Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
Just now, saintant said:

One way traffic isn't it and not in the right direction.

Is it? We've been all over them but lack a cutting edge with the final pass often going astray.

Posted
3 minutes ago, Saint NL said:

Manning again, he's not having a great game

He's looked very good IMO. Not defensively but attacking wise, it's only he and Charley trying anything different.

Posted

This is not particularly good. Neither was the 1st half last week.

Alcaraz not been good, SAA ineffective. Edozie poor but got a goal (that the keeper should have done better with).

2nd half last week we were far quicker with the ball going forward, which we kind of need to do here...

Meh

Posted
3 minutes ago, AlexLaw76 said:

This is not particularly good. Neither was the 1st half last week.

Alcaraz not been good, SAA ineffective. Edozie poor but got a goal (that the keeper should have done better with).

2nd half last week we were far quicker with the ball going forward, which we kind of need to do here...

Meh

Are you ever happy ?

  • Like 3
Posted

Qpr have looked more threatening imo despite our reams of possession

Alcaraz really poor. SAA, completely anonymous. Showing why he should be restricted to cameos for now.

Edozie is definitely winning his match up against their right back. Still think he shouldn't be a regular starter in a team aiming for promotion. He can dribble & It was nice piece of movement (but It was a bad shot) and his crossing is still diabolically bad.

Posted

Feels like groundhog Day.

You could put the comments from pretty much any game this season and it'd be the same. Slow, ponderous football, finally score and then immediately switch off.

The main positive is that we normally score late on so there's that to look forward to.

 

Charles looks good in CB, Bazunu has been alright, Edozie has been lively and got his goal, not a huge amount of positives elsewhere.

Posted
8 minutes ago, Saint NL said:

Manning again, he's not having a great game

This is the third game I've seen Manning play and apart from the occasional cross he is the most limited LB I've seen in a Saints shirt since Fox and Harding.      Give me Perraud or even Larios.       

Posted
Just now, austsaint said:

This is the third game I've seen Manning play and apart from the occasional cross he is the most limited LB I've seen in a Saints shirt since Fox and Harding.      Give me Perraud or even Larios.       

Danny fox was quality at this level, it's worrying that Manning looks so poor.

Posted
Just now, Baird of the land said:

I remember preferring harding as Fox was awful defensively

Didn't matter as we were so much better than the majority of the league anyway. This season we're not.

Posted
33 minutes ago, Suhari said:

It's working for me.

iFollow, my Macafee VPN on and set to Australia.

Finally got it working. Thanks for the suggestion.

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)

Interesting stat at half time, QPR won 91% of their tackles, we only had 60%

Aerial duels won, saints had 16% to qprs 60-something % 👀

Edited by Saint NL
Posted (edited)
6 minutes ago, AlexLaw76 said:

What have I said that was incorrect?

It would be correct to say that the planet is hurtling through the universe at 300,000 mph on a path to certain oblivion, but someone with a naturally cheerful demeanor wouldn't point it out every five minutes... ;)

Edited by trousers
Posted (edited)

This performance is what's to be expected when you sell the two players that were actually scoring for us. No physicality up front at all and very ponderous in midfield.

Edited by Disco Stu
  • Like 1
Posted

We need to somehow eke a win out of this game and then do some decent business in the final days of the transfer window because the current squad will not be troubling the top 2 and maybe not the top 6 either.

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)
6 minutes ago, AlexLaw76 said:

What have I said that was incorrect?

You posted opinion rather than fact, therefore whether it is 'correct' or not it open to interpretation. Which is fine, but the predominant opinions you seem to hold appear to be "glass half empty".

Edited by badgerx16
  • Like 1
Posted
Just now, badgerx16 said:

You posted opinion rather than fact, which is fine, but the predominant opinions you seem to hold appear to be "glass half empty".

What have I said that YOU believe to be incorrect, as my opinion?

Was Alcaraz, or even Saints, really good in the 1st half?

Posted

At the very least this score means that no one will end up mentally scarred by having to witness me streak across the pitch at full time.

  • Haha 1
Posted

76.4% possession and it’s 1-1 with QPR having one more shot in target than us. Consistently having THAT stat is going to kill any semblance of a decent season. Massive week of work needed from Wilcox.

  • Like 1
Posted
8 minutes ago, Saint_clark said:

Danny fox was quality at this level, it's worrying that Manning looks so poor.

The words ‘quality’ and Danny Fox are total opposites… 

  • Like 1
Posted
1 minute ago, AlexLaw76 said:

What have I said that YOU believe to be incorrect, as my opinion?

Was Alcaraz, or even Saints, really good in the 1st half?

You said Alcatraz was"not good", I certainly disagree with that. Overall our attacking was too slow and as the cliche goes, "not enough bodies in the box", but Ido not think it was poor, at least going forward. Our defending, on the other hand, might be described as "needs improvement".

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...