Disco Stu Posted May 17 Author Share Posted May 17 No Adams. Strange as I thought he was touch and go for the first leg. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChrisPY Posted May 17 Share Posted May 17 8 minutes ago, Turkish said: Good on them. I was cynical and thought it’d be shite but looks class It was a bit more than cynicism. You were pretty belittling and patronising about it. Good of you to apologise though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kjurwi Posted May 17 Share Posted May 17 kwp and Fraser wingbacks. Back 3 Bednarek THB and Stephens. Brooks for Mara Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Block41 Saint Posted May 17 Share Posted May 17 Just now, farawaysaint said: You must be fun at parties. Quite fun but 5 at the fucking back in a must win game is a joke from this woeful manager. 1 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lighthouse Posted May 17 Share Posted May 17 I’m guessing a back four, with Stephens at LB. It worked at the Hawthorns earlier in the year. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Saint NL Posted May 17 Share Posted May 17 Looks like 4-3-3 to me, but what do I know? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
coalman Posted May 17 Share Posted May 17 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
trousers Posted May 17 Share Posted May 17 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sheaf Saint Posted May 17 Share Posted May 17 1 minute ago, Block41 Saint said: Quite fun but 5 at the fucking back in a must win game is a joke from this woeful manager. Doesn't look like a back 5 to me. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
trousers Posted May 17 Share Posted May 17 (edited) 3 minutes ago, Disco Stu said: No Adams. Strange as I thought he was touch and go for the first leg. He was never going to play reading between the lines of Russ's semi-cryptic press conference comments Edited May 17 by trousers Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bpsaint Posted May 17 Share Posted May 17 As good as can be I suppose. At least Mara isn’t starting. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Convict Colony Posted May 17 Share Posted May 17 Stephens RB, he did the job there v Brom earlier in the season, KWP on the left Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sheaf Saint Posted May 17 Share Posted May 17 3 minutes ago, Disco Stu said: No Adams. Strange as I thought he was touch and go for the first leg. He must be 'close'. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
obelisk Posted May 17 Share Posted May 17 That team isn't what I was hoping for. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Saint_clark Posted May 17 Share Posted May 17 Just now, obelisk said: That team isn't what I was hoping for. Yeah I wanted Mara to start too. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dark Munster Posted May 17 Share Posted May 17 Replace Brooks by Tall Paul, have Fraser as wing back, and I'd be happy with the line up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
coalman Posted May 17 Share Posted May 17 Given Adams is out, Stewart can't start and Mara is... not sure what else we could do. Sad to see Brooks starting Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ErwinK1961 Posted May 17 Share Posted May 17 3 minutes ago, Block41 Saint said: Quite fun but 5 at the fucking back in a must win game is a joke from this woeful manager. Short of a fully fit Adams or Stewart, that’s pretty much our best XI, not sure what else you’re expecting. 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Block41 Saint Posted May 17 Share Posted May 17 2 minutes ago, Sheaf Saint said: Doesn't look like a back 5 to me. Well if it isn't it's an awful CB at LB. Still a wank lineup. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kjurwi Posted May 17 Share Posted May 17 Would have preferred Edozie or Sulemana over Brooks. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AlexLaw76 Posted May 17 Share Posted May 17 3 minutes ago, Sheaf Saint said: Doesn't look like a back 5 to me. I reckon Fraser will play more like a left midfielder in possession, and drop in when out... 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chez Posted May 17 Share Posted May 17 1 minute ago, Block41 Saint said: Well if it isn't it's an awful CB at LB. Still a wank lineup. Ou of interest, what would your starting side have been? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Saint86 Posted May 17 Share Posted May 17 There has been some Martin-Warnock conversations post Leicester me things 😂 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toadhall Saint Posted May 17 Share Posted May 17 Now let’s get the job done! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Saint86 Posted May 17 Share Posted May 17 Just now, Chez said: Ou of interest, what would your starting side have been? Manning got destroyed at LB at the Hawthornes, and that was in a back 5. Stephens will be fine whether he is left or right. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SNSUN Posted May 17 Share Posted May 17 Great photos from the ground lads. Jealous. I'm working nights tonight so have to give up the Sky before the final whistle so I'm really hoping we get the job done without extra time or I'll miss it. Line up iffy. I still think having the 3 cbs blunts our attack somewhat. But we will see. 100 per cent effort lads. We haven't had many days as Saints fans to cheer. Hopefully tonight we can have one so at least we can have a day out at Wembley. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Saint_clark Posted May 17 Share Posted May 17 1 minute ago, Saint86 said: Manning got destroyed at LB at the Hawthornes, and that was in a back 5. Stephens will be fine whether he is left or right. When he isn't passing it straight to the opposition. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Suhari Posted May 17 Share Posted May 17 Evening. Shitting it. Brooks needs a performance tonight. COYRs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
saintant Posted May 17 Share Posted May 17 Weak front line without Adams. Maybe RM should have risked Stewart as he's more or less said he's ready. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LGTL Posted May 17 Share Posted May 17 Can’t be arsed with the whys. Just fucking win 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
