Jump to content

January Transfer Window 2024


Master Bates
 Share

Recommended Posts

36 minutes ago, hypochondriac said:

TBF you'd expect Downes and THB to have cost significantly more if we'd actually bought them. The striker was an idiotic signing I said as much at the time. 

Yes, for sure. I seem to remember there is an obligation to buy THB of just over £20m if we're promoted.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Saint Scott said:

Yes, for sure. I seem to remember there is an obligation to buy THB of just over £20m if we're promoted.

Worth every penny. We’ll get a couple of years out of him then sell him for 3-4 times that. 

  • Like 11
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, Turkish said:

Worth every penny. We’ll get a couple of years out of him then sell him for 3-4 times that. 

That would be the ideal but you'd of thought City would have inserted a more modest buy back option if the obligation is triggered.

 

THB is destined to be a full international for England for many years to come.

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, Saint Scott said:

Yes, for sure. I seem to remember there is an obligation to buy THB of just over £20m if we're promoted.

Getting promoted this year is also really important just to keep THB, pleasure to watch him and fits in so well with Bednarek. From what I hear he's a really down to earth lad, mature for his age which I guess is shown by his captaincy of England u21s and already being included in training with England first team. 

Makes a huge difference from some of the players with questionable attitude who tried to play there last season,  particularly Salisu and Caleta-Car (Lyanco just a lunatic) 

ABK is only on loan at PSV isn't he so potentially we end up with him again if his shoulder ever repairs. 

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Saint Scott said:

That would be the ideal but you'd of thought City would have inserted a more modest buy back option if the obligation is triggered.

 

THB is destined to be a full international for England for many years to come.

I genuinely think good 2nd half of the season THB and KWP should be given a look in for England squad. Of course they won't as football doesn't exist outside the Premier league but they are good enough. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, JRM said:

I genuinely think good 2nd half of the season THB and KWP should be given a look in for England squad. Of course they won't as football doesn't exist outside the Premier league but they are good enough. 

Unfortunately for KWP with TAA, James & Walker ahead of him he won't get in unless due to a major injury crisis.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, JRM said:

I genuinely think good 2nd half of the season THB and KWP should be given a look in for England squad. Of course they won't as football doesn't exist outside the Premier league but they are good enough. 


Don’t disagree that they are potentially good enough. 
 

I do disagree that players from the championship should be selected. Unless they were absolutely world class. To play for England you have to be playing week in, week out at premier league standard or higher imo. I would be annoyed at an England manager selecting players from the championship unless they were very obviously the best Messi/Ronaldo. 
 

Hopefully THB can earn his way to the top level with us. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, Osvaldorama said:


Don’t disagree that they are potentially good enough. 
 

I do disagree that players from the championship should be selected. Unless they were absolutely world class. To play for England you have to be playing week in, week out at premier league standard or higher imo. I would be annoyed at an England manager selecting players from the championship unless they were very obviously the best Messi/Ronaldo. 
 

Hopefully THB can earn his way to the top level with us. 

Thankfully Southgate couldn’t give a monkeys if you don’t play at all….!

  • Haha 1
  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Osvaldorama said:

I would be annoyed at an England manager selecting players from the championship unless they were very obviously the best Messi/Ronaldo. 

Think it's safe to say that Jordan Henderson is no Leo Messi...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 hours ago, hypochondriac said:

Don't necessarily disagree, I just think if you're talking about spending 15 million in the championship it really needs to be your best and key player rather than a guy with potential who sits on the bench most weeks. Like I said, good player but for that money in our position I'd be expecting one of the top players in the championship. 

I'm glad we gambled on another hot youth prospect again rather than signing Winks, but it just hasn't worked out...yet. To be honest, I expected a bit more than I've seen so far, but time is on his side.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Chez said:

I'm glad we gambled on another hot youth prospect again rather than signing Winks, but it just hasn't worked out...yet. To be honest, I expected a bit more than I've seen so far, but time is on his side.

Not an unreasonable comment. I think Charles is a half decent signing, my problem was with having a restricted budget and buying potential with a lot of it. Seems like an inefficient use of relatively meagre resources to me. 

  • Confused 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

49 minutes ago, hypochondriac said:

Not an unreasonable comment. I think Charles is a half decent signing, my problem was with having a restricted budget and buying potential with a lot of it. Seems like an inefficient use of relatively meagre resources to me. 

I'm surprised by the comments about Charles. I think we are very lucky to have Charles in the squad and think that his  performances, maturity and versatility have been outstanding for a 20 year old. Flynn Downes himself has labelled the performances of teammate Shea Charles "a joke" and added: "I wish I was as good as him when I was 20."

  • Like 14
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, lambtiss said:

I'm surprised by the comments about Charles. I think we are very lucky to have Charles in the squad and think that his  performances, maturity and versatility have been outstanding for a 20 year old. Flynn Downes himself has labelled the performances of teammate Shea Charles "a joke" and added: "I wish I was as good as him when I was 20."

I haven't disputed that he's decent for a 20 year old. We spent 15 million on him in the championship and he's essentially a bit part player. Given the choice, I'd have spent more on a top forward signing rather than the crock we went for to give Leicester a run for their money. It's not a really big deal as we are on an excellent run but if you were being really critical that's where we could improve and where I'd have spent the bulk of our budget. To put it another way, the likes of Downes and Fraser are imo a level above Charles at the moment for all his undoubted potential and are proven championship performers so an equivalent player of that sort was what I'd have liked to have seen in the summer - either loan or transfer - before we spent so much of our budget on a young promising player. I accept others may feel differently but nothing wrong with having high standards. 

