Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
  On 13/10/2021 at 16:15, Minsk said:

I'm sure he was, but I doubt it would have been to the level he would have been training had he stayed here. Could have even arranged a match for him to play 60 minutes in. Even if it was against the U23s. Given the zero minutes for Scotland, I sincerely doubt he will be starting on Saturday.

Expand  

He doesn’t regularly start for Scotland anyway. 

Posted
  On 13/10/2021 at 20:13, Saint Garrett said:

He doesn’t regularly start for Scotland anyway. 

Expand  

He doesn't always 'regularly' start, granted, but he does usually get on the pitch for them. He started 2 of their 3 matches at the Euros, and was brought on a sub in the other. He started 3 of their previous 7 tournament matches, and was brought on as a sub in 2 (strangely, both against Israel). The two he didn't play in were against Faroe Islands and Serbia (he must have been in those squads as he played in matches a few days either side of both). Maybe Steve Clarke just doesn't like the idea of Stuey playing against Israel and Faroe Islands? Or maybe he isn't match fit yet?

  • 1 month later...
Posted

Starting to worry about our stu … he’s plagued with injury this season .. can’t stay fit for long .. subbed 1st at Chelsea and bench for the sweatys.. and another calf injury (reported) to date .. has he an underlying fitness problem we don’t know about ?we all know he can’t string a run of games together midweek and weekend but starting to think it’s something Maybe like covid issues or breathing … blowing out his arse at Chelsea…shame cos we’ve missed his direct runs and intricate passing..!he’s our best option as a 10 .

Posted
  On 22/11/2021 at 12:52, LiberalCommunist said:

He should not have reported for international duty. He needs to get back to peak fitness, because this stop start playing is helping no-one.

He had covid a year ago, so no point trying to blame it on that. 

Expand  

(unless that's what's causing the problem)

Posted
  On 22/11/2021 at 12:52, LiberalCommunist said:

He should not have reported for international duty. He needs to get back to peak fitness, because this stop start playing is helping no-one.

He had covid a year ago, so no point trying to blame it on that. 

Expand  

Cant be Covid, according to M Le Tissier there is no such thing.

Posted
  On 22/11/2021 at 12:58, Saint Troy said:

(unless that's what's causing the problem)

Expand  

It could be long Covid, but I dont believe it is, maybe he just has niggling injuries.

Also, I'm not sure that if he needs to get to peak fitness (as said above), reporting for duty (training etc) and playing in the international games surely will help that, not hinder it.

 

  • Like 1
Posted
  On 22/11/2021 at 13:02, Billy the Kidd said:

It could be long Covid, but I dont believe it is, maybe he just has niggling injuries.

Also, I'm not sure that if he needs to get to peak fitness (as said above), reporting for duty (training etc) and playing in the international games surely will help that, not hinder it.

 

Expand  

It takes several games to get back to peak fitness after a lay-off. 

Posted (edited)

Do we know if this is a flare up of his original calf injury or if it's just bad luck that he's had two unrelated calf injuries in quick succession, the first of which kept him on the sidelines for c.2 months?

Edited by trousers
Posted (edited)
  On 25/11/2021 at 22:28, trousers said:

Do we know if this is a flare up of his original calf injury or if it's just bad luck that he's had two unrelated calf injuries in quick succession, the first of which kept him on the sidelines for c.2 months?

Expand  

Re-emergence  of his calf injury (daily echo).

Edited by Chris cooper
Posted (edited)
  On 25/11/2021 at 22:54, Chris cooper said:

Re-emergence  of his calf injury (daily echo).

Expand  

Jason Roy missed out in Englands T20 side after tearing his calf muscle- when it was being discussed by the pundits they all agreed it can be the hardest one to get over - it appears to have healed only for it to go/flare up again. 

Edited by Toadhall Saint
Posted
  On 28/11/2021 at 09:40, JRM said:

Did they say on the radio Saints haven't won a league game without him since 2019? 

Expand  

There's been some where he's only come on as a sub but the last time we won a league game he didn't feature in at all was a 2-1 win against Norwich on 4th December 2019. Games against Palace, Wolves and Fulham in his first season here are the only other times he's not played in the league and we've won.

Posted
  On 28/11/2021 at 13:01, Diabolus Ex Machina said:

There's been some where he's only come on as a sub but the last time we won a league game he didn't feature in at all was a 2-1 win against Norwich on 4th December 2019. Games against Palace, Wolves and Fulham in his first season here are the only other times he's not played in the league and we've won.

