Jump to content

Matt LeTiss (evening with Matt in Shrewsbury)


bogwoppit
 Share

Recommended Posts

5 hours ago, Fan The Flames said:

Sadly lockdown will probably have impacted on cancer rates, probably neutral on mental health, but there won't be any long term affects of lock down on families, kids or education. 

Not what people who work with kids have reported.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, SaintsLoyal said:

But that’s all part of the pandemic and the alternative clearly wouldn’t have been ‘to carry on’ it would have been total carnage with a breakdown in vital infrastructure like food production and delivery, petrol delivery, security compromised, the list goes on

Most working age people were fine to keep society going. I worked the whole way through it, if carehomes and hospitals had been properly ringfenced (thanks Hancock) a much better balance could have been struck.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Jonnyboy said:

Most working age people were fine to keep society going. I worked the whole way through it, if carehomes and hospitals had been properly ringfenced (thanks Hancock) a much better balance could have been struck.

What does this even mean?

We're all going down the pub but if you work in a care home you can't go anywhere or see anyone?

Life is lived forwards and understood backwards. It's pretty obvious we needed a lockdown to reduce transmission.

You worked all the way through, have a fucking medal. Loads of people did, Including me as well.

Edited by CB Fry
  • Like 1
  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Jonnyboy said:

Many did die from normally survivable conditions though.

I don’t understand your point, are you saying that had we simply let the first wave of covid rip all would have been fine an dandy accept a few dead old people who were already on th way out anyway? Or do you have something constructive and evidence backed to offer?

  • Like 4
  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, CB Fry said:

What does this even mean?

We're all going down the pub but if you work in a care home you can't go anywhere or see anyone?

Life is like ed forwards and understood backwards. It's pretty obvious we needed a lockdown to reduce transmission.

You worked all the way through, have a fucking medal. Loads of people did, Including me as well.

Exactly the genius of the ‘but I’m alright’ argument still doing the rounds three years later is unbelievable.  It’s amazing how quickly people forget the scenes in northern Italy when the first wave hit.

  • Like 2
  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

One of the more pathetic aspects of all of this is how most of the people bleating about impact on mental health, cancer patient referrals etc. were also the ones fighting tooth and nail against any and all Covid countermeasures they were asked/instructed to comply with. Not only do they have evidence that the vaccines are dangerous, lockdowns are against their human rights and social distancing doesn't work, they've also managed to disprove even the most basic hygene advice for any disease that a six year old would understand. The sheer audacity of being the ones to complain about something they were stubbornly trying to drag out as long as possible is quite astonishing.

MLT is probably one of the more severe cases. If a doctor told him to wash his hands after using the lavatory, he'd probably sit there with fingers covered in poo, tweeting about how Bill Gates owns shares in Sanex. At least the Volvic Whisperer has a career of towering far post headers to blame it on, Tiss is just an absolute moon howler.

  • Like 2
  • Haha 1
  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Jonnyboy said:

Most working age people were fine to keep society going. I worked the whole way through it, if carehomes and hospitals had been properly ringfenced (thanks Hancock) a much better balance could have been struck.

You worked through it because of the restrictions and it’s not just about hospitals and old people. As I pointed out the more people that get covid and thus can’t work for a week etc  the infrastructure breaks down. you wouldn’t have any petrol to go to work.

anyway wrong forum for this to be honest.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, Lighthouse said:

The thing about all this is that he doesn’t actually have opinions. What he has is a bog standard anti-opinion to pretty much everything. I could have told you his so called ‘opinion’ on 9/11 a couple of years ago, without him ever having to say, type or retweet a single word himself.

The free 'do your research' thinkers all think the same.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, Thereisonlyonemickychannon said:

Bloody hell. You are all sheep.

Off you go...this way sheeple....to the slaughterhouse.

The irony of those that shout this yet blindly following the lies and exaggeration of accounts looking to take advantage of the outube algorithm is not lost here

Edited by Smirking_Saint
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The fact is there are indeed numerous things to be discussed about the covid pandemic and the vaccine in which people took and died within days. But, the likes of le tissier et all have lost all credibility to make any comment years ago, when saying it’s all a conspiracy by a secret group of elite, who want to put the world in a communist state, whist they drink the blood of sacrificed children. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2023/sep/08/rspb-ministers-wildlife-charity-power-britain

In line with this Govt policy of placing their people on the Boards or as Trustees on the  National Trust , BBC , CH4 , British and Maritime Museums etc etc . These "Think Tanks" are usually registered as charities as well so they can deny climate change etc tax free .

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Thereisonlyonemickychannon said:

Obviously. Two towers reduced to rubble. Impossible. Especially the way they were built. Wake up. Do some research. Blind

Can you educate me and provide links to the research you conducted?

Edited by Marsdinho
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, ally_uk said:

I don't get it? Do they think the vaccines were unsafe or experimental? 

Where does such skewered logic come from? 

Of course they're experimental! They came up with a vaccine within 6 months when generally it takes decades.

