Saints Kits Season 2024/25 - Page 24 NSFW

[S-Clarke]

I think it would be passable without the sponsor, that's really killing it for me. Makes it look cheap as chips. It almost certainly won't be when you want to buy it though.

See, this looks much better -

[Wade Garrett]

Looks like a cheap Tyro League kit.

[Pamplemousse]

What the fuck is an activation?

[Miltonaggro]

If Flynn is reading the room he needs to do the crossed hammers salute again...

[trousers]

We're giving Pompey a good run for their money in the Tinpot Stakes here...

[S-Clarke]

Just now, Pamplemousse said:

What the fuck is an activation?

Welcome to the world of corporate buzz words.

[Saint_clark]

1 minute ago, Pamplemousse said:

What the fuck is an activation?

Glad it's not just me. 

[kitch]

Home kit: Horrible. Looks like a kids team effort. Sponsor's a car crash and the whole thing just looks 'cheap' (even though I guarantee it'll be anything but).

Away kit: Better, as a shirt. Don't mind all yellow, but the sponsor shits all over it. Truly is a tacky logo.

3/10. I won't buy one, even when they get cheap.

[OttawaSaint]

Think both kits look fine.

 

[kitch]

3 minutes ago, S-Clarke said:

I think it would be passable without the sponsor, that's really killing it for me. Makes it look cheap as chips. It almost certainly won't be when you want to buy it though.

See, this looks much better -

That one looks MUCH better.

[Master Bates]

[CSA96]

[Saint_clark]

Goalkeeper kit actually looked quite nice but difficult to fucking tell with the way they set it up.

[Colinjb]

4 minutes ago, S-Clarke said:

I think it would be passable without the sponsor, that's really killing it for me. Makes it look cheap as chips. It almost certainly won't be when you want to buy it though.

See, this looks much better -

Assuming they do this in Men's sizes. Yes. Having that.

[saint lard]

I think it’s disgraceful the level of talking amongst the attendees whilst Russell Martin is being interviewed.

piss poor.
 

[Saint_clark]

Just now, saint lard said:

I think it’s disgraceful the level of talking amongst the attendees whilst Russell Martin is being interviewed.

piss poor.
 

Maybe they shouldn't have spent 3 hours giving them complimentary alcohol then. 

[Saint Matty 76]

Kits average, ruined by a sponsor that would look bad on any red & white design

Away is okay, meh

[S-Clarke]

2 minutes ago, Saint_clark said:

Goalkeeper kit actually looked quite nice but difficult to fucking tell with the way they set it up.

Yeah it was an absolutley horrendous 'activation', or whatever they want to call it.

They'd have been better off just putting it up on the OS as pictures and just forget about any stupid event, you still couldn't get any idea from the stream as to how it looked as the lighting was shit. Pretty big waste of time really, that's an hour I'll never get back.

Edited 16 July, 2024 by S-Clarke

[Monk]

Third kit is pink…genuinely. 

Edited 16 July, 2024 by Monk

[Turkish]

41 minutes ago, Paul Chuckle said:

More importantly will Saint Rob be on the cat walk?

Much to my amazement he announced on twitter earlier he isnt as he has boyfriend duties. I was more shocked he's got a bird than that he wasnt going mind.

[aintforever]

Would look ok if it didn’t have that awful sponsor’s logo on the front. 

[Saint_clark]

1 minute ago, Monk said:

Third kit is pink…genuinely. 

Any pictures? It's not on the store website like the rest of the kits.

[Saint Scott]

Big fan of that away kit. Shame it's ruined by that god awful sponsor. Would of looked top with Draper on it

[CSA96]

Just now, Saint_clark said:

Any pictures? It's not on the store website like the rest of the kits.

You have to tune into the next live stream activation for that one

[Turkish]

13 minutes ago, Colinjb said:

Poor Flynn Downes. 'I left West Ham for this half baked shite?'

You boycotting it this year Colin?

[EBS1980]

Any notable players not in attendance tonight?

[Dusic]

Both are meh but made awful by the sponsor logo.

But after one game nobody cares what a kit looks like anyway.