Expand  

Yes that was it, we haven't won a league game that Stuart Armstrong hasn't featured in for nearly two years, bit of a mad stat, we need him back. 

Posted
  On 05/12/2021 at 08:42, Turkish said:

Now over 2 years and 20 league games since we won a match without him

Expand  

Pretty shit indictment of the players in the squad that replace him to be honest. Our lack of threat from those final third positions isn't good enough. Bar Redmond, who seems to be involved this season, no one else ever contributes from those areas. We're carrying them most of the time.

Posted
  On 05/12/2021 at 10:16, S-Clarke said:

Pretty shit indictment of the players in the squad that replace him to be honest. Our lack of threat from those final third positions isn't good enough. Bar Redmond, who seems to be involved this season, no one else ever contributes from those areas. We're carrying them most of the time.

Expand  

Elyanoussi coming on as sub yesterday was pretty uninspiring.

  • 3 weeks later...
Posted

This part concerns me from Ralph 'Asked for an update on the progress of the 29-year-old by the Daily Echo, the boss responded: “Mentally I’m not so sure because I haven’t spoken with him for one or two weeks now.'

I would have thought he would have regular chats with injured players getting close to coming back into contention. Does he mean that when he last spoke to him Stu maybe not so good mentally?

Posted
  On 21/12/2021 at 15:59, M271 said:

This part concerns me from Ralph 'Asked for an update on the progress of the 29-year-old by the Daily Echo, the boss responded: “Mentally I’m not so sure because I haven’t spoken with him for one or two weeks now.'

I would have thought he would have regular chats with injured players getting close to coming back into contention. Does he mean that when he last spoke to him Stu maybe not so good mentally?

Expand  

If he’s not spoken to him in a week or two and doesn’t know where SA ‘is at’ then that’s a pretty shocking indictment of our manager.  

  • Like 1
Posted

I have to say I find it odd that Ralph hasn’t spoken to Stuart Armstrong for that period of time. I am more worried about Stuart’s mental health then his calf reading between the lines

 

Posted
  On 21/12/2021 at 17:00, bangkoksaint said:

If he’s not spoken to him in a week or two and doesn’t know where SA ‘is at’ then that’s a pretty shocking indictment of our manager.  

Expand  

So what was the Echo reporter's response - "OK, fair enough"?

Surely that comment raised more questions than answers.

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)
  On 21/12/2021 at 17:00, bangkoksaint said:

If he’s not spoken to him in a week or two and doesn’t know where SA ‘is at’ then that’s a pretty shocking indictment of our manager.  

Expand  

I think you'll find it's pretty standard practice for managers to be focused on the squad that can play and leave specialist backroom people to look after those on the treatment table.   If Stuart is getting back into training with the squad now then I would imagine communication will increase.

 

  On 21/12/2021 at 17:52, East Kent Saint said:

He looked and sounded ok on Football Focus as part of the saints Foundation slot with the Benallis , he was linked via the internet 

Expand  

I was pleased to see that too.  I often wonder if there isn't something more than the quoted injury so am looking for little signs that things are ok.  The fact that Stu took part, looked happy, and was prepared to wear a ridiculous jumper is a good sign albeit only a small one, IMO.

Edited by The Left Back
  • Like 2
Posted
  On 21/12/2021 at 18:29, The Left Back said:

I think you'll find it's pretty standard practice for managers to be focused on the squad that can play and leave specialist backroom people to look after those on the treatment table.   If Stuart is getting back into training with the squad now then I would imagine communication will increase.

 

I was pleased to see that too.  I often wonder if there isn't something more than the quoted injury so am looking for little signs that things are ok.  The fact that Stu took part, looked happy, and was prepared to wear a ridiculous jumper is a good sign albeit only a small one, IMO.

Expand  

I would think when a team hasn't won for over two years without said player then the manager should be very focused on knowing exactly when he is likely to be available to play again.

  • Like 2
Posted
  On 21/12/2021 at 21:22, Teddeer said:

I would think when a team hasn't won for over two years without said player then the manager should be very focused on knowing exactly when he is likely to be available to play again.

Expand  

Can you please outline how, exactly, Stu was instrumental in any of our victories this season? Or how he positively impacted in each of those matches?