I'm vaccinated against Covid purely to make everyone else feel safer. I don't think it's anything more than a placebo to help prevent various effects of a mild sniffle.

  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, Bad Wolf said:

Of course they're experimental! They came up with a vaccine within 6 months when generally it takes decades.

I'm vaccinated against Covid purely to make everyone else feel safer. I don't think it's anything more than a placebo to help prevent various effects of a mild sniffle.

Well a few years on they are mainstream vaccines which need constant revision to cover new variants . No vaccine is 100% as we know from flu jabs but they do reduce the spread of potentially fatal illness.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

49 minutes ago, Bad Wolf said:

Of course they're experimental! They came up with a vaccine within 6 months when generally it takes decades.

I'm vaccinated against Covid purely to make everyone else feel safer. I don't think it's anything more than a placebo to help prevent various effects of a mild sniffle.

Nobody feels safer because you're vaccinated. Ironically, everyone you tell that feels a little less comfortable in your company.

Edited by Fabrice29
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Thereisonlyonemickychannon said:

Obviously. Two towers reduced to rubble. Impossible. Especially the way they were built. Wake up. Do some research. Blind

Where does watching the video of the planes hitting them and then them being reduced to rubble stand on the list of "research" out of interest?

  • Like 1
  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Fabrice29 said:

Where does watching the video of the planes hitting them and then them being reduced to rubble stand on the list of "research" out of interest?

Like the moon landing it was all faked of course, if you look closely you can see the wires on the puppet planes as they crash into that incredibly poorly made model set (probably left over from some 50’s B movie) lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Bad Wolf said:

I believe we were told to get vaccinated to protect other people. 

And yet, every time you tell someone that you don't believe it's anything other than a placebo and you only did it for everyone else's benefit people actively make their excuses and move away don't they?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Bad Wolf said:

Of course they're experimental! They came up with a vaccine within 6 months when generally it takes decades.

I'm vaccinated against Covid purely to make everyone else feel safer. I don't think it's anything more than a placebo to help prevent various effects of a mild sniffle.

They were signed off so quick because phenomenal resources were poured into making it happen, not because any corners were cut with the testing

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

42 minutes ago, Ex Lion Tamer said:

They were signed off so quick because phenomenal resources were poured into making it happen, not because any corners were cut with the testing

Correct. The primary reason that these things usually take so long is the delays caused waiting for funding. With Covid, there were rich philanthropists queueing up to throw money at it so we could get it rolled out and get the global economy moving again ASAP.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 08/09/2023 at 20:47, CB Fry said:

What does this even mean?

We're all going down the pub but if you work in a care home you can't go anywhere or see anyone?

Life is lived forwards and understood backwards. It's pretty obvious we needed a lockdown to reduce transmission.

You worked all the way through, have a fucking medal. Loads of people did, Including me as well.

I didn't ask for a medal, I'm saying that many people were able to and society didn't collapse. And yes, social distancing / social limiting to keep the virus away from vulnerable people. I suppose you think Hancock did a good job letting infected patients back into care homes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Jonnyboy said:

I didn't ask for a medal, I'm saying that many people were able to and society didn't collapse. And yes, social distancing / social limiting to keep the virus away from vulnerable people. I suppose you think Hancock did a good job letting infected patients back into care homes.

Society didn't collapse because of the measures in place.

Hancock did a shit job, no idea why you're trying that on with me sweetheart.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 09/09/2023 at 00:00, SaintsLoyal said:

You worked through it because of the restrictions and it’s not just about hospitals and old people. As I pointed out the more people that get covid and thus can’t work for a week etc  the infrastructure breaks down. you wouldn’t have any petrol to go to work.

anyway wrong forum for this to be honest.

How many people here have "worked through it" feeling like crap with a flu or whatever? The point is, a healthy truck driver could still deliver the fuel to keep society going even if he feels poorly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, CB Fry said:

Society didn't collapse because of the measures in place.

Hancock did a shit job, no idea why you're trying that on with me sweetheart.

Society didn't collapse in any country.

Are you saying the UK measures were perfect and nothing can be learnt in case of a similar scenario in the future?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 08/09/2023 at 13:56, Fan The Flames said:

Sadly lockdown will probably have impacted on cancer rates, probably neutral on mental health, but there won't be any long term affects of lock down on families, kids or education. 

You simply couldn't be further from the truth. My wife's a teacher. Pre Covid she wouldn't have been called a C*** daily. Kids squaring up to her and telling her to watch her lip. Why do you think so many teachers are now leaving, the system is fucked. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Mustang Saint said:

You simply couldn't be further from the truth. My wife's a teacher. Pre Covid she wouldn't have been called a C*** daily. Kids squaring up to her and telling her to watch her lip. Why do you think so many teachers are now leaving, the system is fucked. 

Can you link that behaviour to lockdown?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, Mustang Saint said:

Yes as it wasn't like it before lockdown, 

It doesn't work like that, correlation or causation. There appears to be an issue in the short term regarding behaviour in some schools, it's not in all schools and we don't know how long it will last and we don't know if it would have been any different if there wasn't a lockdown.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...