Edited by hypochondriac
  • Confused 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Pretty sure Charles was £10m rising to £15m with add ons? £10m is still a high fee for this league mind. I expected him to be a starter fairly quickly but still think he’s going to be a decent signing for us over time and likely make us a tidy profit as our model requires. 

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 18/01/2024 at 23:27, Saint Scott said:

That would be the ideal but you'd of thought City would have inserted a more modest buy back option if the obligation is triggered.

 

THB is destined to be a full international for England for many years to come.

I don’t really care too much for transfer fees I just want to enjoy watching him whilst he’s here. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, goodymatt said:

Pretty sure Charles was £10m rising to £15m with add ons? £10m is still a high fee for this league mind. I expected him to be a starter fairly quickly but still think he’s going to be a decent signing for us over time and likely make us a tidy profit as our model requires. 

I expect eventually he will turn out to be a decent signing. If we do go up though I can't see him getting much gametime at least initially. Will probably need him if we stay down though and will likely be our Downes replacement. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, hypochondriac said:

I expect eventually he will turn out to be a decent signing. If we do go up though I can't see him getting much gametime at least initially. Will probably need him if we stay down though and will likely be our Downes replacement. 

Charles is a decent signing already, in my book. He has 24 appearances for Saints this year, hardly the "bit player" you make him out to be.  The modern game isn't just about the starting eleven, it's about the whole match day team which he is firmly a part of. 

  • Like 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, lambtiss said:

Charles is a decent signing already, in my book. He has 24 appearances for Saints this year, hardly the "bit player" you make him out to be.  The modern game isn't just about the starting eleven, it's about the whole match day team which he is firmly a part of. 

He's not a starting player which for 10-15 million he should be. Before the season started if you knew nothing about him other than his cost you'd be saying exactly the same thing. It's not his fault that was his price tag of course and like I said we will probably need him if we don't go up this year. Point still stands though. 

  • Like 1
  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, hypochondriac said:

He's not a starting player which for 10-15 million he should be. Before the season started if you knew nothing about him other than his cost you'd be saying exactly the same thing. It's not his fault that was his price tag of course and like I said we will probably need him if we don't go up this year. Point still stands though. 

He was bought as potential, and I suspect the thought was he'd be worth 4 or 5 times the cost in a couple of seasons before we got relegated

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, OldNick said:

He was bought as potential, and I suspect the thought was he'd be worth 4 or 5 times the cost in a couple of seasons before we got relegated

Yep he was bought as potential. Our most expensive signing of the summer and a large chunk of our budget. That's my point. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, hypochondriac said:

Yep he was bought as potential. Our most expensive signing of the summer and a large chunk of our budget. That's my point. 

I can’t say that this bothers me particularly. It would if we were in a situation where we were badly lacking talent in certain areas and couldn’t afford to recruit, but that’s not the case. You said yourself elsewhere that you wouldn’t be bothered if we signed nobody this window, so I don’t think that’s an issue. The one problem with our squad has been a forward in the #9 mould but we did spend the money there, just on the wrong player.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

55 minutes ago, hypochondriac said:

He's not a starting player which for 10-15 million he should be. Before the season started if you knew nothing about him other than his cost you'd be saying exactly the same thing. It's not his fault that was his price tag of course and like I said we will probably need him if we don't go up this year. Point still stands though. 

Exactly this. A £10m player should be the first name on the team sheet in this league, one of the top players in the division. Our two we’ve got one that won’t play all season and another that’s a squad player. He might go on to be great in a couple of years time but those sort of fees are mega money on this league some clubs squads don’t even cost that.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Lighthouse said:

I can’t say that this bothers me particularly. It would if we were in a situation where we were badly lacking talent in certain areas and couldn’t afford to recruit, but that’s not the case. You said yourself elsewhere that you wouldn’t be bothered if we signed nobody this window, so I don’t think that’s an issue. The one problem with our squad has been a forward in the #9 mould but we did spend the money there, just on the wrong player.

Fair comment. I do think if we fail to go up though I will look back and wonder if we should have allocated our funds more wisely. If we go up this is all largely irrelevant. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Turkish said:

Exactly this. A £10m player should be the first name on the team sheet in this league, one of the top players in the division. Our two we’ve got one that won’t play all season and another that’s a squad player. He might go on to be great in a couple of years time but those sort of fees are mega money on this league some clubs squads don’t even cost that.

Yep. He's the sort of signing you'd either get on loan in the champ or take a punt on in the prem to use as backup with the hope that he turns into a world beater. He's not the player currently that he should be given his price tag. Again, not his fault and hopefully it won't matter at the end of the season. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, hypochondriac said:

Yep he was bought as potential. Our most expensive signing of the summer and a large chunk of our budget. That's my point. 

wasnt Lavia the one who was most expensive?either way he could also make us plenty in time

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, OldNick said:

wasnt Lavia the one who was most expensive?either way he could also make us plenty in time

I'd say that the vast majority of our reduced resources should be going towards top championship players rather than looking towards potential with resale value. If we fail to go up for two or three years I doubt he makes us much at all. Don't get me wrong, I think he's a solid championship signing it's just that the price tag is due to potential not top championship quality which is what we really need for the money spent. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

40 minutes ago, Saint NL said:

 

Saw this earlier today, mad that we're there with such big clubs and look where we are now 🤦

RDT_20240120_110329286856449476409680.thumb.jpg.98abd28feddbf2760e3cd5c77814b5d4.jpg

Because we spunked it on shite players and the ones that were any good were tossers

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, Turkish said:

Because we spunked it on shite players and the ones that were any good were tossers

Because you can't sell players on the level we have indefinitely and assume you'll get enough success with buying new ones to be sustainable. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...