[Saint_clark]

Just now, EBS1980 said:

Any notable players not in attendance tonight?

Walker Peters WAS there interestingly.

[Colinjb]

2 minutes ago, Turkish said:

You boycotting it this year Colin?

Please.

Considering reducing my quota though.

[Chez]

31 minutes ago, CSA96 said:

so the badge and Puma logo are of the ironed on variety. If I bought a shirt for god knows how much these days, I'd expect that at least. 

Sponsor looks tacky. Not much you can do about that.

I like the two-tine effect on sleeves and back. Not sure why they didn't use that on the front, but maybe it would have looked too busy.

It's very simple, but that's not a bad thing after some of the over fussy woeful designs.

Yeah, I like it.

 

Edited 16 July, 2024 by Chez

[S-Clarke]

1 minute ago, EBS1980 said:

Any notable players not in attendance tonight?

The one I was bothered about was KWP, but he was there. So no swap deals with West Ham for that one!

[Pamplemousse]

[CSA96]

Couple more shots...

 

[Saint_clark]

Just now, Pamplemousse said:

Jesus. No thanks.

[Chez]

https://www.southamptonfc.com/en/news/article/saints-launch-2024-25-home-and-away-kits

 

[Scoobysaint]

£65 for an adult shirt, £45 for junior. Not a bad kit but for some reason it looks more Sunderland than Southampton. Will look better once we all get used to it and get a few wins in it. 

[Chez]

1 minute ago, Pamplemousse said:

After years of saying how much I dislike the home shirt and wonder who the fuck designed it, I like this (sponsor logo apart), from the back, at least.

[S-Clarke]

1 minute ago, Chez said:

https://www.southamptonfc.com/en/news/article/saints-launch-2024-25-home-and-away-kits

 

Interesting that they chose both Lumley and Bazunu to model the GK kit, but McCarthy is nowhere to be seen. Maybe Bazunu isn't as far away as they first thought? 

[Chez]

1 minute ago, Scoobysaint said:

£65 for an adult shirt

Wow. Is that how much shirts are these days? 

[Sheaf Saint]

Well it will be nice to resurrect the "Yellows" chant at away games this season. I've missed that.

[sandwichsaint]

1 hour ago, Paul Chuckle said:

Just seen this on Bebo. Not great TBH

 

Points deduction incoming, bringing the game into disrepute.

[Chez]

1 minute ago, S-Clarke said:

Interesting that they chose both Lumley and Bazunu to model the GK kit, but McCarthy is nowhere to be seen. Maybe Bazunu isn't as far away as they first thought? 

Maybe the GK shoot was a while ago and he hadn't signed then?

[Sheaf Saint]

1 minute ago, Chez said:

Maybe the GK shoot was a while ago and he hadn't signed then?

Not like Mccarthy to miss a shot.

[Chez]

5 minutes ago, CSA96 said:

Couple more shots...

 

 

 

 

Don't mind the away kit either. Badge looks naff and would have preferred blue trim, but the pattern is alright. Sponsor logo slightly less jarring...only slightly.

[Hopper]

6 minutes ago, Chez said:

so the badge and Puma logo are of the ironed on variety. If I bought a shirt for god knows how much these days, I'd expect that at least. Looks cheap as fuck.

Sponsor looks tacky.

Quite like the two-tine effect on sleeves. Not sure why they didn't use that throughout.

Its very simple, but that's not a bad thing after some of the over fussy woeful designs.

 

I think the badge is stitched by the looks. Just small thread.

[The Kraken]

2 minutes ago, Chez said:

Wow. Is that how much shirts are these days? 

You think that’s bad…..

Wonder is @Lord Duckhunter will be buying one for his other half.

[Chez]

9 minutes ago, Saint_clark said:

Walker Peters WAS there interestingly.

Bednarek was in the photoshoot.

[SaintsFan86]

Said it was shite... Abomination.

[Turkish]

Just now, The Kraken said:

You think that’s bad…..

Wonder is @Lord Duckhunter will be buying one for his other half.

snapdragon, no?

[Sheaf Saint]

Looking at the pics on the OS, have we basically got the same shorts for both home and away?