Jump to content

Saints Kits Season 2024/25 - Page 24 NSFW


Master Bates
 Share

Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, Sheaf Saint said:

Looking at the pics on the OS, have we basically got the same shorts for both home and away?

Pretty much, same design. Away shorts are Navy with Yellow.

Pretty sure its a UEFA/EPL rule that prohibits striped backs. Has been since 2015 ish I think.

Edited by Hopper
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Sheaf Saint said:

Looking at the pics on the OS, have we basically got the same shorts for both home and away?

puma logo different colours.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, S-Clarke said:

Welcome to the world of corporate buzz words.

I really enjoyed watching the launch, 20 mins of watching people sipping beers then Kenzie building the excitement, super stuff. 

Kits ordered. 

  • Haha 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't mind the shirt, I don't like the sponsor - but whatever the club thinks is financially our best option then so be it. I get the home shirt as a Christmas present from the wife every year so it's not like I have to spend my own hard earned on it.

I do need a new Saints hoody though...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It’s ok, clean, simple, just a shame it’s a plain back, I just don’t get that. There’s no need, a black number would have looked great on a striped back. I won’t get one because of that. Maybe next year. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Kits are fine, sponsor does ruin them but if that’s the biggest offer then we take it. 

For me red and white stripes for home and a yellow away kit is my preference, so can’t complain.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, JCBSaint said:

It’s ok, clean, simple, just a shame it’s a plain back, I just don’t get that. There’s no need, a black number would have looked great on a striped back. I won’t get one because of that. Maybe next year. 

It's a UEFA/EPL Guideline sadly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Don’t mind the shirts although the bib effect is a bit strange. Much prefer the home shirt to last year’s effort. Is the third kit really pink?

Agree with everyone about the sponsor’s logo.

Edited by sadoldgit
Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, Pamplemousse said:

GSoZYs5WoAAjueX?format=jpg&name=large

Awful.

And what happens with the player name and those 5 white lines? Name printed under it would be far too low so got to print over them?

Very glad I don’t buy Saints shirts as this one is very poor.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Hopper said:

It's a UEFA/EPL Guideline sadly.

I know there’s a guideline for those who qualify but we don’t! 
I just think it’s a ridiculous rule no matter the team, we have been watching striped  backs for decades, now somebody that probably had nothing to do that day decides we all have to have plain backs, we could see the numbers perfectly fine  years ago, now somehow it’s too difficult? Absolutely ridiculous, it ruins a kit in my opinion. At least for another year I save on having to buy one. 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

47 minutes ago, Pamplemousse said:

GSoZYs5WoAAjueX?format=jpg&name=large

What an abortion.

Really have to wonder about the people in charge of our club, and the commercial dept. 

How do other clubs manage it.

  • Like 1
  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Master Bates said:

Sunday League shirt lol

Screenshot_20240716-183826_Messenger.jpg

I believe the phrase that best describes that is "low effort". 

I know the profit margins on all football shirts are obscene but seriously, how much are they charging for that piece of market-quality tat? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, Sidney Fudpucker the 3rd said:

Said for years that we should wear yellow & black, not yellow & blue. However, The kits are fairly bobbins. Home looks like a non-league affair. Sponsor looks terrible. 

Complete lack of imagination, again. 

 

Agreed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

50 minutes ago, Sheaf Saint said:

They look virtually identical except for the colour of the Puma logo

AWAY_DOUBLE_01_20240403_SFC_KITSHOOT_AWAY_DOUBLE_01_0005_nuknb4.jpg.fa1d2d5e0f88aaeb35dc1775d4e8243d.jpg

Why do the socks look like they're designed to prevent strokes post operation?!?!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I guess that kit manufacturers knock up a handful of designs for the club to then choose the ones they like best?

If this is the case then whoever has the final say at Saints clearly has little taste. Other than last season, which was a safe bet as it was a replica of a popular 80's kit, Saints shirts have been piss poor for years. 

It can't be a case of every manufacturer being rubbish at designing kits. They seem to do ok with other clubs so it must be that we have Stevie Wonder making the final decision. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The home kit on the players look okay, if utterly uninspired. 

The ones hanging up in the shop look shockingly terrible.

I think it's the extra fabric in XL etc, is adding an extra white strip of stripe ? Is that what is happening? Looks horrid.

Otherwise, three plain white stripes down the front of a red kit with black trim is pretty much what you'd expect/want from a ' traditional ' Saints kit. No?

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 07/06/2024 at 10:34, Saint Scott said:

Hummel's striped Kilmarnock kit for next season. This would of been lovely, striped back too!

 

 

 

On 08/06/2024 at 09:47, JesusWasOurRightBack said:

Yeah, it does have a Sunderland-y feel. Sunderland are back with Hummel this year and they've immediately made them a kit which would have been great for Saints. spacer.png

Here's what might have been. 

Should have stayed with Hummel. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The home kit is atrocious. Reminds me of the old flybe exeter kit (which was better). Struggle to nail "lower league" better if we had tried.
Exeter City Special football shirt 2009 - 2010. Sponsored by Flybe

Edited by Saint86
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Saint Garrett said:

Not sure Puma have ever made a decent kit. Such a shame we’ve gone with them. Really poor effort, and a shocking sponsor logo. Looks so cheap. 

How very underwhelming 

The club wanted to maximise commercial revenue i guess.... hopefully that didn't include shirt sales 🤣

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, Badger said:

 

Here's what might have been. 

Should have stayed with Hummel. 

I think we'd have had 89/90 home kit  which would have been brilliant 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

43 minutes ago, Badger said:

Who has the more stylish kit, us or Brackley Town ?

They have a nicer sponsor logo but the actual kit is nothing worth writing a musical about.

I wonder if we’re the only fans who do this or if the Arsenal forum is full of people saying, “it looks like a Bristol City kit,” every summer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just cracked opened a bottle of Kingfisher, dimmed the lights and going to put the opening 30 mins of the kit launch on and pretend I'm there mingling with Southamptons best fans and influencers.

Edited by Paul Chuckle
  • Like 1
  • Haha 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

38 minutes ago, Saint Garrett said:

Not sure Puma have ever made a decent kit. Such a shame we’ve gone with them. Really poor effort, and a shocking sponsor logo. Looks so cheap. 

How very underwhelming 

wonder how well this will sell compared to last seasons?.....................maybe its a grower?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Lighthouse changed the title to Saints Kits Season 2024/25 - Page 24 NSFW

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...