Jump to content

Saints 3-1 West Brom - Match Thread

Disco Stu

By Disco Stu
in The Saints

 Share

Recommended Posts

saintant

saintant

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, VectisSaint said:

Lots on here clearly not watching the match, or at least seeing what they want to see. Just the finishing touch missing.

Seems maybe you are the one not seeing what is actually happening.

  • Like 1
trousers

trousers

Posted
Posted (edited)
2 minutes ago, Lighthouse said:

I don’t know what game most of you are watching. If this lot had swapped shirts before the game, you’d all be saying we’d be thoroughly outplayed all over the park, were lucky to make it to HT and can only see one winner.

Nailed on Saints victory then...? ;)

Edited by trousers
Chez

Chez

Posted
Posted
Just now, verlaine1979 said:

Martin's tactics require us to play dangerous passes around our own box and safe passes around theirs.

That's the wrong way round.

certainly need a little more invention in the final third. Fraser, Aribo and Brooks not really looked to take anyone on or drive at oponents (apart from the one lungbusting run by Brooks).

  • Like 2
Saint_clark

Saint_clark

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, Lighthouse said:

I don’t know what game most of you are watching. If this lot had swapped shirts before the game, you’d all be saying we’d be thoroughly outplayed all over the park, were lucky to make it to HT and can only see one winner.

Rarely we agree but you're spot on here. Amazes me that more people don't employ the "if the shirts were swapped" technique of judging how a game is going. 

  • Like 1
  • Haha 2
igsey

igsey

Posted
Posted

Think we should see Stewart on sooner rather than later. AA needs to be on the right wing, he's much more effective there.

  • Like 1
GrumpyYorkshireSaint

GrumpyYorkshireSaint

Posted
Posted
Just now, Chez said:

certainly need a little more invention in the final third. Fraser, Aribo and Brooks not really looked to take anyone on or drive at oponents (apart from the one lungbusting run by Brooks).

Fraser did win the ball and charge forward but then had to pass back once near the corner flag and it fizzled out yet again.

Baird of the land

Baird of the land

Posted
Posted
Just now, Lighthouse said:

I don’t know what game most of you are watching. If this lot had swapped shirts before the game, you’d all be saying we’d be thoroughly outplayed all over the park, were lucky to make it to HT and can only see one winner.

Their keeper has barely had to do anything to do, that’s not being outplayed off the park.

Farmer Saint

Farmer Saint

Posted
Posted
3 minutes ago, Lighthouse said:

I don’t know what game most of you are watching. If this lot had swapped shirts before the game, you’d all be saying we’d be thoroughly outplayed all over the park, were lucky to make it to HT and can only see one winner.

They have become a parody of themselves - it feels like there are a lot posters who's wives have told them they fancy Russ, and they're jealous of the sticky fingers being due to him. 

  • Like 1
  • Haha 2
Turkish

Turkish

Posted
Posted
5 minutes ago, harvey said:

The thought of seeing Smallbone on the pitch again next season horrifies me.

Whats he done wrong tonight?

the lack of physical presence up front has been a problem for us

  • Like 2
harvey

harvey

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, Saint_clark said:

Because he's been one of the better "Dean Hammond's" in the league this season, HTH. 

Nowhere near.

Saint_clark

Saint_clark

Posted
Posted
Just now, Turkish said:

Whats he done wrong tonight?

the lack of physical presence up front has been a problem for us

Yep, if Stewart were playing in place of Brooks we'd have looked a lot better but once again the wing backs are not getting forward enough.

Lighthouse

Lighthouse

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, trousers said:

Nailed on Saints victory then...? ;)

It’s a very finely balanced game between two of the five best teams in this league. Both have a game plan and are playing it quite well, the game could go either way. I don’t know why anyone would expect differently, Norwich’s collapse yesterday was very much the exception, rather than the rule.

  • Like 2
Farmer Saint

Farmer Saint

Posted
Posted
Just now, Saint_clark said:

Yep, if Stewart were playing in place of Brooks we'd have looked a lot better but once again the wing backs are not getting forward enough.

Isn't Fraser playing wingback? 

Patches O Houlihan

Patches O Houlihan

Posted
Posted
11 minutes ago, adrian lord said:

mmm. Never threatened their goal in 46 mins of huffing and puffing and possession domination. WBA doing a number on us. 

Yes WBA have unleashed a host of shots McCarthy has had to batten down the hatches - NOT. One of their only two creative forwards has been nailed to the defensive 1/3 because we have been good. 
 

WBA are no mugs and they are very well organised. It’s ridiculous to imagine we can stroll through them like 1970s Brazil when they are clearly so focused on defence.

 

 

 

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing
×
×
  • Create New...