trousers Posted May 17 Share Posted May 17 Just now, LGTL said: Can’t be arsed with the whys. Just fucking win This! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
trousers Posted May 17 Share Posted May 17 1 minute ago, saintant said: Weak front line without Adams. Maybe RM should have risked Stewart as he's more or less said he's ready. Yeah, he's either ready or he isn't. Play him if he's ready, surely...? No need to be risk adverse for this game.... 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Block41 Saint Posted May 17 Share Posted May 17 4 minutes ago, Saint_clark said: When he isn't passing it straight to the opposition. Not allowed to say that about captain Jack. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Convict Colony Posted May 17 Share Posted May 17 3 minutes ago, saintant said: Weak front line without Adams. Maybe RM should have risked Stewart as he's more or less said he's ready. Would expect Stewart to come on at 60mins no matter what tonight, switch Arma out to a wing and withdraw brooks cos he isnt a big at tracking back. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bangkoksaint Posted May 17 Share Posted May 17 If Che isn’t fit enough even for the bench in such an important game then I doubt we’ll see him again, even if we get to Wembley. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
trousers Posted May 17 Share Posted May 17 (edited) 1 minute ago, bangkoksaint said: If Che isn’t fit enough even for the bench in such an important game then I doubt we’ll see him again, even if we get to Wembley. If I was a cynic I would venture it's something other than "fitness".... #nosmokewithoutfire #wolveslink Edited May 17 by trousers 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toadhall Saint Posted May 17 Share Posted May 17 1 minute ago, bangkoksaint said: If Che isn’t fit enough even for the bench in such an important game then I doubt we’ll see him again, even if we get to Wembley. I thought as much when it was a calf injury. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Master Bates Posted May 17 Share Posted May 17 This 5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Turkish Posted May 17 Share Posted May 17 16 minutes ago, ChrisPY said: It was a bit more than cynicism. You were pretty belittling and patronising about it. Good of you to apologise though. Happy to be wrong. I did what you said but that looks great. Huge turn out. Lets hope they create the same atmosphere inside the stadium 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
saintant Posted May 17 Share Posted May 17 2 minutes ago, trousers said: If I was a cynic I would venture it's something other than "fitness".... #nosmokewithoutfire #wolveslink Agree 🙂 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NewYorkSaint Posted May 17 Share Posted May 17 Here's little old me with a modest request... This is such a giant game. Our whole season on the line... and potentially more, given the consequences of who all we'll lose if we don't go up. Any chance that - just for this one match - we lean positive. Act as if we actually believe in this team, this manager, this club. Feel the excitement, the possibility, the joy of loving football... even if we go a goal or two down early. I mean if there's ever a day to be a happy-clappy supporter, surely this is that day? C'mon, you oh-so-cool dyed-in-the-wool cynics, snarkers and snipers! You can do it! This is it!!! 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bangkoksaint Posted May 17 Share Posted May 17 If that is the case with Che then it’s an awful indictment on him and football. Let’s forget him and get the job done! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sfc4prem Posted May 17 Share Posted May 17 1 minute ago, saintant said: Agree 🙂 We get nothing out of that, surely a player can't refuse to play in such a way? Equally, Wolves can't influence our playing of Che, especially considering their paying nothing to us to get his services. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SNSUN Posted May 17 Share Posted May 17 Daughter in bed, wife making Fajitas. Sky is on. Let's do it. UTS Thankfully with the Euros ahead of us the football doesn't end here. But it's not quite the same not having Saints playing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
trousers Posted May 17 Share Posted May 17 1 minute ago, sfc4prem said: We get nothing out of that, surely a player can't refuse to play in such a way? Equally, Wolves can't influence our playing of Che, especially considering their paying nothing to us to get his services. Welcome to modern day football.... 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sfc4prem Posted May 17 Share Posted May 17 Just now, trousers said: Welcome to modern day football.... If it's true then the bloke can go suck a spiny cactus, the wanker. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
coalman Posted May 17 Share Posted May 17 Adam A has stitches in his cheek. WTF? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Convict Colony Posted May 17 Share Posted May 17 2 minutes ago, sfc4prem said: We get nothing out of that, surely a player can't refuse to play in such a way? Equally, Wolves can't influence our playing of Che, especially considering their paying nothing to us to get his services. His contract would only kick in on 1st july, every game between now and then is a massive risk for him as he could be injured and been unemployed for a year. I am sure he would still try his best but subconsciously it would effect him in tackles etc. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AlexLaw76 Posted May 17 Share Posted May 17 Just now, sfc4prem said: If it's true then the bloke can go suck a spiny cactus, the wanker. if true of course, and not something in the figment of Saintsweb imagination 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr X Posted May 17 Share Posted May 17 4 minutes ago, bangkoksaint said: If that is the case with Che then it’s an awful indictment on him and football. Let’s forget him and get the job done! What is the case? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.thumb.jpg.3045ea5d847cee52311a8a4ac91aab2b.jpg)
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now