the #1. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Badger

Badger

Posted
Posted
4 hours ago, LegalEagle said:

We’re in for the Plymouth keeper 

Which one ? 

1 hour ago, The Curse of St Mary's said:

Just read he is known for his shot stopping ability and decisive dealing of crosses which sells it for me. Complete opposite to Bazuna then! I seem to recall made some good saves at St Marys back in December. One year left on his contract. Seems more like a back up type signing rather than straight in as the #1. 

The bloke who played at StMary’s as I recall was their second GK (Hazard) as the first choice Cooper was injured. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Badger

Badger

Posted
Posted
55 minutes ago, The Curse of St Mary's said:

He has had two separate knee injuries throughout last year so you could well be right. 

No wonder we're interested in him then. 

  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
SaintsBarry74

SaintsBarry74

Posted
Posted
On 18/05/2024 at 14:25, pingpong said:

If we're promoted, baz.

If not, we'll probably lose him and need to replace, probably from lower down the league.

He's the worst shot stopper the Premier league AND the championship have ever seen. He fails the eye test and statistically this cannot be disputed.

Lumley and McCarthy are both not good enough for the level of play. Perhaps we could get an aging Kasper Schmeichel on the cheap? He's still Denmark's no1.

  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Chez

Chez

Posted
Posted
9 minutes ago, SaintsBarry74 said:

Perhaps we could get an aging Kasper Schmeichel on the cheap? He's still Denmark's no1.

Not for me. He has always been a bit overrated IMO, but however good you think he was at his best, he was very poor in the season before Leicester City let him go. He's ageing (37) and like Perraud was not deemed good enough for OGC Nice this year, so was farmed out to Anderlecht. In the Championship, maybe, but if we go up we need someone top-notch approaching their prime.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Whitey Grandad

Whitey Grandad

Posted
Posted
53 minutes ago, SaintsBarry74 said:

He's the worst shot stopper the Premier league AND the championship have ever seen. He fails the eye test and statistically this cannot be disputed.

Lumley and McCarthy are both not good enough for the level of play. Perhaps we could get an aging Kasper Schmeichel on the cheap? He's still Denmark's no1.

Of course it can. Statistics are guesswork.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Whitey Grandad

Whitey Grandad

Posted
Posted
2 hours ago, Weston Super Saint said:

That is just daft!

The entire league table is 'statistics' (presentation of data).

Did someone just 'guess' that Leicester finished first and Ipswich second?

The league table is not ‘statistics’

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Weston Super Saint

Weston Super Saint

Posted
Posted
49 minutes ago, Whitey Grandad said:

The league table is not ‘statistics’

Of course it is!

It's data, that has been interpreted and presented. The fact that it is in a table is just one option, it could be presented in a number of ways.

That is literally the definition of statistics.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Whitey Grandad

Whitey Grandad

Posted
Posted
24 minutes ago, Weston Super Saint said:

Of course it is!

It's data, that has been interpreted and presented. The fact that it is in a table is just one option, it could be presented in a number of ways.

That is literally the definition of statistics.

It literally isn’t.

Raw data is simply that. A league table is raw data. A list of discrete numbers in tabulated form. Statistics are what you get when data is manipulated and interpreted. Interpretation involves guesswork.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Saint_clark

Saint_clark

Posted
Posted
21 hours ago, LegalEagle said:

Cooper

Would be an excellent signing. His save percentage with the amount of shots Bazunu faced would have seen us concede 15 goals less this season. 

And as we all know you can't argue with stats like that.

  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Whitey Grandad

Whitey Grandad

Posted
Posted
16 minutes ago, Saint_clark said:

Would be an excellent signing. His save percentage with the amount of shots Bazunu faced would have seen us concede 15 goals less this season. 

And as we all know you can't argue with stats like that.

But his save percentage only applies to the shots that he actually faced, not to the ones that Bazunu faced.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Badger

Badger

Posted
Posted
26 minutes ago, Whitey Grandad said:

But his save percentage only applies to the shots that he actually faced, not to the ones that Bazunu faced.

Nice one Whitey. 
 

Award yourself an MLG point. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
pingpong

pingpong

Posted
Posted
6 hours ago, SaintsBarry74 said:

He fails the eye test and statistically this cannot be disputed.

Really? We have data proving he failed an eye test?  Even if he did, can it not be corrected by contact lenses? This is massive news, he could be the first visually impaired goalkeeper to play at the top level and an inspiration for disabled fans across the world.

My respect for him has doubled hearing this shocking news. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Saint_clark

Saint_clark

Posted
Posted
3 hours ago, Whitey Grandad said:

But his save percentage only applies to the shots that he actually faced, not to the ones that Bazunu faced.

Ah yes. I forgot that Bazunu has only faced worldies and every other keeper in the league only faced piddly rollers along the floor.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Whitey Grandad

Whitey Grandad

Posted
Posted
37 minutes ago, Saint_clark said:

Ah yes. I forgot that Bazunu has only faced worldies and every other keeper in the league only faced piddly rollers along the floor.

The point is, we just don’t know. Stupidly simplistic numbers such as percentage of shots faced yield no useful information. A shot on target can be from any direction, at any angle, at any speed and from any distance. The figures I’ve seen have a surprisingly tight spread, something from 60% to 70% which means that there is not a lot to choose between any of them.

As random number generators go goalkeeping statistics are as good as they come.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Saint_clark

Saint_clark

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, Whitey Grandad said:

The point is, we just don’t know. Stupidly simplistic numbers such as percentage of shots faced yield no useful information. A shot on target can be from any direction, at any angle, at any speed and from any distance. The figures I’ve seen have a surprisingly tight spread, something from 60% to 70% which means that there is not a lot to choose between any of them.

As random number generators go goalkeeping statistics are as good as they come.

The difference between 60 and 70 percent is more than 10 goals with the amount of shots faced within a season, a huge amount. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing
×
×
  • Create New...