  • Like 1
Posted
  On 21/12/2021 at 23:50, Minsk said:

Can you please outline how, exactly, Stu was instrumental in any of our victories this season? Or how he positively impacted in each of those matches?

Expand  

Well I'm not going to go into specifics on those games but when a team hasn't won a game for over two years when a certain player hasn't played then it's pretty clear to most of us that said player is a fairly vital cog in the machine wouldn't you say?

Posted
  On 22/12/2021 at 17:39, Teddeer said:

Well I'm not going to go into specifics on those games but when a team hasn't won a game for over two years when a certain player hasn't played then it's pretty clear to most of us that said player is a fairly vital cog in the machine wouldn't you say?

Expand  

He hasn’t influenced the game at all this season.

So you can t really take into account this statistic in the 3 games we won this season.

Posted
  On 21/12/2021 at 22:15, egg said:

It's got that feel to it. Ostracised and not selected until jabbed, perhaps. 

Expand  

Ridiculous.

Posted
  On 21/12/2021 at 22:15, egg said:

It's got that feel to it. Ostracised and not selected until jabbed, perhaps. 

Expand  

But allegedly only 16% of prem players so far have had the jab ,to which i find totally unacceptable.

Posted
  On 22/12/2021 at 20:53, Yozzman said:

So why was he picked against Leeds, Villa etc when he wasn't vaccinated and being ostracized?

Expand  

Just seems a bit putting two and two together, and hoping it makes four.

There’s no backing. Are you even sure he hasn’t been vaccinated?

Just seems more rumour mill this.

Posted
  On 22/12/2021 at 23:19, Roo1976 said:

But allegedly only 16% of prem players so far have had the jab ,to which i find totally unacceptable.

Expand  

Is that vaccinated or boosted? It’s been widely reported that at least 75% have been vaccinated. 

  • Like 1
Posted
  On 22/12/2021 at 20:31, egg said:

Why? 

Expand  

Because it's a completely unfounded rumour that doesn't fit the available evidence (the fact that he made a few appearances prior to his injury flaring up again).

Didn't you say you were a lawyer? I would have thought you would know better than to engage in baseless speculation like this.

Posted (edited)
  On 23/12/2021 at 09:51, Sheaf Saint said:

Because it's a completely unfounded rumour that doesn't fit the available evidence (the fact that he made a few appearances prior to his injury flaring up again).

Didn't you say you were a lawyer? I would have thought you would know better than to engage in baseless speculation like this.

Expand  

it was clear that my post was speculative...the word "perhaps" is clear. This is a forum, we all speculate. 

Edited by egg
Posted
  On 21/12/2021 at 17:00, bangkoksaint said:

If he’s not spoken to him in a week or two and doesn’t know where SA ‘is at’ then that’s a pretty shocking indictment of our manager.  

Expand  

Why? If he's injured then his progress is down to the medical team, who I presume would be updating Ralph on that progress. What does the manager regularly need to speak to him about? What regular conversation are you envisaging between an injured player who can't train and the first team manager who is preparing/coaching the team for games that said player can't be involved in? 

Player has long term injury, player is treated by medical team/physios who update the manager on the recovery from injury every week or so, manager also checks up with player to see how he is doing every week or so. I see nothing wrong with that scenario. 

What do you want Ralph by his bedside 24/7 nursing him back to health? 

  • Like 2
Posted
  On 23/12/2021 at 10:04, hypochondriac said:

I was told he was homesick. Bit weird for a footballer but would explain why he was mysteriously available for Scotland. 

Expand  

I was told he was getting teased and bullied by some of the bigger boys and his mum won't let him play until it's sorted.

 

  • Haha 3
Posted (edited)
  On 22/12/2021 at 23:19, Roo1976 said:

But allegedly only 16% of prem players so far have had the jab ,to which i find totally unacceptable.

Expand  

Maybe they're a little worried about all the footballers collapsing on the pitch with heart issues??

Edited by magnet
  • Confused 4
Posted
  On 22/12/2021 at 17:39, Teddeer said:

Well I'm not going to go into specifics on those games but when a team hasn't won a game for over two years when a certain player hasn't played then it's pretty clear to most of us that said player is a fairly vital cog in the machine wouldn't you say?

Expand  

Stu is certainly one of our better players, but the fact we haven't won a match he has been involved in for so long is more down to coincidence than his performances. Especially so this season. He has done absolutely nothing of note in any match this season. That is precisely why you are unwilling, sorry make that unable, to go in to any specifics.

 

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...