Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
4 minutes ago, Winnersaint said:

Common denominator is absence of Flynn Downes. 

Yes, was just thinking that. Some players you don't realise their value to the team until they're missing 

Posted
Just now, Winnersaint said:

At least we’ve established who tonight’s scapegoat is.

Give over, he's been the worst player on the pitch. 

Great build up play and eventually run from Edozie there but then he shits himself when it comes to the cross. Shame.

Posted

I think we are doing ok. In control, we will get a goal and go on to win. City are shit and offer no threat going forwards at all. 
Patientez vous s’il vous plâit. 

  • Like 1
Posted
1 minute ago, Saint_clark said:

For all of City's supposed "dangerous" play, we look completely comfortable at the back. We'll win this.

Yep, this. 2-0 I reckon :)

Posted
Just now, Winnersaint said:

At least we’ve established who tonight’s scapegoat is.

How is it a scapegoat when it's true??? Charles has been awful the worst player on the pitch 

Posted (edited)
3 minutes ago, Winnersaint said:

At least we’ve established who tonight’s scapegoat is.

Usually ends up with a MOTM performance or a screamer goal from distance so there's hope for him yet. 

Edited by SNSUN
Posted
Just now, sandwichsaint said:

Don't write off AA just yet, not sure where the goals are coming from tonight?

100th appearance tonight for Saints. 

Posted
Just now, Saint_clark said:

Give over, he's been the worst player on the pitch. 

Great build up play and eventually run from Edozie there but then he shits himself when it comes to the cross. Shame.

 

1 minute ago, AlexLaw76 said:

He has been shite

He has indeed, but like most fanbases we do love to apportion blame and responsibility when things don’t go our way. Not sure its always productive.

Posted
1 minute ago, SNSUN said:

Usually precludes a MOTM performance or a screamer goal from distance so there's hope for him yet. 

*Anal mode activate*

I believe you mean, 'is the prelude to', precludes would imply the oposite.

Posted
1 minute ago, Winnersaint said:

 

He has indeed, but like most fanbases we do love to apportion blame and responsibility when things don’t go our way. Not sure its always productive.

I don't think it affects anything whatsoever. 

Posted
1 minute ago, Lighthouse said:

*Anal mode activate*

I believe you mean, 'is the prelude to', precludes would imply the oposite.

Damn in before the edit! I meant conclude 😁

Posted

Stuart Armstrong the only alternative midfielder on the bench, I think Charles will get 15 minutes in the second half to buck his ideas up before he's hooked.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...