Jump to content

Saints Kits Season 2024/25 - Page 24 NSFW


Master Bates
 Share

Recommended Posts

I think it would be passable without the sponsor, that's really killing it for me. Makes it look cheap as chips. It almost certainly won't be when you want to buy it though.

See, this looks much better -

2425 WomensKitShoot Selects 171 dtnxb0

  • Like 9
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Home kit: Horrible. Looks like a kids team effort. Sponsor's a car crash and the whole thing just looks 'cheap' (even though I guarantee it'll be anything but).

Away kit: Better, as a shirt. Don't mind all yellow, but the sponsor shits all over it. Truly is a tacky logo.

3/10. I won't buy one, even when they get cheap.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, S-Clarke said:

I think it would be passable without the sponsor, that's really killing it for me. Makes it look cheap as chips. It almost certainly won't be when you want to buy it though.

See, this looks much better -

2425 WomensKitShoot Selects 171 dtnxb0

That one looks MUCH better.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, S-Clarke said:

I think it would be passable without the sponsor, that's really killing it for me. Makes it look cheap as chips. It almost certainly won't be when you want to buy it though.

See, this looks much better -

2425 WomensKitShoot Selects 171 dtnxb0

Assuming they do this in Men's sizes. Yes. Having that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, saint lard said:

I think it’s disgraceful the level of talking amongst the attendees whilst Russell Martin is being interviewed.

piss poor.
 

Maybe they shouldn't have spent 3 hours giving them complimentary alcohol then. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Saint_clark said:

Goalkeeper kit actually looked quite nice but difficult to fucking tell with the way they set it up.

Yeah it was an absolutley horrendous 'activation', or whatever they want to call it.

They'd have been better off just putting it up on the OS as pictures and just forget about any stupid event, you still couldn't get any idea from the stream as to how it looked as the lighting was shit. Pretty big waste of time really, that's an hour I'll never get back.

Edited by S-Clarke
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

41 minutes ago, Paul Chuckle said:

More importantly will Saint Rob be on the cat walk?

Much to my amazement he announced on twitter earlier he isnt as he has boyfriend duties. I was more shocked he's got a bird than that he wasnt going mind.

  • Haha 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Saint_clark said:

Any pictures? It's not on the store website like the rest of the kits.

You have to tune into the next live stream activation for that one

  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, CSA96 said:

spacer.png

so the badge and Puma logo are of the ironed on variety. If I bought a shirt for god knows how much these days, I'd expect that at least. 

Sponsor looks tacky. Not much you can do about that.

I like the two-tine effect on sleeves and back. Not sure why they didn't use that on the front, but maybe it would have looked too busy.

It's very simple, but that's not a bad thing after some of the over fussy woeful designs.

Yeah, I like it.

 

Edited by Chez
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, EBS1980 said:

Any notable players not in attendance tonight?

The one I was bothered about was KWP, but he was there. So no swap deals with West Ham for that one!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Pamplemousse said:

GSoZYs5WoAAjueX?format=jpg&name=large

After years of saying how much I dislike the home shirt and wonder who the fuck designed it, I like this (sponsor logo apart), from the back, at least.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, S-Clarke said:

Interesting that they chose both Lumley and Bazunu to model the GK kit, but McCarthy is nowhere to be seen. Maybe Bazunu isn't as far away as they first thought? 

Maybe the GK shoot was a while ago and he hadn't signed then?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, CSA96 said:

Couple more shots...

 

 

 

 

spacer.png

Don't mind the away kit either. Badge looks naff and would have preferred blue trim, but the pattern is alright. Sponsor logo slightly less jarring...only slightly.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Chez said:

so the badge and Puma logo are of the ironed on variety. If I bought a shirt for god knows how much these days, I'd expect that at least. Looks cheap as fuck.

Sponsor looks tacky.

Quite like the two-tine effect on sleeves. Not sure why they didn't use that throughout.

Its very simple, but that's not a bad thing after some of the over fussy woeful designs.

 

I think the badge is stitched by the looks. Just small thread.

Screenshot 2024-07-16 201840.png

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Lighthouse changed the title to Saints Kits Season 2024/25 - Page 24 NSFW

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...